Cited by 297Food Security and Health in Diverse PopulationsNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorHealth disparities and outcomes

Large scale food retailing as an intervention for diet and health: quasi-experimental evaluation of a natural experiment

Open access
Cummins, Steven, Petticrew, Mark, Higgins, Cassie, Findlay, Anne, Sparks, Leigh·2005·Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the effect on fruit and vegetable consumption, self reported, and psychological health of a “natural experiment”—the introduction of large scale food retailing in a deprived Scottish community. Design: Prospective quasi-experimental design comparing baseline and follow up data in an “intervention” community with a matched “comparison” community in Glasgow, UK. Participants: 412 men and women aged 16 or over for whom follow up data on fruit and vegetable consumption and GHQ-12 were available. Main outcome measures: Fruit and vegetable consumption in portions per day, poor self reported health, and poor psychological health (GHQ-12). Main results: Adjusting for age, sex, educational attainment, and employment status there was no population impact on daily fruit and vegetable consumption, self reported, and psychological health. There was some evidence for a net reduction in the prevalence of poor psychological health for residents who directly engaged with the intervention. Conclusions: Government policy has advocated using large scale food retailing as a social intervention to improve diet and health in poor communities. In contrast with a previous uncontrolled study this study did not find evidence for a net intervention effect on fruit and vegetable consumption, although there was evidence for an improvement in psychological health for those who directly engaged with the intervention. Although definitive conclusions about the effect of large scale retailing on diet and health in deprived communities cannot be drawn from non-randomised controlled study designs, evaluations of the impacts of natural experiments may offer the best opportunity to generate evidence about the health impacts of retail interventions in poor communities.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/jech.2004.029843

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cummins, S., Petticrew, M., Higgins, C., Findlay, A., & Sparks, L.
Affiliations
  • University of London (GB)
  • MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit (GB)
  • University of Stirling (GB)
Corresponding author
Cummins, Steven
Venue
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2005-11-14
Volume
59
Issue
12
Pages
1035-1040
ISSN
  • 0141-7681 (ISSN-L)
  • 0143-005X
  • 1470-2738
OpenAlex
W2000812326
Cited by
297
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 30
FWCI
27.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
  • Stirling Online Research Repository (University of Stirling) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
Funders
  • University of Glasgow
  • Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
Keywords
fruit and vegetable intake, mental health, self-reported health, underserved areas, social intervention, food retail policy, natural experiment, GHQ-12, diet and health
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Diet, Diet Surveys, Feeding Behavior, Female, Food Services, Fruit, Health Status, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Scotland, Socioeconomic Factors, Vegetables, Health Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review