CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 259Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNursing care and researchFamily Caregiving in Mental Illness

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effect of a training programme to reduce stress in carers of patients with dementia.

Open access
Brodaty, H., Gresham, M.·1989·BMJ
DOI 10.1136/bmj.299.6712.1375PMC PMC1838247
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

OBJECTIVE--To reduce the psychological stress and improve the skills in coping of people who care for relatives with dementia. DESIGN--Assessment and suitability of carers by questionnaire; assessment of patients and carers in a hospital outpatient clinic; allocation to groups according to date of application to study. Linkage of groups of four carers and programme coordinator by telephone conference calls over 12 months after programmes. Reassessment at three, six, 12, and, for those in the "wait list" group, 18 months. SETTING--The programmes were conducted in the psychiatry unit of a Sydney teaching hospital. SUBJECTS--Eligible patients were less than 80 years old, had mild to moderate dementia, and lived at home with their carer. Of the 96 patient-carer pairs in the study, 33 were in the dementia carers' programme group, 31 were in the memory retraining group, and 32 were in the wait list group. INTERVENTIONS--Carers in the dementia carers' programme received training in coping with the difficulties of looking after patients with dementia while the patients had sessions in subjects such as memory retraining. In the memory retraining programme patients were admitted and received the patient component of the carers' programme while their carers had 10 days' respite. In the wait list group carers waited six months before undertaking the carers' programme. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Effect of the programmes on carers' general health questionnaire scores and the rate of placement of patients in institutions. RESULTS--At 12 months' follow up the carers' programme had resulted in significantly lower psychological stress among carers than the memory retraining programme (mean (SD) general health questionnaire scores at 0 months were 6.31 (6.23) and 3.60 (6.25) respectively, and at 12 months were 4.69 (5.58) and 7.40 (9.39); p less than 0.05.) In the wait list group distress scores remained stable, even after the carers and patients had undertaken the carers' programme. Patients deteriorated over 12 months regardless of group allocation, but at 30 months, allowing for patients who died and could not be included in the analysis, 65% of patients in the carers' programme group were still living at home compared with 26% in the memory retraining programme group. CONCLUSION--The intensive intervention programme described for carers of patients with dementia can reduce the psychological morbidity of the carer and delay the placement of the patient in an institution without increasing the use of health services by either patient or carer.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.299.6712.1375

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 31 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Brodatv H, Hadzi-Pavlovic D. The psychosocial effects on carers of liing with dementia. lust N ZJ Psvchiatry (in press).
  2. Brodaty H, Griffin D, Hadzi-Pavlovic D. A survey of dementia carers: how doctors communicate with dementia patients and their carers; the problem behaviours of dementia; and factors associated with institutionalisation. A ust N Z3J Psychiatry (in press).
  3. Goldberg D. 7'he detection of psychiatric illness by questionnaire. New York: Oxford University Press, 1972.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Brodaty, H., & Gresham, M.
ORCID
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
1989-12-02
Volume
299
Issue
6712
Pages
1375-1379
ISSN
  • 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
  • 1468-5833
DOI
10.1136/bmj.299.6712.1375
PMC
PMC1838247
OpenAlex
W1995993981
Cited by
259
References
31
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 4
FWCI
7.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
www.bmj.com/company/legal-information/terms-conditions/legal-information/tdm-licencepolicy (tdm)
Locations
  • BMJ (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing care and research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family Caregiving in Mental Illness
Keywords
dementia caregivers, caregiver stress, memory retraining, respite care, institutional placement, home care, psychological distress, family caregivers, General Health Questionnaire, clinical deterioration, community-based intervention, memory clinics, waitlist control, intervention cost-effectiveness
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Dementia, Health Education, Home Nursing, Humans, Institutionalization, Stress, Psychological, Time Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review