Cited by 136Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityFungal Plant Pathogen ControlFungal and yeast genetics research

FKS Mutations and Elevated Echinocandin MIC Values among Candida glabrata Isolates from U.S. Population-Based Surveillance

Open access
Zimbeck, Alicia J., Iqbal, Naureen, Ahlquist, Angela M., Farley, Monica M., Harrison, Lee H., Chiller, Tom, Lockhart, Shawn R.·2010·Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy

Abstract

Candida glabrata is the second leading cause of candidemia in the United States. Its high-level resistance to triazole antifungal drugs has led to the increased use of the echinocandin class of antifungal agents for primary therapy of these infections. We monitored C. glabrata bloodstream isolates from a population-based surveillance study for elevated echinocandin MIC values (MICs of ≥0.25 μg/ml). From the 490 C. glabrata isolates that were screened, we identified 16 isolates with an elevated MIC value (2.9% of isolates from Atlanta and 2.0% of isolates from Baltimore) for one or more of the echinocandin drugs caspofungin, anidulafungin, and micafungin. All of the isolates with elevated MIC values had a mutation in the previously identified hot spot 1 of either the glucan synthase FKS1 (n = 2) or FKS2 (n = 14) gene. No mutations were detected in hot spot 2 of either FKS1 or FKS2. The predominant mutation was mutation of FKS2-encoded serine 663 to proline (S663P), found in 10 of the isolates with elevated echinocandin MICs. Two of the mutations, R631G for FKS1 and R665G for FKS2, have not been reported previously for C. glabrata. Multilocus sequence typing indicated that the predominance of the S663P mutation was not due to the clonal spread of a single sequence type. With a rising number of echinocandin therapy failures reported, it is important to continue to monitor rates of elevated echinocandin MIC values and the associated mutations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/aac.00836-10

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Non-synonymous changes in MOH1 were discovered in two out of the 10 additional unrelated C. glabrata clinical isolates harbouring Fks2 S663P.

    “We discovered non-synonymous changes in MOH1 in two out of the 10 clinical isolates sequenced and non-synonymous changes in CDC6 in 7 out of 10 of the clinical isolates (Figure 4).”

    From Global Analysis of the Evolution and Mechanism of Echinocandin Resistance in Candida glabrata (2012) · cites this paper as [71]

    The Results (page unavailable) report 10 C. glabrata isolates with Fks2p S663P and show that they belonged to multiple sequence types. The paper does not report MOH1 changes in two of those isolates; that discovery is presented as the citing authors’ own finding. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Non-synonymous changes in CDC6 were discovered in 7 out of 10 of the additional unrelated C. glabrata clinical isolates harbouring Fks2 S663P.

    “We discovered non-synonymous changes in MOH1 in two out of the 10 clinical isolates sequenced and non-synonymous changes in CDC6 in 7 out of 10 of the clinical isolates (Figure 4).”

    From Global Analysis of the Evolution and Mechanism of Echinocandin Resistance in Candida glabrata (2012) · cites this paper as [71]

    The Results (MLST analysis; page unavailable) report 10 C. glabrata isolates with Fks2p S663P across several sequence types, supporting the count and evidence against a single clone. The paper does not report CDC6 changes in seven of those isolates or establish that all 10 were unrelated; its Discussion says clonality cannot be ruled out in at least two cases. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Alternative technologies including molecular detection and MALDI-TOF are being developed for echinocandin resistance detection.

    “Alternative technologies are being developed including molecular detection and MALDI-TOF.”

    From Echinocandin resistance: an emerging clinical problem? (2014) · cites this paper as [53]

  • Categorizations determined using MALDI-TOF MS-based AFST (ms-AFST) were consistent with the wild-type and mutant FKS1 genotypes and the AFST reference methodology.

    “Categorizations determined using MALDI-TOF MS-based AFST (ms-AFST) were consistent with the wild-type and mutant FKS1 genotypes and the AFST reference methodology.”

    From Echinocandin resistance: an emerging clinical problem? (2014) · cites this paper as [53]

  • A simplified MALDI-TOF version facilitated discrimination of susceptible and resistant isolates of C. albicans after only 3 hours of incubation in the presence of two breakpoint-level drug concentrations (0.03 and 32 mg/L) of caspofungin.

    “It was followed by a simplified version, which facilitated discrimination of susceptible and resistant isolates of C. albicans after only 3 hours of incubation in the presence of two “breakpoint” level drug concentrations (0.03 and 32 mg/L) of caspofungin (53).”

    From Echinocandin resistance: an emerging clinical problem? (2014) · cites this paper as [53]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [1]Ahlquist, A., M. M. Farley, L. H. Harrison, W. Baughman, B. Siegel, R. Hollick, S. R. Lockhart, S. S. Magill, and T. Chiller. 2009. Epidemiology of candidemia in metropolitan Atlanta and Baltimore city and county: preliminary results of population-based, active laboratory surveillance—2008-2010, abstr. M-1241. Abstr. 49th Int. Conf. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., San Francisco, CA. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC.
  2. [10]Deresinski, S. C., and D. A. Stevens. 2003. Caspofungin. Clin. Infect. Dis. 36:1445-1457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. [20]Larkin, M. A., G. Blackshields, N. P. Brown, R. Chenna, P. A. McGettigan, H. McWilliam, F. Valentin, I. M. Wallace, A. Wilm, R. Lopez, J. D. Thompson, T. J. Gibson, and D. G. Higgins. 2007. ClustalW and ClustalX version 2. Bioinformatics 23:2947-2948. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zimbeck, A. J., Iqbal, N., Ahlquist, A. M., Farley, M. M., Harrison, L. H., Chiller, T., & Lockhart, S. R.
Affiliations
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
  • Emory University (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
Venue
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
Published
2010-12
Volume
54
Issue
12
Pages
5042-5047
ISSN
  • 0066-4804 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-6596
OpenAlex
W2146779308
Cited by
136
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 18
FWCI
7.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Association of Public Health Laboratories
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Fungal Plant Pathogen Control
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
Keywords
Candida glabrata, echinocandin resistance, FKS1, FKS2, caspofungin, anidulafungin, micafungin, candidemia, bloodstream isolates, antifungal susceptibility, multilocus sequence typing, population-based surveillance
MeSH terms
Caspofungin, Micafungin, Anidulafungin, Antifungal Agents, Candidiasis, Fungal Proteins, Glucosyltransferases, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Mutation, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Drug Resistance, Multiple, Fungal, Candida glabrata, Echinocandins, Lipopeptides

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review