The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A mathematical model of the finding of usability problems
Open accessAbstract
For 11 studies, we find that the detection of usability problems as a function of number of users tested or heuristic evaluators employed is well modeled as a Poisson process. The model can be used to plan the amount of evaluation required to achieve desired levels of thoroughness or benefits. Results of early tests can provide estimates of the number of problems left to be found and the number of additional evaluations needed to find a given fraction. With quantitative evaluation costs and detection values, the model can estimate the numbers of evaluations at which optimal cost/benefit ratios are obtained and at which marginal utility vanishes. For a “medium” example, we estimate that 16 evaluations would be worth their cost, with maximum benefit/cost ratio at four.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source doesn’t support the claim as written.
In the citing paper
“The recommended number of participants for usability testing is at least 10 people [14].”
From The PAediatric Risk Assessment (PARA) Mobile App to Reduce Postdischarge Child Mortality: Design, Usability, and Feasibility for Health Care Workers in Uganda (2016) · cites this paper as [14]
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Nevertheless, there is some consensus that usability tests may include a minimum of 5 participants per iteration and that approximately 80% of usability issues are discovered with as few as 4-6 participants [80].”
From Development and Evaluation of the Usefulness, Usability, and Feasibility of iNNOV Breast Cancer: Mixed Methods Study (2022) · cites this paper as [80]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“which meets the optimal requirement for detecting all usability problems [78]”
From Development and usability testing of a web-based and therapist-assisted coping skills program for managing psychosocial problems in individuals with hand and upper limb injuries: Mixed methods study (2020) · cites this paper as [78]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1993) · Cited by 9,879
Self-citation(1993) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2009-0-21512-1 · Cited by 5,552
Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces
Nielsen, J., & Molich, R. (1990) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems Empowering people - CHI '90 · doi:10.1145/97243.97281 · Cited by 3,533
Self-citationThe Usability Engineering Lifecycle
NIELSEN, J. (1993) · Usability Engineering · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-052029-2.50007-3 · Cited by 2,657
Self-citationNielsen, J. (1995) · Conference companion on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '95 · doi:10.1145/223355.223730 · Cited by 2,620
Self-citationIntroduction to Stochastic Processes
Toral, R., & Colet, P. (2014) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9783527683147.ch6 · Cited by 2,406
Nielsen, J. (1994) · Cited by 1,778
Self-citationRefining the Test Phase of Usability Evaluation: How Many Subjects Is Enough?
Virzi, R. A. (1992) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/001872089203400407 · Cited by 1,269
Finding usability problems through heuristic evaluation
Nielsen, J. (1992) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/142750.142834 · Cited by 1,139
Self-citationImproving a human-computer dialogue
Molich, R., & Nielsen, J. (1990) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/77481.77486 · Cited by 821
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- and Knowledge Based Systems. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers, 743-750.
- Nielsen, J. (1993). Iterative design of user interfaces. IEEE Computer 26 (to appear, probably in the July issue).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 1,000
(2001) · ACM Transactions on Information Systems · doi:10.1145/502115.502118 · Cited by 81
A systematic review of software usability studies
Sagar, K., & Saha, A. (2017) · International Journal of Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s41870-017-0048-1 · Cited by 80
(2024) · ACM eBooks · doi:10.1145/3674127 · Cited by 86
Nabovati, E., Vakili-Arki, H., Eslami, S., & Khajouei, R. (2014) · Journal of Medical Systems · doi:10.1007/s10916-014-0035-z · Cited by 79
Usability of Chinese Destination Management Organization Websites
Qi, S., Law, R., & Buhalis, D. (2008) · Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing · doi:10.1080/10548400802402933 · Cited by 79
Introducing IoT and Wearable Technologies into Task-Based Language Learning for Young Children
de la Guía, E., López, V., Orozco–Barbosa, L., Luján, V. M. B., Penichet, V. M. R., & Pérez, M. D. L. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies · doi:10.1109/tlt.2016.2557333 · Cited by 78
Cockton, G., & Woolrych, A. (2002) · interactions · doi:10.1145/566981.566990 · Cited by 78
Gunter, R., Fernandes-Taylor, S., Mahnke, A., Awoyinka, L., Schroeder, C., Wiseman, J., Sullivan, S., Bennett, K., Greenberg, C., & Kent, K. C. (2016) · JMIR mHealth and uHealth · doi:10.2196/mhealth.6023 · Cited by 77
Computational State Space Models for Activity and Intention Recognition. A Feasibility Study
Krüger, F., Nyolt, M., Yordanova, K., Hein, A., & Kirste, T. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0109381 · Cited by 78
The Evaluator Effect in Usability Studies: Problem Detection and Severity Judgments
Jacobsen, N. E., Hertzum, M., & John, B. E. (1998) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/154193129804201902 · Cited by 76
Network-in-a-box: how to set up a secure wireless network in under a minute
Balfanz, D., Durfee, G., Grinter, R. E., Smetters, D. K., & Stewart, P. A. (2004) · Cited by 74
Usability and Feasibility of PIERS on the Move: An mHealth App for Pre-Eclampsia Triage
Lim, J., Cloete, G., Dunsmuir, D. T., Payne, B. A., Scheffer, C., von Dadelszen, P., Dumont, G. A., & Ansermino, J. M. (2015) · JMIR mHealth and uHealth · doi:10.2196/mhealth.3942 · Cited by 73
Evaluation of Procedures for Adjusting Problem-Discovery Rates Estimated From Small Samples
Lewis, J. R. (2001) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1207/s15327590ijhc1304_06 · Cited by 72
Yassien, E., Masa'deh, R., Mufleh, M., Alrowwad, A., & Masa’deh, R. M. T. (2017) · Journal of Management Research · doi:10.5296/jmr.v9i3.11186 · Cited by 76
Marques, B., Silva, S., Alves, J., Rocha, A., Dias, P., & Santos, B. S. (2022) · International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM) · doi:10.1007/s12008-021-00798-6 · Cited by 71
Hands-On Remote Labs: Collaborative Web Laboratories as a Case Study for IT Engineering Classes
Bochicchio, M. A., & Longo, A. (2009) · IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies · doi:10.1109/tlt.2009.30 · Cited by 71
Khairat, S., Burke, G., Archambault, H., Schwartz, T. A., Larson, J., & Ratwani, R. M. (2018) · Applied Clinical Informatics · doi:10.1055/s-0038-1648222 · Cited by 70
Forms that Work: Designing Web Forms for Usability
Jarrett, C., & Gaffney, G. (2008) · Cited by 69
Explainable AI meets persuasiveness: Translating reasoning results into behavioral change advice
Dragoni, M., Donadello, I., & Eccher, C. (2020) · Artificial Intelligence in Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.artmed.2020.101840 · Cited by 71
Complementarity and convergence of heuristic evaluation and usability test
Law, L.-C., & Hvannberg, E. Þ. (2002) · Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/572020.572030 · Cited by 67
Ponum, M., Khan, S., Hasan, O., Mahmood, M. T., Abbas, A., Iftikhar, M., & Arshad, R. (2020) · BMC Pediatrics · doi:10.1186/s12887-020-02139-0 · Cited by 66
Adamo‐Villani, N., & Wright, K. (2007) · ACM SIGGRAPH Educators Program · doi:10.1145/1282040.1282058 · Cited by 66
Engaging Students With a Chatbot-Based Academic Advising System
Kuhail, M. A., Katheeri, H. A., Negreiros, J. G. M., Seffah, A., & Alfandi, O. (2022) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2022.2074645 · Cited by 64
Synthesis of the Evidence on What Works for Whom in Telemental Health: Rapid Realist Review
Schlief, M., Saunders, K. R. K., Appleton, R., Barnett, P., Juan, N. V. S., Foye, U., Olive, R. R., Machin, K., Shah, P., Chipp, B., et al. (2022) · Interactive Journal of Medical Research · doi:10.2196/38239 · Cited by 68
Vermeulen, J., Neyens, J., Spreeuwenberg, van Rossum, E., Sipers, Habets, Hewson, D., & de Witte (2013) · Patient Preference and Adherence · doi:10.2147/ppa.s45897 · Cited by 64
Information Visualization and Proxemics: Design Opportunities and Empirical Findings
Jakobsen, M. R., Haile, Y. S., Knudsen, S., & Hornbæk, K. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics · doi:10.1109/tvcg.2013.166 · Cited by 64
Engineering human-in-the-loop interactions in cyber-physical systems
Gil, M., Albert, M., Fons, J., & Pelechano, V. (2020) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2020.106349 · Cited by 63
Zhou, L., DeAlmeida, D. R., & Parmanto, B. (2019) · JMIR mhealth and uhealth · doi:10.2196/13194 · Cited by 63
Analysis of combinatorial user effect in international usability tests
Law, E. L., & Hvannberg, E. Þ. (2004) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/985692.985694 · Cited by 63
Human factors engineering – Design of medical devices
(2010) · doi:10.2345/9781570203640.ch1 · Cited by 63
App-based Self-administrable Clinical Tests of Physical Function: Development and Usability Study
Bergquist, R., Vereijken, B., Mellone, S., Corzani, M., Helbostad, J. L., & Taraldsen, K. (2020) · JMIR mhealth and uhealth · doi:10.2196/16507 · Cited by 63
A business intelligence framework for sustainability information management in higher education
Scholtz, B. M., Calitz, A. P., & Haupt, R. (2018) · International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education · doi:10.1108/ijshe-06-2016-0118 · Cited by 68
Roberts, T., Lowry, P. B., & Sweeney, P. D. (2006) · IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication · doi:10.1109/tpc.2006.870460 · Cited by 60
Mobile Mindfulness Intervention on an Acute Psychiatric Unit: Feasibility and Acceptability Study
Mistler, L. A., Ben-Zeev, D., Carpenter-Song, E., Brunette, M. F., & Friedman, M. J. (2017) · JMIR Mental Health · doi:10.2196/mental.7717 · Cited by 60
Hybrid reality-based user experience and evaluation of a context-aware smart home
Seo, D. W., Kim, H., Kim, J. S., & Lee, J. Y. (2016) · Computers in Industry · doi:10.1016/j.compind.2015.11.003 · Cited by 60
Marčan, M., Pavliha, D., Kos, B., Forjanič, T., & Damijan Miklavčič, A. (2015) · BioMedical Engineering OnLine · doi:10.1186/1475-925x-14-s3-s4 · Cited by 60
Academic Subject Guides: A Case Study of Use at San José State University
Staley, S. M. (2007) · College & Research Libraries · doi:10.5860/crl.68.2.119 · Cited by 60
Georgsson, M., Staggers, N., Årsand, E., & Kushniruk, A. W. (2019) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103110 · Cited by 59
The Employment of an Iterative Design Process to Develop a Pulmonary Graphical Display
Wachter, S. B. (2003) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1197/jamia.m1207 · Cited by 59
Common industry format for usability test reports
Scholtz, J. C. (2000) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/633292.633470 · Cited by 59
Written versus spoken queries: A qualitative and quantitative comparative analysis
Crestani, F., & Du, H. (2006) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.20350 · Cited by 58
Usability Evaluation of User Interfaces Generated with a Model-Driven Architecture Tool
Abrahão, S., Iborra, E., & Vanderdonckt, J. M. (2007) · Human-computer interaction series · doi:10.1007/978-1-84628-941-5_1 · Cited by 58
Sirius: A heuristic-based framework for measuring web usability adapted to the type of website
Torrente, M. D. C. S., Prieto, A. B. M., Gutiérrez, D. Á., & de Sagastegui, M. E. A. (2012) · Journal of Systems and Software · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2012.10.049 · Cited by 57
Using HTML5 visualizations in software fault localization
Gouveia, C. M. D. S., Campos, J., & Abreu, R. (2013) · IEEE Working Conference on Software Visualization (VISSOFT) · doi:10.1109/vissoft.2013.6650539 · Cited by 57
Canossa, A., Drachen, A., & Sørensen, J. R. M. (2011) · International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games (FDG) · doi:10.1145/2159365.2159374 · Cited by 56
Performing and analyzing non-formal inspections of entity relationship diagram (ERD)
Çağıltay, N. E., Tokdemir, G., Kılıç, Ö., & Topallı, D. (2013) · Journal of Systems and Software · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2013.03.106 · Cited by 56
Design and Usability of a Heart Failure mHealth System: A Pilot Study
Alnosayan, N., Chatterjee, S., Alluhaidan, A. S., Lee, E., & Houston-Feenstra, L. (2017) · JMIR Human Factors · doi:10.2196/humanfactors.6481 · Cited by 56
Martínez, W., Threatt, A. L., Rosenbloom, S. T., Wallston, K. A., Hickson, G. B., & Elasy, T. A. (2018) · JMIR Human Factors · doi:10.2196/humanfactors.9569 · Cited by 56
What you get is what you see: revisiting the evaluator effect in usability tests
Hertzum, M., Molich, R., & Jacobsen, N. E. (2013) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2013.783114 · Cited by 55
Sivaji, A., Abdullah, A. B., & Downe, A. G. (2011) · Asia Modelling Symposium · doi:10.1109/ams.2011.24 · Cited by 55
Yu, C. H. Y., Parsons, J. A., Hall, S., Newton, D. C., Jovičić, A., Lottridge, D. M., Shah, B. R., & Straus, S. E. (2014) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/1472-6947-14-60 · Cited by 60
Automatic web content personalization through reinforcement learning
Ferretti, S., Mirri, S., Prandi, C., & Salomoni, P. (2016) · Journal of Systems and Software · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2016.02.008 · Cited by 55
What Does the System Usability Scale (SUS) Measure?
Drew, M. R., Falcone, B., & Baccus, W. L. (2018) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-91797-9_25 · Cited by 73
A Deliberate and Rigorous Approach to Development of Patient-Centered Technologies
Wolpin, S. E., & Stewart, M. (2011) · Seminars in Oncology Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.soncn.2011.04.003 · Cited by 54
Chen, J., Druhl, E., Ramesh, B. P., Houston, T. K., Brandt, C., Zulman, D. M., Vimalananda, V. G., Malkani, S., & Yu, H. Q. (2018) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.8669 · Cited by 53
Khajouei, R., Hajesmaeel‐Gohari, S., & Mirzaee, M. (2018) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2018.02.016 · Cited by 54
Designing and evaluating multimodal interaction for mobile contexts
Lemmelä, S., Vetek, A., Mäkelä, K., & Trendafilov, D. (2008) · INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MULTIMODAL INTERACTION · doi:10.1145/1452392.1452447 · Cited by 54
Money, A., Atwal, A., Young, K. L., Day, Y., Wilson, L., & Money, K. G. (2015) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-015-0190-2 · Cited by 53
Usability study of the mobile library App: an example from Chongqing University
Qunyi, W., Chang, Z., & Cheng, Q. (2015) · Library Hi Tech · doi:10.1108/lht-05-2015-0047 · Cited by 53
Davids, M. R., Chikte, U. M. E., & Halperin, M. L. (2011) · AJP Advances in Physiology Education · doi:10.1152/advan.00127.2010 · Cited by 53
Okewu, E., Misra, S., Maskeliūnas, R., Damaševičius, R., & Sanz, L. F. (2017) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su9101857 · Cited by 53
Evaluating Speech-Based Smart Devices Using New Usability Heuristics
Wei, Z., & Landay, J. A. (2018) · IEEE Pervasive Computing · doi:10.1109/mprv.2018.022511249 · Cited by 58
Henderson, R. D., Smith, M. C., Podd, J., & Varela-Alvarez, H. (1995) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140139508925248 · Cited by 53
Atwal, A., Money, A., & Harvey, M. (2014) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.3723 · Cited by 52
Estimación del tamaño de la muestra para pruebas de usabilidad
Cazañas, A., De San Miguel, A., & Parra, E. (2017) · Enfoque UTE · doi:10.29019/enfoqueute.v8n1.126 · Cited by 52
A hybrid mask RCNN-based tool to localize dental cavities from real-time mixed photographic images
Rashid, U., Javid, A., Khan, A. R., Liu, L., Ahmed, A. R., Khalid, O., Saleem, K., Meraj, S., Iqbal, U., & Nawaz, R. (2022) · PeerJ Computer Science · doi:10.7717/peerj-cs.888 · Cited by 52
Towards an easy to use authoring tool for interactive non-linear video
Meixner, B., Matusik, K., Grill, C., & Harald Kosch, A. (2012) · Multimedia Tools and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11042-012-1218-6 · Cited by 52
Evaluation of a university website’s usability for visually impaired students
Çetin, N. M., Alemdağ, E., Tüzün, H., & Yıldız, M. (2015) · Universal Access in the Information Society · doi:10.1007/s10209-015-0430-3 · Cited by 52
The Rapid Iterative Test and Evaluation Method
Medlock, M. C., Wixon, D. R., McGee, M., & Welsh, D. (2005) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-012095811-5/50017-1 · Cited by 52
Reviewing and Extending the Five-User Assumption
Borsci, S., Macredie, R. D., Barnett, J. C., Martin, J. L., Kuljis, J., & Young, T. P. (2013) · ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction · doi:10.1145/2506210 · Cited by 51
Systematic guidance on usability methods in user-centered software development
Pérez, L. C., & Macías, J. A. (2018) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2018.01.010 · Cited by 51
A mixed-methods evaluation framework for electronic health records usability studies
Khairat, S., Coleman, C., Newlin, T., Rand, V., Ottmar, P., Bice, T. J., & Carson, S. S. (2019) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103175 · Cited by 54
Usability testing of VuFind at an academic library
Denton, W., & Coysh, S. J. (2011) · Library Hi Tech · doi:10.1108/07378831111138189 · Cited by 50
Usability Testing: A Practitioner's Guide to Evaluating the User Experience
Hertzum, M. (2020) · Synthesis lectures on human-centered informatics · doi:10.2200/s00987ed1v01y202001hci045 · Cited by 50
Bauer, A. M., Cooper, S. H., Bechtel, J. M., & Fortney, J. C. (2018) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/10048 · Cited by 49
iPlus a User-Centered Methodology for Serious Games Design
Carrión-Toro, M., Santórum, M., Acosta-Vargas, P., Aguilar, J., & Pérez, M. (2020) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app10249007 · Cited by 49
Think-Aloud Interviews: A Tool for Exploring Student Statistical Reasoning
Reinhart, A., Evans, C., Luby, A. S., Orellana, J., Meyer, M., Wieczorek, J., Elliott, P. W., Burckhardt, P., & Nugent, R. (2022) · Journal of Statistics and Data Science Education · doi:10.1080/26939169.2022.2063209 · Cited by 48
Martínez, M., Yang, K., Constantinescu, A., & Stiefelhagen, R. (2020) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s20185202 · Cited by 47
A Websites Analysis of European Tourism Organizations
Baggio, R. (2003) · Anatolia · doi:10.1080/13032917.2003.9687019 · Cited by 48
Usability Evaluation of a Web-Based Support System for People With a Schizophrenia Diagnosis
van der Krieke, L., Emerencia, A. C., Aiello, M., & Sytema, S. (2012) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.1921 · Cited by 47
Voncken-Brewster, V., Moser, A., van der Weijden, T., Nagykaldi, Z. J., de Vries, H., & Tange, H. J. (2013) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/resprot.2246 · Cited by 47
Do Exploratory Testers Need Formal Training? An Investigation Using HCI Techniques
Micallef, M. J., Porter, C., & Borg, A. (2016) · IEEE International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation Workshops (ICSTW) · doi:10.1109/icstw.2016.31 · Cited by 48
Bateman, A., Zhao, O., Bajcsy, A. V., Jennings, M. C., Toth, B. N., Cohen, A. J., Horton, E. L., Khattar, A., Kuo, R. S., Lee, F. A., et al. (2017) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2017.09.004 · Cited by 48
Breakey, V. R., Warias, A., Ignas, D. M., White, M., Blanchette, V. S., & Stinson, J. (2013) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/1472-6947-13-113 · Cited by 47
Riedelsheimer, T., Dorfhuber, L., & Stark, R. (2020) · Procedia CIRP · doi:10.1016/j.procir.2020.01.123 · Cited by 47
de la Guía, E., Lozano, M. D., & Penichet, V. M. R. (2014) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.12165 · Cited by 42
English, L. L., Dunsmuir, D., Kumbakumba, E., Ansermino, J. M., Larson, C. P., Lester, R., Barigye, C., Ndamira, A., Kabakyenga, J., & Wiens, M. O. (2016) · JMIR mHealth and uHealth · doi:10.2196/mhealth.5167 · Cited by 40
Mijumbi-Deve, R., Rosenbaum, S. E., Oxman, A. D., Lavis, J. N., & Sewankambo, N. K. (2017) · Health Research Policy and Systems · doi:10.1186/s12961-017-0200-1 · Cited by 43
User Experience Evaluation of a Smoking Cessation App in People With Serious Mental Illness
Vilardaga, R., Rizo, J. L., Kientz, J. A., McDonell, M. G., Ries, R. K., & Sobel, K. (2015) · Nicotine & Tobacco Research · doi:10.1093/ntr/ntv256 · Cited by 45
Horton, E. L., Renganathan, R., Toth, B. N., Cohen, A. J., Bajcsy, A. V., Bateman, A., Jennings, M. C., Khattar, A., Kuo, R. S., Lee, F. A., et al. (2016) · Assistive Technology · doi:10.1080/10400435.2016.1176083 · Cited by 47
AulaVR: Virtual Reality, a telepresence technique applied to distance education
Yépez, J., Guevara, L. E. D., & Guerrero, G. (2020) · Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI) · doi:10.23919/cisti49556.2020.9141049 · Cited by 44
Doubleday, E. G., O’Loughlin, V. D., & Doubleday, A. F. (2011) · Anatomical Sciences Education · doi:10.1002/ase.252 · Cited by 48
Wang, R. H., Mihailidis, A., Dutta, T., & Fernie, G. R. (2011) · The Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development · doi:10.1682/jrrd.2010.08.0147 · Cited by 44
LinkDaViz – Automatic Binding of Linked Data to Visualizations
Thellmann, K., Galkin, M., Orlandi, F., & Auer, S. (2015) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-25007-6_9 · Cited by 44
Fleming, J. B., Hill, Y. N., & Burns, M. N. (2017) · JMIR Human Factors · doi:10.2196/humanfactors.7392 · Cited by 45
Teixeira, A., Ferreira, F., Almeida, N., Silva, S., Rosa, A. F., Pereira, J. C., & Vieira, D. (2017) · Universal Access in the Information Society · doi:10.1007/s10209-016-0487-7 · Cited by 43
Poon, S. J., Greenwood‐Ericksen, M. B., Gish, R. E., Neri, P. M., Takhar, S. S., Weiner, S. G., Schuur, J. D., & Landman, A. (2016) · Academic Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1111/acem.12905 · Cited by 43
Andre, T. S., Hartson, H. R., & Williges, R. C. (2003) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1518/hfes.45.3.455.27255 · Cited by 43
Comparison of visitor experiences of virtual reality exhibitions by spatial environment
Chung, S. J., Kim, S., & Kim, K. H. (2023) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2023.103145 · Cited by 42
Fu, M. R., Axelrod, D., Guth, A. A., Wang, Y., Scagliola, J., Hiotis, K. L., Rampertaap, K., & El-Shammaa, N. (2016) · Internet Interventions · doi:10.1016/j.invent.2016.08.001 · Cited by 42
Metadata
- Authors
- Nielsen, J., & Landauer, T. K.
- ORCID
- Nielsen, Jakob
- Venue
- Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '93
- Publisher
- ACM Press
- Published
- 1993
- Pages
- 206-213
- OpenAlex
- W2099473180
- Cited by
- 1,961
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2026: 110 · 2025: 125 · 2024: 123 · 2023: 121 · 2022: 128 · 2021: 129 · 2020: 108 · 2019: 92 · 2018: 93 · 2017: 96 · 2016: 82 · 2015: 92 · 2014: 76 · 2013: 76 · 2012: 65
- FWCI
- 6.58
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
- Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
- Keywords
- usability evaluation, heuristic evaluation, Poisson process model, evaluation planning, user testing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
