The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fairness definitions explained
Abstract
Algorithm fairness has started to attract the attention of researchers in AI, Software Engineering and Law communities, with more than twenty different notions of fairness proposed in the last few years. Yet, there is no clear agreement on which definition to apply in each situation. Moreover, the detailed differences between multiple definitions are difficult to grasp. To address this issue, this paper collects the most prominent definitions of fairness for the algorithmic classification problem, explains the rationale behind these definitions, and demonstrates each of them on a single unifying case-study. Our analysis intuitively explains why the same case can be considered fair according to some definitions and unfair according to others.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Parity on the different metrics across disaggregated population subgroups corresponds to how fairness is often defined [37, 48].”
From Model Cards for Model Reporting (2019) · cites this paper as [48]
In the citing paper
“While similar concepts have been operationalized for machine learning classification tasks (Mehrabi et al. 2021; Verma and Rubin 2018), less has been done in the NLP space, which may contain more ambiguity than classification for tasks like language generation.”
From Bias and Fairness in Large Language Models: A Survey (2024) · cites this paper as Verma and Rubin 2018
In the citing paper
“To combat bias, this paper has highlighted strategies such as robust data augmentation, the application of counterfactual fairness, and the imperative for diverse, representative datasets alongside unbiased data collection methods [49][50][51].”
From Fairness and Bias in Artificial Intelligence: A Brief Survey of Sources, Impacts, and Mitigation Strategies (2023) · cites this paper as [51]
In the citing paper
“As we discussed in §2.3 scholars have proposed a number of competing ways to quantify fairness [46,75,93,148], some of which are mathematically incompatible with each other [26,51,80].”
From Out of Context: Investigating the Bias and Fairness Concerns of “Artificial Intelligence as a Service” (2023) · cites this paper as [148]
In the citing paper
“As a result, a classifier trained without regard to the protected attribute not only fails to remove discrimination, but it can complicate the detection and mitigation of discrimination downstream via in-processing or post-processing techniques [9,10,18,24,25,34,43,51], such as those we describe next.”
From Interventional Fairness: Causal Database Repair for Algorithmic Fairness (2019) · cites this paper as [51]
Citations
Cites
UCI Machine Learning Repository
Asuncion, A. (2007) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 24,190
CAUSALITY: MODELS, REASONING AND INFERENCE
Hitchcock, C., & Pearl, J. (2001) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.2307/3182612 · Cited by 4,827
Dwork, C., Hardt, M., Pitassi, T., Reingold, O., & Zemel, R. (2012) · Proceedings of the 3rd Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference · doi:10.1145/2090236.2090255 · Cited by 3,501
Causality: models, reasoning, and inference
(2000) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.38-1494a · Cited by 2,968
Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learning
Hardt, M., Price, E., & Srebro, N. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1610.02413 · Cited by 2,536
Fair prediction with disparate impact: a study of bias in recidivism prediction instruments
Chouldechova, A. (2017) · Big Data · doi:10.1089/big.2016.0047 · Cited by 2,159
Algorithmic Decision Making and the Cost of Fairness
Corbett-Davies, S., Pierson, E., Feller, A., Goel, S., & Huq, A. (2017) · Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/3097983.3098095 · Cited by 1,149
Kusner, M. J., Loftus, J. R., Russell, C., & Silva, R. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1703.06856 · Cited by 995
Fairness in Criminal Justice Risk Assessments: The State of the Art
Berk, R., Heidari, H., Jabbari, S., Kearns, M., & Roth, A. (2021) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124118782533 · Cited by 988 · cited 7×
“However, it was shown that statistical definitions are insufficient [8, 10, 12, 16].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialInherent trade-offs in the fair determination of risk scores
Kleinberg, J., Mullainathan, S., & Raghavan, M. (2017) · Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik · doi:10.4230/lipics.itcs.2017.43 · Cited by 943 · cited 7×
“Well-calibration [16].”
BackgroundResultInfluential
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- 2016. Machine Bias. https://www.propublica.org/article/machine-bias-risk-assessments-in-criminal-sentencing. (May 2016 ). Online ; accessed February 2018. 2016. Machine Bias. https://www.propublica.org/article/machine-bias-risk-assessments-in-criminal-sentencing. (May 2016). Online; accessed February 2018.
- Matt J. Kusner Joshua R. Loftus Chris Russell and Ricardo Silva. 2017. Counter-factual Fairness. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. Matt J. Kusner Joshua R. Loftus Chris Russell and Ricardo Silva. 2017. Counter-factual Fairness. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 601–700 of 1,004
Beyond principlism: Practical strategies for ethical AI use in research practicesPreprint
Lin, Z. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4576581 · Cited by 5
Fairness and Explanations in Entity Resolution: An Overview
Araújo, T. B., Efthymiou, V., & Stefanidis, K. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3599990 · Cited by 7
The Potential of AI in Nursing Care: Multicenter Evaluation in Fall Risk Assessment
Nanevski, I., Jäger, S., Schulte‐Althoff, M., Behnke, E.-M., Fürstenau, D., & Bießmann, F. (2025) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/71034 · Cited by 5
Hauer, M. P., Müller-Kress, L., Leimüller, G., & Zweig, K. A. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation Workshops (ICSTW) · doi:10.1109/icstw58534.2023.00040 · Cited by 5
Badar, M., & Fisichella, M. (2024) · Big Data and Cognitive Computing · doi:10.3390/bdcc8020016 · Cited by 5
Distribution-aware fairness test generation
Rajan, S. S., Soremekun, E., Traon, Y. L., & Chattopadhyay, S. (2024) · Journal of Systems and Software · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2024.112090 · Cited by 5
Mitigating Subgroup Unfairness in Machine Learning Classifiers: A Data-Driven Approach
Yin, L., Gupta, S., & Jagadish, H. V. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE) · doi:10.1109/icde60146.2024.00171 · Cited by 5
Makhlouf, K., Stefanović, T., Arcolezi, H. H., & Catuscia Palamidessi, A. (2024) · IEEE Computer Security Foundations Workshop (CSFW) · doi:10.1109/csf61375.2024.00039 · Cited by 10
From Expectation to Habit: Why do Software Practitioners Adopt Fairness Toolkits?
Voria, G., Lambiase, S., Schiavone, M. C., Catolino, G., & Palomba, F. (2025) · IEEE/ACM International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Society (ICSE-SEIS) · doi:10.1109/icse-seis66351.2025.00015 · Cited by 5
Jain, B., Huber, M., Elmasri, R. A., & Fegaras, L. (2020) · International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments (PETRA) · doi:10.1145/3389189.3397990 · Cited by 6
Machine Learning Fairness in Justice Systems: Base Rates, False Positives, and False Negatives
Russell, J. R. (2020) · International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications · doi:10.1109/icmla51294.2020.00133 · Cited by 5
Verständig, D., Kast, C., Stricker, J., Nürnberger, A., & Budrich, V. B. (2022) · Verlag Barbara Budrich eBooks · doi:10.3224/84742520 · Cited by 13
Fish, B., & Stark, L. (2022) · ACM Conference on Equity and Access in Algorithms, Mechanisms, and Optimization (EAAMO) · doi:10.1145/3551624.3555296 · Cited by 7
Mitigating Algorithmic Bias with Limited Annotations
Wang, G., Du, M., Liu, N., Zou, N., & Hu, X. (2023) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-43415-0_15 · Cited by 5
Advances in automatically rating the trustworthiness of text processing services
Srivastava, B., Lakkaraju, K., Bernagozzi, M., & Valtorta, M. (2023) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-023-00391-5 · Cited by 10
Evaluating and improving health equity and fairness of polygenic scores
Zhang, T., Zhou, G., Klei, L., Liu, P., Chouldechova, A., Zhao, H., Roeder, K., G’Sell, M., & Devlin, B. (2024) · Human Genetics and Genomics Advances · doi:10.1016/j.xhgg.2024.100280 · Cited by 5
Fairness Certification for Natural Language Processing and Large Language Models
Freiberger, V., & Buchmann, E. (2024) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-66329-1_39 · Cited by 8
Does ChatGPT show gender bias in behavior detection?
Wu, J., Song, Y., & Wu, D. C. (2024) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-024-04219-3 · Cited by 6
Exploring the Inequitable Impact of Data Missingness on Fairness in Machine Learning
Min, S., Asif, H. S., & Vaidya, J. S. (2025) · IEEE Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1109/mis.2025.3549484 · Cited by 5
Achieving Fair Inference Using Error-Prone Outcomes.
Boeschoten, L., van Kesteren, E., Bagheri, A., & Oberski, D. L. (2021) · International Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.9781/ijimai.2021.02.007 · Cited by 10
Lossos, C., Geschwill, S., & Morelli, F. (2021) · HMD Praxis der Wirtschaftsinformatik · doi:10.1365/s40702-021-00707-1 · Cited by 5
What Does It Cost to Deploy an XAI System: A Case Study in Legacy Systems
Höhn, S., & Faradouris, N. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-82017-6_11 · Cited by 5
Practical foundations of machine learning for addiction research. Part II. Workflow and use cases
Morgado, P. C., Carusso, M., Alemany, L. A., & Ación, L. (2022) · The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse · doi:10.1080/00952990.2021.1966435 · Cited by 6
Reliability at multiple stages in a data analysis pipeline
Moskovitch, Y., & Jagadish, H. V. (2022) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3500923 · Cited by 5
Tensions Between the Proxies of Human Values in AI
Datta, T., Nissani, D., Cembalest, M., Khanna, A., Massa, H., & Dickerson, J. P. (2023) · IEEE Conference on Secure and Trustworthy Machine Learning (SaTML) · doi:10.1109/satml54575.2023.00049 · Cited by 7
Fairness-Aware Privacy-Preserving Record Linkage
Vatsalan, D., Yu, J., Henecka, W., & Thorne, B. (2020) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-66172-4_1 · Cited by 5
AI Governance for Businesses.Preprint
Schneider, J., Abraham, R., & Meske, C. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 5
Addressing Fairness, Bias and Class Imbalance in Machine Learning: the FBI-lossPreprint
Ferrari, E., & Bacciu, D. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2105.06345 · Cited by 10
Deho, O. B. (2021) · doi:10.35542/osf.io/86ksq · Cited by 5
Measuring and Reducing Racial Bias in a Pediatric Urinary Tract Infection ModelPreprint
Anderson, J. W., Shaikh, N., & Visweswaran, S. (2023) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2023.09.18.23295660 · Cited by 5
Sustainable AI-Powered Systems and Cybersecurity for Health Diagnostics
Savitha, S., Keerthana, R., Logeswaran, K., Vennila, V., Manjuladevi, R., & Sangeetha, M. (2025) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-2827-0.ch008 · Cited by 4
Towards Responsible AI in Education: Hybrid Recommendation System for K-12 Students Case Study
Drushchak, N., Tyshchenko, V., & Polyakovska, N. (2025) · doi:10.1109/raie66699.2025.00015 · Cited by 6
Genicot, N., & Moraes, T. G. (2025) · Cambridge Forum on AI Law and Governance · doi:10.1017/cfl.2025.10013 · Cited by 7
A fairness scale for real-time recidivism forecasts using a national database of convicted offenders
Verrey, J., Neyroud, P., Sherman, L., & Ariel, B. (2025) · Neural Computing and Applications · doi:10.1007/s00521-025-11478-x · Cited by 6
Gupta, A. K., Mishra, S. S., Priyanka, P., & Verma, A. (2025) · Global AI Summit - International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Emerging Technology (AI Summit) · doi:10.1109/aisummit66170.2025.11410968 · Cited by 7
Fairness Meets Cross-Domain Learning: A Benchmark of Models and Metrics
Iurada, L., Bucci, S., Hospedales, T. M., & Tommasi, T. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3383841 · Cited by 5
ABROCA Distributions For Algorithmic Bias Assessment: Considerations Around Interpretation
Borchers, C., & Baker, R. S. (2025) · International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK) · doi:10.1145/3706468.3706498 · Cited by 4
Rasnick, E., Duan, Q., & Brokamp, C. (2025) · Journal of Public Health Management and Practice · doi:10.1097/phh.0000000000002109 · Cited by 4
Automated Discovery of Trade-Off Between Utility, Privacy and Fairness in Machine Learning Models
Ficiu, B., Lawrence, N. D., & Paleyes, A. (2025) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-74630-7_9 · Cited by 4
Fairness-Aware Graph Neural Networks for ICU Length of Stay Prediction in IoT-Enabled Environments
Maroudis, A.-C., Karathanasopoulou, K. N., Stylianides, C., Dimitrakopoulos, G. J., & Panayides, A. S. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3560180 · Cited by 4
de Lima, L. F. F. P., Ricarte, D. R. D., & Siebra, C. D. A. (2022) · Anais do Simpósio Brasileiro de Sistemas de Informação (SBSI) · doi:10.1145/3535511.3535517 · Cited by 4
A Coverage-based Approach to Nondiscrimination-aware Data Transformation
Accinelli, C., Catania, B., Guerrini, G., & Minisi, S. (2022) · Journal of Data and Information Quality · doi:10.1145/3546913 · Cited by 4
Counterfactual fairness: The case study of a food delivery platform’s reputational-ranking algorithm
Piccininni, M. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1015100 · Cited by 5
Enhancing Individual Fairness through Propensity Score Matching
Karimi, H. R., Khan, M. F. A., Liu, H., Derr, T., & Liu, H. (2022) · IEEE International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics (DSAA) · doi:10.1109/dsaa54385.2022.10032333 · Cited by 6
Algorithmic Fairness in Chest X-ray Diagnosis: A Case Study
Zhang, H., Hartvigsen, T., & Ghassemi, M. (2023) · doi:10.21428/2c646de5.816cae0e · Cited by 22
A Study on Bias and Fairness in Deep Speaker Recognition
Hajavi, A., & Etemad, A. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp49357.2023.10095572 · Cited by 4
Learning Dynamic Prototypes for Visual Pattern Debiasing
Liang, K., Yin, Z., Min, M., Liu, Y., Ma, Z., & Guo, J. (2023) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-023-01956-x · Cited by 5
On Hedden's proof that machine learning fairness metrics are flawed
Søgaard, A., Kappel, K., & Grünbaum, T. (2024) · Inquiry · doi:10.1080/0020174x.2024.2315169 · Cited by 4
Identifying Reasons for Bias: An Argumentation-Based Approach
Waller, M., Rodrigues, O., & Cocarascu, O. (2024) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v38i19.30165 · Cited by 4
Melucci, M. (2024) · Discover Computing · doi:10.1007/s10791-024-09434-9 · Cited by 3
Towards Transnational Fairness in Machine Learning: A Case Study in Disaster Response Systems
Kozcuer, C., Mollen, A., & Bießmann, F. (2024) · Minds and Machines · doi:10.1007/s11023-024-09663-3 · Cited by 4
Quantifying Fairness and Discrimination in Predictive Models
Arthur Charpentier, A. (2024) · Studies in systems, decision and control · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-43601-7_3 · Cited by 4
Legally Binding but Unfair? Towards Assessing Fairness of Privacy Policies
Freiberger, V., & Buchmann, E. (2024) · ACM International Workshop on Security and Privacy Analytics (IWSPA) · doi:10.1145/3643651.3659890 · Cited by 8
Bringing practical statistical science to AI and predictive model fairness testing
Lo, V. S. Y., Datta, S., & Salami, Y. (2024) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-024-00518-2 · Cited by 6
Loureiro, R. B., Pagano, T. P., Lisboa, F. V. N., Nascimento, L. F. S., Oliveira, E. L. S., Winkler, I., & Nascimento, E. G. S. (2025) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2024.126344 · Cited by 6
Öğütcü, S. (2020) · IEEE International Conference on Data Stream Mining & Processing (DSMP) · doi:10.1109/dsmp47368.2020.9204204 · Cited by 4
A Review of Gender Bias Mitigation in Credit Scoring Models
Corrales-Barquero, R., Marín‐Raventós, G., & Barrantes, E. G. (2021) · doi:10.1109/ee-rds53766.2021.9708589 · Cited by 4
L’Intelligence Artificielle, une approche intersectionnelle
Marques, J. (2022) · Interfaces numériques · doi:10.25965/interfaces-numeriques.4796 · Cited by 4
Meta Clustering for Collaborative Learning
Ye, C., Ghanadan, R., & Ding, J. (2022) · Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics · doi:10.1080/10618600.2022.2126484 · Cited by 4
Multi-stage Bias Mitigation for Individual Fairness in Algorithmic Decisions
Ghadage, A., Yi, D., Coghill, G. M., & Pang, W. (2022) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-20650-4_4 · Cited by 4
Algorithmic Fairness and AI Justice in Addressing Health Equity
Park, Y., Singh, M., Koski, E., Sow, D., Scheufele, E. L., & Bright, T. J. (2022) · Health informatics · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-07912-2_15 · Cited by 4
FAPFID: A Fairness-Aware Approach for Protected Features and Imbalanced Data
Dorleon, G., Megdiche, I., Bricon-Souf, N., & Teste, O. (2023) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-66863-4_5 · Cited by 4
Formal Group Fairness and Accuracy in Automated Decision Making
Langenberg, A., Ma, S.-C., Ermakova, T., & Fabian, B. (2023) · Mathematics · doi:10.3390/math11081771 · Cited by 6
Personalized Pricing with Group Fairness Constraint
Chen, X., Xu, Z., Zhao, Z., & Zhou, Y. (2023) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3593013.3594097 · Cited by 4
Defrance, M., & Bie, T. D. (2023) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3593013.3594048 · Cited by 4
Distance Correlation GAN: Fair Tabular Data Generation with Generative Adversarial Networks
Rajabi, A., & Garibay, Ö. Ö. (2023) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-35891-3_26 · Cited by 4
Implementing and analyzing fairness in banking credit scoring
Mariscal, C., Yustiawan, Y., Rochim, F. C., & Tanuar, E. (2024) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2024.03.150 · Cited by 4
Fair Learning by Model Averaging
Fermanian, J., Guégan, D., & Liu, X. (2025) · Risk and Decision Analysis · doi:10.1177/15697371251321734 · Cited by 4
Online and Customizable Fairness-aware Learning
Zhang, W. (2025) · Knowledge and Information Systems · doi:10.1007/s10115-025-02568-2 · Cited by 4
Kasirzadeh, A., & Klein, C. (2021) · Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society · doi:10.1145/3461702.3462606 · Cited by 6
Fair Feature Selection with a Lexicographic Multi-objective Genetic Algorithm
Brookhouse, J., & Freitas, A. A. (2022) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-14721-0_11 · Cited by 4
Leveraging Integer Linear Programming to Learn Optimal Fair Rule Lists
Aïvodji, U., Ferry, J., Gambs, S., Huguet, M., & Siala, M. (2022) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-08011-1_9 · Cited by 4
Grading video interviews with fairness considerationsPreprint
Singhania, A., Unnam, A., & Aggarwal, V. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2007.05461 · Cited by 4
The Impossibility Theorem of Machine Fairness - A Causal Perspective.Preprint
Kailash Karthik, S. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 4
Towards a Measure of Individual Fairness for Deep LearningPreprint
Maughan, K., & Near, J. P. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2009.13650 · Cited by 4
Anticipatory Ethics and the Role of UncertaintyPreprint
Nanayakkara, P., Diakopoulos, N., & Hullman, J. (2020) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2011.13170 · Cited by 20
Unbiased Subdata Selection for Fair Classification: A Unified Framework and Scalable AlgorithmsPreprint
Ye, Q., & Xie, W. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2012.12356 · Cited by 4
Fairness with Continuous Optimal TransportPreprint
Chiappa, S., & Pacchiano, A. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2101.02084 · Cited by 6
Cfarnet: Deep Learning for Target Detection with Constant False Alarm RatePreprint
Diskin, T., Beer, Y., Okun, U., & Wiesel, A. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4590633 · Cited by 4
jfa: Statistical Methods for Auditing
Derks, K. (2020) · doi:10.32614/cran.package.jfa · Cited by 5
Leveraging Machine Learning Algorithms for Real-Time Fraud Detection in Digital Payment SystemsPreprint
Paripati, L. K. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5052498 · Cited by 4
Johnson, D. K. N. (2025) · The Review of Black Political Economy · doi:10.1177/00346446251331615 · Cited by 3
Justified Evidence Collection for Argument-based AI Fairness Assurance
Sabuncuoglu, A., Burr, C., & Maple, C. (2025) · Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3715275.3732003 · Cited by 7
Gender Fairness of Machine Learning Algorithms for Pain Detection
Green, D., Shang, Y., Cheong, J., Liu, Y. M., & Güneş, H. (2025) · International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition · doi:10.1109/fg61629.2025.11099137 · Cited by 3
Racial Bias in AI Training Data: Do Laypersons Notice?
Chen, C., Jang, E., & Sundar, S. S. (2025) · Media Psychology · doi:10.1080/15213269.2025.2558036 · Cited by 3
Evaluating the role of cost and fairness in machine learning models of suicide risk
Kitchen, C., Belouali, A., Nestadt, P. S., Wilcox, H. C., & Kharrazi, H. H. K. (2026) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-026-50095-z · Cited by 5
From Personalization to Responsibility
Khullar, S., Sobhan, A., Tank, N., & Swami, P. (2026) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-2600-1840-8.ch010 · Cited by 3
An Empirical Study on Group Fairness Metrics of Judicial Data
Li, Y., Huang, H., Guo, X., & Yuan, Y. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3122443 · Cited by 3
Towards Data Governance for Federated Machine Learning
Peregrina, J. A., Ortiz, G., & Zirpins, C. (2022) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-23298-5_5 · Cited by 4
Towards Assessing Data Bias in Clinical Trials
Criscuolo, C., Dolci, T., & Salnitri, M. (2022) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-23905-2_5 · Cited by 3
Socially Fair Coverage Control
Malencia, M., Pappas, G. J., & Kumar, V. (2023) · Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/icra48891.2023.10160988 · Cited by 3
The role of luck in the success of social media influencers
Ionescu, S., Hannák, A., & Pagan, N. (2023) · Applied Network Science · doi:10.1007/s41109-023-00573-4 · Cited by 5
Adaptive Boosting Method for Mitigating Ethnicity and Age Group Unfairness
Colakovic, I., & Karakatič, S. (2023) · SN Computer Science · doi:10.1007/s42979-023-02342-7 · Cited by 3
Discrimination for the Sake of Fairness: Fairness by Design and Its Legal Framework
Hoch, H., Hertweck, C., Loi, M., & Tamò‐Larrieux, A. (2021) · Computer law & security review · doi:10.1016/j.clsr.2023.105916 · Cited by 5
Automatic annotation of protected attributes to support fairness optimization
Consuegra‐Ayala, J. P., Gutiérrez, Y., Almeida-Cruz, Y., & Palomar, M. (2024) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2024.120188 · Cited by 3
Improving Equity in Deep Learning Medical Applications with the Gerchberg-Saxton Algorithm
Ay, S., Cardei, M., Meyer, A., Zhang, W., & Topaloĝlu, Ü. (2024) · Journal of Healthcare Informatics Research · doi:10.1007/s41666-024-00163-8 · Cited by 4
Analyzing the Relationship Between Difference and Ratio-Based Fairness Metrics
Yeh, M.-H., Metevier, B., Hoag, A. T., & Thomas, P. S. (2024) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3630106.3658922 · Cited by 6
Hoitsma, F., Nápoles, G., Güven, Ç., & Salgueiro, Y. (2024) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-024-02003-0 · Cited by 3
Sharma, A., Leite, D. F., Demir, C., & Ngomo, A.-C. N. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE) · doi:10.1109/fuzz-ieee60900.2024.10611982 · Cited by 3
Valluru, S. L., Widener, M. N., Srivastava, B., Natarajan, S., & Gangopadhyay, S. (2024) · AI Magazine · doi:10.1002/aaai.12203 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Verma, S., & Rubin, J.
- Affiliations
- Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur (IN)
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the International Workshop on Software Fairness
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2018-05-29
- Pages
- 1-7
- OpenAlex
- W2809878087
- Cited by
- 1,124
- References
- 21
- Citations by year
- 2026: 102 · 2025: 157 · 2024: 188 · 2023: 197 · 2022: 168 · 2021: 170 · 2020: 103 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 140.65
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
- Social Sciences › Law › Discrimination and Equality Law
- Keywords
- algorithmic fairness, algorithmic classification, fairness metrics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
