Cited by 111Mobile Crowdsensing and CrowdsourcingTechnology Use by Older AdultsFinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance

"Why would anybody do this?": Understanding Older Adults' Motivations and Challenges in Crowd Work

Brewer, Robin, Morris, Meredith Ringel, Piper, Anne Marie·2016·Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Abstract

Diversifying participation in crowd work can benefit the worker and requester. Increasing numbers of older adults are online, but little is known about their awareness of or how they engage in mainstream crowd work. Through an online survey with 505 seniors, we found that most have never heard of crowd work but would be motivated to complete tasks by earning money or working on interesting or stimulating tasks. We follow up results from the survey with interviews and observations of 14 older adults completing crowd work tasks. While our survey data suggests that financial incentives are encouraging, in-depth interviews reveal that a combination of personal and social incentives may be stronger drivers of participation, but only if older adults can overcome accessibility issues and understand the purpose of crowd work. This paper contributes insights into how crowdsourcing sites could better engage seniors and other users.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/2858036.2858198

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brewer, R., Morris, M. R., & Piper, A. M.
Affiliations
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • Microsoft (United States) (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Publisher
ACM
Published
2016-05-07
Pages
2246-2257
OpenAlex
W2405742202
Cited by
111
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 2
FWCI
11.17
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
Keywords
crowdwork, older adults, crowdsourcing, participation motivation, financial incentives, social incentives, accessibility, task understanding, crowdsourcing platforms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review