Cited by 673Gestational Diabetes Research and ManagementPregnancy and Medication ImpactMaternal and Neonatal Healthcare

Perinatal mortality and congenital anomalies in babies of women with type 1 or type 2 diabetes in England, Wales, and Northern Ireland: population based study

Open access
Macintosh, Mary C M, Fleming, Kate M, Bailey, Jaron A, Doyle, Pat, Modder, Jo, Acolet, Dominique, Golightly, Shona, Miller, Alison·2006·BMJ

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To provide perinatal mortality and congenital anomaly rates for babies born to women with type 1 or type 2 diabetes in England, Wales, and Northern Ireland. DESIGN: National population based pregnancy cohort. SETTING: 231 maternity units in England, Wales, and Northern Ireland. PARTICIPANTS: 2359 pregnancies to women with type 1 or type 2 diabetes who delivered between 1 March 2002 and 28 February 2003. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Stillbirth rates; perinatal and neonatal mortality; prevalence of congenital anomalies. RESULTS: Of 2359 women with diabetes, 652 had type 2 diabetes and 1707 had type 1 diabetes. Women with type 2 diabetes were more likely to come from a Black, Asian, or other ethnic minority group (type 2, 48.8%; type 1, 9.1%) and from a deprived area (type 2, 46.3% in most deprived fifth; type 1, 22.8%). Perinatal mortality in babies of women with diabetes was 31.8/1000 births. Perinatal mortality was comparable in babies of women with type 1 (31.7/1000 births) and type 2 diabetes (32.3/1000) and was nearly four times higher than that in the general maternity population. 141 major congenital anomalies were confirmed in 109 offspring. The prevalence of major congenital anomaly was 46/1000 births in women with diabetes (48/1000 births for type 1 diabetes; 43/1000 for type 2 diabetes), more than double that expected. This increase was driven by anomalies of the nervous system, notably neural tube defects (4.2-fold), and congenital heart disease (3.4-fold). Anomalies in 71/109 (65%) offspring were diagnosed antenatally. Congenital heart disease was diagnosed antenatally in 23/42 (54.8%) offspring; anomalies other than congenital heart disease were diagnosed antenatally in 48/67 (71.6%) offspring. CONCLUSION: Perinatal mortality and prevalence of congenital anomalies are high in the babies of women with type 1 or type 2 diabetes. The rates do not seem to differ between the two types of diabetes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.38856.692986.ae

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [10]10. Confidential Enquiry into Maternal and Child Health. Maternity Services in 2002 for women with type 1 and type 2 diabetes, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. London: RCOG Press, 2004.
  2. [12]12. Confidential Enquiry into Maternal and Child Health. Stillbirth, neonatal and post-neonatal mortality 2000-2003, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. London: RCOG Press, 2005.
  3. [14]14. Bailar JC, Ederer F. Significance factors for the ratio of a Poissson variable to its expec- tation. Biometrics 1964;20:639-43.
  4. [27]27. Towner D, Kjos SL, Leung B, Montoro MM, Xiang A, Mestman JH, et al. Congenital anomalies in pregnancies complicated by NIDDM. Diabetes Care 1995;18:1446-51.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Macintosh, M. C. M., Fleming, K. M., Bailey, J. A., Doyle, P., Modder, J., Acolet, D., Golightly, S., & Miller, A.
Affiliations
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
Corresponding author
Macintosh, Mary C M
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2006-06-16
Volume
333
Issue
7560
Pages
177
ISSN
  • 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
  • 1468-5833
OpenAlex
W1975469422
Cited by
673
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 89 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 37 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 41 · 2012: 32
FWCI
44.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pregnancy and Medication Impact
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, perinatal mortality, congenital malformations, stillbirth, neural tube defects, congenital heart disease, prenatal diagnosis, pregnancy outcomes, ethnic minority women, socioeconomic deprivation, pregnancy cohort, England Wales Northern Ireland, diabetes in pregnancy, neonatal mortality
MeSH terms
Congenital Abnormalities, Adolescent, Adult, Child, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Gestational Age, United Kingdom, Humans, Infant Mortality, Infant, Newborn, Poverty, Pregnancy, Pregnancy in Diabetics, Pregnancy Outcome, Prevalence, Age of Onset, Stillbirth

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review