Cited by 2Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaCosmology and Gravitation TheoriesStellar, planetary, and galactic studies

Implications of the Milky Way declining rotation curve

Open access
Moffat, J. W., Sharron, H., Toth, V. T.·2025·International Journal of Modern Physics D

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Almost all spiral galaxies have been observed to have flattening rotation curves. The new Gaia Data Release 3 (DR3) shows a Milky Way with a sharply Keplerian declining rotation curve, starting at [Formula: see text]16[Formula: see text]kpc and ending at 26.5[Formula: see text]kpc. The data reduce the total Milky Way mass by an order of magnitude, [Formula: see text], compared to the standard required dark matter halo mass, [Formula: see text]. Newtonian and MOdified Gravity (MOG) fits are applied to the Gaia DR3 rotation curve data. The fit obtained using MOG has a total mass of [Formula: see text], while the Newtonian fit predicts a mass of [Formula: see text]. These are in excess of the estimated visible baryon mass of the Milky Way, [Formula: see text]. It is possible that if the mass of the circumgalactic medium (CGM) plasma-gas continues to be confirmed experimentally, then the additional baryon mass required to account for the estimated total Milky Way mass could be attributed to the CGM hot plasma-gas halo.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1142/s0218271825500348

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Moffat et al. (2025) fit the Jiao et al. data with α_MOG = 13 and λ = 25 kpc, obtaining M_tot ≈ 1.3 × 10^11 M⊙, attributing the residual mass to the hot plasma of the circumgalactic medium (CGM).

    “Moffat et al. (2025) fit the Jiao et al. data with α MOG = 13 and λ = 25 kpc, obtaining M tot ≈ 1 . 3 × 10 11 M ⊙ , attributing the residual mass to the hot plasma of the circumgalactic medium (CGM).”

    From The rotation curve of the Milky Way: State of the art, the Keplerian decline debate, and implications for dark matter (2026) · cites this paper as Moffat et al. (2025)

    Section 3 reports a fit to the Jiao et al. data with M₀ = 1.34 × 10¹¹ M⊙, supporting the approximate mass, but gives α = 0.91 and μ = 0.0803 kpc⁻¹, not α_MOG = 13 or λ = 25 kpc. Section 4 says the excess mass could be dark matter or missing baryons, and treats an explanation involving hot CGM gas as a possibility rather than an established attribution. (LLM, conf=0.91)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 40

  1. Y. Sofue, M. Homma and T. Omodaka, PASJ,61, 227 (2009).
  2. A. C. Eilers et al., ApJ. J., 871, 120 (2019)
  3. P. Mróz et al., ApJ., 870, L10 (2019).
  4. Y. Jiao et al., A&A 678, A208 (2023).
  5. F. S. Labini et al., ApJ, 945, 3 (2023).
  6. Y. Zhou et al., ApJ., J., 946, 73 (2023)
  7. H.-F Wang et al., ApJ., 942, 12 (2023).
  8. X. Ou et al., MNRAS., 528, 693 (2023).
  9. Boylan-Kolchin et al., ApJ. 768. 140 (2013) arXiv:1210.6046. · arXiv
  10. P. R. Kafle et al., ApJ., 794, 59 (2014) arXiv:1408.1787. · arXiv
  11. J. W. Moffat, JCAP, 0603 004 (2006), arxiv:gr-qc/0506021 · arXiv
  12. J. W. Moffat, Eur. Phys. J. C, 80:906 (2020), arXiv:2001.00935. · arXiv
  13. D. Vokrouhlicky, D. Nesvorny and S. Tremaine, ApJ, No 1, 47 (2024).
  14. J. W. Moffat, JCAP, 05,079 (2024).
  15. J. Shull et al., ApJ, 759:23 (2012), arXiv:1112.2706. · arXiv
  16. M. Fukugita, C. J. Hogan and P. J. E. Peebles, ApJ, 503, 518 (1998).
  17. E. Coquery and A. Blanchard, arxiv:astro-ph.CO/2407.18846.
  18. S. S. McGaugh, ApJ, 609, 652 (2004).
  19. M. Milgrom, ApJ., 270, 365 (1983).
  20. J. N. Bregman et al., ApJ, 862, 3 (2018).
  21. J. R. Brownstein and J. W. Moffat, Mon Not. R. Astron. Soc., 382, 29 (2007), arXiv:astro-ph/0702146. · arXiv
  22. Yi Zhang, et al., ApJ., 911, 58 (2021).
  23. V. D'Odorico, Exp. Astron., 55, 209 (2022).
  24. J. P. Macquart, J. X. Prochaska and N. Tejos, Nature, 581, 391 (2020).
  25. M. E. Anderson and J. N. Bregman, ApJ., 714, 320 (2010).
  26. J. W. Moffat and S. Rahvar, Mon Not. R. Astron. Soc., 436, 1439 (2013), arXiv:1306.6383. · arXiv
  27. J. W. Moffat and S. Rahvar, Mon Not. R. Astron. Soc., 441, 3724 (2014), arXiv:1309.5077. · arXiv
  28. M. A. Green and J. W. Moffat, Physics of the Dark Universe, 25, 100323, arXiv:1905.09476. · arXiv
  29. Z. Davari and S. Rahvar, Mon Not. R. Astron. Soc., 496, 3502 (2020), arXiv:2006.06032. · arXiv
  30. N. Israel and J. W. Moffat, Galaxies, 6, 41 (2018), arXiv:1606.09128. · arXiv
  31. John W. Moffat and Viktor Toth, Universe, 2021, 358 (2021).
  32. J. Binney and S. Tremaine, Galactic Dynamics, Princeton University Press, New Jersey.
  33. de Salas et al., JCAP, 2019, 037 (2019).
  34. N. Locatelli et al., A&A., 681, A78 (2024).
  35. J. W. Moffat and V. T. Toth, MNRAS., 527, 2687 (2024).
  36. P. van Dokkum, Z. Shen and A. Romanowsky, Nature, 605, 435 (2022).
  37. E. Manera Pina et al., ApJ. Lett. 833, L33 (2019).
  38. J. W. Moffat and V. T. Toth, MNRAS., 482, L1 (2018).
  39. F. Hammer et al., ApJ., 662, 322 (2007).
  40. M. Haywood, P. D. Matteo and M. D. Lehnert, ApJ., 863, 113 (2018).

Authors
Moffat, J. W., Sharron, H., & Toth, V. T.
Affiliations
  • University of Waterloo (CA)
  • Perimeter Institute (CA)
Venue
International Journal of Modern Physics D
Published
2025-05-23
Volume
34
Issue
07n08
ISSN
  • 0218-2718 (ISSN-L)
  • 1793-6594
OpenAlex
W4409157519
Cited by
2
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1
FWCI
0.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • International Journal of Modern Physics D (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
  • Government of Canada
  • Industry Canada
  • Institut Périmètre de physique théorique
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Keywords
Milky Way rotation curve, halo mass, modified gravity, myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein, Gaia DR3, circumgalactic medium, baryon masses, spiral galaxies, galaxy mass

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review