The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A mathematical model of the finding of usability problems
Open accessAbstract
For 11 studies, we find that the detection of usability problems as a function of number of users tested or heuristic evaluators employed is well modeled as a Poisson process. The model can be used to plan the amount of evaluation required to achieve desired levels of thoroughness or benefits. Results of early tests can provide estimates of the number of problems left to be found and the number of additional evaluations needed to find a given fraction. With quantitative evaluation costs and detection values, the model can estimate the numbers of evaluations at which optimal cost/benefit ratios are obtained and at which marginal utility vanishes. For a “medium” example, we estimate that 16 evaluations would be worth their cost, with maximum benefit/cost ratio at four.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source doesn’t support the claim as written.
In the citing paper
“The recommended number of participants for usability testing is at least 10 people [14].”
From The PAediatric Risk Assessment (PARA) Mobile App to Reduce Postdischarge Child Mortality: Design, Usability, and Feasibility for Health Care Workers in Uganda (2016) · cites this paper as [14]
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Nevertheless, there is some consensus that usability tests may include a minimum of 5 participants per iteration and that approximately 80% of usability issues are discovered with as few as 4-6 participants [80].”
From Development and Evaluation of the Usefulness, Usability, and Feasibility of iNNOV Breast Cancer: Mixed Methods Study (2022) · cites this paper as [80]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“which meets the optimal requirement for detecting all usability problems [78]”
From Development and usability testing of a web-based and therapist-assisted coping skills program for managing psychosocial problems in individuals with hand and upper limb injuries: Mixed methods study (2020) · cites this paper as [78]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1993) · Cited by 9,879
Self-citation(1993) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2009-0-21512-1 · Cited by 5,552
Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces
Nielsen, J., & Molich, R. (1990) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems Empowering people - CHI '90 · doi:10.1145/97243.97281 · Cited by 3,533
Self-citationThe Usability Engineering Lifecycle
NIELSEN, J. (1993) · Usability Engineering · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-052029-2.50007-3 · Cited by 2,657
Self-citationNielsen, J. (1995) · Conference companion on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '95 · doi:10.1145/223355.223730 · Cited by 2,620
Self-citationIntroduction to Stochastic Processes
Toral, R., & Colet, P. (2014) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9783527683147.ch6 · Cited by 2,406
Nielsen, J. (1994) · Cited by 1,778
Self-citationRefining the Test Phase of Usability Evaluation: How Many Subjects Is Enough?
Virzi, R. A. (1992) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/001872089203400407 · Cited by 1,269
Finding usability problems through heuristic evaluation
Nielsen, J. (1992) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/142750.142834 · Cited by 1,139
Self-citationImproving a human-computer dialogue
Molich, R., & Nielsen, J. (1990) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/77481.77486 · Cited by 821
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- and Knowledge Based Systems. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers, 743-750.
- Nielsen, J. (1993). Iterative design of user interfaces. IEEE Computer 26 (to appear, probably in the July issue).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–500 of 1,000
Designing an e-commerce site for users
Kubilus, N. J. (2000) · XRDS Crossroads The ACM Magazine for Students · doi:10.1145/351092.351099 · Cited by 20
Investigating user identification in remote patient monitoring devices
Ondiege, B., & Clarke, M. (2017) · Bioengineering · doi:10.3390/bioengineering4030076 · Cited by 19
Testing in Translation: Conducting Usability Studies With Transnational Users
Rose, E., & Racadio, R. (2021) · Purdue e-Pubs (Purdue University System) · Cited by 19
Tomasi, J., Warren, C., Kolodzey, L., Pinkney, S. J., Guerguerian, A., Kirsch, R. E., Hubbert, J., Sperling, C., Sutton, P., Laussen, P. C., et al. (2018) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023691 · Cited by 20
Sandhu, H. S., Wilson, K. E., Reed, N. P., & Mihailidis, A. (2019) · JMIR Human Factors · doi:10.2196/12135 · Cited by 19
Usability of Mobile Assisted Language Learning App
Ishaq, K., Azan, N., Rosdi, F., Abid, A., & Ali, Q. (2020) · International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications · doi:10.14569/ijacsa.2020.0110145 · Cited by 19
In-Visible Island: Inclusive Storytelling Platform for Visually Impaired Children
Talib, R. I. A., Nikolić, P. K., Sunar, M. S., & Prada, R. (2020) · Mobile Networks and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11036-020-01515-5 · Cited by 19
Burn, A., Ford, T. J., Štochl, J., Jones, P. B., Pérez, J., & Anderson, J. (2022) · JMIR Formative Research · doi:10.2196/30565 · Cited by 19
Meyer, J. T., Tanczak, N., Kanzler, C. M., Pelletier, C., Gassert, R., & Lambercy, O. (2023) · Wearable Technologies · doi:10.1017/wtc.2022.31 · Cited by 19
Rojas, A. N., de Torres, L. Á. P., Mosquera, F. E. C., & Molina‐Recio, G. (2023) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2023.105089 · Cited by 17
Pfautz, J., & Roth, E. M. (2006) · International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2006.01.004 · Cited by 19
Virtual Homage to the Dead: An Analysis of Digital Memorials in the Social Web
Lopes, A. D., Maciel, C. D. O., & Pereira, V. C. (2014) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-07632-4_7 · Cited by 19
Heuristic evaluation on Augmented Reality courseware for the deaf
Zainuddin, N. M. M., Zaman, H. B., & Ahmad, A. (2011) · International Conference on User Science and Engineering · doi:10.1109/iuser.2011.6150562 · Cited by 19
Pande, T., Saravu, K., Temesgen, Z., Seyoum, A., Rai, S., Rao, R. K., Mahadev, D., Pai, M., & Gagnon, M. (2017) · mHealth · doi:10.21037/mhealth.2017.07.01 · Cited by 17
Grossi, M. G. R., Elias, M. C. A. D. S., Chamon, C. M., & Leal, D. C. C. C. (2018) · International Journal of Information and Education Technology · doi:10.18178/ijiet.2018.8.7.1091 · Cited by 19
Determining fidelity of mixed prototypes: Effect of media and physical interaction
Zhou, X., & Rau, P. P. (2019) · Applied Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2019.05.007 · Cited by 19
Evaluating Aspects of Usability in Video Game-Based Programming Learning Platforms
Díaz, J., Arango‐López, J., Sepúlveda, S., Villegas, G., Ahumada, D., & Moreira, F. (2021) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2021.01.141 · Cited by 19
Alaoui, M., & Lewkowicz, M. (2015) · IRBM · doi:10.1016/j.irbm.2015.06.002 · Cited by 17
Developing A Model for Supporting Quality in Restaurant Websites
Stockdale, R., & Borovicka, M. (2007) · Journal of Foodservice Business Research · doi:10.1300/j369v10n01_04 · Cited by 19
Turner‐Bowker, D. M., Saris-Baglama, R. N., DeRosa, M. A., Paulsen, C. A., & Bransfield, C. P. (2009) · Patient · doi:10.2165/11313840-000000000-00000 · Cited by 19
Mixed Prototyping for Products Usability Evaluation
Bruno, F., Cosco, F., Angilica, A., & Muzzupappa, M. (2010) · doi:10.1115/detc2010-28841 · Cited by 19
Ma, X., Li, Y., Forlizzi, J., & Dow, S. P. (2015) · ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1145/2675133.2675174 · Cited by 19
Low-Cost Rapid Usability Testing for health information systems: is it worth the effort?
Baylis, T. B., Kushniruk, A. W., & Borycki, E. M. (2012) · PubMed · Cited by 19
A framework to explore results in multiple media information aggregated search
Rashid, U., & Bhatti, M. A. (2017) · Multimedia Tools and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11042-017-4769-8 · Cited by 18
Learn from your environment: A visual literacy learning model
Guinibert, M. (2020) · Australasian Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.14742/ajet.5200 · Cited by 18
Reading Born-Digital Scholarship: A Study of Webtext User Experience
Tham, J. C. K., & Grace, R. (2020) · Computers & composition/Computers and composition · doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2020.102601 · Cited by 18
Lukkanalikitkul, E., Kongpetch, S., Chotmongkol, W., Morley, M., Anutrakulchai, S., Srichan, C., Thinkhamrop, B., Chunghom, T., Wiangnon, P., Thinkhamrop, W., et al. (2022) · JMIR Formative Research · doi:10.2196/37291 · Cited by 18
Almeqbaali, M., Ouhbi, S., Serhani, M. A., Amiri, L., Jan, R. K., Zaki, N., Sharaf, A., Helali, A. A., & Almheiri, E. (2022) · JMIR Serious Games · doi:10.2196/36936 · Cited by 18
Alfonso, I., Garcés, K., Castro, H. E., & Cabot, J. (2023) · Computing · doi:10.1007/s00607-022-01145-7 · Cited by 18
Koo, Y., Kim, E., Jo, Y., & Nam, I. (2023) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers15082265 · Cited by 18
Research of Virtools Virtual Reality Technology to Landscape Designing
Chen, H. (2015) · The Open Construction and Building Technology Journal · doi:10.2174/1874836801509010164 · Cited by 18
Figueroa, A. M., Cisnero, M. D. L. A. Q., & Juárez‐Ramírez, R. (2016) · International Conference in Software Engineering Research and Innovation (CONISOFT) · doi:10.1109/conisoft.2016.36 · Cited by 18
Gyllensten, I. C., Crundall-Goode, A., Aarts, R. M., & Goode, K. M. (2017) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-016-0398-9 · Cited by 17
Schiro, J., Sylvia Pelayo, A., Martinot, A., Dubos, F., Beuscart-Zéphir, M.-C., & Marcilly, R. (2020) · JMIR Human Factors · doi:10.2196/18427 · Cited by 18
Introducing item response theory for measuring usability inspection processes
Schmettow, M., & Vietze, W. (2008) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/1357054.1357196 · Cited by 18
Weak inter-rater reliability in heuristic evaluation of video games
White, G. R., Mirza-Babaei, P., McAllister, G., & Good, J. (2011) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/1979742.1979788 · Cited by 18
van Lieshout, R., Pisters, M. F., Vanwanseele, B., de Bie, R. A., Wouters, E., & Stukstette, M. J. P. M. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0165199 · Cited by 18
Pantazos, K., & Vatrapu, R. (2016) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.1109/hicss.2016.14 · Cited by 18
An Agile Approach to Improve the Usability of a Physical Telerehabilitation Platform
Pilco, H., Sánchez-Gordón, S., Calle-Jiménez, T., Pérez-Medina, J.-L., Rybarczyk, Y. P., Jadán-Guerrero, J. L., Guevara, C., & Nunes, I. L. (2019) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app9030480 · Cited by 18
Baravalle, A., & Lanfranchi, V. (2003) · Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers · doi:10.3758/bf03195512 · Cited by 18
Information Therapy in Digital Libraries
Theng, Y. L. (2002) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/3-540-36227-4_53 · Cited by 18
Not Just a Hammer: When and How to Employ Multiple Methods in Usability Programs
Rosenbaum, S. (2000) · Cited by 18
Guay, M., Labbé, M., Séguin‐Tremblay, N., Auger, C., Goyer, G., Veloza, E., Chevalier, N., Polgar, J. M., & Michaud, F. (2021) · JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies · doi:10.2196/24669 · Cited by 17
Design and Evaluation of a Head-Worn Display Application for Multi-Patient Monitoring
Kuge, J., Grundgeiger, T., Schlosser, P. D., Sanderson, P. M., & Happel, O. (2021) · Designing Interactive Systems Conference · doi:10.1145/3461778.3462011 · Cited by 17
Reichold, M., Heß, M., Kolominsky‐Rabas, P. L., Graessel, E., & Prokosch, H. (2021) · JMIR Formative Research · doi:10.2196/31649 · Cited by 17
LoCastro, M., Sanapala, C., Wang, Y., Jensen‐Battaglia, M., Wittink, M. N., Norton, S. A., Klepin, H. D., Richardson, D. R., Mendler, J. H., Liesveld, J. L., et al. (2022) · Cancer Medicine · doi:10.1002/cam4.5547 · Cited by 17
Interactive AR Applications for Nonspeaking Autistic People? - A Usability Study
Nazari, A., Shahidi, A., Kaufman, K. M., Bondi, J. E., Alabood, L., Jaswal, V. K., Krishnamurthy, D., & Wang, M. (2023) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3544548.3580721 · Cited by 17
Backtracking Events as Indicators of Usability Problems in Creation-Oriented Applications
Akers, D. L., Jeffries, R., Simpson, M. R., & Winograd, T. A. (2012) · ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction · doi:10.1145/2240156.2240164 · Cited by 17
Usability Testing and the Relation of Clinical Information Systems to Patient Safety
Rogers, M. L., Patterson, E. S., Chapman, R. J., & Render, M. L. (2005) · Cited by 17
The design of a hybrid cultural model for Arabic gamified systems
Alomar, N., Wanick, V., & Wills, G. B. (2016) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.045 · Cited by 17
PERBANDINGAN METODE EVALUASI USABILITY (STUDI KASUS : PENGGUNAAN PERANGKAT SMARTPHONE)
Hendradewa, A. P. (2017) · Teknoin · doi:10.20885/teknoin.vol23.iss1.art2 · Cited by 17
Toward Usability Problem Identification Based on User Emotions Derived from Facial Expressions
Johanßen, J. O., Bernius, J. P., & Bruegge, B. (2019) · IEEE/ACM International Workshop on Emotion Awareness in Software Engineering (SEmotion) · doi:10.1109/semotion.2019.00008 · Cited by 17
Pamparău, C., & Vatavu, R.-D. (2021) · Multimedia Tools and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11042-020-10164-5 · Cited by 20
Presenting Multiple Drug Alerts in an Ambulatory Electronic Prescribing System
Weinger, M. B., Gregg, W. M., Johnson, K. B., & Xie, M. (2014) · Applied Clinical Informatics · doi:10.4338/aci-2013-10-ra-0092 · Cited by 17
IMPROVEMENT OF A LECTURE GAME CONCEPT - Implementing Lecture Quiz 2.0
(2011) · Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Computer Supported Education · doi:10.5220/0003331300260035 · Cited by 17
Toward unified models in user-centered and object-oriented design
Hudson, W. H. (2001) · Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc. eBooks · Cited by 17
Sambhanthan, A., & Good, A. (2012) · International Journal of Knowledge-Based Organizations · doi:10.4018/ijkbo.2012040101 · Cited by 20
The Impact of Causal Attributions on System Evaluation in Usability Tests
Niels, A., Guczka, S. R., & Janneck, M. (2016) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2858036.2858471 · Cited by 16
Chia, A., Chew, M. N. J. S., Tan, S. Y. X., Chan, M. J., Colega, M., Toh, J. Y., Padmapriya, N., Lança, C., Shek, L. P., Saw, S., et al. (2021) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/25794 · Cited by 16
Ceccarini, C., Mirri, S., & Prandi, C. (2022) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s22093361 · Cited by 16
Older adults’ satisfaction with mHealth UI design-based culture: A case study of Jordan
Alsswey, A., Al‐Samarraie, H., & Malak, M. Z. (2022) · Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment · doi:10.1080/10911359.2022.2074183 · Cited by 16
Yōkobo: A Robot to Strengthen Links Amongst Users with Non-Verbal Behaviours
Capy, S., Osorio, P., Hagane, S., Aznar, C., Garcin, D., Coronado, E., Deuff, D., Ocnarescu, I., Milleville-Pennel, I., & Venture, G. (2022) · Machines · doi:10.3390/machines10080708 · Cited by 16
The Design of a Mobile Portion Size Estimation Interface for a Low Literacy Population
Chaudry, B., Connelly, K., Siek, K. A., & Welch, J. L. (2011) · International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare · doi:10.4108/icst.pervasivehealth.2011.246113 · Cited by 18
A usability study of two formats of a shortened systematic review for clinicians
Perrier, L., Kealey, M. R., & Straus, S. E. (2014) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005919 · Cited by 16
Bradford, S., & Rickwood, D. (2014) · Journal of Technology in Human Services · doi:10.1080/15228835.2014.967906 · Cited by 17
Mateo, K. F., Berner, N. B., Ricci, N. L., Seekaew, P., Sikerwar, S., Tenner, C. T., Dognin, J. S., Sherman, S. E., Kalet, A. L., & Jay, M. R. (2018) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-018-2834-2 · Cited by 14
Zheng, H., Rosal, M. C., Li, W., Borg, A., Yang, W., Ayers, D. C., & Franklin, P. D. (2018) · JMIR Human Factors · doi:10.2196/humanfactors.8568 · Cited by 16
Ghalibaf, A. K., Jangi, M., Habibi, M. R. M., Zangouei, S., & Khajouei, R. (2018) · Electronic physician · doi:10.19082/6682 · Cited by 16
Ouyang, X., & Zhou, J. (2018) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2018.1534346 · Cited by 21
Designing an intuitive web application for drug discovery scientists.
Karamanis, N., Pignatelli, M., Carvalho-Silva, D., Rowland, F., Cham, J. A., & Dunham, I. (2018) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2018.01.032 · Cited by 10
Factors Influencing Usability of Rehabilitation Robotic Devices for Lower Limbs
Kim, T. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12020598 · Cited by 16
Martín, M., & Macías, J. A. (2022) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2022.2041885 · Cited by 19
Angelo, J., & Wilson, L. S. (2014) · Occupational Therapy International · doi:10.1002/oti.1367 · Cited by 16
Using Quality Dimensions in the Evaluation of Websites
Stockdale, R., & Borovicka, M. (2007) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/3-211-32710-x_45 · Cited by 16
Incremental user-interface development for interactive multiobjective optimization
Tarkkanen, S., Miettinen, K., Hakanen, J., & Isomäki, H. (2012) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2012.12.035 · Cited by 16
An embodied music cognition approach to multilevel interactive sonification
Diniz, N. C. D. S., Coussement, P., Deweppe, A., Demey, M., & Leman, M. (2012) · Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces · doi:10.1007/s12193-011-0084-2 · Cited by 16
Better discount evaluation: illustrating how critical parameters support heuristic creation
Somervell, J. P., & McCrickard, D. S. (2005) · Interacting with Computers · doi:10.1016/j.intcom.2005.03.007 · Cited by 16
ITALIAN TOURISM ON THE INTERNET - NEW BUSINESS MODELS
Corigliano, M. A., & Baggio, R. (2004) · Cited by 16
Usability Evaluation of a COPD Remote Monitoring Application
Smaradottir, B. F., Gerdes, M. W., Fensli, R. W., & Martínez, S. (2015) · Studies in health technology and informatics · doi:10.3233/978-1-61499-512-8-845 · Cited by 16
Evaluation of a Web-based and Mobile Ski Touring Application for GPS-enabled Smartphones
Haid, E., Kiechle, G., Göll, N., & Soutschek, M. (2008) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-211-77280-5_28 · Cited by 16
Hypervideo application on an experimental control system as an approach to education
Debevc, M., Šafarič, R., & Golob, M. (2008) · Computer Applications in Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/cae.20116 · Cited by 16
Validating the SUE inspection technique
Angeli, A. D., Matera, M., Costabile, M. F., Garzotto, F., & Paolini, P. (2000) · Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces (AVI) · doi:10.1145/345513.345292 · Cited by 16
A measurement model for secure and usable e-commerce websites
Mendoza-González, R., Martín, M. V., Arteaga, J. M., Rodríguez, F. J. Á., & García-Ruiz, M. Á. (2009) · Conference proceedings - Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering · doi:10.1109/ccece.2009.5090096 · Cited by 16
Human-Computer Interaction?Whence and whither?
Shackel, B. (1997) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-4571(199711)48:11 · Cited by 78
Coupling the Users: The Benefits of Paired User Testing for iDTV
Shrimpton-Smith, T., Zaman, B., & Geerts, D. (2008) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447310701821558 · Cited by 16
Blinder, V. S., Patil, S., Finik, J. M., Makower, D., Muppidi, M. R., Lichtenthal, W. G., Parker, P. A., Claros, M., Suarez, J., Narang, B., et al. (2022) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-022-06580-7 · Cited by 16
Fu, H. N. C., Wyman, J. F., Peden-McAlpine, C. J., Draucker, C. B., Schleyer, T., & Adam, T. J. (2023) · JMIR Diabetes · doi:10.2196/38592 · Cited by 15
Assessing the Usefulness of a Visual Programming IDE for Large-Scale Automation Software
Wiesmayr, B., Zoitl, A., & Rabiser, R. (2021) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems (MODELS) · doi:10.1109/models50736.2021.00037 · Cited by 15
Building a Privacy-Preserving Smart Camera System
Beugin, Y., Burke, Q. K., Hoak, B., Sheatsley, R., Pauley, E., Tan, G., Hussain, S. R., & McDaniel, P. D. (2022) · Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies · doi:10.2478/popets-2022-0034 · Cited by 15
Tea, F., Groh, A. M. R., Lacey, C., & Fakolade, A. O. (2024) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-024-01162-0 · Cited by 20
Shen, Y., Wang, S., Shen, Y., Tan, S., Dong, Y., Qin, W., & Zhuang, Y. (2024) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare12131310 · Cited by 20
van Osch, M., Rövekamp, T., Bergman-Agteres, S. N., Wijsman, L. W., Ooms, S. J., Mooijaart, S. P., & Vermeulen, J. (2015) · Patient Preference and Adherence · doi:10.2147/ppa.s82510 · Cited by 15
Automation for task analysis of next generation air traffic management systems
Medina, M., Sherry, L., & Feary, M. (2010) · Transportation Research Part C Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1016/j.trc.2010.03.006 · Cited by 15
Nguyen, S. P. (2014) · International Conference on Collaboration Technologies and Systems (CTS) · doi:10.1109/cts.2014.6867579 · Cited by 15
Welbie, M., Wittink, H. M., Westerman, M. J., Topper, I., Snoei, J., & Devillé, W. L. J. M. (2018) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.7940 · Cited by 15
User Test: How Many Users Are Needed to Find the Psychophysiological Pain Points in a Journey Map?
Lamontagne, C., Sénécal, S., Frédette, M., Chen, S. L., Pourchon, R., Gaumont, Y., Grandpré, D. D., & Léger, P. (2019) · Advances in intelligent systems and computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-25629-6_22 · Cited by 15
Analysing EHR navigation patterns and digital workflows among physicians during ICU pre-rounds
Coleman, C., Gotz, D., Eaker, S., James, E., Bice, T. J., Carson, S. S., & Khairat, S. (2020) · Health Information Management Journal · doi:10.1177/1833358320920589 · Cited by 18
Gowarty, M. A., Aschbrenner, K. A., & Brunette, M. F. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2021.656538 · Cited by 15
Customer emotions when making an online purchase decision: Results of neuromarketing experiments
Yarosh, O., Kalkova, N. N., & Reutov, V. (2021) · Upravlenets · doi:10.29141/2218-5003-2021-12-4-4 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Nielsen, J., & Landauer, T. K.
- ORCID
- Nielsen, Jakob
- Venue
- Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '93
- Publisher
- ACM Press
- Published
- 1993
- Pages
- 206-213
- OpenAlex
- W2099473180
- Cited by
- 1,961
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2026: 110 · 2025: 125 · 2024: 123 · 2023: 121 · 2022: 128 · 2021: 129 · 2020: 108 · 2019: 92 · 2018: 93 · 2017: 96 · 2016: 82 · 2015: 92 · 2014: 76 · 2013: 76 · 2012: 65
- FWCI
- 6.58
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
- Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
- Keywords
- usability evaluation, heuristic evaluation, Poisson process model, evaluation planning, user testing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
