Cited by 215Polymer Surface Interaction StudiesBacterial biofilms and quorum sensingAntimicrobial agents and applications

Polysaccharide-based antibiofilm surfaces

Junter, Guy-Alain, Thébault, Pascal, Lebrun, Laurent·2016·Acta Biomaterialia

Abstract

Surface treatment by natural or modified polysaccharide polymers is a promising means to fight against implant-associated biofilm infections. The present review focuses on polysaccharide-based coatings that have been proposed over the last ten years to impede biofilm formation on material surfaces exposed to bacterial contamination. Anti-adhesive and bactericidal coatings are considered. Besides classical hydrophilic coatings based on hyaluronic acid and heparin, the promising anti-adhesive properties of the algal polysaccharide ulvan are underlined. Surface functionalization by antimicrobial chitosan and derivatives is extensively surveyed, in particular chitosan association with other polysaccharides in layer-by-layer assemblies to form both anti-adhesive and bactericidal coatings.Statement of significance Bacterial contamination of surfaces, leading to biofilm formation, is a major problem in fields as diverse as medicine, first, but also food and cosmetics. Many prophylactic strategies have emerged to try to eliminate or reduce bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation on surfaces of materials exposed to bacterial contamination, in particular implant materials. Polysaccharides are widely distributed in nature. A number of these natural polymers display antibiofilm properties. Hence, surface treatment by natural or modified polysaccharides is a promising means to fight against implant-associated biofilm infections. The present manuscript is an in-depth look at polysaccharide-based antibiofilm surfaces that have been proposed over the last ten years. This review, which is a novelty compared to published literature, will bring well documented and updated information to readers of Acta Biomaterialia.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.actbio.2015.11.010

Cites

117 of 117 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 120 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Junter, G.-A., Thébault, P., & Lebrun, L.
Affiliations
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Corresponding author
Junter, Guy-Alain
Venue
Acta Biomaterialia
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-01
Volume
30
Pages
13-25
ISSN
1742-7061 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2153189401
Cited by
215
References
120
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 11
FWCI
1.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Acta Biomaterialia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Surfaces, Coatings and Films › Polymer Surface Interaction Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Antimicrobial agents and applications
Keywords
antibiofilm surfaces, polysaccharide coatings, bacterial adhesion, anti-adhesive coatings, bactericidal coatings, ulvan, chitosan, layer-by-layer assembly, hyaluronic acid, heparin, algal polysaccharides, surface functionalization
MeSH terms
Animals, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Humans, Bacterial Physiological Phenomena, Biofilms, Coated Materials, Biocompatible, Chitosan

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review