The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fairness definitions explained
Abstract
Algorithm fairness has started to attract the attention of researchers in AI, Software Engineering and Law communities, with more than twenty different notions of fairness proposed in the last few years. Yet, there is no clear agreement on which definition to apply in each situation. Moreover, the detailed differences between multiple definitions are difficult to grasp. To address this issue, this paper collects the most prominent definitions of fairness for the algorithmic classification problem, explains the rationale behind these definitions, and demonstrates each of them on a single unifying case-study. Our analysis intuitively explains why the same case can be considered fair according to some definitions and unfair according to others.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Parity on the different metrics across disaggregated population subgroups corresponds to how fairness is often defined [37, 48].”
From Model Cards for Model Reporting (2019) · cites this paper as [48]
In the citing paper
“While similar concepts have been operationalized for machine learning classification tasks (Mehrabi et al. 2021; Verma and Rubin 2018), less has been done in the NLP space, which may contain more ambiguity than classification for tasks like language generation.”
From Bias and Fairness in Large Language Models: A Survey (2024) · cites this paper as Verma and Rubin 2018
In the citing paper
“To combat bias, this paper has highlighted strategies such as robust data augmentation, the application of counterfactual fairness, and the imperative for diverse, representative datasets alongside unbiased data collection methods [49][50][51].”
From Fairness and Bias in Artificial Intelligence: A Brief Survey of Sources, Impacts, and Mitigation Strategies (2023) · cites this paper as [51]
In the citing paper
“As we discussed in §2.3 scholars have proposed a number of competing ways to quantify fairness [46,75,93,148], some of which are mathematically incompatible with each other [26,51,80].”
From Out of Context: Investigating the Bias and Fairness Concerns of “Artificial Intelligence as a Service” (2023) · cites this paper as [148]
In the citing paper
“As a result, a classifier trained without regard to the protected attribute not only fails to remove discrimination, but it can complicate the detection and mitigation of discrimination downstream via in-processing or post-processing techniques [9,10,18,24,25,34,43,51], such as those we describe next.”
From Interventional Fairness: Causal Database Repair for Algorithmic Fairness (2019) · cites this paper as [51]
Citations
Cites
UCI Machine Learning Repository
Asuncion, A. (2007) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 24,190
CAUSALITY: MODELS, REASONING AND INFERENCE
Hitchcock, C., & Pearl, J. (2001) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.2307/3182612 · Cited by 4,827
Dwork, C., Hardt, M., Pitassi, T., Reingold, O., & Zemel, R. (2012) · Proceedings of the 3rd Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference · doi:10.1145/2090236.2090255 · Cited by 3,501
Causality: models, reasoning, and inference
(2000) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.38-1494a · Cited by 2,968
Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learning
Hardt, M., Price, E., & Srebro, N. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1610.02413 · Cited by 2,536
Fair prediction with disparate impact: a study of bias in recidivism prediction instruments
Chouldechova, A. (2017) · Big Data · doi:10.1089/big.2016.0047 · Cited by 2,159
Algorithmic Decision Making and the Cost of Fairness
Corbett-Davies, S., Pierson, E., Feller, A., Goel, S., & Huq, A. (2017) · Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/3097983.3098095 · Cited by 1,149
Kusner, M. J., Loftus, J. R., Russell, C., & Silva, R. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1703.06856 · Cited by 995
Fairness in Criminal Justice Risk Assessments: The State of the Art
Berk, R., Heidari, H., Jabbari, S., Kearns, M., & Roth, A. (2021) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124118782533 · Cited by 988 · cited 7×
“However, it was shown that statistical definitions are insufficient [8, 10, 12, 16].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialInherent trade-offs in the fair determination of risk scores
Kleinberg, J., Mullainathan, S., & Raghavan, M. (2017) · Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik · doi:10.4230/lipics.itcs.2017.43 · Cited by 943 · cited 7×
“Well-calibration [16].”
BackgroundResultInfluential
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- 2016. Machine Bias. https://www.propublica.org/article/machine-bias-risk-assessments-in-criminal-sentencing. (May 2016 ). Online ; accessed February 2018. 2016. Machine Bias. https://www.propublica.org/article/machine-bias-risk-assessments-in-criminal-sentencing. (May 2016). Online; accessed February 2018.
- Matt J. Kusner Joshua R. Loftus Chris Russell and Ricardo Silva. 2017. Counter-factual Fairness. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. Matt J. Kusner Joshua R. Loftus Chris Russell and Ricardo Silva. 2017. Counter-factual Fairness. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 701–800 of 1,004
de Lima, L. D., Ricarte, D. R., & Siebra, C. A. (2024) · International Conference on Climate Informatics · doi:10.1111/coin.70003 · Cited by 2
Introducing fairness in network visualization
Eades, P., Hong, S.-H., Liotta, G., Montecchiani, F., Nöllenburg, M., Piselli, T., & Wismath, S. (2024) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2024.121642 · Cited by 3
Ghose, A., Pallav, P., & Ali, S. M. (2025) · Advances in finance, accounting, and economics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-7036-0.ch007 · Cited by 4
General procedure to measure fairness in regression problems
Ferreira, J. S., Slavkovik, M., & Casillas, J. (2025) · International Journal of Data Science and Analytics · doi:10.1007/s41060-025-00721-2 · Cited by 4
Guidelines for designing visualization tools for group fairness analysis in binary classification
Cruz, A., Salazar, T., Carvalho, M., Maç�ãs, C., Machado, P., & Abreu, P. H. (2025) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-025-11179-w · Cited by 3
Performance Evaluation for Detecting and Alleviating Biases in Predictive Machine Learning Models
Khakurel, U. B., Abdelmoumin, G., & Rawat, D. B. (2025) · ACM transactions on probabilistic machine learning. · doi:10.1145/3729432 · Cited by 3
Futaisi, N. D. A., Schuller, B. W., Ringeval, F., & Pantić, M. (2025) · Frontiers in Digital Health · doi:10.3389/fdgth.2025.1274675 · Cited by 5
Towards an Interface Description Template for Reusing AI-enabled Systems
Shadab, N., & Salado, A. (2020) · Conference proceedings/Conference proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/smc42975.2020.9282823 · Cited by 3
Data Transparency and Fairness Analysis of the NYPD Stop-and-Frisk Program
Badr, Y., & Sharma, R. (2022) · Journal of Data and Information Quality · doi:10.1145/3460533 · Cited by 3
Marques, J. (2022) · Terminal · doi:10.4000/terminal.8288 · Cited by 3
Quantifying Bias in a Face Verification System
Frisella, M., Khorrami, P., Matterer, J., Kratkiewicz, K., & Torres‐Carrasquillo, P. A. (2022) · doi:10.3390/cmsf2022003006 · Cited by 3
Bias analysis and mitigation in data-driven tools using provenance
Moskovitch, Y., Li, J., & Jagadish, H. V. (2022) · doi:10.1145/3530800.3534528 · Cited by 3
Measuring Fairness in Machine Learning Models via Counterfactual Examples
Haffar, R., Singh, A. K., Domingo‐Ferrer, J., & Jebreel, N. (2022) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-13448-7_10 · Cited by 3
Maximizing Submodular Functions for Recommendation in the Presence of Biases
Mehrotra, A., & Vishnoi, N. K. (2023) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3543507.3583195 · Cited by 3
Explainable Global Fairness Verification of Tree-Based Classifiers
Calzavara, S., Cazzaro, L., Lucchese, C., & Marcuzzi, F. (2023) · IEEE Conference on Secure and Trustworthy Machine Learning (SaTML) · doi:10.1109/satml54575.2023.00011 · Cited by 3
Shih, J., & Chin, Z.-H. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on Electronic Communications, Internet of Things and Big Data (ICEIB) · doi:10.1109/iceib57887.2023.10170339 · Cited by 3
Purificato, E., & Luca, E. W. D. (2023) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-37249-0_14 · Cited by 6
Culture Sensitivity and Information Access: A Qualitative Study among Ethnic Groups
Chen, H., Chan‐Olmsted, S. M., & Thai, M. T. (2023) · The Qualitative Report · doi:10.46743/2160-3715/2023.5981 · Cited by 5
Model-Agnostic Bias Measurement in Link Prediction
Schwertmann, L., Ravi, M. P. K., & de Melo, G. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EACL · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-eacl.121 · Cited by 3
Fair Empirical Risk Minimization Revised
Franco, D., Oneto, L., & Anguita, D. (2023) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-43085-5_3 · Cited by 3
GenFair: A Genetic Fairness-Enhancing Data Generation Framework
Mazzoni, F., Manerba, M. M., Cinquini, M., Guidotti, R., & Ruggieri, S. (2023) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-45275-8_24 · Cited by 3
Evolutionary Algorithms for Fair Machine Learning
Freitas, A. A., & Brookhouse, J. (2023) · Genetic and evolutionary computation · doi:10.1007/978-981-99-3814-8_17 · Cited by 3
Generalizing Group Fairness in Machine Learning via Utilities
Blandin, J., & Kash, I. A. (2023) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.1.14238 · Cited by 6
Abstract Interpretation-Based Feature Importance for Support Vector Machines
Pal, A., Ranzato, F., Urban, C., & Zanella, M. (2023) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-50524-9_2 · Cited by 3
Falcon: Fair Active Learning Using Multi-Armed Bandits
Tae, K. H., Zhang, H., Park, J., Rong, K., & Whang, S. E. (2024) · Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment · doi:10.14778/3641204.3641207 · Cited by 8
Bialkova, S. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-56471-0_10 · Cited by 3
Bothmann, L., & Peters, K. (2024) · AStA Wirtschafts- und Sozialstatistisches Archiv · doi:10.1007/s11943-024-00346-0 · Cited by 3
Bias Mitigation Methods: Applicability, Legality, and Recommendations for Development
Waller, M., Rodrigues, O., Lee, M. S. A., & Cocarascu, O. (2024) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.1.16759 · Cited by 5
Beyond Accuracy: Rethinking Outlier Detection in Asylum Data
Kaltenhauser, K., Slaats, T., Muller, M. J., & Møller, N. H. (2025) · ACM Journal on Responsible Computing · doi:10.1145/3718986 · Cited by 4
Enhancing Transparency in Large Language Models to Meet EU AI Act Requirements
Kalodanis, K., Rizomiliotis, P., Feretzakis, G., Kalles, D., Verykios, V. S., & Anagnostopoulos, D. (2024) · Pan-Hellenic Conference on Progress in Computing and Informatics (PCI) · doi:10.1145/3716554.3716597 · Cited by 6
GNN’s FAME: Fairness-Aware MEssages for Graph Neural Networks
Purificato, E., Mahadik, H. J., Boratto, L., & Luca, E. W. D. (2025) · ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization (UMAP) · doi:10.1145/3699682.3728324 · Cited by 3
FACEGroup: Feasible and Actionable Counterfactual Explanations for Group Fairness
Fragkathoulas, C., Papanikou, V., Pitoura, E., & Terzi, E. (2025) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-06078-5_3 · Cited by 3
Bakker, M. A., Tu, D. P., Gummadi, K. P., Pentland, A., Varshney, K. R., & Weller, A. (2021) · Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society · doi:10.1145/3461702.3462575 · Cited by 2
Hohma, E., Burnell, R., Corrigan, C. C., & Luetge, C. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Technology and Society · doi:10.1109/tts.2022.3211073 · Cited by 3
Audit of Computational Intelligence Techniques for EDI-aware Systems
Abid, N., Shmerko, V. P., & Yanushkevich, S. N. (2022) · International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn55064.2022.9892638 · Cited by 3
Algorithmic Fairness and its Limits in Group-Formation.
Sahlgren, O., & Laitinen, A. (2020) · Tampere University Institutional Repository (Tampere University) · Cited by 3
Taking the Confusion Out of Multinomial Confusion Matrices and Imbalanced Classes
Lovell, D. R., McCarron, B., Langfield, B., Tran, K. A., & Bradley, A. P. (2021) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-981-16-8531-6_2 · Cited by 3
Fundamental Approaches to Software Engineering
Johnsen, E. B., & Wimmer, M. (2022) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-99429-7 · Cited by 3
How Is Socially Responsible Academic Performance Prediction Possible?
Keller, B., Lünich, M., & Marcinkowski, F. (2022) · Advances in higher education and professional development book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-9247-2.ch006 · Cited by 4
What Norms Are Social Robots Reflecting? A Socio-Legal Exploration on HRI Developers
Tanqueray, L., & Larsson, S. (2023) · Frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications · doi:10.3233/faia220630 · Cited by 3
Learning Fair Representations through Uniformly Distributed Sensitive Attributes
Kenfack, P. J., Rivera, A. R., Khan, A., & Mazzara, M. (2023) · IEEE Conference on Secure and Trustworthy Machine Learning (SaTML) · doi:10.1109/satml54575.2023.00014 · Cited by 4
Ahmed, Z., Vidgen, B., & Hale, S. A. (2021) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2103.11806 · Cited by 3
Amortized Generation of Sequential Counterfactual Explanations for Black-box Models.Preprint
Verma, S., Hines, K., & Dickerson, J. P. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 3
Self-citationAn Anti-Subordination Approach to Fair ClassificationPreprint
Keswani, V., & Celis, L. E. (2022) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4116835 · Cited by 3
Sargeant, H. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4513990 · Cited by 3
Digital Labor as a Structural Fairness Issue in Recommender Systems
Genovesi, S. (2023) · The International library of ethics, law and technology · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-34804-4_5 · Cited by 2
Tyagi, S., Anuj, Qian, W., Xie, J., & Andrews, R. (2024) · International Journal of Information Management Data Insights · doi:10.1016/j.jjimei.2024.100283 · Cited by 2
Bias Amplification to Facilitate the Systematic Evaluation of Bias Mitigation Methods
Burgon, A., Zhang, Y., Petrick, N., Sahiner, B., Kenny, H., & Samala, R. K. (2024) · IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics · doi:10.1109/jbhi.2024.3491946 · Cited by 4
Finding representative group fairness metrics using correlation estimations
Anahideh, H., Nezami, N., & Asudeh, A. (2024) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2024.125652 · Cited by 3
Emergent Discrimination: Should We Protect Algorithmic Groups?
Zeiser, J. (2025) · Journal of Applied Philosophy · doi:10.1111/japp.12793 · Cited by 2
Fairness in Machine Learning: A Survey Part 1
Roberts-Licklider, K., & Trafali̇s, T. B. (2025) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-81010-7_16 · Cited by 2
Fairness Challenges in the Design of Machine Learning Applications for Healthcare
Ryan, S., Cai, W., Bowman, R., & Doherty, G. J. (2025) · ACM Transactions on Computing for Healthcare · doi:10.1145/3728368 · Cited by 5
Joshi, H. C., & Kumar, S. (2025) · ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology · doi:10.1145/3730579 · Cited by 2
Evaluating Fairness and Bias in Large Language Models for Tabular Data
Tayebi, A., & Garibay, Ö. Ö. (2025) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-93415-5_7 · Cited by 2
FairSense: Long-Term Fairness Analysis of ML-Enabled Systems
She, Y., Biswas, S., Kästner, C., & Kang, E. (2025) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceedings (ICSE-Companion) · doi:10.1109/icse55347.2025.00159 · Cited by 2
Ponmalar, S., Kumar, K. N., Balaji, R. V., Rohith, T., & Kaarthick, A. K. N. (2025) · International Conference on Augmented Intelligence and Sustainable Systems (ICAISS) · doi:10.1109/icaiss61471.2025.11042179 · Cited by 3
FairAlloc: Learning Fair Organ Allocation Policy for Liver Transplant
Ding, S., Zha, D., Zhang, K., Chen, L., Jiang, X., Hu, X., & Zou, N. (2025) · Journal of Healthcare Informatics Research · doi:10.1007/s41666-025-00206-8 · Cited by 2
Zhou, D., Wu, B., Wang, K., Yang, Q., Deng, Y., & Yiu, S. (2025) · IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE) · doi:10.1109/icde65448.2025.00157 · Cited by 2
Pasupuleti, S. P., Kola, J., Kodete, S. P. M., & Palli, S. H. (2025) · Analytics · doi:10.3390/analytics4040026 · Cited by 3
Towards Systematic Specification and Verification of Fairness Requirements: A Position Paper
Ramadan, Q., Ruohonen, J., Tiwari, A., Alami, A., & Boukhers, Z. (2025) · IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference Workshops (REW) · doi:10.1109/rew66121.2025.00059 · Cited by 2
The Multifaced Nature of Bias in AI: Impact on Model Generalization, Robustness, and Fairness
Ntoutsi, E. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-48522-1_11 · Cited by 2
Multi-objective optimization formulation for Alzheimer’s disease trial patient selection
Moayedikia, A., Fin, S., & Wiil, U. K. (2025) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2025.104955 · Cited by 4
The BEETS framework for responsible artificial intelligence
Tettegah, S. (2026) · Discover Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s44163-026-01597-2 · Cited by 3
Fairness Embedded Adaptive Recommender System: A Conceptual Framework
Popa, A. (2021) · International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications · doi:10.14569/ijacsa.2021.0120560 · Cited by 2
Increasing Fairness in Predictions Using Bias Parity Score Based Loss Function Regularization
Jain, B., Huber, M., & Elmasri, R. A. (2023) · Proceedings of the ... International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference · doi:10.32473/flairs.36.133311 · Cited by 9
SCALES: From Fairness Principles to Constrained Decision-Making
Balakrishnan, S., Bi, J., & Soh, H. (2022) · Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society · doi:10.1145/3514094.3534190 · Cited by 3
Face Biometric Fairness Evaluation on Real vs Synthetic Cross-Spectral Images
Lai, K., Shmerko, V. P., & Yanushkevich, S. N. (2022) · IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Machine Intelligence (CogMI) · doi:10.1109/cogmi56440.2022.00024 · Cited by 2
Algorithmic bias: Looking beyond data bias to ensure algorithmic accountability and equity
Thais, S. J., Shumway, H., & Saragih, A. (2023) · MIT Science Policy Review · doi:10.38105/spr.5lwvw66ssy · Cited by 2
Lenders, D., & Calders, T. (2023) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-023-00342-0 · Cited by 2
New Coarse-to-Fine Approaches for Age Estimation Based on Separable Convolutions
Huang, Y.-J., & Wu, H.-L. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3333871 · Cited by 2
Bias in Machine Learning Algorithms
Sharma, I., & Rathodiya, B. (2019) · Türk bilgisayar ve matematik eğitimi dergisi · doi:10.61841/turcomat.v10i2.14387 · Cited by 2
Pelegrina, G. D., Couceiro, M., & Duarte, L. T. (2024) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3630106.3658905 · Cited by 2
Barrera, D., Brailsford, S., & Chapman, A. P. (2024) · Journal of the Operational Research Society · doi:10.1080/01605682.2024.2354364 · Cited by 2
Fairness in AI: challenges in bridging the gap between algorithms and law
Giannopoulos, G., Psalla, M., Kavouras, L., Sacharidis, D., Mareček, J., Matilla, G. M., & Emiris, I. Z. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering Workshops (ICDEW) · doi:10.1109/icdew61823.2024.00034 · Cited by 2
Non-Invasive Fairness in Learning Through the Lens of Data Drift
Yang, K., & Meliou, A. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE) · doi:10.1109/icde60146.2024.00172 · Cited by 2
The Case for Hybrid Multi-Objective Optimisation in High-Stakes Machine Learning Applications
Freitas, A. A. (2024) · ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter · doi:10.1145/3682112.3682116 · Cited by 3
Modeling Individual Fairness Beliefs and Its Applications
Zhang, C., Jacob, V. S., & Ryu, Y. U. (2024) · ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems · doi:10.1145/3682070 · Cited by 2
Identifying Characteristics of Reflection Triggers in Data Science Ethics Education
Linke, D., & Müller-Birn, C. (2024) · Mensch und Computer (MuC) · doi:10.1145/3670653.3677486 · Cited by 2
Bias Detection and Correction Methods for Machine Learning Algorithms
Dimitrakopoulou, G., Kapsalis, N., & Kokkinis, G. (2024) · 2024 5th International Conference in Electronic Engineering, Information Technology & Education (EEITE) · doi:10.1109/eeite61750.2024.10654404 · Cited by 2
Pelegrina, G. D., Siraj, S., Duarte, L. T., & Michel Grabisch, B. (2024) · Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2024.109427 · Cited by 2
Igoche, B. I., Matthew, O., Bednár, P., & GEGOV, A. E. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1109/is61756.2024.10705239 · Cited by 2
FIEAP: A Machine Learning Approach for Fair and Interpretable Employee Attrition Prediction
Dorleon, G. (2024) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-78090-5_17 · Cited by 2
Yin, H. J., Li, Q., Yang, S., Zhang, C., Zhai, Y., Hou, H., & Yan, Q. (2024) · Holistic Integrative Oncology · doi:10.1007/s44178-024-00134-4 · Cited by 2
How people connect fairness and equity when they talk about data uses
Kennedy, H., Ditchfield, H., Oman, S., Bates, J., Medina-Perea, I., Frątczak, M., & Taylor, M. (2024) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/20539517241303162 · Cited by 3
Gender-Neutral English to Portuguese Machine Translator: Promoting Inclusive Language
Rabonato, R. T., Milios, E., & Berton, L. (2025) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-79038-6_13 · Cited by 2
A Retrospective of the Tutorial on Opportunities and Challenges of Online Deep Learning
Kulbach, C., Cazzonelli, L., Ngo, H.-A., Le-Nguyen, M.-H., & Bifet, A. (2025) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-74630-7_25 · Cited by 2
Ramachandran, S., & Rattani, A. (2023) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2025.130024 · Cited by 4
Interdisciplinary Perspectives on the (Un)fairness of Artificial Intelligence
Starke, C., Blanke, T., Helberger, N., Smets, S., & de Vreese, C. H. (2025) · Minds and Machines · doi:10.1007/s11023-025-09722-3 · Cited by 2
Chowdhury, S., & Klautzer, L. (2025) · Cambridge Forum on AI Law and Governance · doi:10.1017/cfl.2025.7 · Cited by 3
Portable fair decision making through modular approach
Wu, F., Ye, A., Chen, Q., Zhang, H., & Chen, J. (2025) · Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2025.111361 · Cited by 3
Qin, Q., Djian, B., Merlo, E., Li, H., & Gambs, S. (2025) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2025.107876 · Cited by 1
Improved Boosted Classification to Mitigate the Ethnicity and Age Group Unfairness
Colakovic, I., & Karakatič, S. (2022) · International Conference on Data Science, Technology and Applications (DATA) · doi:10.5220/0011287400003269 · Cited by 2
Lee, M. S. A., Floridi, L., & Singh, J. P. (2022) · Digital ethics lab yearbook · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-09846-8_11 · Cited by 2
Accinelli, C., Catania, B., & Guerrini, G. (2022) · IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData) · doi:10.1109/bigdata55660.2022.10020717 · Cited by 2
A New Reinforcement Learning-Based Framework for Unbiased Autonomous Software Systems
Sulaimon, I. A., Ghoneim, A., & Alrashoud, M. R. (2019) · International Conference on Modeling, Simulation, and Applied Optimization · doi:10.1109/icmsao.2019.8880288 · Cited by 3
Racicot, T., Khoury, R., & Père, C. (2021) · doi:10.21428/594757db.81632d17 · Cited by 2
Algorithmic Fairness in Applied Machine Learning Contexts
Russell, J. R. (2021) · International Conference on Compute and Data Analysis (ICCDA) · doi:10.1145/3456529.3456537 · Cited by 2
A systematic approach to group fairness in automated decision making
Hertweck, C., & Heitz, C. (2021) · Zürcher Hochschule für Angewandte Wissenschaften digital collection (Zurich University of Applied Sciences) · doi:10.21256/zhaw-23113 · Cited by 2
Learn and Visually Explain Deep Fair Models: an Application to Face Recognition
Franco, D., Oneto, L., Navarin, N., & Anguita, D. (2021) · International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn52387.2021.9533659 · Cited by 3
Assessing Fair Machine Learning Strategies Through a Fairness-Utility Trade-off Metric
de Lima, L. D., Ricarte, D. R., & Siebra, C. A. (2021) · Anais do XVIII Encontro Nacional de Inteligência Artificial e Computacional (ENIAC 2021) · doi:10.5753/eniac.2021.18288 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Verma, S., & Rubin, J.
- Affiliations
- Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur (IN)
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the International Workshop on Software Fairness
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2018-05-29
- Pages
- 1-7
- OpenAlex
- W2809878087
- Cited by
- 1,124
- References
- 21
- Citations by year
- 2026: 102 · 2025: 157 · 2024: 188 · 2023: 197 · 2022: 168 · 2021: 170 · 2020: 103 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 140.65
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
- Social Sciences › Law › Discrimination and Equality Law
- Keywords
- algorithmic fairness, algorithmic classification, fairness metrics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
