Cited by 182Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesRelativity and Gravitational TheoryBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics

so (4) Plebanski action and relativistic spin-foam model

Open access
Pietri, R De, Freidel, L·1999·Classical and Quantum Gravity

Abstract

We study the correspondence between the `relativistic spin-foam' model introduced by Barrett, Crane and Baez and the so (4) Plebanski action. We argue that the so (4) Plebanski model is the continuum analogue of the relativistic spin-foam model. We prove that the so (4) Plebanski action possesses four phases, one of which is related to gravity and discuss the relation between this model and the model of Euclidean tetrad gravity. We also show that the so (4) Plebanski model possesses another natural discretization that can be associated with another, new, spin-foam model which appear to be the so (4) counterpart of the spin-foam model describing the self-dual formulation of gravity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0264-9381/16/7/303

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Reisenberger M 1998 Classical Euclidean general relativity from 'lefthanded area = righthanded area' Preprint gr-qc/9804061 · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pietri, R. D., & Freidel, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Parma (IT)
  • École Normale Supérieure de Lyon (FR)
Venue
Classical and Quantum Gravity
Published
1999-01-01
Volume
16
Issue
7
Pages
2187-2196
ISSN
  • 0264-9381 (ISSN-L)
  • 1361-6382
OpenAlex
W2071979448
Cited by
182
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 12
FWCI
5.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Classical and Quantum Gravity (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
Keywords
Barrett-Crane model, self-dual gravity, continuum limit, quantum gravity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review