The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A mathematical model of the finding of usability problems
Open accessAbstract
For 11 studies, we find that the detection of usability problems as a function of number of users tested or heuristic evaluators employed is well modeled as a Poisson process. The model can be used to plan the amount of evaluation required to achieve desired levels of thoroughness or benefits. Results of early tests can provide estimates of the number of problems left to be found and the number of additional evaluations needed to find a given fraction. With quantitative evaluation costs and detection values, the model can estimate the numbers of evaluations at which optimal cost/benefit ratios are obtained and at which marginal utility vanishes. For a “medium” example, we estimate that 16 evaluations would be worth their cost, with maximum benefit/cost ratio at four.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source doesn’t support the claim as written.
In the citing paper
“The recommended number of participants for usability testing is at least 10 people [14].”
From The PAediatric Risk Assessment (PARA) Mobile App to Reduce Postdischarge Child Mortality: Design, Usability, and Feasibility for Health Care Workers in Uganda (2016) · cites this paper as [14]
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Nevertheless, there is some consensus that usability tests may include a minimum of 5 participants per iteration and that approximately 80% of usability issues are discovered with as few as 4-6 participants [80].”
From Development and Evaluation of the Usefulness, Usability, and Feasibility of iNNOV Breast Cancer: Mixed Methods Study (2022) · cites this paper as [80]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“which meets the optimal requirement for detecting all usability problems [78]”
From Development and usability testing of a web-based and therapist-assisted coping skills program for managing psychosocial problems in individuals with hand and upper limb injuries: Mixed methods study (2020) · cites this paper as [78]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1993) · Cited by 9,879
Self-citation(1993) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2009-0-21512-1 · Cited by 5,552
Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces
Nielsen, J., & Molich, R. (1990) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems Empowering people - CHI '90 · doi:10.1145/97243.97281 · Cited by 3,533
Self-citationThe Usability Engineering Lifecycle
NIELSEN, J. (1993) · Usability Engineering · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-052029-2.50007-3 · Cited by 2,657
Self-citationNielsen, J. (1995) · Conference companion on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '95 · doi:10.1145/223355.223730 · Cited by 2,620
Self-citationIntroduction to Stochastic Processes
Toral, R., & Colet, P. (2014) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9783527683147.ch6 · Cited by 2,406
Nielsen, J. (1994) · Cited by 1,778
Self-citationRefining the Test Phase of Usability Evaluation: How Many Subjects Is Enough?
Virzi, R. A. (1992) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/001872089203400407 · Cited by 1,269
Finding usability problems through heuristic evaluation
Nielsen, J. (1992) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/142750.142834 · Cited by 1,139
Self-citationImproving a human-computer dialogue
Molich, R., & Nielsen, J. (1990) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/77481.77486 · Cited by 821
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- and Knowledge Based Systems. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers, 743-750.
- Nielsen, J. (1993). Iterative design of user interfaces. IEEE Computer 26 (to appear, probably in the July issue).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 501–600 of 1,000
Aalaei, S., Amini, M., Habibi, M. R. M., Shahraki, H., & Eslami, S. (2022) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-022-01912-8 · Cited by 15
A Remote Vehicle Operations Center’s Role in Collecting Human Factors Data
Buck, B. K., Chancey, E. T., Politowicz, M. S., Unverricht, J., & Geuther, S. C. (2023) · AIAA SciTech Forum · doi:10.2514/6.2023-2526 · Cited by 15
Comparing two designs (or anything else!) using paired sample T-tests
Fritz, M., & Berger, P. D. (2015) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-800635-1.00003-3 · Cited by 15
Ponce, P., Peffer, T. E., & Molina, A. (2018) · Frontiers in Energy · doi:10.1007/s11708-018-0562-2 · Cited by 14
Controlling the Usability Evaluation Process under Varying Defect Visibility
Schmettow, M. (2009) · Electronic workshops in computing · doi:10.14236/ewic/hci2009.22 · Cited by 15
Feedback in low vs. high fidelity visuals for game prototypes
Köhler, B., Haladjian, J., Simeonova, B., & Ismailovic, D. (2012) · doi:10.1109/gas.2012.6225926 · Cited by 15
STUDY AND DEVELOP A NEW GRAPHICAL PASSWORD SYSTEM
Eljetlawi, A. M. (2008) · Cited by 15
Hoogerbrugge, A. J., Hooge, I. T. C., Hessels, R. S., & Strauch, C. (2025) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-025-02754-8 · Cited by 15
The human factors evaluation program of a control room: The French EPR approach
Labarthe, J., & la Garza, C. D. (2010) · Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries · doi:10.1002/hfm.20227 · Cited by 14
A Reusable Multiplayer Game for Promoting Active School Transport: Development Study
Laine, T. H., Duong, N., Lindvall, H., Oyelere, S. S., Rutberg, S., & Lindqvist, A.-K. (2022) · JMIR Serious Games · doi:10.2196/31638 · Cited by 14
Design of a Patient Voice App Experience for Heart Failure Management: Usability Study
Barbaric, A., Munteanu, C., Ross, H. J., Tong, K.-C., & Cafazzo, J. A. (2022) · JMIR Formative Research · doi:10.2196/41628 · Cited by 14
Informational Needs for Dental-Oriented Electronic Health Records from Dentists’ Perspectives
Alanazi, A., Alghamdi, G., & Aldosari, B. (2023) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare11020266 · Cited by 14
New Insights into User-Defined Smart Ring Gestures with Implications for Gesture Elicitation Studies
Gheran, B.-F., Vatavu, R.-D., & Vanderdonckt, J. M. (2023) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/3544549.3585590 · Cited by 14
Lostelius, P. V., Mattebo, M., Adolfsson, E. T., Söderlund, A., Andersén, M., Vadlin, S., & Revenäs, Å. (2023) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-023-02191-7 · Cited by 14
Beyeler, M., Légeret, C., Kiwitz, F., & van der Horst, K. (2023) · JMIR Human Factors · doi:10.2196/47913 · Cited by 14
Using Crowdsourcing to Capture Complexity in Human Interpretations of Multimedia Content
Larson, M., Melenhorst, M., Menéndez-Blanco, M., & Xu, P. (2014) · Advances in computer vision and pattern recognition · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-05696-8_10 · Cited by 14
Software complexity and its impacts in embedded intelligent real-time systems
Coşkun, E., & Grabowski, M. (2005) · Journal of Systems and Software · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2005.01.009 · Cited by 14
Model-Driven Development for Requirements Engineering: The Case of Goal-Oriented Approaches
Monteiro, R., Araújo, J., Amaral, V., Goulão, M., & Patrício, P. (2012) · International Conference on the Quality of Information and Communications Technology (QUATIC) · doi:10.1109/quatic.2012.38 · Cited by 14
Movement-Based Interaction Applied to Physical Rehabilitation Therapies
Garrido, J. E., Penichet, V. M. R., & Pérez, M. D. L. (2014) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.3154 · Cited by 14
Use Case Evaluation (UCE): A Method for Early Usability Evaluation in Software Development
Hornbæk, K., Høegh, R. T., Pedersen, M. B., & Stage, J. (2007) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-74796-3_58 · Cited by 14
Kieffer, S., & Vanderdonckt, J. M. (2016) · ACM Symposium on Applied Computing · doi:10.1145/2851613.2851912 · Cited by 14
Borba, E. Z., Corrêa, A. G. D., Lopes, R. D. D., & Zuffo, M. K. (2019) · Multimedia Tools and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11042-019-07924-3 · Cited by 14
Li, P., Paulus, Y. M., Davila, J. R., Gosbee, J. W., Margolis, T. P., Fletcher, D. A., & Kim, T. N. (2019) · BMJ Innovations · doi:10.1136/bmjinnov-2018-000321 · Cited by 14
Cross-Platform Usability Model Evaluation
Majrashi, K., Hamilton, M., Uitdenbogerd, A. L., & Al-Megren, S. (2020) · Multimodal Technologies and Interaction · doi:10.3390/mti4040080 · Cited by 14
A machine learning-based forensic tool for image classification - A design science approach
Mar, J. R. D., Bahşi, H., Mršić, L., & Hausknecht, K. (2021) · Forensic Science International Digital Investigation · doi:10.1016/j.fsidi.2021.301265 · Cited by 14
Stawarz, K., Liang, I. J., Alexander, L., Carlin, A., Wijekoon, A., & Western, M. J. (2023) · JMIR Aging · doi:10.2196/41810 · Cited by 14
Hwang, W., & Salvendy, G. (2009) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447310802629793 · Cited by 14
Evaluating a digital ship design tool prototype: Designers’ perceptions of novel ergonomics software
Mallam, S., Lundh, M., & MacKinnon, S. N. (2016) · Applied Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2016.08.026 · Cited by 14
Variability Management and Assessment for User Interface Design
Martinez, J., Sottet, J.-S., Frey, A. G., Ziadi, T., Bissyandé, T. F., Vanderdonckt, J. M., Klein, J., & Traon, Y. L. (2017) · Human-computer interaction series · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-60947-8_3 · Cited by 14
Using a new set of heuristics in evaluating Arabic interfaces
Muhanna, M., Amro, R. N., & Qusef, A. D. (2018) · Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.jksuci.2018.05.014 · Cited by 14
Potzel, A. L., Gar, C., Seißler, J., & Lechner, A. (2021) · JMIR mhealth and uhealth · doi:10.2196/26163 · Cited by 19
Evaluation of the Usability of Chinese Destination Management Organisation Websites
Shanshan, Q., Buhalis, D., & Law, R. (2007) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-211-69566-1_25 · Cited by 14
Informing the design of pipeline-based software visualisations
Churcher, N., & Irwin, W. (2005) · UC Research Repository (University of Canterbury) · Cited by 14
Towards Computer-Supported Collaborative Software Engineering
Cook, C. (2007) · UC Research Repository (University of Canterbury) · doi:10.26021/2111 · Cited by 14
Babatunde, F. O., MacDermid, J., Grewal, R., Macedo, L., & Szekeres, M. (2020) · JMIR Human Factors · doi:10.2196/17088 · Cited by 12
“We enrolled four ICT experts to act as evaluators during heuristics evaluation, which meets the optimal requirement for detecting all usability problems [78].”
Jeon, H., Jun, Y., Laine, T. H., & Kim, E. (2023) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-023-11840-3 · Cited by 13
da Silva, M. M. O., Roberto, R. A., Radu, I. W., Cavalcante, P. S., Schneider, B., & Teichrieb, V. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies · doi:10.1109/tlt.2023.3327592 · Cited by 13
Bickmann, P., Froböse, I., & Grieben, C. (2024) · Journal of Medical Systems · doi:10.1007/s10916-024-02042-6 · Cited by 14
Do LLMs Meet the Needs of Software Tutorial Writers? Opportunities and Design Implications
Bhat, A., Shrivastava, D., & Guo, J. (2024) · Designing Interactive Systems Conference · doi:10.1145/3643834.3660692 · Cited by 13
Multi-faceted informatics system for digitising and streamlining the reablement care model
Bond, R., Mulvenna, M. D., Finlay, D., & Martin, S. (2015) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2015.05.008 · Cited by 13
Adaptable, Personalizable and Multi User Museum Exhibits
Partarakis, N., Antona, M., & Stephanidis, C. (2016) · Springer series on cultural computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-28722-5_11 · Cited by 13
Semantic Technologies for Healthy Lifestyle Monitoring
Dragoni, M., Rospocher, M., Bailoni, T., Maimone, R., & Eccher, C. (2018) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-00668-6_19 · Cited by 13
Improving road safety and user experience by employing dynamic in‐vehicle information systems
Galarza, M. A., & Paradells, J. (2018) · IET Intelligent Transport Systems · doi:10.1049/iet-its.2018.5022 · Cited by 14
Derksen, M. E., Jaspers, M., van Strijp, S., & Fransen, M. P. (2021) · JMIR Formative Research · doi:10.2196/24112 · Cited by 14
Kuang, E., Jin, X., & Fan, M. (2022) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3491102.3517647 · Cited by 22
Towards Multimodal Equipment to Help in the Diagnosis of COVID-19 Using Machine Learning Algorithms
Villa-Parra, A. C., Criollo, I., Valadão, C., Silva, L., Coelho, Y., Lampier, L., Rangel, L., Sharma, G., Delisle-Rodríguez, D., Calle-Sigüencia, J., et al. (2022) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s22124341 · Cited by 13
Assessing the usefulness of a visual programming IDE for large-scale automation software
Wiesmayr, B., Zoitl, A., & Rabiser, R. (2023) · Software & Systems Modeling · doi:10.1007/s10270-023-01084-7 · Cited by 13
Knijnenburg, S. L., Kremer, L. C. M., Jaspers, M., & Peute, L. (2015) · Applied Clinical Informatics · doi:10.4338/aci-2014-11-ra-0109 · Cited by 13
Masmuzidin, M. Z., Jiang, J., & Wan, T. (2012) · Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.061 · Cited by 13
H-PC: a cloud computing tool for supervising hypertensive patients
Vilaplana, J., Solsona, F., Abella, F., Cuadrado, J., Teixidó, I., Mateo, J., & Rius, J. (2014) · The Journal of Supercomputing · doi:10.1007/s11227-014-1312-9 · Cited by 13
Control smart homes easily with simple touch
Kartakis, S., Antona, M., & Stephanidis, C. (2011) · doi:10.1145/2072652.2072654 · Cited by 13
Using Formal Models to Design User Interfaces A Case Study
Bowen, J., & Reeves, S. (2007) · Electronic workshops in computing · doi:10.14236/ewic/hci2007.16 · Cited by 13
Using WCAG 2.0 and Heuristic Evaluation to Evaluate Accessibility in Educational Web Based Pages
Debevc, M., Kožuh, I., Hauptman, S., Klembas, A., Bele, J. L., & Holzinger, A. (2015) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-22629-3_16 · Cited by 12
Evaluating perceptual visual attributes in social and cultural heritage web sites
Artese, M. T., Ciocca, G., & Gagliardi, I. (2017) · Journal of Cultural Heritage · doi:10.1016/j.culher.2017.02.009 · Cited by 13
Matsudaira, K., Oka, H., Oshima, Y., Chikuda, H., Taniguchi, Y., Matsubayashi, Y., Kawaguchi, M., Sato, E., Murano, H., Laurent, T., et al. (2018) · BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders · doi:10.1186/s12891-018-1986-x · Cited by 13
User-Centered Development of an Online Platform for Drug Dosing Recommendations in Pediatrics
Rödle, W., Wimmer, S. J., Zahn, J., Prokosch, H., Hinkes, B. G., Neubert, A. C., Rascher, W., Kraus, S., Toddenroth, D., & Sedlmayr, B. (2019) · Applied Clinical Informatics · doi:10.1055/s-0039-1693714 · Cited by 13
Nicol, G. E., Ricchio, A., Metts, C. L., Yingling, M. D., Ramsey, A. T., Schweiger, J. A., Miller, J. P., & Lenze, E. J. (2020) · JMIR mhealth and uhealth · doi:10.2196/18609 · Cited by 11
Task, usability, and error analyses of ambulance-based telemedicine for stroke care
Rogers, H., Madathil, K. C., Joseph, A., McNeese, N. J., Holmstedt, C. A., Holden, R. J., & McElligott, J. T. (2021) · IISE Transactions on Healthcare Systems Engineering · doi:10.1080/24725579.2021.1883775 · Cited by 13
Heuristics and Think-aloud Method for Evaluating the Usability of Game-based Language Learning
Ishaq, K., Rosdi, F., Zin, N. A. M., & Abid, A. (2021) · International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications · doi:10.14569/ijacsa.2021.0121136 · Cited by 15
Usability evaluation of SatNav application onmobile phone using mGQM
Hussain, A., & Kutar, M. (2012) · Universiti Utara Malaysia Institutional Repository (Universiti Utara Malaysia) · Cited by 13
Usability evaluation guidelines for business intelligence applications
Jooste, C., van Biljon, J. A., & Mentz, J. C. (2013) · South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists · doi:10.1145/2513456.2513478 · Cited by 13
Valentin, A., Lancry, A., & Lemarchand, C. (2010) · Le travail humain · doi:10.3917/th.733.0261 · Cited by 13
A Reference to Usability Inspection Methods
Cheng, L. C., & Mustafa, M. (2015) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-287-332-3_43 · Cited by 13
Heuristic evaluation quality score (HEQS): a measure of heuristic evaluation skills
Kirmani, S., & Rajasekaran, S. (2007) · Cited by 13
A Model-Driven Approach for Developing Responsive Web Apps
Seixas, J., Ribeiro, A., & da Silva, A. R. (2019) · International Conference on Evaluation of Novel Approaches to Software Engineering · doi:10.5220/0007678300002174 · Cited by 13
Chorianopoulos, K. (2004) · doi:10.12681/eadd/17648 · Cited by 13
Eugenia, M. P., Abdurrofi, M., Almahenzar, B., & Khoirunnisa, A. (2022) · Seminar Nasional Official Statistics · doi:10.34123/semnasoffstat.v2022i1.1454 · Cited by 12
Liu, Y., & Martens, J.-B. (2024) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2024.103227 · Cited by 15
An immersive labeling method for large point clouds
Lin, T., Yu, Z., McGinity, M., & Gumhold, S. (2024) · Computers & Graphics · doi:10.1016/j.cag.2024.104101 · Cited by 14
Lottridge, D. M., Chignell, M., & Straus, S. E. (2011) · International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2011.01.005 · Cited by 12
Gamification of learning activities with the Odin service
Paiva, J. C., Leal, J. P., & Queirós, R. (2016) · Computer Science and Information Systems · doi:10.2298/csis160123025p · Cited by 12
Fontecha, J., Gónzalez, I., & Bravo, J. (2019) · Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing · doi:10.1007/s12652-019-01369-0 · Cited by 12
Health information exchange: What matters at the organizational level?
Guerrazzi-Young, C., & Feldman, S. S. (2020) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2020.103375 · Cited by 14
Say It in Your Own Words: Defining Declarative Process Models Using Speech Recognition
van der Aa, H., Balder, K. J., Maggi, F. M., & Nolte, A. (2020) · Lecture notes in business information processing · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-58638-6_4 · Cited by 12
Martínez, R. A., Ribera, M., Granollers, T., & Pascual, A. (2020) · El Profesional de la Informacion · doi:10.3145/epi.2020.sep.15 · Cited by 12
Chin, W. S. Y., Kurowski, A., Gore, R. J., Chen, G., & Punnett, L. (2021) · JMIR Formative Research · doi:10.2196/20739 · Cited by 12
Kong, M., Lee, M., Kang, H., & Hong, T. (2021) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2021.111475 · Cited by 12
Virtual and Augmented Reality Direct Ophthalmoscopy Tool: A Comparison between Interactions Methods
Chan, M., Uribe-Quevedo, Á., Kapralos, B., Jenkin, M. R. M., Jaimes, N., & Kanev, K. D. (2021) · Multimodal Technologies and Interaction · doi:10.3390/mti5110066 · Cited by 12
Elchynski, A. L., Desai, N., D’Silva, D., Hall, B., Marks, Y., Wiisanen, K., Cicali, E. J., Cavallari, L. H., & Nguyen, K. A. (2021) · Journal of Personalized Medicine · doi:10.3390/jpm11111227 · Cited by 13
Rodrigues, J. C., Menezes, P. J., & Restivo, M. T. (2023) · Frontiers in Digital Health · doi:10.3389/fdgth.2023.1078511 · Cited by 12
Neef, C., Linden, K., & Richert, A. (2023) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app13063537 · Cited by 12
Weber, F., Müller, C., Bahns, C., Kopkow, C., Färber, F., Gellert, P. R., Otte, I., Vollmar, H. C., Brannath, W., Diederich, F., et al. (2023) · BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders · doi:10.1186/s12891-023-06255-7 · Cited by 13
QUEST: Querying Complex Information by Direct Manipulation
Nitsche, M., & Nürnberger, A. (2013) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-39209-2_28 · Cited by 12
S-PC: An e-treatment application for management of smoke-quitting patients
Vilaplana, J., Solsona, F., Abella, F., Cuadrado, J., Alves, R., & Mateo, J. (2014) · Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine · doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2014.03.005 · Cited by 12
Warell, A., & Young, K. (2011) · International Journal of Vehicle Design · doi:10.1504/ijvd.2011.040587 · Cited by 12
Davids, M. R., Harvey, J., Halperin, M. L., & Chikte, U. M. E. (2015) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.12336 · Cited by 12
Heuristics for evaluating IT security management tools
Jaferian, P., Hawkey, K., Sotirakopoulos, A., & Beznosov, K. (2011) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/1979742.1979820 · Cited by 12
Usability in Local E-Government
Yıldız, M., Ocak, N., Yildirim, C., Çağıltay, K., & Babaoğlu, C. (2016) · International Journal of Public Administration in the Digital Age · doi:10.4018/ijpada.2016010104 · Cited by 12
Designing User Friendly Mobile Application to Assist Cancer Patients in Illness Management
Mirković, J., Bryhni, H., & Ruland, C. M. (2011) · Cited by 12
User Evaluation of a Smartphone Application for Anticoagulation Therapy
Smaradottir, B. F., Martínez, S., Borycki, E. M., Loudon, G. H., Kushniruk, A. W., Jortveit, J., & Fensli, R. W. (2018) · Studies in health technology and informatics · doi:10.3233/978-1-61499-852-5-466 · Cited by 12
Reeder, B., Drake, C., Ozkaynak, M., & Wald, H. L. (2019) · Journal of Gerontological Nursing · doi:10.3928/00989134-20190408-01 · Cited by 12
Ke, J. X. C., George, R. B., Wozney, L., & Chorney, J. M. L. (2019) · Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d anesthésie · doi:10.1007/s12630-019-01392-x · Cited by 11
Díaz, J., Villareal, A., Aguirre, A., Collazos, C. A., Rusu, C., Quiñones, D., & Rusu, V. (2019) · IEEE Latin America Transactions · doi:10.1109/tla.2019.8891945 · Cited by 12
Yuhui, W., Tian, L., & Liu, X. (2020) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2019.1709339 · Cited by 12
SimpleAR: Augmented Reality high-level content design framework using visual programming
Apaza, Y. M. O., Valderrama, A. P., & Corrales-Delgado, C. (2019) · International Conference of the Chilean Computer Science Society (SCCC) · doi:10.1109/sccc49216.2019.8966427 · Cited by 12
Initial Design and Testing of Multiplayer Cooperative Game to Support Physical Activity in Schools
Oyelere, S. S., Berghem, S. M., Brännström, R., Rutberg, S., Laine, T. H., & Lindqvist, A.-K. (2022) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci12020100 · Cited by 13
Interface designs for pen-based mobile video browsing
Hürst, W., & Götz, G. (2008) · Designing Interactive Systems Conference · doi:10.1145/1394445.1394488 · Cited by 12
Utilizing Expert Panels in Agricultural Safety and Health Research
Kingman, D. M., Yoder, A. M., Hodge, N. S., Ruiz, R. O., & Field, W. E. (2005) · Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health · doi:10.13031/2013.17897 · Cited by 12
The Bootstrap Discovery Behaviour (BDB): a new outlook on usability evaluation
Borsci, S., Londei, A., & Federici, S. (2010) · Cognitive Processing · doi:10.1007/s10339-010-0376-6 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Nielsen, J., & Landauer, T. K.
- ORCID
- Nielsen, Jakob
- Venue
- Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '93
- Publisher
- ACM Press
- Published
- 1993
- Pages
- 206-213
- OpenAlex
- W2099473180
- Cited by
- 1,961
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2026: 110 · 2025: 125 · 2024: 123 · 2023: 121 · 2022: 128 · 2021: 129 · 2020: 108 · 2019: 92 · 2018: 93 · 2017: 96 · 2016: 82 · 2015: 92 · 2014: 76 · 2013: 76 · 2012: 65
- FWCI
- 6.58
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
- Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
- Keywords
- usability evaluation, heuristic evaluation, Poisson process model, evaluation planning, user testing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review