The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A mathematical model of the finding of usability problems
Open accessAbstract
For 11 studies, we find that the detection of usability problems as a function of number of users tested or heuristic evaluators employed is well modeled as a Poisson process. The model can be used to plan the amount of evaluation required to achieve desired levels of thoroughness or benefits. Results of early tests can provide estimates of the number of problems left to be found and the number of additional evaluations needed to find a given fraction. With quantitative evaluation costs and detection values, the model can estimate the numbers of evaluations at which optimal cost/benefit ratios are obtained and at which marginal utility vanishes. For a “medium” example, we estimate that 16 evaluations would be worth their cost, with maximum benefit/cost ratio at four.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source doesn’t support the claim as written.
In the citing paper
“The recommended number of participants for usability testing is at least 10 people [14].”
From The PAediatric Risk Assessment (PARA) Mobile App to Reduce Postdischarge Child Mortality: Design, Usability, and Feasibility for Health Care Workers in Uganda (2016) · cites this paper as [14]
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Nevertheless, there is some consensus that usability tests may include a minimum of 5 participants per iteration and that approximately 80% of usability issues are discovered with as few as 4-6 participants [80].”
From Development and Evaluation of the Usefulness, Usability, and Feasibility of iNNOV Breast Cancer: Mixed Methods Study (2022) · cites this paper as [80]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“which meets the optimal requirement for detecting all usability problems [78]”
From Development and usability testing of a web-based and therapist-assisted coping skills program for managing psychosocial problems in individuals with hand and upper limb injuries: Mixed methods study (2020) · cites this paper as [78]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1993) · Cited by 9,879
Self-citation(1993) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2009-0-21512-1 · Cited by 5,552
Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces
Nielsen, J., & Molich, R. (1990) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems Empowering people - CHI '90 · doi:10.1145/97243.97281 · Cited by 3,533
Self-citationThe Usability Engineering Lifecycle
NIELSEN, J. (1993) · Usability Engineering · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-052029-2.50007-3 · Cited by 2,657
Self-citationNielsen, J. (1995) · Conference companion on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '95 · doi:10.1145/223355.223730 · Cited by 2,620
Self-citationIntroduction to Stochastic Processes
Toral, R., & Colet, P. (2014) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9783527683147.ch6 · Cited by 2,406
Nielsen, J. (1994) · Cited by 1,778
Self-citationRefining the Test Phase of Usability Evaluation: How Many Subjects Is Enough?
Virzi, R. A. (1992) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/001872089203400407 · Cited by 1,269
Finding usability problems through heuristic evaluation
Nielsen, J. (1992) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/142750.142834 · Cited by 1,139
Self-citationImproving a human-computer dialogue
Molich, R., & Nielsen, J. (1990) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/77481.77486 · Cited by 821
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- and Knowledge Based Systems. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers, 743-750.
- Nielsen, J. (1993). Iterative design of user interfaces. IEEE Computer 26 (to appear, probably in the July issue).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 1,000
Development of a Just-in-Time Adaptive mHealth Intervention for Insomnia: Usability Study
Pulantara, I. W., Parmanto, B., & Germain, A. (2018) · JMIR Human Factors · doi:10.2196/humanfactors.8905 · Cited by 43
Usability evaluation of an NHS library website
Ebenezer, C. (2003) · Health Information & Libraries Journal · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2532.2003.00450.x · Cited by 42
On the Advantages of a Systematic Inspection for Evaluating Hypermedia Usability
Angeli, A. D., Matera, M., Costabile, M. F., Garzotto, F., & Paolini, P. (2003) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1207/s15327590ijhc1503_01 · Cited by 42
Baumel, A., & Schueller, S. M. (2016) · JMIR Mental Health · doi:10.2196/mental.5335 · Cited by 41
Fromme, E. K., Kenworthy-Heinige, T., & Hribar, M. R. (2010) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-010-0905-y · Cited by 42
How many testers are needed to assure the usability of medical devices?
Borsci, S., Macredie, R. D., Martin, J. L., & Young, T. P. (2014) · Expert Review of Medical Devices · doi:10.1586/17434440.2014.940312 · Cited by 44
A Gamified Flexible Transportation Service for On-Demand Public Transport
Drakoulis, R., Bellotti, F., Bakas, I., Berta, R., Paranthaman, P. K., Dange, G. R., Lytrivis, P., Paglé, K., Gloria, A. D., & Amditis, A. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1109/tits.2018.2791643 · Cited by 43
Kapinga, A. F., Montero, C. S., & Mbise, E. R. (2019) · The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries · doi:10.1002/isd2.12073 · Cited by 52
Extension of heuristic evaluation method: a review and reappraisal
Ling, C., & Salvendy, G. (2005) · Ergonomia · Cited by 41
Designing an AI-Based Virtual Try-On Web Application
Marelli, D., Bianco, S., & Ciocca, G. (2022) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s22103832 · Cited by 40
Ten usability principles for the development of effective WAP and m‐commerce services
Condos, C., James, A. E., Every, P., & Simpson, T. (2002) · Aslib Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1108/00012530210452546 · Cited by 40
Making a difference---the impact of inspections
Sawyer, P., Flanders, A., & Wixon, D. R. (1996) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/238386.238579 · Cited by 40
Development of mHealth system for supporting self-management and remote consultation of skincare
Parmanto, B., Pramana, G., Yu, D. X., Fairman, A. D., & Dicianno, B. E. (2015) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-015-0237-4 · Cited by 39
A model for evaluating the security and usability of e-banking platforms
Alarifi, A., Alsaleh, M., & Alomar, N. (2017) · Computing · doi:10.1007/s00607-017-0546-9 · Cited by 39
Community heuristics for user interface evaluation of crowdsourcing platforms
Campo, S. À., Khan, V.-J., Papangelis, K., & Markopoulos, P. (2018) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2018.02.028 · Cited by 39
How do Practitioners Capture and Utilize User Feedback During Continuous Software Engineering?
Johanßen, J. O., Kleebaum, A., Bruegge, B., & Paech, B. (2019) · IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE) · doi:10.1109/re.2019.00026 · Cited by 39
Do patterns help novice evaluators? A comparative study
Lanzilotti, R., Ardito, C. A., Costabile, M. F., & Angeli, A. D. (2010) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2010.07.005 · Cited by 38
Supporting user-perceived usability benchmarking through a developed quantitative metric
Veral, R., & Macías, J. A. (2018) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2018.09.012 · Cited by 38
Usability testing of a monitoring and feedback tool to stimulate physical activity
van der Weegen, Verwey, R., Tange, H. J., Spreeuwenberg, M. D., & de Witte, L. (2014) · Patient Preference and Adherence · doi:10.2147/ppa.s57961 · Cited by 38
Usability of a metadata creation application for resource authors
Crystal, A., & Greenberg, J. (2005) · Library & Information Science Research · doi:10.1016/j.lisr.2005.01.012 · Cited by 38
Federici, S., Borsci, S., & Stamerra, G. (2009) · Cognitive Processing · doi:10.1007/s10339-009-0347-y · Cited by 38
Interaction Walkthrough: Evaluation of Safety Critical Interactive Systems
Thimbleby, H. W. (2007) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-69554-7_5 · Cited by 37
Gameful Design Heuristics: A Gamification Inspection Tool
Tondello, G. F., Kappen, D. L., Ganaba, M., & Nacke, L. E. (2019) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-22646-6_16 · Cited by 48
Silva, A. G., Caravau, H., Martins, A. I., Almeida, A. M., Silva, T., Ribeiro, Ó. M., Santinha, G. A. D. S., & Rocha, N. P. (2020) · JMIR Human Factors · doi:10.2196/22774 · Cited by 37
An olfactory display for virtual reality glasses
Guimarães, M. D. P., Martins, J. M., Dias, D. R. C., Guimarães, R. D. F. R., & Gnecco, B. B. (2022) · Multimedia Systems · doi:10.1007/s00530-022-00908-8 · Cited by 37
A usability evaluation of medical software at an expert conference setting
Bond, R., Finlay, D., Nugent, C., Moore, G., & Guldenring, D. (2013) · Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine · doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2013.10.006 · Cited by 37
‘R‐What?’ Development of a role‐based access control policy‐writing tool for e‐Scientists
Brostoff, S., Sasse, M. A., Chadwick, D. W., Cunningham, J. A., Mbanaso, U. M., & Otenko, S. (2005) · Software Practice and Experience · doi:10.1002/spe.691 · Cited by 37
Wolpin, S. E., Halpenny, B., Whitman, G. J., McReynolds, J., Stewart, M., Lober, W. B., & Berry, D. (2014) · Health Informatics Journal · doi:10.1177/1460458213495744 · Cited by 36
Jasin, J., Ng, H. T., Atmosukarto, I., Iyer, P., Osman, F., Wong, P. Y. K., Pua, C. Y., & Cheow, W. S. (2023) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-023-11602-1 · Cited by 43
Lin, Y. L., Guerguerian, A., Tomasi, J., Laussen, P. C., & Trbovich, P. (2017) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-017-0520-7 · Cited by 36
Gazing at Games: An Introduction to Eye Tracking Control
Sundstedt, V. (2012) · Synthesis lectures on computer graphics and animation · doi:10.2200/s00395ed1v01y201111cgr014 · Cited by 35
A User-Centered Approach to Evaluating Wayfinding Systems in Healthcare
Bubric, K., Harvey, G., & Pitamber, T. (2020) · HERD Health Environments Research & Design Journal · doi:10.1177/1937586720959074 · Cited by 35
Bernard, J., Daberkow, D., Fellner, D. W., Fischer, K., Koepler, O., Kohlhammer, J., Runnwerth, M., Ruppert, T., Schreck, T., & Sens, I. (2014) · International Journal on Digital Libraries · doi:10.1007/s00799-014-0134-y · Cited by 37
A Pilot Study on Usability Analysis of Emergency Department Information System by Nurses
Shapiro, J. S., Genes, N. G., Aguilar, M. V., Mohrer, D., Baumlin, K. M., Belden, J. L., & Kim, M. S. (2012) · Applied Clinical Informatics · doi:10.4338/aci-2011-11-ra-0065 · Cited by 36
Ray, J. M., Ratwani, R. M., Sinsky, C. A., Frankel, R. M., Friedberg, M. W., Powsner, S. M., Rosenthal, D. I., Wachter, R. M., & Melnick, E. R. (2019) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1093/jamia/ocz098 · Cited by 34
Browsing museum image collections on a multi-touch table
Ciocca, G., Olivo, P., & Schettini, R. (2011) · Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.is.2011.09.009 · Cited by 34
Eye tracking scanpath analysis on web pages
Eraslan, S., Yeşilada, Y., & Harper, S. (2016) · ACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications (ETRA) · doi:10.1145/2857491.2857519 · Cited by 35
NetVisia: Heat Map & Matrix Visualization of Dynamic Social Network Statistics & Content
Gove, R., Gramsky, N., Kirby, R., Sefer, E., Sopan, A., Dunne, C., Shneiderman, B., & Taieb‐Maimon, M. (2011) · International Conference on Social Computing · doi:10.1109/passat/socialcom.2011.216 · Cited by 34
How UX Practitioners Produce Findings in Usability Testing
Reeves, S. (2019) · ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction · doi:10.1145/3299096 · Cited by 34
Farrahi, R., Jeddi, F. R., Nabovati, E., Jabali, M. S., & Khajouei, R. (2019) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-019-0893-x · Cited by 34
Gerbaudo, R., Gaspar, R., & Lins, R. G. (2021) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-021-10537-9 · Cited by 43
Website Evaluation: A Usability-Based Perspective
Avouris, N. M., Tselios, N. K., Fidas, C. A., & Papachristos, E. (2003) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/3-540-38076-0_15 · Cited by 34
Usability Evaluation for Business Intelligence Applications: A User Support Perspective
Jooste, C., van Biljon, J. A., & Mentz, J. C. (2014) · South African Computer Journal · doi:10.18489/sacj.v53i0.198 · Cited by 34
What Communicates Quality to the Spatial Data Consumer?
Boin, A., & Hunter, G. (2008) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781420069273.sec5 · Cited by 34
Including the Human Factor in Dependability Benchmarks
Brown, A. B., Chung, L. C., & Patterson, D. A. (2002) · Cited by 34
Brinkley, J., & Tabrizi, N. (2017) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/1541931213601699 · Cited by 35
The building performance sketch
Donn, M., Selkowitz, S. E., & Bordass, B. (2012) · Building Research & Information · doi:10.1080/09613218.2012.655070 · Cited by 33
Rello, L., & Baeza-Yates, R. A. (2014) · International Web for All Conference (W4A) · doi:10.1145/2596695.2596697 · Cited by 33
Hearst, M. A., Laskowski, P., & Silva, L. (2016) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2858036.2858280 · Cited by 33
Heuristics for the Development and Evaluation of Educational Robotics Systems
Giang, C., Piatti, A., & Francesco Mondada, C. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Education · doi:10.1109/te.2019.2912351 · Cited by 33
Rudi, D., Kiefer, P., & Raubal, M. (2019) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140139.2019.1685132 · Cited by 33
Suen, A. O., Butler, R. A., Arnold, R. M., Myers, B. A., Witteman, H. O., Cox, C. E., Argenas, A., Buddadhumaruk, P., Bursic, A. E., Ernecoff, N. C., et al. (2019) · Journal of Critical Care · doi:10.1016/j.jcrc.2019.12.002 · Cited by 31
Loh, K. P., Sanapala, C., Watson, E., Jensen‐Battaglia, M., Janelsins, M. C., Klepin, H. D., Schnall, R., Culakova, E., Vertino, P. M., Susiarjo, M., et al. (2022) · Blood Advances · doi:10.1182/bloodadvances.2022007056 · Cited by 34
Schmettow, M., Vos, W. M., & Schraagen, J. M. (2013) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2013.04.007 · Cited by 33
Kamper, R. J. (2002) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2002.9669129 · Cited by 33
Taxonomy for building permit system - organizing knowledge for building permit digitalization
Fauth, J., Bloch, T., Noardo, F., Nisbet, N., Deac-Kaiser, S.-B. D.-K. S.-B., Gade, P. N., & Tekavec, J. (2023) · Advanced Engineering Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.aei.2023.102312 · Cited by 32
UVLHub: A feature model data repository using UVL and open science principles
Romero-Organvídez, D., Galindo, J. Á., Sundermann, C., Horcas, J.-M., & Benavides, D. (2024) · Journal of Systems and Software · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2024.112150 · Cited by 32
A prototype mobile application for triaging dental emergencies
Stein, C. D., Xiao, X. H., Levine, S., Schleyer, T., Hochheiser, H., & Thyvalikakath, T. P. (2016) · The Journal of the American Dental Association · doi:10.1016/j.adaj.2016.03.021 · Cited by 32
Lowry, P. B., Roberts, T., Dean, D. L., & Marakas, G. M. (2009) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00189 · Cited by 29
Baxter, S. L., Lander, L. I., Clay, B. J., Bell, J., Hansen, K., Walker, A., & Tai‐Seale, M. (2022) · Applied Clinical Informatics · doi:10.1055/s-0041-1742216 · Cited by 31
A comparison of methods currently used in inclusive design
Goodman-Deane, J., Ward, J., Hosking, I. M., & Clarkson, P. J. (2014) · Applied Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2013.11.005 · Cited by 33
The fine art of user-centered software development
Peischl, B., Ferk, M., & Holzinger, A. (2014) · Software Quality Journal · doi:10.1007/s11219-014-9239-1 · Cited by 31
Refactoring legacy AJAX applications to improve the efficiency of the data exchange component
Ying, M., & Miller, J. (2012) · Journal of Systems and Software · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2012.07.019 · Cited by 31
PerKApp: A general purpose persuasion architecture for healthy lifestyles
Maimone, R., Guerini, M., Dragoni, M., Bailoni, T., & Eccher, C. (2018) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2018.04.010 · Cited by 31
Monteiro-Guerra, F., Signorelli, G. R., Tadas, S., Zubiete, E. D., Rivera-Romero, O., Fernández-Luque, L., & Caulfield, B. (2020) · JMIR mhealth and uhealth · doi:10.2196/17552 · Cited by 31
McCall, T., Ali, M. O., Yu, F., Fontelo, P. A., & Khairat, S. (2021) · JMIR Formative Research · doi:10.2196/24393 · Cited by 31
An Evaluation Service for Digital Public Health Interventions: User-Centered Design Approach
Karpathakis, K., Libow, G., POTTS, H. W. W., Dixon, S., Greaves, F., & Murray, E. (2021) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/28356 · Cited by 31
Aldekhyyel, R. N., Almulhem, J. A., & Binkheder, S. (2021) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare9111574 · Cited by 36
Comparing usability testing outcomes and functions of six electronic nursing record systems
Cho, I., Kim, E., Choi, W. H., & Staggers, N. (2016) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.01.007 · Cited by 31
Introduction: Current Issues in Usability Evaluation
Lewis, J. R. (2001) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1207/s15327590ijhc1304_01 · Cited by 31
Keenan, H. L., Duke, S. L., Wharrad, H. J., Doody, G. A., & Patel, R. M. (2022) · Technical Innovations & Patient Support in Radiation Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.tipsro.2022.09.001 · Cited by 40
A semantically enhanced service repository for user-centric service discovery and management
Yu, J., Sheng, Q. Z., Han, J., Wu, Y., & Chengfei Liu, A. (2011) · Data & Knowledge Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.datak.2011.10.005 · Cited by 30
Building quality mHealth for low resource settings
Ettinger, K. M., Pharaoh, H., Buckman, R. Y., Conradie, H., & Karlen, W. (2016) · Journal of Medical Engineering & Technology · doi:10.1080/03091902.2016.1213906 · Cited by 36
Design and development of a gait training system for Parkinson’s disease
Garzo, A., Silva, P. A., Garay-Vitoria, N., Hernández, E., Cullen, S., Cock, V. C. D., Ihalainen, P., & Villing, R. C. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0207136 · Cited by 30
Stoll, J. A., Tashman, C. S., Edwards, W. K., & Spafford, K. L. (2008) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/1357054.1357217 · Cited by 30
Lai, T.-Y. (2007) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2007.05.007 · Cited by 30
Holtz, B., Murray, K. M. E., Hershey, D. S., Richman, J., Dunneback, J. K., Vyas, A. K., & Wood, M. A. (2017) · Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare · doi:10.1177/1357633x17745470 · Cited by 34
Challenges and resources for evaluating geographical IR
Martins, B., Silva, M. J., & Chaves, M. S. (2005) · Workshop on Geographic Information Retrieval (GIR) · doi:10.1145/1096985.1097001 · Cited by 30
Schütze, D., Holtz, S., Neff, M. C., Köhler, S. M., Schaaf, J., Frischen, L. S., Sedlmayr, B., & Müller, B. S. (2023) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-023-02245-w · Cited by 29
Hoffman, D. L., Kopalle, P. K., & Novak, T. P. (2009) · Cited by 29
Evaluation of XIS-Mobile, a Domain Specific Language for Mobile Application Development
Ribeiro, A., & da Silva, A. R. (2014) · Journal of Software Engineering and Applications · doi:10.4236/jsea.2014.711081 · Cited by 29
Development of a web-based user experience evaluation system for home appliances
Park, J., Han, S. H., Park, J., Park, J., Kwahk, J., Lee, M., & Jeong, D. Y. (2018) · International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2018.05.017 · Cited by 29
Coulter, R. W. S., Sang, J. M., Louth-Marquez, W., Henderson, E. R., Espelage, D. L., Hunter, S. C., DeLucas, M., Abebe, K. Z., Miller, E. P., Morrill, B. A., et al. (2019) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/12164 · Cited by 30
Shiells, K. R., Diaz-Baquero, A. A., Štěpánková, O., & Holmerová, I. (2020) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-020-01160-8 · Cited by 29
Fareed, N., Swoboda, C. M., Jonnalagadda, P., Griesenbrock, T., Gureddygari, H., & Aldrich, A. M. (2020) · Applied Clinical Informatics · doi:10.1055/s-0040-1714249 · Cited by 29
Hazard analysis for human-on-the-loop interactions in sUAS systems
Vierhauser, M., Islam, M. N. A., Agrawal, A., Cleland‐Huang, J., & Mason, J. (2021) · ACM Joint European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering (ESEC/FSE) · doi:10.1145/3468264.3468534 · Cited by 29
Akin, B. A., Bryson, S. A., Testa, M. F., Blasé, K. A., McDonald, T., & Melz, H. (2013) · Evaluation and Program Planning · doi:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2013.06.003 · Cited by 29
Development of interpretation keys for environmental product declarations
Steen, B., Gärling, A., Imrell, A. M., & Sanne, K. (2007) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2007.01.005 · Cited by 29
Vincent, C. A. (2010) · Patient Safety · doi:10.1002/9781444323856.ch12 · Cited by 29
Practical usability evaluation
Perlman, G. (1997) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/1120212.1120326 · Cited by 29
Kim, J. C., Saguna, S., & Åhlund, C. (2023) · JMIR Human Factors · doi:10.2196/42145 · Cited by 32
Usability assessment of ASIBOT: a portable robot to aid patients with spinal cord injury
Jardón, A., Gil, Á., de la Peña, A. I., Monje, C. A., & Balaguer, C. (2010) · Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology · doi:10.3109/17483107.2010.528144 · Cited by 28
Morley, S. (1998) · International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS) · doi:10.1145/274497.274527 · Cited by 28
The characteristics of usable room temperature control
Karjalainen, S. (2008) · Aaltodoc (Aalto University) · Cited by 28
Nitsch, M., Adamcik, T., Kuso, S., Zeiler, M. D., & Waldherr, K. (2019) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu11040713 · Cited by 28
An Approach Based on VR to Design Industrial Human-Robot Collaborative Workstations
Prati, E., Villani, V., Peruzzini, M., & Sabattini, L. (2021) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app112411773 · Cited by 27
Augmented Reality in Radiology for Education and Training—A Design Study
Raith, M. A., Kamp, C., Stoiber, C., Jakl, A., & Wagner, M. (2022) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare10040672 · Cited by 27
Enhanced browsing in digital libraries: three new approaches to browsing in Greenstone
McKay, D., Shukla, P., Hunt, R., & Cunningham, S. J. (2004) · International Journal on Digital Libraries · doi:10.1007/s00799-004-0088-6 · Cited by 31
Mulas, F., Carta, S., Pilloni, P., & Manca, M. (2011) · International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology (ACE) · doi:10.1145/2071423.2071510 · Cited by 27
Multimodal immersive digital twin platform for cyber–physical robot fleets in nuclear environments
Baniqued, P. D. E., Bremner, P., Sandison, M., Harper, S. T., Agrawal, S., Bolarinwa, J., Blanche, J. R. D., Jiang, Z., Johnson, T., Mitchell, D., et al. (2024) · Journal of Field Robotics · doi:10.1002/rob.22329 · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Nielsen, J., & Landauer, T. K.
- ORCID
- Nielsen, Jakob
- Venue
- Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '93
- Publisher
- ACM Press
- Published
- 1993
- Pages
- 206-213
- OpenAlex
- W2099473180
- Cited by
- 1,961
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2026: 110 · 2025: 125 · 2024: 123 · 2023: 121 · 2022: 128 · 2021: 129 · 2020: 108 · 2019: 92 · 2018: 93 · 2017: 96 · 2016: 82 · 2015: 92 · 2014: 76 · 2013: 76 · 2012: 65
- FWCI
- 6.58
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
- Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
- Keywords
- usability evaluation, heuristic evaluation, Poisson process model, evaluation planning, user testing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
