Cited by 89Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityFungal and yeast genetics researchFungal Plant Pathogen Control

Antifungal Combinations against Candida albicans Biofilms In Vitro

Open access
Bachmann, Stefano P., Ramage, Gordon, VandeWalle, Kacy, Patterson, Thomas F., Wickes, Brian L., López-Ribot, José L.·2003·Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy

Abstract

Candida biofilms display increased resistance to most antifungal agents. We have evaluated the efficacy of combinations of fluconazole (FLC), amphotericin B, and caspofungin (CSP) against Candida albicans biofilms in vitro. Indifference was observed for all the combinations of paired antifungal agents when a checkerboard titration method was used. Time-kill experiments revealed an antagonistic effect of high FLC doses with CSP.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/aac.47.11.3657-3659.2003

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous findings have indicated little or no effect for treatment of mature biofilms when FLU is used in combination with other antifungals, including AmB and CAS.

    “Previous findings have indicated little or no effect for treatment of mature biofilms when FLU is used in combination with other antifungals, including AmB and CAS [10], whereas synergistic effects (similar to the enhanced effect reported in this study) have been observed when FLU is combined with calcium channel inhibitors [11] and doxycycline [12], among others.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bachmann, S. P., Ramage, G., VandeWalle, K., Patterson, T. F., Wickes, B. L., & López-Ribot, J. L.
Affiliations
  • Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine
  • The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US)
Venue
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
Published
2003-11
Volume
47
Issue
11
Pages
3657-3659
ISSN
  • 0066-4804 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-6596
OpenAlex
W2159121924
Cited by
89
References
12
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 6
FWCI
2.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (5 RO1 DE11381-04, R01DE011381)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Fungal Plant Pathogen Control
Keywords
Candida albicans, biofilm, fluconazole, amphotericin B, caspofungin, checkerboard titration, time-kill kinetics, drug antagonism, antifungal resistance
MeSH terms
Caspofungin, Amphotericin B, Antifungal Agents, Candida albicans, Drug Combinations, Peptides, Peptides, Cyclic, Tetrazolium Salts, Fluconazole, Biofilms, Echinocandins, Lipopeptides

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review