Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 3,054

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Factors associated with hospital admission and critical illness among 5279 people with coronavirus disease 2019 in New York City: prospective cohort study

Open access
Petrilli, Christopher M, Jones, Simon A, Yang, Jie, Rajagopalan, Harish, O’Donnell, Luke, Chernyak, Yelena, Tobin, Katie A, Cerfolio, Robert J, Francois, Fritz, Horwitz, Leora I·2020·BMJ

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Objective: To describe outcomes of people admitted to hospital with coronavirus disease 2019 (covid-19) in the United States, and the clinical and laboratory characteristics associated with severity of illness. Design: Prospective cohort study. Setting: Single academic medical center in New York City and Long Island. Participants: 5279 patients with laboratory confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-Cov-2) infection between 1 March 2020 and 8 April 2020. The final date of follow up was 5 May 2020. Main outcome measures: Outcomes were admission to hospital, critical illness (intensive care, mechanical ventilation, discharge to hospice care, or death), and discharge to hospice care or death. Predictors included patient characteristics, medical history, vital signs, and laboratory results. Multivariable logistic regression was conducted to identify risk factors for adverse outcomes, and competing risk survival analysis for mortality. Results: Of 11 544 people tested for SARS-Cov-2, 5566 (48.2%) were positive. After exclusions, 5279 were included. 2741 of these 5279 (51.9%) were admitted to hospital, of whom 1904 (69.5%) were discharged alive without hospice care and 665 (24.3%) were discharged to hospice care or died. Of 647 (23.6%) patients requiring mechanical ventilation, 391 (60.4%) died and 170 (26.2%) were extubated or discharged. The strongest risk for hospital admission was associated with age, with an odds ratio of >2 for all age groups older than 44 years and 37.9 (95% confidence interval 26.1 to 56.0) for ages 75 years and older. Other risks were heart failure (4.4, 2.6 to 8.0), male sex (2.8, 2.4 to 3.2), chronic kidney disease (2.6, 1.9 to 3.6), and any increase in body mass index (BMI) (eg, for BMI >40: 2.5, 1.8 to 3.4). The strongest risks for critical illness besides age were associated with heart failure (1.9, 1.4 to 2.5), BMI >40 (1.5, 1.0 to 2.2), and male sex (1.5, 1.3 to 1.8). Admission oxygen saturation of <88% (3.7, 2.8 to 4.8), troponin level >1 (4.8, 2.1 to 10.9), C reactive protein level >200 (5.1, 2.8 to 9.2), and D-dimer level >2500 (3.9, 2.6 to 6.0) were, however, more strongly associated with critical illness than age or comorbidities. Risk of critical illness decreased significantly over the study period. Similar associations were found for mortality alone. Conclusions: Age and comorbidities were found to be strong predictors of hospital admission and to a lesser extent of critical illness and mortality in people with covid-19; however, impairment of oxygen on admission and markers of inflammation were most strongly associated with critical illness and mortality. Outcomes seem to be improving over time, potentially suggesting improvements in care.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.m1966

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. 10.1001/jama.2020.2648 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1001/jama.2020.4344 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.15585/mmwr.mm6912e2 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.15585/mmwr.mm6913e2 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.0994 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.1017 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1001/jama.2020.1585 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.3346/jkms.2020.35.e132 · DOI
  9. 10.1056/NEJMoa2004500 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Popescu, 2019, Comparison of 3 Safety-Net Hospital Definitions and Association With Hospital Characteristics, JAMA Netw Open, 2, 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.8577 · DOI
  11. 10.2307/2290467 · DOI
  12. 10.1007/978-0-387-21706-2 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.2307/2347496 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.2307/2670170 · DOI
  15. 10.1214/aos/1176350951 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1056/NEJMoa050333 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1001/jama.2016.0291 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30167-3 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1086/315320 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1093/cid/cis211 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1056/NEJMra021333 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa254 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1016/j.trsl.2020.04.007 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1371/journal.pone.0121971 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1038/s41598-017-02660-w · DOI
  26. 10.1042/CS20180306 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1161/01.CIR.86.3.1046 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 3,054

Metadata

Authors
Petrilli, C. M., Jones, S. A., Yang, J., Rajagopalan, H., O’Donnell, L., Chernyak, Y., Tobin, K. A., Cerfolio, R. J., Francois, F., & Horwitz, L. I.
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2020-05-22
Volume
369
Pages
m1966
ISSN
1756-1833 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3028583791
Cited by
3,054
References
8
FWCI
81.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Factors associated with hospital admission and critical illness among 5279 people with coronavirus disease 2019 in New York City: prospective cohort study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.m1966
The paper
Petrilli, C. M., Jones, S. A., Yang, J., Rajagopalan, H., O’Donnell, L., Chernyak, Y., Tobin, K. A., Cerfolio, R. J., Francois, F., & Horwitz, L. I. (2020). Factors associated with hospital admission and critical illness among 5279 people with coronavirus disease 2019 in New York City: prospective cohort study. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m1966

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.