The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sifting the evidence---what's wrong with significance tests? Another comment on the role of statistical methods
Open accessAbstract
The findings of medical research are often met with considerable scepticism, even when they have apparently come from studies with sound methodologies that have been subjected to appropriate statistical analysis. This is perhaps particularly the case with respect to epidemiological findings that suggest that some aspect of everyday life is bad for people. Indeed, one recent popular history, the medical journalist James Le Fanu's The Rise and Fall of Modern Medicine , went so far as to suggest that the solution to medicine's ills would be the closure of all departments of epidemiology.1 One contributory factor is that the medical literature shows a strong tendency to accentuate the positive; positive outcomes are more likely to be reported than null results.2–4 By this means alone a host of purely chance findings will be published, as by conventional reasoning examining 20 associations will produce one result that is “significant at P=0.05” by chance alone. If only positive findings are published then they may be mistakenly considered to be of importance rather than being the necessary chance results produced by the application of criteria for meaningfulness based on statistical significance. As many studies contain long questionnaires collecting information on hundreds of variables, and measure a wide range of potential outcomes, several false positive findings are virtually guaranteed. The high volume and often contradictory nature5 of medical research findings, however, is not only because of publication bias. A more fundamental problem is the widespread misunderstanding of the nature of statistical significance. #### Summary points P values, or significance levels, measure the strength of the evidence against the null hypothesis; the smaller the P value, the stronger the evidence against the null hypothesis An arbitrary division of results, into “significant” or “non-significant” according to the P value, was not the intention of the …
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“When studies in a given field are designed with a power of 20%, it means that if there are 100 genuine non-null effects to be discovered in that field, these studies are expected to discover only 20 of them 11 .”
From Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience (2013) · cites this paper as [11]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical Methods for Research Workers
Fisher, R. A. (1945) · American Journal of Clinical Pathology · doi:10.1093/ajcp/15.11.552b · Cited by 10,883
Sontrop, J. M., Dixon, S. N., Garg, A. X., Jiménez, I. B., Dohein, O., Huang, S. S., & Clark, W. F. (2013) · American Journal of Nephrology · doi:10.1159/000350377 · Cited by 5,903
Casella, G., & Berger, R. L. (1993) · Chapman & Hall/CRC eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781003456285 · Cited by 5,835
Publication bias in clinical research
Easterbrook, P. J., Gopalan, R., Berlin, J. A., & Matthews, D. R. (1991) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/0140-6736(91)90201-y · Cited by 3,109
IX. On the problem of the most efficient tests of statistical hypotheses
Neyman, J., & Pearson, E. S. (1933) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A Containing Papers of a Mathematical or Physical Character · doi:10.1098/rsta.1933.0009 · Cited by 2,370
Confidence intervals rather than P values: estimation rather than hypothesis testing.
Gardner, M. J., & Altman, D. G. (1986) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.292.6522.746 · Cited by 2,014
Smithson, M. J. (2000) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781446218525 · Cited by 1,871
Bayesian statistical inference for psychological research.
Edwards, W., Lindman, H., & Savage, L. J. (1963) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0044139 · Cited by 1,734
Freiman, J. A., Chalmers, T. C., Smith, H., & Kuebler, R. R. (1978) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm197809282991304 · Cited by 1,628
ON THE PROBLEM OF THE MOST EFFICIENT TESTS OF STATISTICAL HYPOTHESES
Neyman, J., & Pearson, E. S. (1967) · University of California Press eBooks · doi:10.1525/9780520339897-008 · Cited by 1,545
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- [38]Davey Smith G. Reflections on the limits to epidemiology. J Clin Epidemiol (in press).
- BMJ. 2001 Jan 27;322(7280):226–231.
- 1-1.Fisher RA. Statistical methods for research workers. 1st ed. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd; 1925. . Reprinted by Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
- 1-2.Fisher RA. Design of experiments. 1st ed. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd; 1935. . Reprinted by Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
- 1-4.Cox DR. Statistical significance tests. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1982;14:325–331. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1982.tb01987.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2005) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124 · Cited by 10,505
Progressive Statistics for Studies in Sports Medicine and Exercise Science
HOPKINS, W. G., MARSHALL, S. W., BATTERHAM, A. M., & HANIN, J. (2009) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1249/mss.0b013e31818cb278 · Cited by 9,128
Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience
Button, K. S., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Mokrysz, C., Nosek, B. A., Flint, J., Robinson, E. S. J., & Munafò, M. R. (2013) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3475 · Cited by 7,641
The ASA Statement on p -Values: Context, Process, and Purpose
Wasserstein, R. L., & Lazar, N. A. (2016) · The American Statistician · doi:10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108 · Cited by 6,306
Sensitivity analysis in observational research: Introducing the E-value
VanderWeele, T. J., & Ding, P. (2017) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/m16-2607 · Cited by 6,350
A manifesto for reproducible science
Munafò, M. R., Nosek, B. A., Bishop, D. V. M., Button, K. S., Chambers, C. D., Percie du Sert, N., Simonsohn, U., Wagenmakers, E.-J., Ware, J. J., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2017) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-016-0021 · Cited by 3,397
Statistical tests, P values, confidence intervals, and power: a guide to misinterpretations
Greenland, S., Senn, S. J., Rothman, K. J., Carlin, J. B., Poole, C., Goodman, S. N., & Altman, D. G. (2016) · European Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1007/s10654-016-0149-3 · Cited by 3,200
Orienting the causal relationship between imprecisely measured traits using GWAS summary data.
Hemani, G., Tilling, K., & Davey Smith, G. (2017) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1007081 · Cited by 2,607
Making Meaningful Inferences About Magnitudes
Batterham, A. M., & Hopkins, W. G. (2006) · International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance · doi:10.1123/ijspp.1.1.50 · Cited by 2,186
McCormack, S., Dunn, D. T., Desai, M., Dolling, D. I., Gafos, M., Gilson, R., Sullivan, A. K., Clarke, A., Reeves, I., Schembri, G., et al. (2016) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(15)00056-2 · Cited by 1,878
Wacholder, S., Chanock, S. J., García‐Closas, M., ghormli, L. K. E., & Rothman, N. (2004) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/djh075 · Cited by 1,753
Cipriani, A., Furukawa, T. A., Salanti, G., Geddes, J. R., Higgins, J. P., Churchill, R., Watanabe, N., Nakagawa, A., Omori, I. M., McGuire, H., et al. (2009) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(09)60046-5 · Cited by 1,654
Skrivankova, V. W., Richmond, R. C., Woolf, B. A. R., Davies, N. M., Swanson, S. A., VanderWeele, T. J., Timpson, N. J., Higgins, J. P. T., Dimou, N., Langenberg, C., et al. (2021) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.n2233 · Cited by 1,648
Bias and causal associations in observational research
Grimes, D. A., & Schulz, K. F. (2002) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(02)07451-2 · Cited by 1,553
The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science
Head, M. L., Holman, L., Lanfear, R., Kahn, A. T., & Jennions, M. D. (2015) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002106 · Cited by 1,388
“NHST is the most widely used data analysis method in most scientific disciplines [22,23].”
MethodPRACTICE GUIDELINE FOR THE Treatment of Patients With Major Depressive Disorder
Gelenberg, A. J., Freeman, P. B., Markowitz, J. C., Rosenbaum, J. F., Thase, M. E., Trivedi, M. H., & Rhoads, R. S. (2010) · Cited by 1,372
Beyond Power Calculations: Assessing Type S (Sign) and Type M (Magnitude) Errors
Gelman, A., & Carlin, J. (2014) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691614551642 · Cited by 1,343
Reporting of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Randomized Trials: The CONSORT PRO Extension
Calvert, M., Blazeby, J., Altman, D. G., Revicki, D. A., Moher, D., Brundage, M. D., & CONSORT PRO Group, F. T. (2013) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2013.879 · Cited by 1,386
Problems of reporting genetic associations with complex outcomes
Colhoun, H. M., McKeigue, P., & Smith, G. D. (2003) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(03)12715-8 · Cited by 1,203
Theodoratou, E., Tzoulaki, I., Zgaga, L., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2014) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.g2035 · Cited by 956
Harbord, R. M., & Higgins, J. P. T. (2008) · The Stata Journal: Promoting communications on statistics and Stata · doi:10.1177/1536867x0800800403 · Cited by 897
Type 2 diabetes and cancer: umbrella review of meta-analyses of observational studies
Tsilidis, K. K., Kasimis, J. C., López, D. S., Ntzani, E., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2015) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.g7607 · Cited by 885
Richardson, T. G., Sanderson, E., Palmer, T. M., Ala-Korpela, M., Ference, B. A., Davey Smith, G., & Holmes, M. V. (2020) · PLOS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1003062 · Cited by 843
Can trial sequential monitoring boundaries reduce spurious inferences from meta-analyses?
Thorlund, K., Devereaux, P. J., Wetterslev, J., Guyatt, G. H., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Thabane, L., Gluud, L. L., Als-Nielsen, B. E. T., & Gluud, C. N. (2008) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyn179 · Cited by 834
Snowling, N. J., & Hopkins, W. G. (2006) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc06-1317 · Cited by 813
Adiposity and cancer at major anatomical sites: umbrella review of the literature
Kyrgiou, M., Kalliala, I., Markozannes, G., Gunter, M. J., Paraskevaidis, E., Gabra, H., Martin-Hirsch, P., & Tsilidis, K. K. (2017) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.j477 · Cited by 803
Walsh, M. W., Srinathan, S., McAuley, D. F., Mrkobrada, M., Levine, O. H., Ribic, C. M., Molnar, A. O., Dattani, N. D., Burke, A., Guyatt, G. H., et al. (2014) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.10.019 · Cited by 792
An overview of clinical research: the lay of the land
Grimes, D. A., & Schulz, K. F. (2002) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(02)07283-5 · Cited by 734
King, A. A., Lenox, M. J., & Terlaak, A. (2005) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2005.19573111 · Cited by 875
Molendijk, M. L., Spinhoven, P., Polak, M., Bus, B. A. A., Penninx, B. W. J. H., & Elzinga, B. M. (2014) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/mp.2013.105 · Cited by 702
Subgroup analyses in randomized trials: risks of subgroup-specific analyses;
Brookes, S. T., Whitely, E., Egger, M., Smith, G. D., Mulheran, P. A., & Peters, T. J. (2004) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2003.08.009 · Cited by 775
Bujang, M., Sa'at, N., Sidik, T. M. I. T. A. B., & Joo, L. C. (2018) · Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences · doi:10.21315/mjms2018.25.4.12 · Cited by 661
Risk factors for endometrial cancer: An umbrella review of the literature
Raglan, O., Kalliala, I. E. J., Markozannes, G., Cividini, S., Gunter, M. J., Nautiyal, J., Gabra, H., Paraskevaidis, E. A., Martin‐Hirsch, P. L., Tsilidis, K. K., et al. (2018) · International Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1002/ijc.31961 · Cited by 664
An investigation of the false discovery rate and the misinterpretation of p -values
Colquhoun, D. (2014) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.140216 · Cited by 792
Brookes, S. T., Whitley, E., Peters, T. J., Mulheran, P. A., Egger, M., & Davey Smith, G. (2001) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta5330 · Cited by 580
Smith, G. D., Lawlor, D. A., Harbord, R., Timpson, N., Day, I., & Ebrahim, S. (2007) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0040352 · Cited by 569
Escaping the Bonferroni iron claw in ecological studies
García, L. V. (2004) · Oikos · doi:10.1111/j.0030-1299.2004.13046.x · Cited by 556
Design, power, and interpretation of studies in the standard murine model of ALS
Scott, S., Kranz, J. E., Cole, J., Lincecum, J. M., Thompson, K., Kelly, N., Bostrom, A., Theodoss, J., Al‐Nakhala, B. M., Vieira, F. G., et al. (2008) · Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis · doi:10.1080/17482960701856300 · Cited by 504
Elkan, R., Egger, M., Kendrick, D., Dewey, M., Hewitt, M., Robinson, J., Blair, M., Williams, D., & Brummell, K. (2001) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.323.7315.719 · Cited by 489
Why, When and How to Adjust Your P Values?
Jafari, M., & Ansari‐Pour, N. (2019) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · doi:10.22074/cellj.2019.5992 · Cited by 542
Patel, V., Weobong, B., Weiss, H. A., Anand, A., Bhat, B., Katti, B., Dimidjian, S., Araya, R., Hollon, S. D., King, M., et al. (2017) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(16)31589-6 · Cited by 448
Bayesian statistical methods for genetic association studies
Stephens, M., & Balding, D. J. (2009) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2615 · Cited by 480
Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2019) · CHANCE · doi:10.1080/09332480.2019.1579573 · Cited by 474
Longer‐term primary prevention for alcohol misuse in young people: a systematic review
Foxcroft, D. R., Ireland, D., Lister‐Sharp, D. J., Lowe, G., & Breen, R. (2003) · Addiction · doi:10.1046/j.1360-0443.2003.00355.x · Cited by 433
WHO systematic review of randomised controlled trials of routine antenatal care
Carroli, G., Villar, J., Piaggio, G., Khan-Neelofur, D., Gülmezoglu, M., Mugford, M., Lumbiganon, P., Farnot, U., & Bersgjø, P. (2001) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(00)04723-1 · Cited by 435
Nobili, V., Vizzutti, F., Arena, U., Abraldeṣ, J. G., Marra, F., Pietrobattista, A., Fruhwirth, R., Marcellini, M., & Pinzani, M. (2008) · Hepatology · doi:10.1002/hep.22376 · Cited by 433
Biau, D. J., Kernéis, S., & Porcher, R. (2008) · Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research · doi:10.1007/s11999-008-0346-9 · Cited by 428
Effect of a Low-Intensity PSA-Based Screening Intervention on Prostate Cancer Mortality
Martin, R. M., Donovan, J., Turner, E. L., Metcalfe, C. D., Young, G., Walsh, E. I., Lane, J. A., Noble, S., Oliver, S. E., Evans, S., et al. (2018) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2018.0154 · Cited by 415
Self-citationCassar, S., Misso, M. L., Hopkins, W. G., Shaw, C. S., Teede, H. J., & Stepto, N. K. (2016) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/dew243 · Cited by 415
Lack of benefit of dietary advice to men with angina: results of a controlled trial
Burr, M. L., Ashfield-Watt, P. A. L., Dunstan, F. D. J., Fehily, A. M., Breay, P., Ashton, T., Zotos, P. C., Haboubi, N. A. A., & Elwood, P. C. (2003) · European Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601539 · Cited by 409
Bayes factors for genome‐wide association studies: comparison with P ‐values
Wakefield, J. (2008) · Genetic Epidemiology · doi:10.1002/gepi.20359 · Cited by 404
P-Value, a true test of statistical significance? a cautionary note
Dahiru, T. (2011) · Annals of Ibadan Postgraduate Medicine · doi:10.4314/aipm.v6i1.64038 · Cited by 390
Evolution of Reporting P Values in the Biomedical Literature, 1990-2015
Chavalarias, D., Wallach, J. D., Li, A. H. T., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2016) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2016.1952 · Cited by 370
Deforche, B. I., Dyck, D. V., Deliens, T., & Bourdeaudhuij, I. D. (2015) · International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity · doi:10.1186/s12966-015-0173-9 · Cited by 387
The Association Between Childhood Depression and Adulthood Body Mass Index
Pine, D. S., Goldstein, R. B., Wolk, S. I., & Weissman, M. M. (2001) · PEDIATRICS · doi:10.1542/peds.107.5.1049 · Cited by 371
Multiplicity in randomised trials I: endpoints and treatments
Schulz, K. F., & Grimes, D. A. (2005) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(05)66461-6 · Cited by 366
Lovegrove, R. E., Constantinides, V. A., Heriot, A. G., Athanasiou, T., Darzi, A. W., Remzi, F. H., Nicholls, R. J., Fazio, V. W., & Tekkis, P. P. (2006) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/01.sla.0000225031.15405.a3 · Cited by 364
Could Fisher, Jeffreys and Neyman Have Agreed on Testing?
Berger, J. O. (2003) · Statistical Science · doi:10.1214/ss/1056397485 · Cited by 348
Bench to Bedside: The Quest for Quality in Experimental Stroke Research
Dirnagl, U. (2006) · Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism · doi:10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600298 · Cited by 348
C-reactive protein and its role in metabolic syndrome: mendelian randomisation study
Timpson, N. J., Lawlor, D. A., Harbord, R. M., Gaunt, T. R., Day, I. N. M., Palmer, L. J., Hattersley, A. T., Ebrahim, S. B. J., Lowe, G. D. O., Rumley, A., et al. (2005) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(05)67786-0 · Cited by 345
Abraldeṣ, J. G., Villanueva, C., Bañares, R., Aracil, C., Catalina, M., García‐Pagán, J. C., & Bosch, J. (2007) · Journal of Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2007.10.008 · Cited by 343
Synthesising quantitative evidence in systematic reviews of complex health interventions
Higgins, J. P. T., López-López, J. A., Becker, B. J., Davies, S. R., Dawson, S., Grimshaw, J. M., McGuinness, L. A., Moore, T. H. M., Rehfuess, E. A., Thomas, J., et al. (2019) · BMJ Global Health · doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000858 · Cited by 322
Smith, G. D. (2011) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyr117 · Cited by 339
A Comprehensive Analysis of Deep Regression
Lathuilière, S., Mesejo, P., Alameda-Pineda, X., & Horaud, R. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2019.2910523 · Cited by 358
A tutorial on support vector machine-based methods for classification problems in chemometrics
Luts, J., Ojeda, F., de Plas, R. V., Moor, B. D., Huffel, S. V., & Suykens, J. A. K. (2010) · Analytica Chimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.aca.2010.03.030 · Cited by 336
The False-positive to False-negative Ratio in Epidemiologic Studies
Ioannidis, J. P. A., Tarone, R., & McLaughlin, J. K. (2011) · Epidemiology · doi:10.1097/ede.0b013e31821b506e · Cited by 321
Issues in the reporting of epidemiological studies: a survey of recent practice.
Pocock, S. J., Collier, T. J., Dandreo, K. J., de Stavola, B. L., Goldman, M. B., Kalish, L. A., Kasten, L. E., & McCormack, V. A. (2004) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.38250.571088.55 · Cited by 313
The earth is flat ( p > 0.05): significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research
Amrhein, V., Korner‐Nievergelt, F., & Roth, T. (2017) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.3544 · Cited by 331
Mining Electronic Health Records (EHRs): A Survey
Yadav, P., Steinbach, M., Kumar, V., & Simon, G. (2018) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3127881 · Cited by 299
Expected Value of Sample Information Calculations in Medical Decision Modeling
Ades, A. E., Lu, G., & Claxton, K. (2004) · Medical Decision Making · doi:10.1177/0272989x04263162 · Cited by 364
Patel, A., Laffan, M., Waheed, U., & Brett, S. J. (2014) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.g4561 · Cited by 292
The effect of smoking after surgery for Crohn’s disease: a meta-analysis of observational studies
Reese, G., Nanidis, T. G., Borysiewicz, C., Yamamoto, T., Orchard, T. R., & Tekkis, P. P. (2008) · International Journal of Colorectal Disease · doi:10.1007/s00384-008-0542-9 · Cited by 287
When Null Hypothesis Significance Testing Is Unsuitable for Research: A Reassessment
Szucs, D., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2017) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2017.00390 · Cited by 298
Reliability of transient elastography for the diagnosis of advanced fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C
Arena, U., Vizzutti, F., Abraldeṣ, J. G., Corti, G., Stasi, C., Moscarella, S., Milani, S., Lorefice, E., Petrarca, A., Romanelli, R. G., et al. (2008) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gut.2008.149708 · Cited by 279
Statistical Foundations for Model-Based Adjustments
Greenland, S., & Pearce, N. E. (2015) · Annual Review of Public Health · doi:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031914-122559 · Cited by 274
Kim, J. H., Kim, J. Y., Lee, J., Jeong, G. H., Lee, E., Lee, S., Lee, K. H., Kronbichler, A., Stubbs, B., Solmi, M., et al. (2020) · The Lancet Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(20)30312-6 · Cited by 258
The Primary Outcome Fails — What Next?
Pocock, S., & Stone, G. W. (2016) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra1510064 · Cited by 275
Calibration of an accelerometer during free-living activities in children
Mattocks, C., Leary, S. D., Ness, A., Deere, K. C., Saunders, J., Tilling, K. M., Kirkby, J., Blair, S. N., & Riddoch, C. (2007) · International Journal of Pediatric Obesity · doi:10.1080/17477160701408809 · Cited by 268
Type 2 Diabetes and Cancer: An Umbrella Review of Observational and Mendelian Randomization Studies
Pearson‐Stuttard, J., Papadimitriou, N., Markozannes, G., Cividini, S., Κακούρου, Α., Gill, D., Rizos, E. C., Monori, G., Ward, H. A., Kyrgiou, M., et al. (2021) · Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention · doi:10.1158/1055-9965.epi-20-1245 · Cited by 281
Kim, J. Y., Son, M. J., Son, C. Y., Radua, J., Eisenhut, M., Gressier, F., Koyanagi, A., Carvalho, A. F., Stubbs, B., Solmi, M., et al. (2019) · The Lancet Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(19)30181-6 · Cited by 271
The International Fitness Scale (IFIS): usefulness of self-reported fitness in youth
Ortega, F. B., Ruiz, J. R., España‐Romero, V., Vicente‐Rodríguez, G., Martínez‐Gómez, D., Μanios, Y., Béghin, L., Molnár, D., Widhalm, K., Moreno, L. A., et al. (2011) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyr039 · Cited by 300
Kaul, S., & Diamond, G. A. (2010) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2009.06.065 · Cited by 270
Comparison of colonic stenting and open surgery for malignant large bowel obstruction
Tilney, H. S., Lovegrove, R. E., Purkayastha, S., Sains, P., Weston-Petrides, G. K., Darzi, A. W., Tekkis, P. P., & Heriot, A. G. (2006) · Surgical Endoscopy · doi:10.1007/s00464-005-0644-1 · Cited by 264
Kelley, G. A., & Kelley, K. S. (2009) · Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.10.010 · Cited by 263
An umbrella review of the evidence linking oral health and systemic noncommunicable diseases
Botelho, J., Mascarenhas, P., Viana, J., Proença, L., Orlandi, M., Leira, Y., Chambrone, L., Mendes, J. J., & Machado, V. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-35337-8 · Cited by 308
Empirical Evaluation of Very Large Treatment Effects of Medical Interventions
Pereira, T. V., Horwitz, R. I., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2012) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2012.13444 · Cited by 257
The Importance of Replication in Wildlife Research
Johnson, D. H. (2002) · Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.2307/3802926 · Cited by 254
Metabolic equivalent of task (METs) thresholds as an indicator of physical activity intensity
Mendes, M. D. A., Crochemore‐Silva, I., Ramires, V. V., Reichert, F. F., Martins, R. C., Ferreira, R., & Tomasi, E. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0200701 · Cited by 279
False Alarms and Pseudo-Epidemics: The Limitations of Observational Epidemiology
Grimes, D. A., & Schulz, K. F. (2012) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0b013e31826af61a · Cited by 254
DeWerd, L. A., Ibbott, G. S., Meigooni, A. S., Mitch, M. G., Rivard, M. J., Stump, K. E., Thomadsen, B., & Venselaar, J. L. M. (2011) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1118/1.3533720 · Cited by 247
Improving the odds of drug development success through human genomics: modelling study
Hingorani, A. D., Kuan, V., Finan, C., Krüger, F. A., Gaulton, A., Chopade, S., Sofat, R., MacAllister, R. J., Overington, J. P., Hemingway, H., et al. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-54849-w · Cited by 252
Boon, M. H., & Thomson, H. (2020) · Research Synthesis Methods · doi:10.1002/jrsm.1458 · Cited by 247
Non-Replication and Inconsistency in the Genome-Wide Association Setting
Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2007) · Human Heredity · doi:10.1159/000103512 · Cited by 246
An umbrella review of the evidence associating diet and cancer risk at 11 anatomical sites
Papadimitriou, N., Markozannes, G., Kanellopoulou, A., Critselis, E., Alhardan, S., Karafousia, V., Kasimis, J. C., Katsaraki, C., Papadopoulou, A., Zografou, M. T., et al. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-24861-8 · Cited by 254
Cooper, B. S., Stone, S. P., Kibbler, C. C., Cookson, B., Roberts, J., Medley, G. F., Duckworth, G., Lai, R., & Ebrahim, S. B. J. (2003) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta7390 · Cited by 230
P Value and the Theory of Hypothesis Testing: An Explanation for New Researchers
Biau, D. J., Jolles, B. M., & Porcher, R. (2009) · Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research · doi:10.1007/s11999-009-1164-4 · Cited by 225
The Fragility Index in Multicenter Randomized Controlled Critical Care Trials*
Ridgeon, E. E., Young, P. J., Bellomo, R., Mucchetti, M., Lembo, R., & Landoni, G. (2016) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/ccm.0000000000001670 · Cited by 224
Tackle Injuries in Professional Rugby Union
Quarrie, K. L., & Hopkins, W. G. (2008) · The American Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1177/0363546508316768 · Cited by 223
Low statistical power in biomedical science: a review of three human research domains
Dumas-Mallet, E., Button, K. S., Boraud, T., Gonon, F., & Munafò, M. R. (2017) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.160254 · Cited by 208
Epigenome-wide Association Studies and the Interpretation of Disease -Omics
Birney, E., Smith, G. D., & Greally, J. M. (2016) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1006105 · Cited by 221
Metadata
- Authors
- Sterne, J. A. C.
- Affiliations
- University of Bristol (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Sterne, J. A C
- ORCID
- Sterne, J. A C
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2001-01-27
- Volume
- 322
- Issue
- 7280
- Pages
- 226-231
- ISSN
- 0959-8138 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC1119478
- OpenAlex
- W2025651303
- Cited by
- 1,466
- References
- 48
- Citations by year
- 2026: 48 · 2025: 64 · 2024: 75 · 2023: 63 · 2022: 63 · 2021: 82 · 2020: 72 · 2019: 82 · 2018: 75 · 2017: 79 · 2016: 74 · 2015: 48 · 2014: 56 · 2013: 50 · 2012: 53
- FWCI
- 45.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- BMJ (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
- Keywords
- statistical significance, p-values, publication bias, false positives, null hypothesis, evidence evaluation
- MeSH terms
- Bayes Theorem, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Humans, Research Design, Statistics as Topic, History, 20th Century
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review