The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fairness definitions explained
Abstract
Algorithm fairness has started to attract the attention of researchers in AI, Software Engineering and Law communities, with more than twenty different notions of fairness proposed in the last few years. Yet, there is no clear agreement on which definition to apply in each situation. Moreover, the detailed differences between multiple definitions are difficult to grasp. To address this issue, this paper collects the most prominent definitions of fairness for the algorithmic classification problem, explains the rationale behind these definitions, and demonstrates each of them on a single unifying case-study. Our analysis intuitively explains why the same case can be considered fair according to some definitions and unfair according to others.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Parity on the different metrics across disaggregated population subgroups corresponds to how fairness is often defined [37, 48].”
From Model Cards for Model Reporting (2019) · cites this paper as [48]
In the citing paper
“While similar concepts have been operationalized for machine learning classification tasks (Mehrabi et al. 2021; Verma and Rubin 2018), less has been done in the NLP space, which may contain more ambiguity than classification for tasks like language generation.”
From Bias and Fairness in Large Language Models: A Survey (2024) · cites this paper as Verma and Rubin 2018
In the citing paper
“To combat bias, this paper has highlighted strategies such as robust data augmentation, the application of counterfactual fairness, and the imperative for diverse, representative datasets alongside unbiased data collection methods [49][50][51].”
From Fairness and Bias in Artificial Intelligence: A Brief Survey of Sources, Impacts, and Mitigation Strategies (2023) · cites this paper as [51]
In the citing paper
“As we discussed in §2.3 scholars have proposed a number of competing ways to quantify fairness [46,75,93,148], some of which are mathematically incompatible with each other [26,51,80].”
From Out of Context: Investigating the Bias and Fairness Concerns of “Artificial Intelligence as a Service” (2023) · cites this paper as [148]
In the citing paper
“As a result, a classifier trained without regard to the protected attribute not only fails to remove discrimination, but it can complicate the detection and mitigation of discrimination downstream via in-processing or post-processing techniques [9,10,18,24,25,34,43,51], such as those we describe next.”
From Interventional Fairness: Causal Database Repair for Algorithmic Fairness (2019) · cites this paper as [51]
Citations
Cites
UCI Machine Learning Repository
Asuncion, A. (2007) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 24,190
CAUSALITY: MODELS, REASONING AND INFERENCE
Hitchcock, C., & Pearl, J. (2001) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.2307/3182612 · Cited by 4,827
Dwork, C., Hardt, M., Pitassi, T., Reingold, O., & Zemel, R. (2012) · Proceedings of the 3rd Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference · doi:10.1145/2090236.2090255 · Cited by 3,501
Causality: models, reasoning, and inference
(2000) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.38-1494a · Cited by 2,968
Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learning
Hardt, M., Price, E., & Srebro, N. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1610.02413 · Cited by 2,536
Fair prediction with disparate impact: a study of bias in recidivism prediction instruments
Chouldechova, A. (2017) · Big Data · doi:10.1089/big.2016.0047 · Cited by 2,159
Algorithmic Decision Making and the Cost of Fairness
Corbett-Davies, S., Pierson, E., Feller, A., Goel, S., & Huq, A. (2017) · Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/3097983.3098095 · Cited by 1,149
Kusner, M. J., Loftus, J. R., Russell, C., & Silva, R. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1703.06856 · Cited by 995
Fairness in Criminal Justice Risk Assessments: The State of the Art
Berk, R., Heidari, H., Jabbari, S., Kearns, M., & Roth, A. (2021) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124118782533 · Cited by 988 · cited 7×
“However, it was shown that statistical definitions are insufficient [8, 10, 12, 16].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialInherent trade-offs in the fair determination of risk scores
Kleinberg, J., Mullainathan, S., & Raghavan, M. (2017) · Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik · doi:10.4230/lipics.itcs.2017.43 · Cited by 943 · cited 7×
“Well-calibration [16].”
BackgroundResultInfluential
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 21 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- 2016. Machine Bias. https://www.propublica.org/article/machine-bias-risk-assessments-in-criminal-sentencing. (May 2016 ). Online ; accessed February 2018. 2016. Machine Bias. https://www.propublica.org/article/machine-bias-risk-assessments-in-criminal-sentencing. (May 2016). Online; accessed February 2018.
- Matt J. Kusner Joshua R. Loftus Chris Russell and Ricardo Silva. 2017. Counter-factual Fairness. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. Matt J. Kusner Joshua R. Loftus Chris Russell and Ricardo Silva. 2017. Counter-factual Fairness. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 1,004
Jaton, F. (2021) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/20539517211013569 · Cited by 84
A survey on neural networks for (cyber-) security and (cyber-) security of neural networks
Pawlicki, M., Kozik, R., & Choraś, M. (2022) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2022.06.002 · Cited by 84
Lee, M. S. A., Floridi, L., & Singh, J. (2021) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-021-00067-y · Cited by 71
A flexible framework for evaluating user and item fairness in recommender systems
Deldjoo, Y., Anelli, V. W., Zamani, H., Bellogín, A., & Noia, T. D. (2021) · User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction · doi:10.1007/s11257-020-09285-1 · Cited by 81
On the Applicability of Machine Learning Fairness Notions
Makhlouf, K., Zhioua, S., & Catuscia Palamidessi, A. (2021) · ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter · doi:10.1145/3468507.3468511 · Cited by 96
AdaFair: Cumulative Fairness Adaptive Boosting
Iosifidis, V., & Ntoutsi, E. (2019) · Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management · doi:10.1145/3357384.3357974 · Cited by 75
Deho, O. B., Zhan, C., Li, J., Liu, J., Liu, L., & Le, T. D. (2022) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.13217 · Cited by 87
Choraś, M., Pawlicki, M., Puchalski, D., & Kozik, R. (2020) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-50423-6_46 · Cited by 70
Datasheets for Datasets help ML Engineers Notice and Understand Ethical Issues in Training Data
Boyd, K. (2021) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3479582 · Cited by 67
Metrics for Dataset Demographic Bias: A Case Study on Facial Expression Recognition
Dominguez-Catena, I., Paternain, D., & Galar, M. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2024.3361979 · Cited by 82
Perrone, V., Donini, M., Zafar, M. B., Schmucker, R., Kenthapadi, K., & Archambeau, C. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society · doi:10.1145/3461702.3462629 · Cited by 66
On Predicting Recidivism: Epistemic Risk, Tradeoffs, and Values in Machine Learning
Biddle, J. B. (2020) · Canadian Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1017/can.2020.27 · Cited by 71
Tal, A. S., Kuflik, T., & Kliger, D. (2022) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2022.2095705 · Cited by 73
Monitoring machine learning models: a categorization of challenges and methods
Schröder, T., & Schulz, M. (2022) · Data Science and Management · doi:10.1016/j.dsm.2022.07.004 · Cited by 73
Liu, S., & Vicente, L. N. (2021) · Annals of Operations Research · doi:10.1007/s10479-021-04033-z · Cited by 64
Pessach, D., & Shmueli, E. (2021) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115667 · Cited by 72
Missing the missing values: The ugly duckling of fairness in machine learning
Fernando, M., Cèsar, F., David, N., & José, H. (2021) · International Journal of Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1002/int.22415 · Cited by 62
Soliciting Stakeholders’ Fairness Notions in Child Maltreatment Predictive Systems
Cheng, H.-F., Stapleton, L., Wang, R., Bullock, P., Chouldechova, A., Wu, Z. S. S., & Zhu, H. (2021) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3411764.3445308 · Cited by 71
Zheng, H., Chen, Z., Du, T., Zhang, X., Cheng, Y., Ji, S., Wang, J., Yu, Y., & Chen, J. (2022) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceedings (ICSE-Companion) · doi:10.1145/3510003.3510123 · Cited by 79
A Review of Bias and Fairness in Artificial Intelligence.
González-Sendino, R., Serrano, E., Bajo, J., & Nováis, P. (2023) · International Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.9781/ijimai.2023.11.001 · Cited by 74
Mitigating Demographic Bias in Facial Datasets with Style-Based Multi-attribute Transfer
Georgopoulos, M., Oldfield, J. P., Nicolaou, M. A., Panagakis, Y., & Pantić, M. (2021) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-021-01448-w · Cited by 66
A scoping review of fair machine learning techniques when using real-world data
Huang, Y., Guo, J., Chen, W.-H., Lin, H.-Y., Tang, H., Wang, F., Xu, H., & Bian, J. (2024) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2024.104622 · Cited by 61
Machine learning fairness notions: Bridging the gap with real-world applications
Makhlouf, K., Zhioua, S., & Catuscia Palamidessi, A. (2021) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102642 · Cited by 94
Delecraz, S., Eltarr, L., Becuwe, M., Bouxin, H., Boutin, N., & Oullier, O. (2022) · Journal of Responsible Technology · doi:10.1016/j.jrt.2022.100041 · Cited by 96
Fairness in Large Language Models: A Taxonomic Survey
Chu, Z., Wang, Z., & Zhang, W. (2024) · ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter · doi:10.1145/3682112.3682117 · Cited by 106
Establishing and evaluating trustworthy AI: overview and research challenges
Kowald, D., Scher, S., Pammer-Schindler, V., Müllner, P., Waxnegger, K., Demelius, L., Fessl, A., Toller, M., Mendoza Estrada, I. G., Šimić, I., et al. (2024) · Frontiers in Big Data · doi:10.3389/fdata.2024.1467222 · Cited by 59
Fairness in Deep Learning: A Survey on Vision and Language Research
Parraga, O., Móre, M. D., Mattjie, C., Gavenski, N. S., Kupssinskü, L. S., Medronha, A., de Moura, L. V., Simões, G. S., & Barros, R. C. (2023) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3637549 · Cited by 82
A Unifying Framework for Fairness-Aware Influence Maximization
Farnad, G., Babaki, B., & Michel Gendreau, A. (2020) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3366424.3383555 · Cited by 58
Kaur, D., Hughes, J. W., Rogers, A. J., Kang, G., Narayan, S. M., Ashley, E. A., & Perez, M. V. (2024) · Circulation: Heart Failure · doi:10.1161/circheartfailure.123.010879 · Cited by 58
Bias, Fairness and Accountability with Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Algorithms
Zhou, N., Zhang, Z., Nair, V. N., Singhal, H., & Chen, J. (2022) · International Statistical Review · doi:10.1111/insr.12492 · Cited by 89
Laña, I., Medina, J., Vlahogianni, E. I., & Ser, J. D. (2021) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s21041121 · Cited by 62
Towards Fairness in Practice: A Practitioner-Oriented Rubric for Evaluating Fair ML Toolkits
Richardson, B., Garcia-Gathright, J. I., Way, S. F., Thom, J., & Cramer, H. S. M. (2021) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3411764.3445604 · Cited by 67
Pfeiffer, J., Gutschow, J., Haas, C. S., Möslein, F., Maspfuhl, O., Borgers, F., & Alpsancar, S. (2023) · Business & Information Systems Engineering · doi:10.1007/s12599-023-00787-x · Cited by 77
Interpretable Data-Based Explanations for Fairness Debugging
Pradhan, R., Zhu, J., Glavic, B., & Salimi, B. (2022) · ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD) · doi:10.1145/3514221.3517886 · Cited by 65
Mitigating Bias in Algorithmic Systems—A Fish-eye View
Orphanou, K., Otterbacher, J., Kleanthous, S., Batsuren, K., Giunchiglia, F., Bogina, V., Tal, A. S., Hartman, A., & Kuflik, T. (2022) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3527152 · Cited by 58
A survey on datasets for fairness‐aware machine learning
Le Quy, T., Roy, A., Iosifidis, V., Zhang, W., & Ntoutsi, E. (2022) · WIREs Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1002/widm.1452 · Cited by 261
Music Recommendation Systems: Techniques, Use Cases, and Challenges
Schedl, M., Knees, P., McFee, B., & Bogdanov, D. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-0716-2197-4_24 · Cited by 52
El–Sappagh, S., Alonso, J. M., Abuhmed, T., Ali, F., & Bugarín, A. (2023) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-023-10415-5 · Cited by 58
AI and Algorithmic Bias: Source, Detection, Mitigation and Implications
Fu, R., Huang, Y. H., & Singh, P. V. (2020) · doi:10.1287/educ.2020.0215 · Cited by 130
The Causal Fairness Field Guide: Perspectives From Social and Formal Sciences
Carey, A. N., & Wu, X. (2022) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.3389/fdata.2022.892837 · Cited by 109
Addressing bias in bagging and boosting regression models
Ugirumurera, J., Bensen, E. A., Severino, J., & Sanyal, J. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-68907-5 · Cited by 50
Nakao, Y., Strappelli, L., Stumpf, S., Naseer, A., Regoli, D., & Gamba, G. D. (2022) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2022.2067936 · Cited by 66
They shall be fair, transparent, and robust: auditing learning analytics systems
Simbeck, K. (2023) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-023-00292-7 · Cited by 43
A Systematic Review of Using Machine Learning and Natural Language Processing in Smart Policing
Sarzaeim, P., Mahmoud, Q. H., Azim, A., Bauer, G., & Bowles, I. (2023) · Computers · doi:10.3390/computers12120255 · Cited by 51
Agarwal, A., Agarwal, H., & Agarwal, N. (2022) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-022-00147-7 · Cited by 49
A.I. Robustness: a Human-Centered Perspective on Technological Challenges and Opportunities
Tocchetti, A., Corti, L., Balayn, A., Yurrita, M., Lippmann, P., Brambilla, M., & Yang, J. (2024) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3665926 · Cited by 77
Algorithmic bias, fairness, and inclusivity: a multilevel framework for justice-oriented AI
Panarese, P., Grasso, M. M., & Solinas, C. (2025) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-025-02451-2 · Cited by 66
On the Moral Justification of Statistical Parity
Hertweck, C., Heitz, C., & Loi, M. (2021) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3442188.3445936 · Cited by 59
Investigating Algorithmic Risk and Race
Hamilton, M. (2021) · UCLA Criminal Justice Law Review · doi:10.5070/cj85154807 · Cited by 48
Fairness metrics and bias mitigation strategies for rating predictions
Ashokan, A., & Haas, C. (2021) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102646 · Cited by 47
Algorithmic fairness of machine learning models for Alzheimer disease progression
Yuan, C., Linn, K. A., & Hubbard, R. A. (2023) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.42203 · Cited by 49
Khan, Z., & Fu, Y. (2021) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3442188.3445920 · Cited by 51
Auditing and instructing text-to-image generation models on fairness
Friedrich, F., Brack, M., Struppek, L., Hintersdorf, D., Schramowski, P., Luccioni, A. S., & Kersting, K. (2024) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-024-00531-5 · Cited by 58
A general approach to fairness with optimal transport
Silvia, C., Ray, J., Tom, S., Aldo, P., Heinrich, J., & John, A. (2020) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v34i04.5771 · Cited by 43
“…al. 2012; Feldman et al. 2015; Goh et al. 2016; Chouldechova 2017; Corbett-Davies et al. 2017; Gajane and Pechenizkiy 2017; Kusner et al. 2017; Cotter et al. 2018; Mitchell, Potash, and Barocas 2018; Verma and Rubin 2018; Zhang and Bareinboim 2018; Chi-appa and Isaac 2019; Narasimhan et al. 2020).”
BackgroundAnalyzing the impact of missing values and selection bias on fairness
Wang, Y., & Singh, L. (2021) · International Journal of Data Science and Analytics · doi:10.1007/s41060-021-00259-z · Cited by 55
Modeling implicit bias with fuzzy cognitive maps
Nápoles, G., Grau, I., Concepción, L., Koumeri, L. K., & Papa, J. P. (2022) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2022.01.070 · Cited by 44
McDonald, N., & Pan, S. (2020) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3415218 · Cited by 53
FARF: A Fair and Adaptive Random Forests Classifier
Zhang, W., Bifet, A., Zhang, X., Weiss, J. C., & Nejdl, W. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-75765-6_20 · Cited by 43
Leveling Down in Computer Vision: Pareto Inefficiencies in Fair Deep Classifiers
Zietlow, D., Lohaus, M., Balakrishnan, G., Kleindeßner, M., Locatello, F., Schölkopf, B., & Russell, C. (2022) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr52688.2022.01016 · Cited by 54
Exacerbating Algorithmic Bias through Fairness Attacks
Mehrabi, N., Naveed, M., Morstatter, F., & Galstyan, A. (2021) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v35i10.17080 · Cited by 18
Towards Fair Classifiers Without Sensitive Attributes
Zhao, T., Dai, E., Shu, K., & Wang, S. (2022) · ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM) · doi:10.1145/3488560.3498493 · Cited by 47
Assessing trustworthy AI: Technical and legal perspectives of fairness in AI
Kattnig, M., Angerschmid, A., Reichel, T., & Kern, R. (2024) · Computer law & security review · doi:10.1016/j.clsr.2024.106053 · Cited by 63
Rodolfa, K. T., Salomon, E., Haynes, L., Mendieta, I. H., Larson, J., & Ghani, R. (2020) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3351095.3372863 · Cited by 50
Towards a multi-stakeholder value-based assessment framework for algorithmic systems
Yurrita, M., Murray-Rust, D., Balayn, A., & Bozzon, A. (2022) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3531146.3533118 · Cited by 50
"I'm not sure what difference is between their content and mine, other than the person itself"
Ma, R., & Kou, Y. (2022) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3555150 · Cited by 52
van Berkel, N., Sarsenbayeva, Z., & Gonçalves, J. (2022) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2022.102954 · Cited by 48
Time to Assess Bias in Machine Learning Models for Credit Decisions
Brotcke, L. (2022) · Journal of risk and financial management · doi:10.3390/jrfm15040165 · Cited by 45
The Current State and Challenges of Fairness in Federated Learning
Vucinich, S., & Zhu, Q. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3295412 · Cited by 44
Beyond principlism: practical strategies for ethical AI use in research practices
Lin, Z. (2024) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-024-00585-5 · Cited by 56
Quality assurance strategies for machine learning applications in big data analytics: an overview
Ogrizović, M., Drašković, D., & Bojić, D. M. (2024) · Journal Of Big Data · doi:10.1186/s40537-024-01028-y · Cited by 69
Barlas, P., Kyriakou, K., Guest, O., Kleanthous, S., & Otterbacher, J. (2021) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3432931 · Cited by 41
Robust Fairness Under Covariate Shift
Rezaei, A., Liu, A., Memarrast, O., & Ziebart, B. D. (2021) · AAAI Publications (The Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI)) · doi:10.1609/aaai.v35i11.17135 · Cited by 44
Estiri, H., Strasser, Z. H., Rashidian, S., Klann, J. G., Wagholikar, K. B., McCoy, T. H., & Murphy, S. N. (2022) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1093/jamia/ocac070 · Cited by 43
Fairness in Design: A Framework for Facilitating Ethical Artificial Intelligence Designs
Zhang, J., Shu, Y., & Yu, H. (2023) · International Journal of Crowd Science · doi:10.26599/ijcs.2022.9100033 · Cited by 44
Responsible AI: A Primer for the Legal Community
Golbin, I., Rao, A. S., Hadjarian, A., & Krittman, D. (2020) · IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData) · doi:10.1109/bigdata50022.2020.9377738 · Cited by 38
Survey on fairness notions and related tensions
Alves, G. T., Bernier, F., Couceiro, M., Makhlouf, K., Catuscia Palamidessi, A., & Zhioua, S. (2023) · EURO Journal on Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.ejdp.2023.100033 · Cited by 47
Objective metrics for ethical AI: a systematic literature review
Palumbo, G., Carneiro, D. R., & Alves, V. (2024) · International Journal of Data Science and Analytics · doi:10.1007/s41060-024-00541-w · Cited by 52
Freiesleben, T., König, G., Molnar, C., & Tejero-Cantero, Á. (2024) · Minds and Machines · doi:10.1007/s11023-024-09691-z · Cited by 66
FairFace Challenge at ECCV 2020: Analyzing Bias in Face Recognition
Sixta, T., Jacques, J. C. S., Buch-Cardona, P., Vazquez, E., & Escalera, S. (2020) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-65414-6_32 · Cited by 41
AI Fairness for People with Disabilities: Point of View
Trewin, S. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1811.10670 · Cited by 38
Inherent Limitations of AI Fairness
Buyl, M., & Bie, T. D. (2024) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3624700 · Cited by 50
An Empirical Study on Correlations Between Deep Neural Network Fairness and Neuron Coverage Criteria
Zheng, W., Lin, L., Wu, X., & Chen, X. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2023.3349001 · Cited by 38
Sánchez‐Monedero, J., Dencik, L., & Edwards, L. (2019) · Goldsmiths (University of London) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1910.06144 · Cited by 37
Antidiscrimination Insurance Pricing: Regulations, Fairness Criteria, and Models
Xin, X., & Huang, F. (2024) · North American Actuarial Journal · doi:10.1080/10920277.2023.2190528 · Cited by 43
AI human impact: toward a model for ethical investing in AI-intensive companies
Brusseau, J. (2020) · Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment · doi:10.1080/20430795.2021.1874212 · Cited by 27
Chen, C., & Sundar, S. S. (2023) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3544548.3580805 · Cited by 41
Prevalence of bias against neurodivergence‐related terms in artificial intelligence language models
Brandsen, S., Chandrasekhar, T., Franz, L., Grapel, J., Dawson, G., & Carlson, D. (2024) · Autism Research · doi:10.1002/aur.3094 · Cited by 46
Candelieri, A., Ponti, A., & Archetti, F. (2024) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/s10994-024-06515-0 · Cited by 48
Dang, V. N., Cascarano, A., Mulder, R. H., Cecil, C. A. M., Zuluaga, M. A., Hernández-González, J., & Lekadir, K. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-58427-7 · Cited by 48
Normative Challenges of Risk Regulation of Artificial Intelligence
Orwat, C., Bareis, J., Folberth, A., Jahnel, J., & Wadephul, C. (2024) · NanoEthics · doi:10.1007/s11569-024-00454-9 · Cited by 63
Kulkarni, V., Gawali, M., & Kharat, A. T. (2021) · JMIR Medical Informatics · doi:10.2196/28776 · Cited by 36
Experts’ View on Challenges and Needs for Fairness in Artificial Intelligence for Education
Fenu, G., Galici, R., & Marras, M. (2022) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-11644-5_20 · Cited by 36
Mitigating Unfairness via Evolutionary Multiobjective Ensemble Learning
Zhang, Q., Liu, J., Zhang, Z., Wen, J., Mao, B., & Yao, X. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation · doi:10.1109/tevc.2022.3209544 · Cited by 36
Your fairness may vary: Pretrained language model fairness in toxic text classification
Baldini, I., Wei, D., Ramamurthy, K. N., Singh, M., & Yurochkin, M. (2022) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.findings-acl.176 · Cited by 51
OpenBias: Open-Set Bias Detection in Text-to-Image Generative Models
Moreno D’Incà, Peruzzo, E., Mancini, M., Xu, D., Goe, V., Xu, X., Wang, Z., Shi, H., & Sebe, N. (2024) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr52733.2024.01162 · Cited by 54
Mitigating Algorithmic Bias in AI-Driven Cardiovascular Imaging for Fairer Diagnostics
Sufian, M. A., Alsadder, L., Hamzi, W., Zaman, S., Sagar, A. S. M. S., & Hamzi, B. (2024) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics14232675 · Cited by 38
A Geometric Solution to Fair Representations
He, Y., Burghardt, K., & Lerman, K. (2020) · Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society · doi:10.1145/3375627.3375864 · Cited by 43
Demographic Fairness in Biometric Systems: What Do the Experts Say?
Rathgeb, C., Drozdowski, P., Frings, D., Damer, N., & Busch, C. (2022) · IEEE Technology and Society Magazine · doi:10.1109/mts.2022.3217700 · Cited by 43
Cheong, J., Kalkan, S., & Güneş, H. (2021) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/msp.2021.3106619 · Cited by 35
Black is the new orange: how to determine AI liability
Padovan, P. H., Martins, C. M., & Reed, C. (2022) · Artificial Intelligence and Law · doi:10.1007/s10506-022-09308-9 · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- Verma, S., & Rubin, J.
- Affiliations
- Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur (IN)
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the International Workshop on Software Fairness
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2018-05-29
- Pages
- 1-7
- OpenAlex
- W2809878087
- Cited by
- 1,124
- References
- 21
- Citations by year
- 2026: 102 · 2025: 157 · 2024: 188 · 2023: 197 · 2022: 168 · 2021: 170 · 2020: 103 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 140.65
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
- Social Sciences › Law › Discrimination and Equality Law
- Keywords
- algorithmic fairness, algorithmic classification, fairness metrics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
