Cited by 58Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityYeasts and Rust Fungi StudiesFungal and yeast genetics research

Multilocus sequence type analysis reveals both clonality and recombination in populations of Candida glabrata bloodstream isolates from U.S. surveillance studies

Open access
Lott, Timothy J., Frade, João P., Lockhart, Shawn R.·2010·Eukaryotic Cell

Abstract

The human commensal yeast Candida glabrata is becoming increasingly important as an agent of nosocomial bloodstream infection. However, relatively little is known concerning the genetics and population structure of this species. We have analyzed 230 incident bloodstream isolates from previous and current population-based surveillance studies by using multilocus sequence typing (MLST). Our results show that in the U.S. cities of Atlanta, GA; Baltimore, MD; and San Francisco, CA during three time periods spanning 1992 to 2009, five populations of C. glabrata bloodstream isolates are defined by a relatively small number of sequence types. There is little genetic differentiation in the different C. glabrata populations. We also show that there has been a significant temporal shift in the prevalence of one major subtype in Atlanta. Our results support the concept that both recombination and clonality play a role in the population structure of this species.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/ec.00002-10

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • C. glabrata ST distribution in Atlanta area hospitals changed significantly between 1992 and 2008.

    “Figure 2A shows that C. glabrata ST distribution in Atlanta area hospitals changed significantly between 1992 and 2008”

    From Genetic Drivers of Multidrug Resistance in Candida glabrata (2016) · cites this paper as Lott et al., 2010

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lott, T. J., Frade, J. P., & Lockhart, S. R.
Affiliations
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
Venue
Eukaryotic Cell
Published
2010-04
Volume
9
Issue
4
Pages
619-625
ISSN
  • 1535-9778 (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-9786
OpenAlex
W2154807668
Cited by
58
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Eukaryotic Cell (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Yeasts and Rust Fungi Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
Keywords
Candida glabrata, bloodstream infection, nosocomial infections, clonality, recombination, population structure, multilocus sequence typing, sequence types, fungal genomics
MeSH terms
Candidiasis, Cross Infection, Genetics, Population, Genotype, Georgia, Humans, Phylogeny, Population Surveillance, Recombination, Genetic, San Francisco, Baltimore, Bacterial Typing Techniques, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Candida glabrata

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review