Cited by 360Stellar, planetary, and galactic studiesGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies

In Disguise or Out of Reach: First Clues about In Situ and Accreted Stars in the Stellar Halo of the Milky Way from Gaia DR2

Open access
Haywood, M., Di Matteo, P., Lehnert, M. D., Snaith, O., Khoperskov, S., Gómez, A.·2018·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

We investigate the nature of the double color–magnitude sequence observed in the Gaia DR2 HR diagram of stars with high transverse velocities. The stars in the reddest-color sequence are likely dominated by the dynamically hot tail of the thick disk population. Information from Nissen & Schuster and from the APOGEE survey suggests that stars in the blue-color sequence have elemental abundance patterns that can be explained by this population having a relatively low star formation efficiency during its formation. In dynamical and orbital spaces, such as the “Toomre diagram,” the two sequences show a significant overlap, but with a tendency for stars on the blue-color sequence to dominate regions with no or retrograde rotation and high total orbital energy. In the plane defined by the maximal vertical excursion of the orbits versus their apocenters, stars of both sequences redistribute into discrete wedges. We conclude that stars that are typically assigned to the halo in the solar vicinity are actually both accreted stars lying along the blue sequence in the HR diagram, and the low rotational velocity tail of the old Galactic disk, possibly dynamically heated by past accretion events. Our results imply that a halo population formed in situ and responsible for the early chemical enrichment prior to the formation of the thick disk has yet to be robustly identified, and that what has been defined as the stars of the in situ stellar halo of the Galaxy may in fact be fossil records of its last significant merger.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3847/1538-4357/aad235

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The other very important contributor in the vicinity of the Sun to stars on halo-like orbits is the tail of the Milky Way thick disk.

    “The other very important contributor in the vicinity of the Sun to stars on halo-like orbits is the (tail of the) Milky Way thick disk (Gaia Collab. et al. 2018a, Haywood et al. 2018, Koppelman et al. 2018), as can be seen Figure 2a.”

    From Streams, Substructures, and the Early History of the Milky Way (2020) · cites this paper as Haywood et al. 2018

  • The second sequence in the color-magnitude diagram is populated by stars that are kinematically part of the tail of the thick disk.

    “However, the second sequence is populated by stars that, kinematically, are clearly part of the tail of the thick disk seen in Figure 5b (Di Matteo et al. 2019, Haywood et al. 2018).”

    From Streams, Substructures, and the Early History of the Milky Way (2020) · cites this paper as Haywood et al. 2018

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Belokurov, V., Erkal, D., Evans, N. W., Koposov, S. E., & Deason, A. J. 2018, arXiv:1802.03414 · arXiv
  2. Evans, D. W., Riello, M., De Angeli, F., et al. 2018, arXiv:1804.09368 · arXiv
  3. Gaia Collaboration, Brown, A. G. A., Vallenari, A., et al. 2018a, arXiv:1804.09365 · arXiv
  4. Gaia Collaboration, Babusiaux, C., van Leeuwen, F., et al. 2018b, arXiv:1804.09378 · arXiv
  5. Gaia Collaboration, Katz, D., Antoja, T., et al. 2018c, arXiv:1804.09380 · arXiv
  6. Koppelman, H. H., Helmi, A., & Veljanoski, J. 2018, arXiv:1804.11347 · arXiv
  7. Lallement, R., Capitanio, L., Ruiz-Dern, L., et al. 2018, arXiv:1804.06060 · arXiv
  8. Malhan, K., Ibata, R. A., & Martin, N. F. 2018, arXiv:1804.11339 · arXiv
  9. Posti, L., Helmi, A., Veljanoski, J., & Breddels, M. 2017, arXiv:1711.04766 · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Haywood, M., Di Matteo, P., Lehnert, M. D., Snaith, O., Khoperskov, S., & Gómez, A.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Korea Institute for Advanced Study (KR)
Corresponding author
  • Haywood, M.
  • Gómez, A.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2018-08-16
Volume
863
Issue
2
Pages
113
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2802061397
Cited by
360
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 54 · 2024: 49 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 55 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 9
FWCI
19.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Astrophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-15-CE31-0007)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Keywords
Milky Way stellar halo, thick disk, retrograde rotation, orbital energies, chemical enrichment, Gaia DR2, APOGEE

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review