Cited by 23Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsPhysical Activity and HealthDigital Mental Health Interventions

Effect of Adding Telephone-Based Brief Coaching to an mHealth App (Stay Strong) for Promoting Physical Activity Among Veterans: Randomized Controlled Trial

Open access
Damschroder, Laura J, Buis, Lorraine R, McCant, Felicia A, Kim, Hyungjin Myra, Evans, Richard, Oddone, Eugene Z, Bastian, Lori A, Hooks, Gwendolyn +4 more·2020·Journal of Medical Internet Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Background: Though maintaining physical conditioning and a healthy weight are requirements of active military duty, many US veterans lose conditioning and rapidly gain weight after discharge from active duty service. Mobile health (mHealth) interventions using wearable devices are appealing to users and can be effective especially with personalized coaching support. We developed Stay Strong, a mobile app tailored to US veterans, to promote physical activity using a wrist-worn physical activity tracker, a Bluetooth-enabled scale, and an app-based dashboard. We tested whether adding personalized coaching components (Stay Strong+Coaching) would improve physical activity compared to Stay Strong alone. Objective: The goal of this study is to compare 12-month outcomes from Stay Strong alone versus Stay Strong+Coaching. Methods: Participants (n=357) were recruited from a national random sample of US veterans of recent wars and randomly assigned to the Stay Strong app alone (n=179) or Stay Strong+Coaching (n=178); both programs lasted 12 months. Personalized coaching components for Stay Strong+Coaching comprised of automated in-app motivational messages (3 per week), telephone-based human health coaching (up to 3 calls), and personalized weekly goal setting. All aspects of the enrollment process and program delivery were accomplished virtually for both groups, except for the telephone-based coaching. The primary outcome was change in physical activity at 12 months postbaseline, measured by average weekly Active Minutes, captured by the Fitbit Charge 2 device. Secondary outcomes included changes in step counts, weight, and patient activation. Results: The average age of participants was 39.8 (SD 8.7) years, and 25.2% (90/357) were female. Active Minutes decreased from baseline to 12 months for both groups (P<.001) with no between-group differences at 6 months (P=.82) or 12 months (P=.98). However, at 12 months, many participants in both groups did not record Active Minutes, leading to missing data in 67.0% (120/179) for Stay Strong and 61.8% (110/178) for Stay Strong+Coaching. Average baseline weight for participants in Stay Strong and Stay Strong+Coaching was 214 lbs and 198 lbs, respectively, with no difference at baseline (P=.54) or at 6 months (P=.28) or 12 months (P=.18) postbaseline based on administrative weights, which had lower rates of missing data. Changes in the number of steps recorded and patient activation also did not differ by arm. Conclusions: Adding personalized health coaching comprised of in-app automated messages, up to 3 coaching calls, plus automated weekly personalized goals, did not improve levels of physical activity compared to using a smartphone app alone. Physical activity in both groups decreased over time. Sustaining long-term adherence and engagement in this mHealth intervention proved difficult; approximately two-thirds of the trial’s 357 participants failed to sync their Fitbit device at 12 months and, thus, were lost to follow-up. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02360293; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02360293 International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID): RR2-10.2196/12526

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/19216

Cites

77 of 77 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These features are standard in health apps and are crucial for self-therapy, but they have limited long-term effectiveness.

    “Although these features are standard in health apps and are crucial for self-therapy, they have limited long-term effectiveness [73,74].”

    From Smartphone-Based Speech Therapy for Poststroke Dysarthria: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating Efficacy and Feasibility (2024) · cites this paper as [73]

    The Discussion (Conclusions; page unavailable) reports declining physical activity and engagement over 12 months, supporting the concern about limited long-term effectiveness in this trial. The Discussion (mHealth Interventions for Physical Activity; page unavailable) says goal setting and self-monitoring matter for behavior change, but the paper does not establish that the unspecified features are standard across health apps or crucial for self-therapy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Damschroder, L. J., Buis, L. R., McCant, F. A., Kim, H. M., Evans, R., Oddone, E. Z., Bastian, L. A., Hooks, G., Kadri, R., White-Clark, C., Richardson, C. R., & Gierisch, J. M.
Affiliations
  • VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Durham VA Health Care System (US)
  • Yale University (US)
  • Duke University (US)
Corresponding author
Damschroder, Laura J
Venue
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Published
2020-08-04
Volume
22
Issue
8
Pages
e19216
ISSN
1438-8871 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3045358457
Cited by
23
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1
FWCI
4.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (CIN 13–410)
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • Office of Research and Development
  • Health Services Research and Development (CIN 13‐410)
  • University of Michigan
  • Strong
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P30DK092926)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
physical activity promotion, veterans, mobile health apps, personalized coaching, wearable activity trackers, Fitbit, motivational messages, goal setting, patient activation, step count
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Motivation, Veterans, Exercise, Telemedicine, Mobile Applications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review