Cited by 63Obstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchSleep and related disordersRespiratory Support and Mechanisms

Fixed-pressure CPAP versus auto-adjusting CPAP: comparison of efficacy on blood pressure in obstructive sleep apnoea, a randomised clinical trial

Open access
Pépin, J L, Tamisier, R, Baguet, J P, Lepaulle, B, Arbib, F, Arnol, N, Timsit, J F, Lévy, P·2016·Thorax

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Millions of individuals with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) are treated by CPAP aimed at reducing blood pressure (BP) and thus cardiovascular risk. However, evidence is scarce concerning the impact of different CPAP modalities on BP evolution. METHODS: This double-blind, randomised clinical trial of parallel groups of patients with OSA indicated for CPAP treatment compared the efficacy of fixed-pressure CPAP (FP-CPAP) with auto-adjusting CPAP (AutoCPAP) in reducing BP. The primary endpoint was the change in office systolic BP after 4 months. Secondary endpoints included 24 h BP measurements. RESULTS: Patients (322) were randomised to FP-CPAP (n=161) or AutoCPAP (n=161). The mean apnoea+hypopnoea index (AHI) was 43/h (SD, 21); mean age was 57 (SD, 11), with 70% of males; mean body mass index was 31.3 kg/m(2) (SD, 6.6) and median device use was 5.1 h/night. In the intention-to-treat analysis, office systolic blood pressure decreased by 2.2 mm Hg (95% CI -5.8 to 1.4) and 0.4 mm Hg (-4.3 to 3.4) in the FP-CPAP and AutoCPAP group, respectively (group difference: -1.3 mm Hg (95% CI -4.1 to 1.5); p=0.37, adjusted for baseline BP values). 24 h diastolic BP (DBP) decreased by 1.7 mm Hg (95% CI -3.9 to 0.5) and 0.5 mm Hg (95% CI -2.3 to 1.3) in the FP-CPAP and AutoCPAP group, respectively (group difference: -1.4 mm Hg (95% CI -2.7 to -0.01); p=0.048, adjusted for baseline BP values). CONCLUSIONS: The result was negative regarding the primary outcome of office BP, while FP-CPAP was more effective in reducing 24 h DBP (a secondary outcome). TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01090297.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2015-207700

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Additional randomized controlled trials demonstrated similar reductions in sleepiness and improvements in quality-of-life measures with APAP.

    “Additional RCTs1036,1038 demonstrated similar findings in the reduction of sleepiness1036 and improvement in QOL measures.1039”

    From International Consensus Statement on Obstructive Sleep Apnea (2023) · cites this paper as [1039]

    The PP analysis reports that quality of life improved equally in the AutoCPAP and fixed-pressure CPAP arms. The Introduction says CPAP reduces sleepiness, but the trial results in our copy do not report a reduction in sleepiness with AutoCPAP; that part of the attributed claim is not supported by this study. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Recent data suggest that the blood pressure reduction reported with APAP may not be as robust as with CPAP.

    “Recent data suggest that the blood pressure reduction reported with APAP may not be as robust with CPAP”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [1]1. Sleep on July 31, 2023 by guest. Protected by copyright. http://thorax.bmj.com/ Thorax: first published as 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2015-207700 on 18 April 2016. Downloaded from REFERENCES
  2. [42]42. Pépin JL, et al. Thorax 2016;71:726-733. doi:10.1136/thoraxjnl-2015-207700 Sleep on July 31, 2023 by guest. Protected by copyright. http://thorax.bmj.com/ Thorax: first published as 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2015-207700 on 18 April 2016. Downloaded from
  3. [51]51. Pépin JL, et al. Thorax 2016;71:726-733. doi:10.1136/thoraxjnl-2015-207700 733 Sleep on July 31, 2023 by guest. Protected by copyright. http://thorax.bmj.com/ Thorax: first published as 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2015-207700 on 18 April 2016. Downloaded from

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pépin, J. L., Tamisier, R., Baguet, J. P., Lepaulle, B., Arbib, F., Arnol, N., Timsit, J. F., & Lévy, P.
Affiliations
  • Inserm (FR)
  • Groupe Hospitalier Mutualiste de Grenoble (FR)
Corresponding author
Pépin, J L
Venue
Thorax
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2016-04-18
Volume
71
Issue
8
Pages
726-733
ISSN
  • 0040-6376 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-3296
OpenAlex
W2336233631
Cited by
63
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 1
FWCI
7.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Thorax (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
Agir pour les Maladies Chroniques
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
Keywords
obstructive sleep apnea, continuous positive airway pressure, blood pressure, 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure, cardiovascular risk, apnea-hypopnea index, medication adherence, lifestyle intervention, sleep-disordered breathing
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Blood Pressure, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Risk Factors, Body Mass Index, Polysomnography, Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory, Sleep Apnea, Obstructive, Continuous Positive Airway Pressure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review