Cited by 173Bariatric Surgery and OutcomesBone health and osteoporosis researchBody Contouring and Surgery

Risk of fracture after bariatric surgery in the United Kingdom: population based, retrospective cohort study

Open access
Lalmohamed, A., de Vries, F., Bazelier, M. T., Cooper, A., van Staa, T.-P., Cooper, C., Harvey, N. C.·2012·BMJ

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To estimate fracture risk in patients receiving bariatric surgery versus matched controls. DESIGN: Population based, retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Use of records from the United Kingdom General Practice Research Database, now known as the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (from January 1987 to December 2010). PARTICIPANTS: Patients with a body mass index of at least 30, with a record of bariatric surgery (n=2079), and matched controls without a record (n=10,442). Each bariatric surgery patient was matched to up to six controls by age, sex, practice, year, and body mass index. Patients were followed from the date of bariatric surgery for the occurrence of any fracture. We used time dependent Cox regression to calculate relative rates of fracture, adjusted for disease and previous drug treatment, and time-interaction terms to evaluate fracture timing patterns. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Relative rates of any, osteoporotic, and non-osteoporotic fractures. RESULTS: Mean follow-up time was 2.2 years. Overall, there was no significantly increased risk of fracture in patients who underwent bariatric surgery, compared with controls (8.8 v 8.2 per 1000 person years; adjusted relative risk 0.89, 95% confidence interval 0.60 to 1.33). Bariatric surgery also did not affect risk of osteoporotic and non-osteoporotic fractures. However, we saw a trend towards an increased fracture risk after three to five years following surgery, as well as in patients who had a greater decrease in body mass index after surgery, but this was not significant. CONCLUSION: Bariatric surgery does not have a significant effect on the risk of fracture. For the first few years after surgery, these results are reassuring for patients undergoing such operations, but do not exclude a more protracted adverse influence on skeletal health in the longer term.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.e5085

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The RYGB subgroup lost more weight, had more cortical bone loss than GB or SG, and had declines in cortical load share estimated by finite element analysis.

    “The sub-group of RYGB patients lost more weight, had more cortical bone loss than those with GB or SG and had declines in cortical load share estimated by finite element analysis84.”
  • A UK retrospective cohort study found no significantly increased risk of fracture in 2079 bariatric surgery patients compared to 10442 matched controls.

    “A retrospective cohort study from the United Kingdom found no significantly increased risk of fracture in 2079 bariatric surgery patients compared to 10442 matched controls 84.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [40]Nakamura K, Haglind E, Clowes J, Achenbach S, Atkinson E, Melton LJ, et al. ENDO conference abstract: fracture risk after bariatric surgery. ENDO Conference, 2009.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lalmohamed, A., de Vries, F., Bazelier, M. T., Cooper, A., van Staa, T.-P., Cooper, C., & Harvey, N. C.
Affiliations
  • Utrecht University (NL)
  • Crawley Hospital (GB)
  • Southampton General Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Cooper, C.
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2012-08-03
Volume
345
Issue
aug03 1
Pages
e5085-e5085
ISSN
1756-1833 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1970277737
Cited by
173
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 4
FWCI
16.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • BMJ (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Body Contouring and Surgery
Keywords
bariatric surgery, fracture risk, osteoporotic fractures, body mass index, obesity, skeletal health, long-term outcomes
MeSH terms
Adult, Bone Resorption, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Male, Obesity, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Weight Loss, Bone Density, Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic, Body Mass Index, Proportional Hazards Models, Case-Control Studies, Treatment Outcome, Bariatric Surgery, Fractures, Bone, Osteoporotic Fractures

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review