Cited by 35Obstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchSleep and related disordersRespiratory Support and Mechanisms

Autoadjusted versus fixed CPAP for obstructive sleep apnoea: a multicentre, randomised equivalence trial

Open access
Bloch, Konrad E, Huber, Fabienne, Furian, Michael, Latshang, Tsogyal D, Lo Cascio, Christian M, Nussbaumer-Ochsner, Yvonne, Senn, Oliver, Russi, Erich W +7 more·2018·Thorax

Abstract

Background: The obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSAS) is conventionally treated by continuous positive airway pressure set at a fixed level (fCPAP). Automatic mask pressure adjustment (autoCPAP) is increasingly used during home therapy. We investigated whether autoCPAP is equivalent to fCPAP in improving sleepiness in patients with OSAS in the long-term. Methods: In this multicentre equivalence trial, 208 patients with OSAS, with median Epworth sleepiness score (ESS) 13, apnoea/hypopnoea index 48.4/hour, were randomised to treatment with autoCPAP (5–15 mbar) or fCPAP (pressure set at the 90th percentile applied by autoCPAP during 2–4 weeks adaptation). Coprimary outcomes were changes in subjective and objective sleepiness from baseline to 2 years after treatment. Equivalence ranges were ±2 points in ESS and ±3 min sleep resistance time evaluated by recording responses to light signals. Results: At 2 years, in the intention to treat analysis, the reduction in sleepiness versus pretreatment baseline was similar in patients using autoCPAP (n=113, mean ESS-change −6.3, 95% CI −7.1 to −5.5; sleep resistance time +8.3 min, +6.9 to +9.7) and fCPAP (n=95, mean ESS-change −6.2, 95% CI −7.0 to −5.3; sleep resistance time +6.3 min, +4.7 to +7.8). The 95% CI of difference in ESS-reduction between autoCPAP and fCPAP was −0.9 to +1.4 and the 95% CI of difference in increase in sleep resistance time was −2.6 to +1.0 min. Blood pressure reduction and OSAS-related costs were similar between groups. Conclusions: AutoCPAP and fCPAP are equivalent within prespecified ranges in improving subjective and objective sleepiness in patients with OSAS over the course of 2 years. Costs of these treatments are similar. Trial registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00280800.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2016-209699

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The randomized equivalence trial of 208 sleepy patients by Bloch et al. comparing APAP with CPAP demonstrated ESS reductions of 6.3 and 6.2, respectively.

    “The randomized equivalence trial of 208 sleepy patients (mean ESS 13.1) by Bloch et al.1036 comparing APAP to CPAP demonstrated reductions of ESS scores of 6.3 and 6.2, respectively.”

    From International Consensus Statement on Obstructive Sleep Apnea (2023) · cites this paper as [1036]

    The Results report a randomized equivalence trial of 208 patients and mean ESS reductions of 6.3 points with autoCPAP and 6.2 with fixed CPAP at 24 months. However, the citing sentence’s baseline mean ESS of 13.1 is not supported: the trial table lists baseline means of 13.3 and 13.5 for the two groups, while the Abstract gives an overall median of 13. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Additional randomized controlled trials demonstrated similar reductions in sleepiness and improvements in quality-of-life measures with APAP.

    “Additional RCTs1036,1038 demonstrated similar findings in the reduction of sleepiness1036 and improvement in QOL measures.1039”

    From International Consensus Statement on Obstructive Sleep Apnea (2023) · cites this paper as [1036]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bloch, K. E., Huber, F., Furian, M., Latshang, T. D., Lo Cascio, C. M., Nussbaumer-Ochsner, Y., Senn, O., Russi, E. W., Kohler, M., Schoch, O. D., Turk, A., Imhof, E., Laube, I., Matthews, F., & Thurnheer, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Zurich (CH)
  • University Hospital Zurich (CH)
  • Kantonsspital St. Gallen (CH)
  • Triemli Hospital (CH)
  • Kantonsspital Münsterlingen (CH)
Corresponding author
Bloch, Konrad E
Venue
Thorax
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2017-10-05
Volume
73
Issue
2
Pages
174-184
ISSN
  • 0040-6376 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-3296
OpenAlex
W2763481489
Cited by
35
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4
FWCI
3.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Thorax (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Funders
  • Respironics Foundation
  • Lung League Zurich, Switzerland
  • Swiss National Science Foundation
  • Lunge League St. Gallen, Switzerland
  • Lunge League Thurgau, Switzerland
  • ResMed Switzerland
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
Keywords
obstructive sleep apnea, continuous positive airway pressure, daytime sleepiness, Epworth sleepiness score, blood pressure, treatment costs, equivalence
MeSH terms
Equivalence Trials as Topic, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Time Factors, Cohort Studies, Treatment Outcome, Sleep Apnea, Obstructive, Continuous Positive Airway Pressure, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review