The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Wikidata: a free collaborative knowledgebase
Open accessAbstract
This collaboratively edited knowledgebase provides a common source of data for Wikipedia, and everyone else.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Foundations for Provenance on the Web
Moreau, L. (2010) · Foundations and Trends® in Web Science · doi:10.1561/1800000010 · Cited by 168
Cited by
A Survey on Knowledge Graphs: Representation, Acquisition, and Applications
Ji, S., Pan, S., Cambria, E., Marttinen, P., & Yu, P. S. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2021.3070843 · Cited by 2,947
Unifying Large Language Models and Knowledge Graphs: A Roadmap
Pan, S., Luo, L., Wang, Y., Chen, C., Wang, J., & Wu, X. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2024.3352100 · Cited by 1,376
Knowledge graph refinement: A survey of approaches and evaluation methods
Paulheim, H. (2016) · Semantic Web · doi:10.3233/sw-160218 · Cited by 849
Knowledge Enhanced Contextual Word Representations
Peters, M. E., Neumann, M., Logan, R., Schwartz, R., Joshi, V., Singh, S., & Smith, N. A. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d19-1005 · Cited by 661
StereoSet: Measuring stereotypical bias in pretrained language models
Nadeem, M., Bethke, A., & Reddy, S. (2021) · Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.416 · Cited by 643
Knowledge Graph Embedding for Link Prediction
Rossi, A., Barbosa, D., Firmani, D., Matinata, A., & Merialdo, P. (2021) · ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data · doi:10.1145/3424672 · Cited by 601
“Examples of notable KGs are FreeBase [7], WikiData [62], DBPedia [4], Yago [54] and – in industry – Google KG [52], Microso Satori [48] and Facebook Graph Search [53].”
BackgroundTemporal Relational Ranking for Stock Prediction
Feng, F., He, X., Wang, X., Luo, C., Liu, Y., & Chua, T.-S. (2019) · ACM Transactions on Information Systems · doi:10.1145/3309547 · Cited by 553
DocRED: A Large-Scale Document-Level Relation Extraction Dataset
Yao, Y., Ye, D., Li, P., Han, X., Lin, Y., Liu, Z., Liu, Z., Huang, L., Zhou, J., & Sun, M. (2019) · Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1074 · Cited by 550
Veale, M., & Binns, R. (2017) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/2053951717743530 · Cited by 512
Veale, M., & Binns, R. (2017) · doi:10.31235/osf.io/ustxg · Cited by 512
Deriving Validity Time in Knowledge Graph
Leblay, J., & Chekol, M. W. (2018) · Companion of the The Web Conference 2018 on The Web Conference 2018 - WWW '18 · doi:10.1145/3184558.3191639 · Cited by 365
Bulathwela, S., Pérez-Ortiz, M., Holloway, C., Cukurova, M., & Shawe-Taylor, J. (2024) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su16020781 · Cited by 269
Introduction: What is a knowledge graph?
Fensel, D., Şimşek, U., Angele, K., Huaman, E., Kärle, E., Panasiuk, O., Toma, I., Umbrich, J., & Wahler, A. (2020) · Knowledge Graphs · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-37439-6_1 · Cited by 244
Time-aware language models as temporal knowledge bases
Dhingra, B., Cole, J. R., Eisenschlos, J. M., Gillick, D., Eisenstein, J., & Cohen, W. W. (2022) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00459 · Cited by 212
Graph Retrieval-Augmented Generation: A Survey
Peng, B., Zhu, Y., Liu, Y., Bo, X., Shi, H., Hong, C., Zhang, Y., & Tang, S. (2026) · ACM Transactions on Information Systems · doi:10.1145/3777378 · Cited by 206
Barack’s Wife Hillary: Using Knowledge Graphs for Fact-Aware Language Modeling
Logan, R., Liu, N. F., Peters, M. E., Gardner, M., & Singh, S. (2019) · Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1598 · Cited by 168
Assessing The Factual Accuracy of Generated Text
Goodrich, B., Rao, V., Liu, P. J., & Saleh, M. (2019) · Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining · doi:10.1145/3292500.3330955 · Cited by 162
Knowledge Graph Based Synthetic Corpus Generation for Knowledge-Enhanced Language Model Pre-training
Agarwal, O., Ge, H., Shakeri, S., & Al-Rfou, R. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.naacl-main.278 · Cited by 161
A comprehensive survey on relation extraction: recent advances and new frontiers
Zhao, X., Deng, Y., Yang, M., Wang, L., Zhang, R., Cheng, H., Lam, W., Shen, Y., & Xu, R. (2024) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3674501 · Cited by 168
Modeling Relation Paths for Knowledge Graph Completion
Shen, Y., Ding, N., Zheng, H.-T., Li, Y., & Yang, M. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2020.2970044 · Cited by 153
Sentence Embedding Alignment for Lifelong Relation Extraction
Wang, H., Xiong, W., Yu, M., Guo, X., Chang, S., & Wang, W. Y. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1086 · Cited by 127
Rethinking search: making domain experts out of dilettantes
Metzler, D., Tay, Y., Bahri, D., & Najork, M. (2021) · ACM SIGIR Forum · doi:10.1145/3476415.3476428 · Cited by 112
Knowledge Graph Quality Management: a Comprehensive Survey
Xue, B., & Zou, L. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2022.3150080 · Cited by 108
Simple Entity-Centric Questions Challenge Dense Retrievers
Sciavolino, C., Zhong, Z., Lee, J., & Chen, D. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.496 · Cited by 98
Entity-Based Knowledge Conflicts in Question Answering
Longpre, S., Perisetla, K., Chen, A., Ramesh, N., DuBois, C., & Singh, S. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.565 · Cited by 101
Revisiting DocRED - Addressing the False Negative Problem in Relation Extraction
Tan, Q., Xu, L., Bing, L., Ng, H. T., & Aljunied, S. M. (2022) · Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.580 · Cited by 94
Luo, H., E, H., Tang, Z., Peng, S., Guo, Y., Zhang, W., Ma, C., Dong, G., Song, M., Lin, W., et al. (2024) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics ACL 2024 · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.findings-acl.122 · Cited by 88
Knowledge Editing for Large Language Models: A Survey
Wang, S., Zhu, Y., Liu, H., Zheng, Z., Chen, C., & Li, J. (2025) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3698590 · Cited by 79
Heinzerling, B., & Inui, K. (2021) · Proceedings of the 16th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Main Volume · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.eacl-main.153 · Cited by 78
A Survey on Temporal Knowledge Graph: Representation Learning and Applications
Cai, L., Mao, X., Zhou, Y., Long, Z., Wu, C., & Lan, M. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2403.04782 · Cited by 68
Algorithmic Amplification of Politics on Twitter
Huszár, F., Ktena, S. I., O’Brien, C., Belli, L., Schlaikjer, A., & Hardt, M. (2022) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2025334119 · Cited by 65
ProoFVer: Natural Logic Theorem Proving for Fact Verification
Krishna, A., Riedel, S., & Vlachos, A. (2022) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00503 · Cited by 51
Knowledge-Augmented Language Model Prompting for Zero-Shot Knowledge Graph Question Answering
Baek, J., Aji, A., & Saffari, A. (2023) · Proceedings of the First Workshop on Matching From Unstructured and Structured Data (MATCHING 2023) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.matching-1.7 · Cited by 51
“, Poseidon) in Figure 1 in the Wikidata KG (Vrandecic and Krötzsch, 2014), there exist 60 triples, and most of them (e.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialKnowledge graphs: Introduction, history, and perspectives
Chaudhri, V. K., Baru, C., Chittar, N., Dong, X. L., Genesereth, M., Hendler, J., Kalyanpur, A., Lenat, D. B., Sequeda, J., Vrandečić, D., et al. (2022) · AI Magazine · doi:10.1002/aaai.12033 · Cited by 71
Self-citationOn the Evolution of Knowledge Graphs: A Survey and Perspective
Jiang, X., Xu, C., Shen, Y., Sun, X., Tang, L., Wang, S., Chen, Z., Wang, Y., & Guo, J. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.04835 · Cited by 42
A Dataset for Answering Time-Sensitive Questions
Chen, W., Wang, X., & Wang, W. Y. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2108.06314 · Cited by 40
Sarkar, S., Gaur, M., Chen, L. K., Garg, M., & Srivastava, B. (2023) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2023.1229805 · Cited by 38
INK: knowledge graph embeddings for node classification
Steenwinckel, B., Vandewiele, G., Weyns, M., Agozzino, T., Turck, F. D., & Ongenae, F. (2022) · Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1007/s10618-021-00806-z · Cited by 35
OpenBiodiv: A Knowledge Graph for Literature-Extracted Linked Open Data in Biodiversity Science
Penev, L., Dimitrova, M., Senderov, V., Zhelezov, G., Georgiev, T., Stoev, P., & Simov, K. (2019) · Publications · doi:10.3390/publications7020038 · Cited by 34
Does Recommend-Revise Produce Reliable Annotations? An Analysis on Missing Instances in DocRED
Huang, Q., Hao, S., Ye, Y., Zhu, S., Feng, Y., & Zhao, D. (2022) · Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.acl-long.432 · Cited by 28
Automated clinical knowledge graph generation framework for evidence based medicine.
Alam, F., Giglou, H. B., & Malik, K. M. (2023) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2023.120964 · Cited by 27
A Semantic Parsing and Reasoning-Based Approach to Knowledge Base Question Answering
Abdelaziz, I., Ravishankar, S., Kapanipathi, P., Roukos, S., & Gray, A. (2021) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v35i18.17988 · Cited by 26
Kraft, A., & Soulier, E. (2024) · The 2024 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3630106.3658981 · Cited by 25
Entity Enabled Relation Linking
Pan, J. Z., Zhang, M., Singh, K., Harmelen, F. V., Gu, J., & Zhang, Z. (2019) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-30793-6_30 · Cited by 20
Hendawi, R., Alian, S., & Li, J. (2022) · JMIR Formative Research · doi:10.2196/35069 · Cited by 19
The Life Cycle of Knowledge in Big Language Models: A Survey
Cao, B., Lin, H., Han, X., & Sun, L. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2303.07616 · Cited by 18
The Life Cycle of Knowledge in Big Language Models: A Survey
Cao, B., Lin, H., Han, X., & Sun, L. (2024) · Machine Intelligence Research · doi:10.1007/s11633-023-1416-x · Cited by 18
Towards Temporal Knowledge Graph Embeddings with Arbitrary Time Precision
Leblay, J., Chekol, M. W., & Liu, X. (2020) · Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management · doi:10.1145/3340531.3412028 · Cited by 15
Extracting Semantic Relations for Scholarly Knowledge Base Construction
Al-Zaidy, R. A., & Giles, C. L. (2018) · 2018 IEEE 12th International Conference on Semantic Computing (ICSC) · doi:10.1109/icsc.2018.00017 · Cited by 15
Message Passing for Complex Question Answering over Knowledge Graphs
Vakulenko, S., Fernandez Garcia, J. D., Polleres, A., de Rijke, M., & Cochez, M. (2019) · Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management · doi:10.1145/3357384.3358026 · Cited by 14
Quantifying gender bias towards politicians in cross-lingual language models
Stańczak, K., Ray Choudhury, S., Pimentel, T., Cotterell, R., & Augenstein, I. (2023) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0277640 · Cited by 13
El Morr, C., Maret, P., Muhlenbach, F., Dharmalingam, D., Tadesse, R., Creighton, A., Kundi, B., Buettgen, A., Mgwigwi, T., Dinca-Panaitescu, S., et al. (2021) · JMIR Formative Research · doi:10.2196/33335 · Cited by 12
Modeling Paths for Explainable Knowledge Base Completion
Stadelmaier, J., & Padó, S. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 ACL Workshop BlackboxNLP: Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for NLP · doi:10.18653/v1/w19-4816 · Cited by 12
Using knowledge graphs and behaviour trees for feedback-aware presentation agents,
Axelsson, N., & Skantze, G. (2020) · Proceedings of the 20th ACM International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents · doi:10.1145/3383652.3423884 · Cited by 11
Knowledgeable or Educated Guess? Revisiting Language Models as Knowledge Bases
Cao, B., Lin, H., Han, X., Sun, L., Yan, L., Liao, M., Xue, T., & Xu, J. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2106.09231 · Cited by 10
Creating a Scholarly Knowledge Graph from Survey Article Tables
Oelen, A., Stocker, M., & Auer, S. (2020) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-64452-9_35 · Cited by 9
Completeness, Recall, and Negation in Open-world Knowledge Bases: A Survey
Razniewski, S., Arnaout, H., Ghosh, S., & Suchanek, F. (2024) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3639563 · Cited by 8
TeCre: A Novel Temporal Conflict Resolution Method Based on Temporal Knowledge Graph Embedding
Ma, J., Zhou, C., Chen, Y., Wang, Y., Hu, G., & Qiao, Y. (2023) · Information · doi:10.3390/info14030155 · Cited by 7
Credible Intervals for Knowledge Graph Accuracy Estimation
Marchesin, S., & Silvello, G. (2025) · Proceedings of the ACM on Management of Data · doi:10.1145/3725279 · Cited by 7
Implicit Relation Linking for Question Answering over Knowledge Graph
Zhao, Y., Huang, J., Hu, W., Chen, Q., Qiu, X., Huo, C., & Ren, W. (2022) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2022 · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.findings-acl.312 · Cited by 5
Building a large gene expression-cancer knowledge base with limited human annotations
Marchesin, S., Menotti, L., Giachelle, F., Silvello, G., & Alonso, O. (2023) · Database · doi:10.1093/database/baad061 · Cited by 4
Time Travel with the BiTemporal RDF Model
Tansel, A. U., Wu, D., & Wang, H.-T. (2025) · Mathematics · doi:10.3390/math13132109 · Cited by 3
REMem: Reasoning with Episodic Memory in Language Agent
Shu, Y., Jonnalagedda, S. P., Gao, X., Gutiérrez, B. J., Qi, W., Das, K., Sun, H., & Su, Y. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.13530 · Cited by 1
Fundamental Problems With Model Editing: How Should Rational Belief Revision Work in LLMs?
Hase, P., Hofweber, T., Zhou, X., Stengel-Eskin, E., & Bansal, M. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.19354 · Cited by 1
ConceptFormer: Towards Efficient Use of Knowledge-Graph Embeddings in Large Language Models
Barmettler, J., Bernstein, A., & Rossetto, L. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2504.07624 · Cited by 3
Provenance-Enhanced Statements in Knowledge Graphs
Vitali, F., & Pasqual, V. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.15246
Metadata
- Authors
- Vrandečić, D., & Krötzsch, M.
- Venue
- Communications of the ACM
- Published
- 2014-09-23
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 78-85
- ISSN
- 0001-0782 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7317
- OpenAlex
- W2080133951
- Cited by
- 3,342
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 234.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
