Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 73Sport Psychology and PerformanceSports injuries and preventionSports Performance and Training

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 271 of the 272 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 1 are not checked yet; none of the 212 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

IOC consensus statement on elite youth athletes competing at the Olympic Games: essentials to a healthy, safe and sustainable paradigm

Open access

Abstract

With the pronounced ongoing growth of global youth sports, opportunities for and participation of youth athletes on the world sports stage, including the Olympic Games, are expected to escalate. Yet, adolescence is a vulnerable period of development and inherently dynamic, with non-linear and asynchronous progression of physical, physiological, psychological and social attributes. These non-concurrent changes within and between individuals are accompanied by irregular and unpredictable threats and impediments. Likewise, the evident age-based criteria and conventional path for those youth athletes deemed eligible candidates for the Olympic Games are not well or consistently defined. Furthermore, the unstructured and largely varying policies and practices across the sporting International Federations specific to youth participation underscore the need to establish a contemporary universal paradigm that would enable elite youth athletes to navigate an individualised healthy pathway to personal, athletic and sport success. First, we reviewed and summarised key challenges facing elite youth athletes and the relevant evidence fundamental to facilitating and supporting central aspects of health and well-being, while empowering safe, sustainable and positive engagement during athletic and personal advancement and competition. Second, we developed and present a modern elite youth athlete model that emphasises a child-centred, practical framework with corresponding guidelines and recommendations to protect health and well-being while safely and favourably managing international sport competition. Our proposed evidence-informed paradigm will enable and support individualised pathways for healthy, well-rounded and sustainable positive engagement while achieving sport success for youth contending or aiming to compete at world-class international sporting events.

Checked 2026-11-14 · 1 reference not checked yet

Overview

CoChat Summary

TL;DR

This IOC consensus statement argues that elite youth participation in the Olympic Games requires a child-centred, rights-respecting, developmentally informed paradigm rather than reliance on age eligibility alone. It synthesises scoping reviews and expert consensus to propose nine recommendations for safeguarding, health, mental well-being, and sustainable athletic development.

Key findings

  • The statement proposes a contemporary paradigm for elite youth athletes competing internationally, with nine implementation recommendations: a centralised youth-athlete health learning hub; coach education/accreditation; youth-specific safeguarding frameworks; child-friendly codes of conduct; flexible competition formats; mental and psychosocial well-being definitions; parent/coach guidance; healthy adult–youth relationships; and nutrition considerations.
  • Age eligibility remains variable and not fully scientifically informed. IOC internal data show just over 30% of U18 Olympic participants from 2012–2022 returned to compete as adults, and the authors state it is premature to make or confidently speculate on a specific age eligibility requirement recommendation.
  • The growth/maturation–injury scoping review retained 30 articles, mostly in soccer (n=19) and male-only samples (23 studies; 7 mixed; none female-only). Reported overuse injury prevalence ranged from 17% across endurance/technical/team sports to 37% in skiing and handball and 68% in running; ACL injuries occur approximately 3.5 times more often in female athletes after puberty.
  • The mental-health scoping review included 33 records and data from 5826 youth athletes (2538 boys, 3288 girls). Disordered eating was most studied (k=16), followed by anxiety (k=7) and depression (k=5); caseness estimates were 0–14.4% for disordered eating in boys and 11–34% in girls, 6% mixed/14% boys/40% girls for depression, and 8% boys/28% girls for anxiety; self-reported mental health symptoms ranged from nearly 7% to just over 20%.

Methods

  • The IOC convened a consensus meeting in Lausanne, Switzerland, on 24–26 May 2023, with a deliberately multidisciplinary faculty covering youth athletic health, growth and maturation, sports medicine, mental health, safeguarding, coaching, and sport administration.
  • The panel relied predominantly on expert narrative reviews and three scoping reviews: (a) growth and maturation changes and injury risk, (b) mental health and well-being, and (c) positive athlete engagement and development. Searches generally adhered to PRISMA-ScR; final included sets were 30 growth/maturation–injury articles, 33 mental-health records, and 43 positive-engagement articles.
  • Consensus was developed through online discussion, an in-person meeting, and a Delphi-like anonymous Likert scoring process (1–9), with recommendations included only if ≥80% of participants scored ≥7, followed by editing and repeated voting as needed.

Limitations

  • Stated: the panel considered systematic evaluation of International Federation policies premature and relied predominantly on expert narrative reviews; it explicitly states that no specific age eligibility recommendation can be confidently made and that age-determination proxies have limited validity and reliability.
  • Stated: mental-health evidence is limited—few studies, none from the Youth Olympic Games, mainly cross-sectional designs, no published prospective studies, a paucity of research on youth travelling and competing at world-class events, and a dearth of developmentally and contextually appropriate measures; intervention effectiveness for mental health in elite youth sport is unstudied.
  • Stated/evident: the growth/maturation–injury scoping review had no female-only studies (23 male-only, 7 mixed, 0 female-only), and mental-health risk factors varied between studies; the consensus recommendations were developed via expert consensus and Delphi-like voting rather than prospective validation (evident from the text).

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bjsports-2024-108186

Cites

271 of 272 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 Valid · 4 Not valid · 117 Not checked · 33 Own results and interpretations

77 more claims

Create a free account to see all 154 claims and every source verdict.

See all claims — free account
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 62
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 22
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 3

Create a free account to see these claims.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

1 of 1

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Mockdece Neves, 2016, Body dissatisfaction among artistic gymnastics adolescent athletes and non-athletes, Braz J Kineanthropom Hum Perform, 18, 82
  2. Géczi, 2009, Psychological profile of Hungarian national young ice hockey players, Kinesiol Zagreb, 41, 88
  3. Smith, 2020, An interpretative phenomenological analysis of performance influencing factors within the practice environment, J Phys Educ Sport, 20, 1646
  4. Wixey, 2023, Identifying the Psychological Characteristics Desired of Elite Youth Athletes: toward an Interdisciplinary Approach to Talent Development, J Sport Behav, 46, 93
  5. Wixey, 2021, An initial exploration into coaching strategies used to develop a mastery motivational climate within a Premier League Soccer Academy, J Contemp Athl, 15, 229
  6. Garcia-de-Alcaraz, 2022, Exploring the relative age effect in Spanish beach volleyball players, J Phys Educ Sport, 22, 2604
  7. Tedesqui, 2019, Relationships Between Athletes’ Self-Reported Grit Levels and Coach-Reported Practice Engagement Over One Sport Season, J Sport Behav, 41
  8. Lloyd, 2012, The youth physical development model: a new approach to long-term athletic development, S & C J, 34, 61
  9. 10.1037/0012-1649.35.5.1268 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Weedon G . Youth migration in english professional football: living, labouring and learning in premier league academies. In: Football and migration. Routledge, 2014: 176–90.
  11. Fédération Internationale de Football A . Regulations on the status and transfer of players. Zurich, Switzerland, 2022. Available: https://digitalhub.fifa.com/m/620d0240c40944ed/original/Regulations-on-the-Status-and-Transfer-of-Players-October-2022-edition.pdf
  12. Côté J , Fraser-Thomas J . Youth involvement and positive development in sport. In: Crocker PRE , ed. Sport psychology: a canadian perspective. 3rd edn. Toronto: Pearson, 2016.
  13. 10.1037/0003-066x.55.1.170 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Bruner MW , Eys MA , Martin LJ . The power of groups in youth sport. London, UK: Elsevier, 2020.
  15. Côté J , Hancock D , Abernethy B . Nurturing talent in youth sport. In: Papaioannou AG , Hackfort D , eds. Routledge companion to sport and exercise psychology: global perspectives and fundamental concepts. London: Routledge, 2014: 22–33.

Cited by

See all 73

Metadata

Authors
Bergeron, M. F., Côté, J., Cumming, S. P., Purcell, R., Armstrong, N., Basilico, L., Burrows, K., Charrin, J.-B., Felix, A., Groesswang, H., Iwasaki, Y., Kocher, M. S., Martowicz, M., McConnell, K., Moran, J., Holm Moseid, C., Mountjoy, M., Soligard, T., Tetelbaum, E., Thiel, A., Vertommen, T., Viseras, G., Budgett, R., Engebretsen, L., & Erdener, U.
Affiliations
  • University of Hartford (US)
  • Queen's University (CA)
  • University of Bath (GB)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • University of Exeter (GB)
  • World Skate, Maison du Sport International, Lausanne, Switzerland
  • International Olympic Committee (CH)
  • International Bobsleigh & Skeleton Federation (IBSF), Salzburg, Austria
  • Anti-Doping, Medical and Scientific Commission, Fédération Internationale de Gymnastique, Lausanne, Switzerland
  • Boston Children's Hospital (US)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • Oslo Sports Trauma Research Center, Institute of Sports Medicine, Norwegian School of Sports Sciences, Oslo, Norway
  • McMaster University (CA)
  • German Sport University Cologne (DE)
Corresponding author
Bergeron, Michael F
Venue
British Journal of Sports Medicine
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2024-08-28
Volume
58
Issue
17
Pages
946-965
ISSN
  • 0306-3674 (ISSN-L)
  • 1473-0480
OpenAlex
W4401946345
Cited by
73
References
272
Citations by year
2026: 43 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 4
FWCI
25.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • British Journal of Sports Medicine (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure (University of Bath) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
IOC
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports injuries and prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
Keywords
elite youth athletes, Olympic Games, adolescent development, youth sport participation, athlete safety
MeSH terms
Youth Sports, Adolescent, Athletic Injuries, Child, Competitive Behavior, Humans, Consensus, Athletic Performance, Athletes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-14, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-14 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.