Cited by 68Physical Activity and HealthMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsContext-Aware Activity Recognition Systems

Do physical activity interventions combining self-monitoring with other components provide an additional benefit compared with self-monitoring alone? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Open access
Vetrovsky, Tomas, Borowiec, Agnieszka, Juřík, Roman, Wahlich, Charlotte, Śmigielski, Witold, Steffl, Michal, Tufano, James J, Drygas, Wojciech +3 more·2022·British Journal of Sports Medicine

Abstract

Objective: To determine the net effect of different physical activity intervention components on step counts in addition to self-monitoring. Design: A systematic review with meta-analysis and meta-regression. Data sources: Five databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, ProQuest and Discus) were searched from inception to May 2022. The database search was complemented with backward and forward citation searches and search of the references from relevant systematic reviews. Eligibility criteria: Randomised controlled trials comparing an intervention using self-monitoring (active control arm) with an intervention comprising the same treatment PLUS any additional component (intervention arm). Data extraction and synthesis: The effect measures were mean differences in daily step count. Meta-analyses were performed using random-effects models, and effect moderators were explored using univariate and multivariate meta-regression models. Results: Eighty-five studies with 12 057 participants were identified, with 75 studies included in the meta-analysis at postintervention and 24 at follow-up. At postintervention, the mean difference between the intervention and active control arms was 926 steps/day (95% CI 651 to 1201). At a follow-up, the mean difference was 413 steps/day (95% CI 210 to 615). Interventions with a prescribed goal and involving human counselling, particularly via phone/video calls, were associated with a greater mean difference in the daily step count than interventions with added print materials, websites, smartphone apps or incentives. Conclusion: Physical activity interventions that combine self-monitoring with other components provide an additional modest yet sustained increase in step count compared with self-monitoring alone. Some forms of counselling, particularly remote phone/video counselling, outperformed other intervention components, such as websites and smartphone apps. PROSPERO registered number: CRD42020199482.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bjsports-2021-105198

Cites

136 of 137 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Wearables may offer personalized health monitoring and behavior tracking, deliver immediate feedback on health metrics, encourage healthier lifestyles, and support physical fitness management.

    “Wearables may offer personalized health monitoring and behavior tracking (Vetrovsky et al., 2022), deliver immediate feedback on various health metrics, encourage healthier lifestyles, and support physical fitness management (Brickwood et al., 2019; Wang et al., 2020).”

    From Sociodemographics and Digital Health Literacy in Using Wearables for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention: Cross-Sectional Nationwide Survey in Germany (2025) · cites this paper as Vetrovsky et al., 2022

    The Background (page unavailable) describes fitness trackers as devices for self-monitoring physical activity, and Results > Study characteristics (page unavailable) identifies wearable fitness trackers among the devices studied. This supports behavior tracking, but the paper does not establish the broader claim of personalized health monitoring. The later claims about feedback, lifestyles, and fitness management are attached to other citations, not Vetrovsky et al. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vetrovsky, T., Borowiec, A., Juřík, R., Wahlich, C., Śmigielski, W., Steffl, M., Tufano, J. J., Drygas, W., Stastny, P., Harris, T., & Małek, Ł.
Affiliations
  • Institute of Cardiology (PL)
  • Charles University (CZ)
  • St George's, University of London (GB)
  • University of Łódź (PL)
  • Medical University of Lodz (PL)
Venue
British Journal of Sports Medicine
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2022-09-07
Volume
56
Issue
23
Pages
1366-1374
ISSN
  • 0306-3674 (ISSN-L)
  • 1473-0480
OpenAlex
W4294884568
Cited by
68
References
136
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 19
FWCI
2.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Sports Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • St George's Online Research Archive (St George's University of London) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Agentura Pro Zdravotnický Výzkum České Republiky (NU21-09-00007)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
Keywords
physical activity interventions, self-monitoring, step count, counseling, telephone counseling, goal setting, mobile application, print materials, incentives, online intervention, intervention components
MeSH terms
Data Management, Humans, Motivation, Telephone, Exercise, Mobile Applications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review