The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A mathematical model of the finding of usability problems
Open accessAbstract
For 11 studies, we find that the detection of usability problems as a function of number of users tested or heuristic evaluators employed is well modeled as a Poisson process. The model can be used to plan the amount of evaluation required to achieve desired levels of thoroughness or benefits. Results of early tests can provide estimates of the number of problems left to be found and the number of additional evaluations needed to find a given fraction. With quantitative evaluation costs and detection values, the model can estimate the numbers of evaluations at which optimal cost/benefit ratios are obtained and at which marginal utility vanishes. For a “medium” example, we estimate that 16 evaluations would be worth their cost, with maximum benefit/cost ratio at four.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source doesn’t support the claim as written.
In the citing paper
“The recommended number of participants for usability testing is at least 10 people [14].”
From The PAediatric Risk Assessment (PARA) Mobile App to Reduce Postdischarge Child Mortality: Design, Usability, and Feasibility for Health Care Workers in Uganda (2016) · cites this paper as [14]
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Nevertheless, there is some consensus that usability tests may include a minimum of 5 participants per iteration and that approximately 80% of usability issues are discovered with as few as 4-6 participants [80].”
From Development and Evaluation of the Usefulness, Usability, and Feasibility of iNNOV Breast Cancer: Mixed Methods Study (2022) · cites this paper as [80]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“which meets the optimal requirement for detecting all usability problems [78]”
From Development and usability testing of a web-based and therapist-assisted coping skills program for managing psychosocial problems in individuals with hand and upper limb injuries: Mixed methods study (2020) · cites this paper as [78]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1993) · Cited by 9,879
Self-citation(1993) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2009-0-21512-1 · Cited by 5,552
Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces
Nielsen, J., & Molich, R. (1990) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems Empowering people - CHI '90 · doi:10.1145/97243.97281 · Cited by 3,533
Self-citationThe Usability Engineering Lifecycle
NIELSEN, J. (1993) · Usability Engineering · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-052029-2.50007-3 · Cited by 2,657
Self-citationNielsen, J. (1995) · Conference companion on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '95 · doi:10.1145/223355.223730 · Cited by 2,620
Self-citationIntroduction to Stochastic Processes
Toral, R., & Colet, P. (2014) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9783527683147.ch6 · Cited by 2,406
Nielsen, J. (1994) · Cited by 1,778
Self-citationRefining the Test Phase of Usability Evaluation: How Many Subjects Is Enough?
Virzi, R. A. (1992) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/001872089203400407 · Cited by 1,269
Finding usability problems through heuristic evaluation
Nielsen, J. (1992) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/142750.142834 · Cited by 1,139
Self-citationImproving a human-computer dialogue
Molich, R., & Nielsen, J. (1990) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/77481.77486 · Cited by 821
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- and Knowledge Based Systems. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers, 743-750.
- Nielsen, J. (1993). Iterative design of user interfaces. IEEE Computer 26 (to appear, probably in the July issue).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 1,000
Student Searching with EBSCO Discovery: A Usability Study
Owens, E. E., Jones, G., McMain, L. M., Shen, L., & Vieira, S. (2014) · Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship · doi:10.1080/1941126x.2014.877331 · Cited by 26
A graph-based approach for visualizing and exploring a multimedia search result space
Rashid, U., Viviani, M., & Pasi, G. (2016) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2016.07.072 · Cited by 26
An Adaptive Interface Design (AID) for enhanced computer accessibility and rehabilitation
Lin, Y., Breugelmans, J., Iversen, M. D., & Schmidt, D. M. (2016) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2016.09.012 · Cited by 29
Fernandez-Nieto, G. M., Martínez‐Maldonado, R., Kitto, K., & Shum, S. B. (2021) · International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK) · doi:10.1145/3448139.3448176 · Cited by 26
Guarino, A., Lettieri, N., Malandrino, D., & Zaccagnino, R. (2021) · Neural Computing and Applications · doi:10.1007/s00521-021-06343-6 · Cited by 30
Coblenz, M. J., Kambhatla, G., Koronkevich, P., Wise, J., Barnaby, C., Sunshine, J., Aldrich, J., & Myers, B. A. (2021) · ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction · doi:10.1145/3452379 · Cited by 26
Mitre-Ortiz, A., Arteaga, J. M., & Cardona-Reyes, H. (2022) · Universal Access in the Information Society · doi:10.1007/s10209-022-00882-y · Cited by 26
UniteXR: Joint Exploration of a Real-World Museum and its Digital Twin
Schott, E., Makled, E., Zoeppig, T. J., Muehlhaus, S., Weidner, F., Broll, W., & Froehlich, B. (2023) · ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology (VRST) · doi:10.1145/3611659.3615708 · Cited by 26
Explainable predictive process monitoring: a user evaluation
Rizzi, W., Comuzzi, M., Francescomarino, C. D., Ghidini, C., Lee, S., Maggi, F. M., & Nolte, A. (2024) · Process Science · doi:10.1007/s44311-024-00003-3 · Cited by 39
Designing an over-the-counter consumer decision-making tool for older adults
Martin-Hammond, A. M., Abegaz, T. T., & Gilbert, J. E. (2015) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2015.07.006 · Cited by 26
Lopes, P., Pino, M., Carletti, G. O. N., Hamidi, S., Legué, S., Kerhervé, H., Benveniste, S., Andéol, G., Bonsom, P., Reingewirtz, S., et al. (2016) · IRBM · doi:10.1016/j.irbm.2016.02.004 · Cited by 26
Jones, W. E., Drake, C., Mack, D. C., Reeder, B., Trautner, B. W., & Wald, H. L. (2017) · Applied Clinical Informatics · doi:10.4338/aci-2016-12-ra-0209 · Cited by 26
Conceptual design and evaluation of a human machine interface for highly automated truck driving
Richardson, N. T., Lehmer, C., Lienkamp, M., & Michel, B. (2018) · IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium · doi:10.1109/ivs.2018.8500520 · Cited by 31
Modelling and measuring Collaborative Software Engineering
Cook, C., & Churcher, N. (2005) · UC Research Repository (University of Canterbury) · Cited by 26
Common industry specification for usability - requirements
Theofanos, M. F. (2007) · doi:10.6028/nist.ir.7432 · Cited by 26
Fico, G., Hernanzez, L., Cancela, J., Dagliati, A., Sacchi, L., Martinez-Millana, A., Posada, J., Manero, L., Verdú, J., Facchinetti, A., et al. (2019) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-019-0887-8 · Cited by 22
Concurrent or Retrospective Thinking Aloud in Usability Tests: A Meta-Analytic Review
Hertzum, M. (2024) · ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction · doi:10.1145/3665327 · Cited by 25
Linguistic Patterns and Linguistic Styles for Requirements Specification: Focus on Data Entities
da Silva, A. R., & Savić, D. (2021) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app11094119 · Cited by 25
Affective graphs: The visual appeal of Linked Data
Suvodeep Mazumdar, A., Petrelli, D., Elbedweihy, K., Lanfranchi, V., & Ciravegna, F. (2015) · Semantic Web · doi:10.3233/sw-140162 · Cited by 25
ECOVAL: Ecological Validity of Cues and Representative Design in User Experience Evaluations
de Louvain, U. C., & Kieffer, S. (2017) · AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.17705/1thci.00093 · Cited by 25
Understanding the unknown: A thematic analysis of subjective paranormal experiences
Drinkwater, K. G., Dagnall, N., Grogan, S., & Riley, V. (2017) · Staffordshire Online Repository (Staffordshire University) · Cited by 25
Exploring Real-Time Collaboration in Crowd-Powered Systems Through a UI Design Tool
Lee, S. W., Krosnick, R., Park, S. Y., Keelean, B., Vaidya, S., O’Keefe, S. D., & Lasecki, W. S. (2018) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3274373 · Cited by 25
Gance‐Cleveland, B., Leiferman, J. A., Aldrich, H., Nodine, P., Anderson, J., Nacht, A. S., Martin, J., Carrington, S., & Ozkaynak, M. (2019) · Journal of Midwifery & Women s Health · doi:10.1111/jmwh.13009 · Cited by 25
A multi-camera image processing and visualization system for train safety assessment
Lisanti, G., Karaman, S., Pezzatini, D., & Bimbo, A. D. (2017) · Multimedia Tools and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11042-017-4351-4 · Cited by 25
Struck, C. (2012) · TU/e Research Portal · doi:10.6100/ir735575 · Cited by 27
Stawarz, K., Preist, C., Tallon, D., Wiles, N., Kessler, D., Turner, K., Shafran, R., & Coyle, D. (2020) · JMIR Mental Health · doi:10.2196/15972 · Cited by 24
Using simulation to aid decision making in managing the usability evaluation process
Rodríguez, N. H., Ruiz, M., Orta, E., & Valderrama, J. T. (2014) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2014.06.001 · Cited by 24
A Process for Systematic Development of Symbolic Models for Activity Recognition
Yordanova, K., & Kirste, T. (2015) · ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1145/2806893 · Cited by 24
The Agile UX Development Lifecycle: Combining Formative Usability and Agile Methods
Kieffer, S., Ghouti, A., & Macq, B. M. M. (2017) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.24251/hicss.2017.070 · Cited by 24
Nair, A. K. S., & Bhattacharyya, S. S. (2018) · foresight · doi:10.1108/fs-05-2018-0048 · Cited by 24
Alman, A., Ciccio, C. D., Haas, D., Maggi, F. M., & Nolte, A. (2020) · International Conference on Process Mining (ICPM) · doi:10.1109/icpm49681.2020.00027 · Cited by 24
Gowarty, M. A., Longacre, M. R., Vilardaga, R., Kung, N. J., Gaughan-Maher, A. E., & Brunette, M. F. (2021) · JMIR Mental Health · doi:10.2196/26873 · Cited by 24
Beescape: Characterizing user needs for environmental decision support in beekeeping
Robinson, A. C., Peeler, J. L., Prestby, T. J., Goslee, S., Anton, K., & Grozinger, C. M. (2021) · Ecological Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ecoinf.2021.101366 · Cited by 24
Johnston, W., Keogh, A., Dickson, J., Leslie, S. J., Megyesi, P., Connolly, R., Burke, D., & Caulfield, B. (2022) · JMIR Formative Research · doi:10.2196/34257 · Cited by 29
User-Centered Design Stories: Real-World UCD Case Studies
Righi, C., & James, J. (2007) · Cited by 24
Spasić, ., Button, K., Divoli, A., Gupta, S., Pataky, T., Pizzocaro, D., Preece, A. D., Deursen, R. W. M. V., & Wilson, C. (2015) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/resprot.4091 · Cited by 27
Improving Online Course Design through Usability Testing
Fisher, E. A., & Wright, V. H. (2010) · Cited by 24
Usability testing of a 3D touch screen kiosk system for way-finding
Tüzün, H., Telli, E., & Alır, A. (2016) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.006 · Cited by 24
Biofeedback Treatment App for Pediatric Migraine: Development and Usability Study
Stubberud, A., Tronvik, E., Olsen, A., Gravdahl, G. B., & Linde, M. (2020) · Headache The Journal of Head and Face Pain · doi:10.1111/head.13772 · Cited by 25
Usability Evaluation for Online Professional Search in the Dutch Archaeology DomainPreprint
Brandsen, A., Verberne, S., Lambers, K., & Wansleeben, M. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2103.04437 · Cited by 24
Human factors approach to evaluate the user interface of physiologic monitoring
Fidler, R., Bond, R., Finlay, D., Guldenring, D., Gallagher, A., Pelter, M., Drew, B., & Hu, X. (2015) · Journal of Electrocardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2015.08.032 · Cited by 23
Avni, Y., Danial‐Saad, A., Sheidin, J., & Kuflik, T. (2025) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2025.103469 · Cited by 26
A formative study of influences on student testing behaviors
Buffardi, K., & Edwards, S. H. (2014) · ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE) · doi:10.1145/2538862.2538982 · Cited by 23
On personalizing Web content through reinforcement learning
Ferretti, S., Mirri, S., Prandi, C., & Salomoni, P. (2016) · Universal Access in the Information Society · doi:10.1007/s10209-016-0463-2 · Cited by 23
Architectural Jewels of Lublin
Montusiewicz, J., & Miłosz, M. (2021) · Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage · doi:10.1145/3446978 · Cited by 23
A Comparative Research on Usability and User Experience of User Interface Design Software
Wang, J., Xu, Z., Wang, X., & Lu, J. (2022) · International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications · doi:10.14569/ijacsa.2022.0130804 · Cited by 23
Improving intrusion detection systems through heuristic evaluation
Zhou, A., Blustein, J., & Zincir-Heywood, N. (2004) · Conference proceedings - Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering · doi:10.1109/ccece.2004.1349725 · Cited by 23
Brunette, M. F., Ferron, J. C., Gottlieb, J. D., Devitt, T. S., & Rotondi, A. J. (2016) · Internet Interventions · doi:10.1016/j.invent.2016.05.003 · Cited by 24
Melton, B. L., Zillich, A. J., Saleem, J. J., Russ, A. L., Tisdale, J. E., & Overholser, B. R. (2016) · Applied Clinical Informatics · doi:10.4338/aci-2016-05-ra-0081 · Cited by 23
Marchak, J. G., Cherven, B. O., Lewis, R. W., Edwards, P. J., Meacham, L. R., Palgon, M., Escoffery, C., & Mertens, A. C. (2019) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-019-05199-w · Cited by 24
The Future of Usability Evaluation: Increasing Impact on Value
Rosenbaum, S. (2007) · Human-computer interaction series · doi:10.1007/978-1-84628-941-5_15 · Cited by 23
The spirit of place of Bhaktapur, Nepal
Silva, K. D. (2015) · International Journal of Heritage Studies · doi:10.1080/13527258.2015.1028962 · Cited by 23
Iterative usability testing as continuous feedback: a control systems perspective
Genov, A. (2005) · Journal of Usability Studies archive · Cited by 23
Adapting Jake Knapp’s Design Sprint Approach for AR/VR Applications in Digital Heritage
Southall, H., Marmion, M., & Davies, A. (2019) · Progress in IS · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-06246-0_5 · Cited by 23
Gove, R., Saxe, J., Gold, S., Long, A., & Bergamo, G. (2014) · IEEE Symposium on Visualization for Cyber Security (VIZSEC) · doi:10.1145/2671491.2671496 · Cited by 22
Su, G. E., Sunar, M. S., & Ismail, A. W. (2020) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2020.102433 · Cited by 22
Human-centered design for medical devices and diagnostics in global health
Fisher, M., Johansen, E., & Spark Health Design, C. (2020) · Global Health Innovation · doi:10.15641/ghi.v3i1.762 · Cited by 22
Miłosz, M., Skulimowski, S. P., Kęsik, J., & Montusiewicz, J. (2020) · Digital Applications in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage · doi:10.1016/j.daach.2020.e00155 · Cited by 22
Akın, Ş., Ergün, O., Sürer, E., & Dino, İ. G. (2020) · Engineering Construction & Architectural Management · doi:10.1108/ecam-07-2020-0562 · Cited by 22
Finley, J. M., Gotsis, M., Lympouridis, V., Jain, S., Kim, A., & Fisher, B. E. (2021) · Frontiers in Neurology · doi:10.3389/fneur.2020.577713 · Cited by 24
A process model for quality in use evaluation of clinical decision support systems
Souza-Pereira, L., Ouhbi, S., & Pombo, N. G. C. C. (2021) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2021.103917 · Cited by 24
Perales‐Puchalt, J., Acosta-Rullán, M., Ramírez, M., Espinoza-Kissell, P., Vidoni, E. D., Niedens, M., Ellerbeck, E. F., Hinton, L., Loera, L., Ramírez, A. S., et al. (2022) · JMIR Aging · doi:10.2196/35625 · Cited by 22
Heterogeneity in the Usability Evaluation Process
Schmettow, M. (2008) · Electronic workshops in computing · doi:10.14236/ewic/hci2008.9 · Cited by 22
Eltahir, M. E., Al-Qatawneh, S. S., Al-Ramahi, N., & Alsalhi, N. R. (2019) · Journal of Technology and Science Education · doi:10.3926/jotse.590 · Cited by 22
Conversational management of network trouble perturbations in personal videoconferencing
Rintel, S. (2010) · Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction (OzCHI) · doi:10.1145/1952222.1952288 · Cited by 22
Error prevention in online forms: Use color instead of asterisks to mark required-fields
Pauwels, S. L., Hubscher, C., Leuthold, S., Bargas-Avila, J. A., & Opwis, K. (2009) · Interacting with Computers · doi:10.1016/j.intcom.2009.05.007 · Cited by 22
Chorianopoulos, K., & Spinellis, D. D. (2004) · Computers & Graphics · doi:10.1016/j.cag.2003.12.004 · Cited by 22
van de Glind, P. B. (2013) · Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) · Cited by 22
Voice Assistant Reminders for Pain Self-Management Tasks in Aging Adults
Shade, M. Y., Rector, K., Soumana, R., & Kupzyk, K. (2020) · Journal of Gerontological Nursing · doi:10.3928/00989134-20200820-03 · Cited by 21
User-oriented evaluation of a medical image retrieval system for radiologists
Markonis, D., Holzer, M., Baroz, F., Castañeda, R. L. R. D., Boyer, C., Langs, G., & Müller, H. (2015) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.04.003 · Cited by 21
Development of an Augmented Reality Concept for Icebreaker Assistance and Convoy Operations
Frydenberg, S., Aylward, K., Nordby, K., & Eikenes, J. O. (2021) · Journal of Marine Science and Engineering · doi:10.3390/jmse9090996 · Cited by 21
Shewchuk, B., Green, L. A., Barber, T., Miller, J., Teare, S., Campbell-Scherer, D. L., Mrklas, K., LI, L. C., Marlett, N. J., Wasylak, T., et al. (2021) · JMIR Formative Research · doi:10.2196/30495 · Cited by 22
FAIREST: A Framework for Assessing Research Repositories
Mathieu D’aquin, A., Kirstein, F., Oliveira, D., Schimmler, S., & Urbanek, S. (2022) · Data Intelligence · doi:10.1162/dint_a_00159 · Cited by 23
Comparing online cognitive load on mobile versus PC-based devices
Caldiroli, C. L., Gasparini, F., Corchs, S., Mangiatordi, A., Garbo, R., Antonietti, A., & Mantovani, F. (2022) · Personal and Ubiquitous Computing · doi:10.1007/s00779-022-01707-8 · Cited by 23
How can usability contribute to user experience?
Moczarny, I. M., de Villiers, R., & van Biljon, J. A. (2012) · South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists · doi:10.1145/2389836.2389862 · Cited by 21
The "Spree" Expert Finding System
Metze, F., Bauckhage, C., & Alpcan, T. (2007) · IEEE International Conference on Semantic Computing (ICSC) · doi:10.1109/icosc.2007.4338393 · Cited by 21
Usability evaluation of an academic library website: A case of the University of the Punjab
Iqbal, M., & Warraich, N. F. (2012) · Pakistan Journal of Information Management and Libraries · doi:10.47657/201213777 · Cited by 21
Design and Usability of Interactive User Profiles for Online Health Communities
Hartzler, A. L., Weis, B., Cahill, C., Pratt, W., Park, A., Backonja, U., & McDonald, D. W. (2016) · ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction · doi:10.1145/2903718 · Cited by 21
Rosenkranz, C., Holten, R., Räkers, M., & Behrmann, W. (2016) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/ejis.2015.22 · Cited by 21
Research Plus™ mobile app: information literacy “On the Go”
Mullins, K. (2017) · Reference Services Review · doi:10.1108/rsr-03-2016-0020 · Cited by 21
Radović, A., DeMand, A., Gmelin, T. A., Stein, B. D., & Miller, E. P. (2017) · Journal of Technology in Human Services · doi:10.1080/15228835.2017.1347552 · Cited by 21
Usability evaluation of menu interfaces for smartwatches
Park, K., Jeong, M., & Kim, K. (2018) · Journal of Computer Information Systems · doi:10.1080/08874417.2018.1425644 · Cited by 21
Lazar, J. K., Feng, J. H., & Hochheiser, H. (2017) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-805390-4.00010-8 · Cited by 21
Pastorino, M., Fioravanti, A., Arredondo, M. T., Cogollor, J. M., Rojo, J., Ferré, M., Bieńkiewicz, M. M. N., Hermsdörfer, J., Fringi, E., & Wing, A. M. (2014) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s140610213 · Cited by 21
The Enzyme Portal: a case study in applying user-centred design methods in bioinformatics
de Matos, P., Cham, J. A., Cao, H., Alcántara, R., Rowland, F., López, R., & Steinbeck, C. (2013) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-14-103 · Cited by 21
Mendes-Santos, C., Nunes, F., Weiderpass, E., Santana, R., & Andersson, G. (2022) · JMIR Cancer · doi:10.2196/33550 · Cited by 19
“Nevertheless, there is some consensus that usability tests may include a minimum of 5 participants per iteration and that approximately 80% of usability issues are discovered with as few as 4-6 participants [80].”
BackgroundAn open solution to provide personalized feedback for building energy management
Monacchi, A., Versolatto, F., Herold, M., Egarter, D., Tonello, A. M., & Elmenreich, W. (2017) · Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Smart Environments · doi:10.3233/ais-170422 · Cited by 20
"Canderoid": A mobile system to remotely monitor travelling status of the elderly with dementia
Xiao, B., Asghar, Z., Jamsa, T., & Pulli, P. J. (2013) · International Joint Conference on Awareness Science and Technology & Ubi-Media Computing · doi:10.1109/icawst.2013.6765519 · Cited by 20
ERDOĞAN, R., Saglam, Z., ÇETİNTAV, G., & Yılmaz, F. G. K. (2023) · Smart Learning Environments · doi:10.1186/s40561-023-00242-0 · Cited by 20
The TRECVid 2008 Event Detection evaluation
Rose, T., Fiscus, J. G., Over, P. L., Garofolo, J. S., & Michel, M. (2009) · IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/wacv.2009.5403089 · Cited by 20
Uddin, A., Morita, P. P., Tallevi, K., Armour, K., Li, J., Nolan, R. P., & Cafazzo, J. A. (2016) · JMIR mhealth and uhealth · doi:10.2196/mhealth.5288 · Cited by 20
Taylor, N. J., Hogden, E., Clay‐Williams, R., Li, Z., Lawton, R., & Braithwaite, J. (2016) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011069 · Cited by 21
Paiva, J. C., Leal, J. P., & Queirós, R. (2016) · ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE) · doi:10.1145/2899415.2899441 · Cited by 20
Visualization and Music Harmony: Design, Implementation, and Evaluation
Malandrino, D., Pirozzi, D., & Zaccagnino, R. (2018) · International Conference on Information Visualisation (IV) · doi:10.1109/iv.2018.00092 · Cited by 20
Zaidi, S. F. M., Duthie, C., Carr, E., & Maksoud, S. H. A. E. (2018) · ACM SIGGRAPH International Conference on Virtual-Reality Continuum and its Applications in Industry (VRCAI) · doi:10.1145/3284398.3284431 · Cited by 21
A conceptual model for quality of experience management to provide context-aware eHealth services
da Silva, M. D., Gonçalves, A., & Dantas, M. (2019) · Future generations computer systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2019.07.033 · Cited by 18
Loh, K. P., Sanapala, C., Giovanni, G. D., Klepin, H. D., Janelsins, M. C., Schnall, R., Culakova, E., Vertino, P. M., Susiarjo, M., Mendler, J. H., et al. (2021) · Journal of Geriatric Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.jgo.2021.02.023 · Cited by 20
An assessment of visualization tools for patient monitoring and medical decision making
Craft, M., Dobrenz, B., Dornbush, E., Hunter, M., Morris, J., Stone, M. T., & Barnes, L. E. (2015) · Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium · doi:10.1109/sieds.2015.7116976 · Cited by 20
Usability Evaluation Methods The Reliability and Usage of Cognitive Walkthrough and Usability Test
Jacobsen, N. E. (1999) · Cited by 20
Library web site administration: a strategic planning model for the smaller academic library
Ryan, S. (2003) · The Journal of Academic Librarianship · doi:10.1016/s0099-1333(03)00039-9 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Nielsen, J., & Landauer, T. K.
- ORCID
- Nielsen, Jakob
- Venue
- Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '93
- Publisher
- ACM Press
- Published
- 1993
- Pages
- 206-213
- OpenAlex
- W2099473180
- Cited by
- 1,961
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2026: 110 · 2025: 125 · 2024: 123 · 2023: 121 · 2022: 128 · 2021: 129 · 2020: 108 · 2019: 92 · 2018: 93 · 2017: 96 · 2016: 82 · 2015: 92 · 2014: 76 · 2013: 76 · 2012: 65
- FWCI
- 6.58
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
- Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
- Keywords
- usability evaluation, heuristic evaluation, Poisson process model, evaluation planning, user testing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review