Cited by 145Physical Activity and HealthBehavioral Health and InterventionsMobile Health and mHealth Applications

Financial incentives for physical activity in adults: systematic review and meta-analysis

Mitchell, Marc S, Orstad, Stephanie L, Biswas, Aviroop, Oh, Paul I, Jay, Melanie, Pakosh, Maureen T, Faulkner, Guy·2020·British Journal of Sports Medicine

Abstract

Objective: The use of financial incentives to promote physical activity (PA) has grown in popularity due in part to technological advances that make it easier to track and reward PA. The purpose of this study was to update the evidence on the effects of incentives on PA in adults. Data sources: Medline, PubMed, Embase, PsychINFO, CCTR, CINAHL and COCH. Eligibility criteria: Randomised controlled trials (RCT) published between 2012 and May 2018 examining the impact of incentives on PA. Design: A simple count of studies with positive and null effects (‘vote counting’) was conducted. Random-effects meta-analyses were also undertaken for studies reporting steps per day for intervention and post-intervention periods. Results: 23 studies involving 6074 participants were included (64.42% female, mean age = 41.20 years). 20 out of 22 studies reported positive intervention effects and four out of 18 reported post-intervention (after incentives withdrawn) benefits. Among the 12 of 23 studies included in the meta-analysis, incentives were associated with increased mean daily step counts during the intervention period (pooled mean difference (MD), 607.1; 95% CI: 422.1 to 792.1). Among the nine of 12 studies with post-intervention daily step count data incentives were associated with increased mean daily step counts (pooled MD, 513.8; 95% CI:312.7 to 714.9). Conclusion: Demonstrating rising interest in financial incentives, 23 RCTs were identified. Modest incentives ($1.40 US/day) increased PA for interventions of short and long durations and after incentives were removed, though post-intervention ‘vote counting’ and pooled results did not align. Nonetheless, and contrary to what has been previously reported, these findings suggest a short-term incentive ‘dose’ may promote sustained PA.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bjsports-2019-100633

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mitchell, M. S., Orstad, S. L., Biswas, A., Oh, P. I., Jay, M., Pakosh, M. T., & Faulkner, G.
Affiliations
  • Western University (CA)
  • New York University (US)
  • Institute for Work & Health (CA)
  • University Health Network (CA)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
Corresponding author
Mitchell, Marc S
Venue
British Journal of Sports Medicine
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2019-05-15
Volume
54
Issue
21
Pages
1259-1268
ISSN
  • 0306-3674 (ISSN-L)
  • 1473-0480
OpenAlex
W2945344227
Cited by
143
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 2
FWCI
2.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • British Journal of Sports Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
financial incentives, physical activity promotion, step count, adults, sustained physical activity, health behavior change, wearable activity trackers
MeSH terms
Fitness Trackers, Adult, Health Promotion, Humans, Motivation, Time Factors, Token Economy, Health Behavior, Exercise

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review