Cited by 85Emotion and Mood RecognitionMental Health Research TopicsDigital Mental Health Interventions

Joint modeling of heterogeneous sensing data for depression assessment via multi-task learning

Open access
Lu, Jin, Shang, Chao, Yue, Chaoqun, Morillo, Reynaldo, Ware, Shweta, Kamath, Jayesh, Bamis, Athanasios, Russell, Alexander +2 more·2018·Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies

Abstract

Depression is a common mood disorder that causes severe medical problems and interferes negatively with daily life. Identifying human behavior patterns that are predictive or indicative of depressive disorder is important. Clinical diagnosis of depression relies on costly clinician assessment using survey instruments which may not objectively reflect the fluctuation of daily behavior. Self-administered surveys, such as the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS) commonly used to monitor depression, may show disparities from clinical decision. Smartphones provide easy access to many behavioral parameters, and Fitbit wrist bands are becoming another important tool to assess variables such as heart rates and sleep efficiency that are complementary to smartphone sensors. However, data used to identify depression indicators have been limited to a single platform either iPhone, or Android, or Fitbit alone due to the variation in their methods of data collection. The present work represents a large-scale effort to collect and integrate data from mobile phones, wearable devices, and self reports in depression analysis by designing a new machine learning approach. This approach constructs sparse mappings from sensing variables collected by various tools to two separate targets: self-reported QIDS scores and clinical assessment of depression severity. We propose a so-called heterogeneous multi-task feature learning method that jointly builds inference models for related tasks but of different types including classification and regression tasks. The proposed method was evaluated using data collected from 103 college students and could predict the QIDS score with an R2 reaching 0.44 and depression severity with an F1-score as high as 0.77. By imposing appropriate regularizers, our approach identified strong depression indicators such as time staying at home and total time asleep.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3191753

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Only two studies have combined physiological and smartphone data streams in models to monitor changing depressive symptoms.

    “only two studies have combined these data streams in models to monitor changing depressive symptoms (26, 27).”
  • Only one of the two studies that combined physiological and smartphone data streams relied on exclusive passive data collection.

    “Only one relied on exclusive passive data collection (27).”
  • Prior investigations have primarily focused on detecting presence or absence of depression rather than on assessing its severity, and they have shown overall low accuracy.

    “This has resulted in possible reliability problems, since these investigations have primarily focused on detecting presence or absence of depression rather than on assessing its severity, and they have shown overall low accuracy (14–18, 23–27).”
  • Studies conducted with patients with depression have mostly relied on self-report questionnaires to assign diagnoses and/or measure variation in symptoms and train the models.

    “Those studies conducted with patients with depression have mostly relied on self-report questionnaires to assign diagnoses and/or measure variation in symptoms and train the models.”
  • Previous evaluations of models to estimate depression passively have primarily relied on examining correlations between estimated and observed symptoms.

    “Previous evaluations of models to estimate depression passively have primarily relied on examining correlations between estimated and observed symptoms (18, 26, 27).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 54 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. N. Jaques, S. Taylor, A. Sano, and R. Picard. Multi-task, multi-kernel learning for estimating individual wellbeing. In Proc. NIPS Workshop on Multimodal Machine Learning, December 2015.
  2. K. Kroenke, R. L. Spitzer, and J. B. Williams. The PHQ-9. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 16(9):606-613, 2001.
  3. R. LiKamWa, Y. Liu, N. D. Lane, and L. Zhong. Can your smartphone infer your mood? In PhoneSense workshop, pages 1-5, 2011.
  4. H. Lu, D. Frauendorfer, M. Rabbi, M. S. Mast, G. T. Chittaranjan, A. T. Campbell, D. Gatica-Perez, and T. Choudhury. Stresssense: Detecting stress in unconstrained acoustic environments using smartphones. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Conference on Ubiquitous Computing, pages 351-360. ACM, 2012.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lu, J., Shang, C., Yue, C., Morillo, R., Ware, S., Kamath, J., Bamis, A., Russell, A., Wang, B., & Bi, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Connecticut, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Storrs, CT, USA
  • University of Connecticut (US)
  • UConn Health (US)
  • Amazon (United States) (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies
Published
2018-03-26
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
1-21
ISSN
2474-9567 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2794506852
Cited by
85
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2
FWCI
8.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • NSF (IIS-1407205, IIS-1320586, DBI-1356655)
  • NIH (R01DA037349, K02DA043063)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
depression assessment, multi-task learning, smartphone sensors, wearable devices, Fitbit, self-reported depression, depression severity prediction, sparse feature learning, sleep duration, time at home, university students, human behavior patterns

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review