The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fairness definitions explained
Abstract
Algorithm fairness has started to attract the attention of researchers in AI, Software Engineering and Law communities, with more than twenty different notions of fairness proposed in the last few years. Yet, there is no clear agreement on which definition to apply in each situation. Moreover, the detailed differences between multiple definitions are difficult to grasp. To address this issue, this paper collects the most prominent definitions of fairness for the algorithmic classification problem, explains the rationale behind these definitions, and demonstrates each of them on a single unifying case-study. Our analysis intuitively explains why the same case can be considered fair according to some definitions and unfair according to others.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Parity on the different metrics across disaggregated population subgroups corresponds to how fairness is often defined [37, 48].”
From Model Cards for Model Reporting (2019) · cites this paper as [48]
In the citing paper
“While similar concepts have been operationalized for machine learning classification tasks (Mehrabi et al. 2021; Verma and Rubin 2018), less has been done in the NLP space, which may contain more ambiguity than classification for tasks like language generation.”
From Bias and Fairness in Large Language Models: A Survey (2024) · cites this paper as Verma and Rubin 2018
In the citing paper
“To combat bias, this paper has highlighted strategies such as robust data augmentation, the application of counterfactual fairness, and the imperative for diverse, representative datasets alongside unbiased data collection methods [49][50][51].”
From Fairness and Bias in Artificial Intelligence: A Brief Survey of Sources, Impacts, and Mitigation Strategies (2023) · cites this paper as [51]
In the citing paper
“As we discussed in §2.3 scholars have proposed a number of competing ways to quantify fairness [46,75,93,148], some of which are mathematically incompatible with each other [26,51,80].”
From Out of Context: Investigating the Bias and Fairness Concerns of “Artificial Intelligence as a Service” (2023) · cites this paper as [148]
In the citing paper
“As a result, a classifier trained without regard to the protected attribute not only fails to remove discrimination, but it can complicate the detection and mitigation of discrimination downstream via in-processing or post-processing techniques [9,10,18,24,25,34,43,51], such as those we describe next.”
From Interventional Fairness: Causal Database Repair for Algorithmic Fairness (2019) · cites this paper as [51]
Citations
Cites
UCI Machine Learning Repository
Asuncion, A. (2007) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 24,190
CAUSALITY: MODELS, REASONING AND INFERENCE
Hitchcock, C., & Pearl, J. (2001) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.2307/3182612 · Cited by 4,827
Dwork, C., Hardt, M., Pitassi, T., Reingold, O., & Zemel, R. (2012) · Proceedings of the 3rd Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference · doi:10.1145/2090236.2090255 · Cited by 3,501
Causality: models, reasoning, and inference
(2000) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.38-1494a · Cited by 2,968
Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learning
Hardt, M., Price, E., & Srebro, N. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1610.02413 · Cited by 2,536
Fair prediction with disparate impact: a study of bias in recidivism prediction instruments
Chouldechova, A. (2017) · Big Data · doi:10.1089/big.2016.0047 · Cited by 2,159
Algorithmic Decision Making and the Cost of Fairness
Corbett-Davies, S., Pierson, E., Feller, A., Goel, S., & Huq, A. (2017) · Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/3097983.3098095 · Cited by 1,149
Kusner, M. J., Loftus, J. R., Russell, C., & Silva, R. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1703.06856 · Cited by 995
Fairness in Criminal Justice Risk Assessments: The State of the Art
Berk, R., Heidari, H., Jabbari, S., Kearns, M., & Roth, A. (2021) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124118782533 · Cited by 988 · cited 7×
“However, it was shown that statistical definitions are insufficient [8, 10, 12, 16].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialInherent trade-offs in the fair determination of risk scores
Kleinberg, J., Mullainathan, S., & Raghavan, M. (2017) · Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik · doi:10.4230/lipics.itcs.2017.43 · Cited by 943 · cited 7×
“Well-calibration [16].”
BackgroundResultInfluential
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- 2016. Machine Bias. https://www.propublica.org/article/machine-bias-risk-assessments-in-criminal-sentencing. (May 2016 ). Online ; accessed February 2018. 2016. Machine Bias. https://www.propublica.org/article/machine-bias-risk-assessments-in-criminal-sentencing. (May 2016). Online; accessed February 2018.
- Matt J. Kusner Joshua R. Loftus Chris Russell and Ricardo Silva. 2017. Counter-factual Fairness. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. Matt J. Kusner Joshua R. Loftus Chris Russell and Ricardo Silva. 2017. Counter-factual Fairness. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 901–1,000 of 1,004
Aksoy, O. (2024) · Advances in human resources management and organizational development book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-1766-2.ch013 · Cited by 1
Theoretical Guarantees for Model Auditing with Finite AdversariesPreprint
Díaz, M., Kairouz, P., Liao, J., & Sankar, L. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1911.03405 · Cited by 1
Ethics of Food Recommender ApplicationsPreprint
Karpati, D., Najjar, A., & Ambrossio, D. A. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2002.05679 · Cited by 1
Inherent Trade-offs in the Fair Allocation of TreatmentsPreprint
He, Y., Burghardt, K., Guo, S., & Lerman, K. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2010.16409 · Cited by 1
Ramadan, Q. (2020) · Cited by 1
A Framework and Benchmarking Study for Counterfactual Generating Methods on Tabular DataPreprint
Oliveira, R., & Martens, D. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2107.04680 · Cited by 1
Your fairness may vary: Group fairness of pretrained language models in toxic text classification.Preprint
Baldini, I., Wei, D., Ramamurthy, K. N., Yurochkin, M., & Singh, M. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 1
Statistical discrimination in learning agentsPreprint
Duéñez‐Guzmán, E. A., McKee, K. R., Mao, Y., Coppin, B., Chiappa, S., Vezhnevets, A. S., Bakker, M. A., Bachrach, Y., Sadedin, S., Isaac, W. S., et al. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2110.11404 · Cited by 11
Fairness in design : a tool for guidance for ethical artificial intelligence design
Shu, Y. (2021) · DR-NTU (Nanyang Technological University) · doi:10.32657/10356/154153 · Cited by 1
Normative Challenges of Risk Regulation of Artificial Intelligence and Automated Decision-MakingPreprint
Orwat, C., Bareis, J., Folberth, A., Jahnel, J., & Wadephul, C. (2022) · SocArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31235/osf.io/qkx8b · Cited by 1
Rzepka, N., Fernsel, L., Müller, H.-G., Simbeck, K., & Niels Pinkwart, C. (2023) · EdArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.35542/osf.io/qa9vz · Cited by 3
Algorithmic Fairness of Machine Learning Models for Alzheimer’s Disease Progression PredictionPreprint
Yuan, C., Linn, K. A., Hubbard, R. A., & Initiative, A. D. N. (2023) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2023.07.06.23292322 · Cited by 1
PACOL: Poisoning Attacks Against Continual LearnersPreprint
Ditzler, G., & Li, H. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4517547 · Cited by 3
Inequality-Averse Outcome-Based MatchingPreprint
Körtner, J., & Bach, R. L. (2023) · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/yrn4d · Cited by 3
On Prediction-Modelers and Decision-Makers: Why Fairness Requires More Than a Fair Prediction ModelPreprint
Scantamburlo, T., Baumann, J., & Heitz, C. (2023) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.05598 · Cited by 2
Cyril Neba, C. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4861836 · Cited by 1
Deep and statistical learning on audio-visual data for human-machine interface on embedded systems
Pouthier, B. (2024) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/8fc20884z8244z4d31z9a57zc5ed94601377 · Cited by 2
Sun, H. (2023) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/9f57d770z3466z4d39z8cfez9826045d155d · Cited by 1
On Adaptive Fairness in Software Systems
Farahani, A., Pasquale, L., Bennaceur, A., Welsh, T., & Nuseibeh, B. (2021) · International Symposium on Software Engineering for Adaptive and Self-Managing Systems (SEAMS) · doi:10.1109/seams51251.2021.00022 · Cited by 10
How Freedom is Undermined by Advanced Technology and What to Do About It
Weger, G. (2019) · European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics · doi:10.1145/3335082.3335099
Emergent design principles for prediction algorithms in health care
Wheelock, K., Lee, J. M., & Ghanbari, H. (2020) · Heart Rhythm · doi:10.1016/j.hrthm.2020.02.014
Towards an Interface Description Template for AI-enabled SystemsPreprint
Shadab, N., & Salado, A. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2007.07250
Facets of Fairness in Search and RecommendationPreprint
Verma, S., Gao, R., & Shah, C. S. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2008.01194
Self-citationFair Learning: an optimal transport based approach
Gordaliza, P. (2020) · UVaDOC UVaDOC University of Valladolid Documentary Repository (University of Valladolid) · doi:10.35376/10324/43392
Fairness Preferences, Actual and Hypothetical: A Study of Crowdworker IncentivesPreprint
Peng, A., Naecker, J., Hutchinson, B., Smart, A., & Moorosi, N. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2012.04216
Learning to Ignore: Fair and Task Independent RepresentationsPreprint
Boedi, L. H., & Gräbner, H. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.21256/zhaw-21602 · Cited by 1
Russell, J. R. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2102.04342
Algorithmic Accountability and the Statistical Legal Subject
Goldenfein, J. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108637657.007
Assessing Algorithmic Fairness without Sensitive Information
Noiret, S. (2021) · International Conference on Information Technology for Social Good (GoodIT) · doi:10.1145/3462203.3475894
FARF: A Fair and Adaptive Random Forests ClassifierPreprint
Zhang, W., Bifet, A., Zhang, X., Weiss, J. C., & Nejdl, W. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2108.07403
On the Fundamental Trade-offs in Learning Invariant Representations.Preprint
Sadeghi, B., & Boddeti, V. N. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University)
Costs and Benefits of Fair Regression
Zhao, H. (2024) · doi:10.55277/researchhub.mz9wqvk1
Distillorium: Learning fair rule lists with FairCORELS
Aïvodji, U. (2021)
Understanding Algorithmic Discrimination in Health Economics Through the Lens of Measurement Errors
Basu, A., Hammarlund, N. E., Khor, S., & Bansal, A. (2021) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w29413
Agarwal, S., & Mishra, S. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-76860-7_2
Marques, J. (2022) · Communication technologies et développement · doi:10.4000/ctd.7109
Wheeler, N. E. (2020) · Significance · doi:10.1111/1740-9713.01404
Díaz-Rodríguez, N., Binkytė-Sadauskienė, R., Bakkali, W., Bookseller, S., Tubaro, P., Bacevičius, A., & Chatila, R. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2104.14492 · Cited by 1
Clustering-Based Subgroup Detection for Automated Fairness Analysis
Schäfer, J. M., & Wiese, L. (2022) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-15743-1_5
(2022) · Issues in Information Systems · doi:10.48009/3_iis_2022_123
Exploring the Impact of Gender Bias Mitigation Approaches on a Downstream Classification Task
Sobhani, N., & Delany, S. J. (2022) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-16564-1_10 · Cited by 1
Proving unfairness of decision making systems without model access
Resheff, Y. S., Horesh, Y., & Shahar, M. (2022) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2022.118987
Algorithmic Bias and Fairness in Machine Learning: Two Sides of the Same Coin?
Priya, M. B. N., Srujana, G., Alekhya, A. N. S., Mundru, Y., & Yogi, M. K. (2022) · Journal of Soft Computing Paradigm · doi:10.36548/jscp.2022.4.002
Fairness von Biometrischen Systemen
Kolberg, J. (2023) · Datenschutz und Datensicherheit - DuD · doi:10.1007/s11623-022-1709-1
Fic Graph - Quantifying Fairness with Sensitive AttributePreprint
Akintande, O. J., & Olubusoye, O. E. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4352107
The Impact of Artificial Intelligence and Debiasing on Applicant Quality and Gender DiversityPreprint
Awad, E., Balafoutas, L., Chen, L., Ip, E., & Vecci, J. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4351820
Équité, explicabilité, paradoxes et biais
Saporta, G. (2022) · Statistique et société · doi:10.4000/statsoc.539
A Comparative Study of Gender Bias Mitigation Techniques and the Role of Implicit StereotypesPreprint
Sobhani, N., & Delany, S. J. (2023) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3126256/v1 · Cited by 1
Improving Fairness via Deep Ensemble Framework Using Preprocessing Interventions
Tayebi, A., & Garibay, Ö. Ö. (2023) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-35891-3_29 · Cited by 2
Methodology and tools for designing ethical artificial intelligence systems
Zhang, J. (2023) · DR-NTU (Nanyang Technological University) · doi:10.32657/10356/169362
Brief Audit of Post-pandemic Biometrics
Gnanasekar, S. T., Shaposhnyk, O., Yankovyi, I., & Yanushkevich, S. N. (2023) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-37731-0_44
Learning to Design Fair and Private Voting Rules (Extended Abstract)
Mohsin, F., Liu, A., Chen, P., Rossi, F., & Xia, L. (2023) · International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.24963/ijcai.2023/785
Uso de agrupamento para alcançar explicabilidade global de modelos de aprendizado de máquina
Vieira, C. P. R. (2023) · Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations (Universidade de São Paulo) · doi:10.11606/d.100.2023.tde-22052023-205242
Exploring fair scheduling aspects – Through final exam scheduling
Jáhn-Erdős, S., & Kővári, B. (2023) · Pollack Periodica · doi:10.1556/606.2023.00780
Leveraging Group Contrastive Explanations for Handling Fairness
Castelnovo, A., Inverardi, N., Malandri, L., Mercorio, F., Mezzanzanica, M., & Seveso, A. (2023) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-44070-0_17
Maximum Fairness-Aware (k, r)-Core Identification in Large Graphs
Tan, X., Guo, C., Wang, X., Zhang, W., & Chen, C. (2023) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-47843-7_19
Holmes, J. (2023) · Digital Repository Service (Northeastern University) · doi:10.17760/d20618668
Dissanayake, P. (2023) · Open Access Victoria University of Wellington | Te Herenga Waka (Figshare) · doi:10.26686/wgtn.24580947
Learning Analytics und Diskriminierung
Rzepka, N., Simbeck, K., & Niels Pinkwart, C. (2023) · Digitale Gesellschaft · doi:10.1515/9783839465820-013
Les « jeux de ficelles » d’une gouvernance éthique de l’intelligence artificielle
Marques, J. (2023) · Communication · doi:10.4000/communication.17756 · Cited by 2
Where has privacy gone?Preprint
Aı̈meur, E., & Gilles Brassard, A. (2024) · doi:10.22541/au.170664083.33427025/v1
A Case Study of Accurate and Fair Classification
Liu, X., & Chao, Z. (2024) · Lecture notes in electrical engineering · doi:10.1007/978-981-99-9243-0_40
Distributed information fusion for secure healthcare
Pathak, J., & Rajput, A. S. (2024) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-44-313233-9.00022-9
Reporting of Fairness Metrics in Clinical Risk Prediction Models: A Call for ChangePreprint
Rountree, L., Lin, Y.-T., Liu, C., Salvatore, M., Admon, A. J., Nallamothu, B. K., Singh, K., Basu, A., & Mukherjee, B. (2024) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2024.03.16.24304390
Arthur Charpentier, A. (2024) · Springer Actuarial · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-49783-4_8 · Cited by 1
Hoeppner, S., & Samek, M. (2024) · AUC IURIDICA · doi:10.14712/23366478.2024.24 · Cited by 1
Künstliche Intelligenz und ethische Verantwortung
Reder, M., & Koska, C. (2024) · Edition Moderne, Postmoderne · doi:10.1515/9783839469057 · Cited by 2
Vertrauen im Kontext – Messung und Operationalisierung
Wolf, S., Schütte, J. F., Hauer, M., & Koska, C. (2024) · transcript Verlag eBooks · doi:10.1515/9783839469057-011
Exploring Fairness Interpretability with FairnessFriend: A Chatbot Solution
Criscuolo, C., & Dolci, T. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering Workshops (ICDEW) · doi:10.1109/icdew61823.2024.00037
Conditional Calibrated Explanations: Finding a Path Between Bias and Uncertainty
Löfström, H., & Löfström, T. (2024) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-63787-2_17 · Cited by 1
OxonFair: A Flexible Toolkit for Algorithmic FairnessPreprint
Delaney, E. D., Fu, Z., Wachter, S., Mittelstadt, B., & Russell, C. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4894794 · Cited by 8
Kemmerzell, N., & Schreiner, A. (2024) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-70893-0_10
Bias mitigation for fair automation of classification tasks
Consuegra‐Ayala, J. P., Gutiérrez, Y., Almeida-Cruz, Y., & Palomar, M. (2024) · Expert Systems · doi:10.1111/exsy.13734
Maximum Entropy Logistic Regression for Demographic Parity in Supervised Classification
Vromman, F. V., Courtain, S., Leleux, P., de Schaetzen, C., Beghein, E., Kneip, A., & Saerens, M. (2024) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-74650-5_11
Fairness Analysis in Causal Models: An Application to Public Procurement
Teixeira, S., Nogueira, A. R., & da Gama, J. M. P. (2024) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-74627-7_14 · Cited by 1
Green, J. W., Glass, B., Purdy, J., & Daley, D. (2025) · doi:10.2196/preprints.71724
Correa-Agudelo, E., Gautam, Y., & Baye, T. M. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5194362
Multi-factor debiasing for correlating confounders for fair diagnostic model
Joshi, V., Correa, R., Das, A., Gichoya, J. W., & Banerjee, I. (2025) · SPIE Medical Imaging: Image Processing · doi:10.1117/12.3047316
FROC: Building Fair ROC from a Trained Classifier
Vummintala, A. M., Das, S., & Gujar, S. (2025) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v39i25.34836
Fairness and Trust in Data-Driven Decisions: Analyzing Discrepancies in Ordinal Decisions
Abel, E., & Siraj, S. (2025) · IEEE Symposium on Trustworthy, Explainable and Responsible Computational Intelligence (CITREx) · doi:10.1109/citrex64975.2025.10974938
da Silva, T. B., & Futai, M. M. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5246000
FairSpace: An Interactive Visualization System for Constructing Fair Consensus from Many Rankings
Shrestha, H., Cachel, K., Alkhathlan, M., Rundensteiner, E. A., & Harrison, L. (2025) · Computer Graphics Forum · doi:10.1111/cgf.70132
IEEE Standard for Evaluation Method of Machine Learning Fairness
(2025) · IEEE Standards · doi:10.1109/ieeestd.2025.11015942
The Parent-Child Framework: Biologically Inspired Bias-Free Machine Learning Model
Bayleyegn, Y. S., & Aragaw, B. T. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-96033-8_55
Aggregating Concepts of Fairness and Accuracy in Prediction Algorithms
Kinney, D. B. (2025) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3715275.3732031
M²FGB: A Min-Max Gradient Boosting Framework for Subgroup Fairness
Pereira, J. S. D. B., Valdrighi, G., & Raimundo, M. M. (2025) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3715275.3732197
Liu, Y., Yao, R., Liu, Y., Zong, R., Li, Z., Zhang, Y., & Wang, D. (2025) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3715275.3732066
Beyond Consistency: Nuanced Metrics for Individual Fairness
Waller, M., Rodrigues, O., & Cocarascu, O. (2025) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3715275.3732141 · Cited by 4
From fair graphs to fair data: a DAG-based approach to mitigating bias in AI systems
Jiang, V. W., Batista, G., & Bain, M. (2026) · Knowledge and Information Systems · doi:10.1007/s10115-026-02817-y
Algorithmes et discrimination dans l’emploi
Kirat, T. (2025) · Statistique et société · doi:10.4000/14amc
Elçi, Ö., Hooker, J., & Zhang, P. Y. (2025) · Synthesis lectures on operations research and applications · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-82190-5_1
Bridging the Gap: Deep Learning for Equitable Skin Disease Diagnosis Across Diverse Skin Tones
Kabir, A. U., Bhuiyan, T. I., Dhrubo, V., Islam, T., Morshed, M. A., & Reza, A. W. (2025) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-981-96-2721-9_9
Rana, S. A., Azizul, Z. H., & Awan, A. A. (2025) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-7064727/v1
Metadata
- Authors
- Verma, S., & Rubin, J.
- Affiliations
- Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur (IN)
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the International Workshop on Software Fairness
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2018-05-29
- Pages
- 1-7
- OpenAlex
- W2809878087
- Cited by
- 1,124
- References
- 21
- Citations by year
- 2026: 102 · 2025: 157 · 2024: 188 · 2023: 197 · 2022: 168 · 2021: 170 · 2020: 103 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 140.65
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
- Social Sciences › Law › Discrimination and Equality Law
- Keywords
- algorithmic fairness, algorithmic classification, fairness metrics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
