Cited by 303Bacteriophages and microbial interactionsGut microbiota and healthViral-associated cancers and disorders

Diagnostic potential and interactive dynamics of the colorectal cancer virome

Open access
Hannigan, Geoffrey D., Duhaime, Melissa B., Ruffin, Mack T., Koumpouras, Charlie C., Schloss, Patrick D.·2018·mBio

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Colorectal cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related death in the United States and worldwide. Its risk and severity have been linked to colonic bacterial community composition. Although human-specific viruses have been linked to other cancers and diseases, little is known about colorectal cancer virus communities. We addressed this knowledge gap by identifying differences in colonic virus communities in the stool of colorectal cancer patients and how they compared to bacterial community differences. The results suggested an indirect role for the virome in impacting colorectal cancer by modulating the associated bacterial community. These findings both support the idea of a biological role for viruses in colorectal cancer and provide a new understanding of basic colorectal cancer etiology.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/mbio.02248-18

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hannigan, G. D., Duhaime, M. B., Ruffin, M. T., Koumpouras, C. C., & Schloss, P. D.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
Corresponding author
Schloss, Patrick D.
Venue
mBio
Published
2018-12-21
Volume
9
Issue
6
ISSN
  • 2150-7511 (ISSN-L)
  • 2161-2129
OpenAlex
W2950868848
Cited by
298
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 32 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 52 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
18.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • mBio (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
HHS | National Institutes of Health (P30DK034933, T32AI007528, 5U01CA86400)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Bacteriophages and microbial interactions
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Viral-associated cancers and disorders
Keywords
colorectal cancer, virome, human viruses, colonic microbiota, gut bacterial community, cancer etiology, viral-bacterial interactions, cancer diagnosis
MeSH terms
Bacteria, Bacteriophages, Feces, Humans, RNA, Ribosomal, 16S, Viruses, Colorectal Neoplasms, Cohort Studies, Metagenomics, Microbiota

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review