Cited by 106Bariatric Surgery and OutcomesBone health and osteoporosis researchBody Contouring and Surgery

Fracture risk after gastric bypass surgery: a retrospective cohort study

Open access
Axelsson, Kristian F, Werling, Malin, Eliasson, Björn, Szabo, Eva, Näslund, Ingmar, Wedel, Hans, Lundh, Dan, Lorentzon, Mattias·2018·Journal of Bone and Mineral Research

Abstract

Gastric bypass surgery constitutes the most common and effective bariatric surgery to treat obesity. Gastric bypass leads to bone loss, but fracture risk following surgery has been insufficiently studied. Furthermore, the association between gastric bypass and fracture risk has not been studied in patients with diabetes, which is a risk factor for fracture and affected by surgery. In this retrospective cohort study using Swedish national databases, 38,971 obese patients undergoing gastric bypass were identified, 7758 with diabetes and 31,213 without. An equal amount of well-balanced controls were identified through multivariable 1:1 propensity score matching. The risk of fracture and fall injury was investigated using Cox proportional hazards and flexible parameter models. Fracture risk according to weight loss and degree of calcium and vitamin D supplementation 1-year postsurgery was investigated. During a median follow-up time of 3.1 (interquartile range [IQR], 1.7 to 4.6) years, gastric bypass was associated with increased risk of any fracture, in patients with and without diabetes using a multivariable Cox model (hazard ratio [HR] 1.26; 95% CI, 1.05 to 1.53; and HR 1.32; 95% CI, 1.18 to 1.47; respectively). Using flexible parameter models, the fracture risk appeared to increase with time. The risk of fall injury without fracture was also increased after gastric bypass. Larger weight loss or poor calcium and vitamin D supplementation after surgery were not associated with increased fracture risk. In conclusion, gastric bypass surgery is associated with an increased fracture risk, which appears to be increasing with time and not associated with degree of weight loss or calcium and vitamin D supplementation following surgery. An increased risk of fall injury was seen after surgery, which could contribute to the increased fracture risk. © 2018 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jbmr.3553

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A retrospective analysis found that Roux-en-Y gastric bypass was linked to increased risk of falls and fractures that escalated over time, and these risks were unrelated to amount of weight lost or presence of calcium and vitamin D supplementation.

    “investigators found not only that RYGB was linked to an increased risk of falls and fractures that escalated over time but also that these risks were unrelated to the amount of weight lost or the presence of calcium and vitamin D supplementation (36).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 39 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Guidry CA. Gastric bypass improves survival compared to propen- sity-matched. Am J Surg. 2015;209(3):463-7.
  2. Randolph JJ, Falbe K, Manuel AK, Balloun JL. A step-by-step guide to propensity score matching in R. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation. 2014;19(18):1-6. Available from: https://pareonline.net/ pdf/v19n18.pdf.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Axelsson, K. F., Werling, M., Eliasson, B., Szabo, E., Näslund, I., Wedel, H., Lundh, D., & Lorentzon, M.
Affiliations
  • Skaraborg Hospital (SE)
  • University of Gothenburg (SE)
  • Department of Surgery. Faculty of Medicine and HealthÖrebro UniversityÖrebroSweden
  • Örebro University (SE)
  • University of Skövde (SE)
  • Sahlgrenska University Hospital (SE)
Corresponding author
Lorentzon, Mattias
Venue
Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
Published
2018-07-16
Volume
33
Issue
12
Pages
2122-2131
ISSN
  • 0884-0431 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-4681
OpenAlex
W2884324039
Cited by
105
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1
FWCI
15.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Bone and Mineral Research (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Research fund
  • Sahlgrenska University Hospital
  • Swedish Research Council (VR)
  • Gustaf V:s och Drottning Victorias Frimurarstiftelse
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Body Contouring and Surgery
Keywords
gastric bypass, fracture risk, bariatric surgery, obesity, diabetes mellitus, fall-related injuries, weight loss, calcium supplementation, vitamin D supplementation, bone loss
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Gastric Bypass, Proportional Hazards Models, Case-Control Studies, Treatment Outcome, Fractures, Bone, Propensity Score

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review