Cited by 27Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive PhysiologyMycotoxins in Agriculture and FoodAnimal Nutrition and Physiology

Fate of Escherichia coli during Ensiling of Wheat and Corn

Open access
Chen, Y., Sela, S., Gamburg, M., Pinto, R., Weinberg, Z. G.·2005·Applied and Environmental Microbiology

Abstract

A recombinant Escherichia coli strain carrying a plasmid with an antibiotic resistance marker and expressing the green fluorescent protein was inoculated at a concentration of 3.8 x 10(8) CFU/g into direct-cut wheat (348 g of dry matter kg(-1)), wilted wheat (450 g of dry matter kg(-1)), and corn (375 g of dry matter kg(-1)). The forages were ensiled in mini-silos. The treatments included control (no E. coli added), application of tagged E. coli, and delayed sealing of the inoculated wheat. Three silos per treatment were sampled on predetermined dates, and the numbers of E. coli were determined on Chromocult TBX medium with or without kanamycin. Colonies presumptively identified as E. coli were also tested for fluorescence activity. Addition of E. coli at the time of ensiling resulted in a more rapid decrease in the pH but had almost no effect on the chemical composition of the final silages or their aerobic stability. E. coli disappeared from the silages when the pH decreased below 5.0. It persisted longer in silages of wilted wheat, in which the pH declined more slowly. Control silages of all crops also contained bacteria, presumptively identified as E. coli, that were resistant to the antibiotic, which suggests that some epiphytic strains are naturally resistant to antibiotics.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/aem.71.9.5163-5170.2005

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [10]Frazier, W. C., and D. C. Westhoff. 1978. Food-borne infections and intoxications: bacterial, p. 419-453. In W. C. Frazier and D. C. Westhoff (ed.), Food microbiology. McGraw Hill, New York, N.Y.
  2. [14]Lindgren, S. 1999. Can HACCP principles be applied for silage safety?, p. 51-66. In T. Pauly (ed.), Silage production in relation to animal performance, animal health, meat and milk quality. Proceedings of the 12th International Silage Conference, July 5-7, Uppsala, Sweden. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
  3. [16]Sheinbaum, M., and A. Tromp. 1982. Diseases during cattle breeding, p. 301-341. In Y. Arnon (ed.), Agricultural encyclopedia, vol. 4. Animals, part 1. Agricultural Encyclopedia Publishing, Tel Aviv, Israel. (In Hebrew.) [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, Y., Sela, S., Gamburg, M., Pinto, R., & Weinberg, Z. G.
Affiliations
Agricultural Research Organization (IL)
Venue
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
Published
2005-09
Volume
71
Issue
9
Pages
5163-5170
ISSN
  • 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-5336
OpenAlex
W2004283815
Cited by
27
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2013: 4
FWCI
2.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied and Environmental Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Mycotoxins in Agriculture and Food
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
Keywords
Escherichia coli, silage inoculation, wheat silage, corn silage, silage pH, aerobic stability, silage chemical composition, antibiotic resistance, green fluorescent protein, wilted forage, epiphytic bacteria, silage microbiology
MeSH terms
Zea mays, Culture Media, Escherichia coli, Fermentation, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Recombinant Fusion Proteins, Silage, Triticum, Colony Count, Microbial, Drug Resistance, Bacterial, Green Fluorescent Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review