Cited by 328Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifePatient Satisfaction in HealthcareMental Health and Patient Involvement

Maximising the impact of patient reported outcome assessment for patients and society

Open access
Calvert, Melanie, Kyte, Derek, Price, Gary, Valderas, Jose M, Hjollund, Niels Henrik·2019·BMJ

Abstract

Patient reported outcome measures can help drive global patient centred healthcare reform, but we need a more efficient coordinated approach to assessment if we are to fully realise benefits for patients and society, say Melanie Calvert and colleagues

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.k5267

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 39 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Hjollund NHI, Andersen T, Bjerrum A, etal . National implementation of clinical PRO in Denmark. Qual Life Res 2015;24:1-191.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Calvert, M., Kyte, D., Price, G., Valderas, J. M., & Hjollund, N. H.
Affiliations
National Institute for Health and Care Research (GB)
Corresponding author
Calvert, Melanie
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2019-01-24
Volume
364
Pages
k5267
ISSN
  • 1756-1833 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
OpenAlex
W2913465166
Cited by
328
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 63 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 50 · 2019: 21
FWCI
51.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • Open Research Exeter (University of Exeter) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Scopus (Elsevier) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • World Health Organization
  • University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
  • Cancer Research UK
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (PDF-2016-09-009)
  • University of Birmingham
  • Astellas Pharma
  • Surgical Reconstruction and Microbiology Research Centre
  • Medical Research Council
  • Instituto de Salud Carlos III
  • Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre
  • Health Data Research UK
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
Keywords
patient-reported outcome measures, patient-centered care, health care reform, patient engagement, social impact
MeSH terms
Patient Reported Outcome Measures, Data Systems, Confidentiality, Humans, Patient Participation, Quality of Health Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review