The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fairness definitions explained
Abstract
Algorithm fairness has started to attract the attention of researchers in AI, Software Engineering and Law communities, with more than twenty different notions of fairness proposed in the last few years. Yet, there is no clear agreement on which definition to apply in each situation. Moreover, the detailed differences between multiple definitions are difficult to grasp. To address this issue, this paper collects the most prominent definitions of fairness for the algorithmic classification problem, explains the rationale behind these definitions, and demonstrates each of them on a single unifying case-study. Our analysis intuitively explains why the same case can be considered fair according to some definitions and unfair according to others.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Parity on the different metrics across disaggregated population subgroups corresponds to how fairness is often defined [37, 48].”
From Model Cards for Model Reporting (2019) · cites this paper as [48]
In the citing paper
“While similar concepts have been operationalized for machine learning classification tasks (Mehrabi et al. 2021; Verma and Rubin 2018), less has been done in the NLP space, which may contain more ambiguity than classification for tasks like language generation.”
From Bias and Fairness in Large Language Models: A Survey (2024) · cites this paper as Verma and Rubin 2018
In the citing paper
“To combat bias, this paper has highlighted strategies such as robust data augmentation, the application of counterfactual fairness, and the imperative for diverse, representative datasets alongside unbiased data collection methods [49][50][51].”
From Fairness and Bias in Artificial Intelligence: A Brief Survey of Sources, Impacts, and Mitigation Strategies (2023) · cites this paper as [51]
In the citing paper
“As we discussed in §2.3 scholars have proposed a number of competing ways to quantify fairness [46,75,93,148], some of which are mathematically incompatible with each other [26,51,80].”
From Out of Context: Investigating the Bias and Fairness Concerns of “Artificial Intelligence as a Service” (2023) · cites this paper as [148]
In the citing paper
“As a result, a classifier trained without regard to the protected attribute not only fails to remove discrimination, but it can complicate the detection and mitigation of discrimination downstream via in-processing or post-processing techniques [9,10,18,24,25,34,43,51], such as those we describe next.”
From Interventional Fairness: Causal Database Repair for Algorithmic Fairness (2019) · cites this paper as [51]
Citations
Cites
UCI Machine Learning Repository
Asuncion, A. (2007) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 24,190
CAUSALITY: MODELS, REASONING AND INFERENCE
Hitchcock, C., & Pearl, J. (2001) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.2307/3182612 · Cited by 4,827
Dwork, C., Hardt, M., Pitassi, T., Reingold, O., & Zemel, R. (2012) · Proceedings of the 3rd Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference · doi:10.1145/2090236.2090255 · Cited by 3,501
Causality: models, reasoning, and inference
(2000) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.38-1494a · Cited by 2,968
Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learning
Hardt, M., Price, E., & Srebro, N. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1610.02413 · Cited by 2,536
Fair prediction with disparate impact: a study of bias in recidivism prediction instruments
Chouldechova, A. (2017) · Big Data · doi:10.1089/big.2016.0047 · Cited by 2,159
Algorithmic Decision Making and the Cost of Fairness
Corbett-Davies, S., Pierson, E., Feller, A., Goel, S., & Huq, A. (2017) · Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/3097983.3098095 · Cited by 1,149
Kusner, M. J., Loftus, J. R., Russell, C., & Silva, R. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1703.06856 · Cited by 995
Fairness in Criminal Justice Risk Assessments: The State of the Art
Berk, R., Heidari, H., Jabbari, S., Kearns, M., & Roth, A. (2021) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124118782533 · Cited by 988 · cited 7×
“However, it was shown that statistical definitions are insufficient [8, 10, 12, 16].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialInherent trade-offs in the fair determination of risk scores
Kleinberg, J., Mullainathan, S., & Raghavan, M. (2017) · Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik · doi:10.4230/lipics.itcs.2017.43 · Cited by 943 · cited 7×
“Well-calibration [16].”
BackgroundResultInfluential
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- 2016. Machine Bias. https://www.propublica.org/article/machine-bias-risk-assessments-in-criminal-sentencing. (May 2016 ). Online ; accessed February 2018. 2016. Machine Bias. https://www.propublica.org/article/machine-bias-risk-assessments-in-criminal-sentencing. (May 2016). Online; accessed February 2018.
- Matt J. Kusner Joshua R. Loftus Chris Russell and Ricardo Silva. 2017. Counter-factual Fairness. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. Matt J. Kusner Joshua R. Loftus Chris Russell and Ricardo Silva. 2017. Counter-factual Fairness. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 801–900 of 1,004
Bias og kvantitativ analyse innen velferd
Storås, A. M., Prabhu, R., Hammer, H. L., & Strümke, I. (2022) · Tidsskrift for velferdsforskning · doi:10.18261/tfv.25.3.3 · Cited by 2
Equal Confusion Fairness: Measuring Group-Based Disparities in Automated Decision Systems
Gürsoy, F., & Kakadiaris, I. A. (2022) · IEEE ... International Conference on Data Mining workshops · doi:10.1109/icdmw58026.2022.00027 · Cited by 2
Toward A Logical Theory Of Fairness and Bias
Belle, V. (2023) · Theory and Practice of Logic Programming · doi:10.1017/s1471068423000157 · Cited by 4
Pablo, D. O., Badri, S., Norén, E., & Nötzli, C. (2023) · Journal of WSCG · doi:10.24132/jwscg.2023.6 · Cited by 3
Rust, P., & Søgaard, A. (2023) · Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2308.08774 · Cited by 3
Learning Fair Representations: Mitigating Statistical Dependencies
Tayebi, A., Yazdani-Jahromi, M., Yalabadi, A. K., Yousefi, N., & Garibay, Ö. Ö. (2024) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-60611-3_8 · Cited by 2
The Need for User-centred Assessment of AI Fairness and Correctness
Stumpf, S., Taka, E., Nakao, Y., Luo, L. K., Sonoda, R., & Yokota, T. (2024) · ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization (UMAP) · doi:10.1145/3631700.3664912 · Cited by 6
Agnostic data debiasing through a local sanitizer learnt from an adversarial network approach.Preprint
Aïvodji, U., Bidet, F., Gambs, S., Ngueveu, R. C., & Tapp, A. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 2
Learning Fair and Interpretable Representations via Linear OrthogonalizationPreprint
He, Y., Burghardt, K., & Lerman, K. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1910.12854 · Cited by 4
Fair inference on error-prone outcomesPreprint
Boeschoten, L., van Kesteren, E., Bagheri, A., & Oberski, D. L. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2003.07621 · Cited by 2
Sociotechnical Aspects of Automated Recommendations: Algorithms, Ethics, and Evaluation
Paraschakis, D. (2020) · doi:10.24834/isbn.9789178770755 · Cited by 2
Adversarial Stacked Auto-Encoders for Fair Representation LearningPreprint
Kenfack, P. J., Khan, A., Hussain, R., & Kazmi, S. M. A. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2107.12826 · Cited by 4
Online Fairness-Aware Learning with Imbalanced Data StreamsPreprint
Iosifidis, V., Zhang, W., & Ntoutsi, E. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2108.06231 · Cited by 8
The Sharpe predictor for fairness in machine learningPreprint
Liu, S., & Vicente, L. N. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2108.06415 · Cited by 2
Kazim, E., Polle, R., Carvalho, G., Koshiyama, A., Inness, C., Knight, A., Gorski, C., Barber, D., Lomas, E., Yılmaz, E., et al. (2021) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3935987 · Cited by 2
Fairness Challenges in Artificial Intelligence
Chakrobartty, S., & El-Gayar, O. (2023) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-9220-5.ch101 · Cited by 2
Error Variance, Fairness, and the Curse on Minorities
Beauxis-Aussalet, E. (2021) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-93733-1_25 · Cited by 1
Notions of Fairness in Automated Decision Making: An Interdisciplinary Approach to Open Issues
Yousefi, Y. (2022) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-12673-4_1 · Cited by 1
Verständig, D., Kast, C., Stricker, J., & Nürnberger, A. (2022) · Verlag Barbara Budrich eBooks · doi:10.2307/j.ctv2xh53x1.3 · Cited by 1
Wessel, D. (2023) · Edition eGov-Campus · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-40101-6_11 · Cited by 1
Fairness, Bias and Trust in the Context of Biometric-Enabled Autonomous Decision Support
Lai, K., Yanushkevich, S. N., & Shmerko, V. P. (2023) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-67868-8_5 · Cited by 1
Towards Mitigating Perceived Unfairness in Contracts from a Non-Legal Stakeholder’s Perspective
Singhal, A., Anish, P. R., Karande, S. S., & Ghaisas, S. S. (2023) · Natural Legal Language Processing Workshop (NLLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.nllp-1.11 · Cited by 3
A Fair Post-processing Method Based on the MADD Metric for Predictive Student Models
Verger, M., Fan, C., Lallé, S., Bouchet, F., & Luengo, V. (2024) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-74627-7_3 · Cited by 1
A Frank System for Co-Evolutionary Hybrid Decision-Making
Mazzoni, F., Guidotti, R., & Malizia, A. (2024) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-58553-1_19 · Cited by 1
Fairness for Deep Learning Predictions Using Bias Parity Score Based Loss Function Regularization
Jain, B., Huber, M., & Elmasri, R. A. (2024) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence Tools · doi:10.1142/s0218213024600030 · Cited by 1
The Level of Implementing AI and its Framework for Creating Structured Strategy for Corporations
Akramov, J., & Valiev, B. (2024) · International Conference on Advance Computing and Innovative Technologies in Engineering (ICACITE) · doi:10.1109/icacite60783.2024.10617232 · Cited by 1
Group Fairness Refocused: Assessing the Social Impact of ML Systems
Hertweck, C., Loi, M., & Heitz, C. (2024) · IEEE Swiss Conference on Data Science (SDS) · doi:10.1109/sds60720.2024.00034 · Cited by 2
Belhadj, S. A., Park, S., Seth, A., Dar, H., & Kooi, T. (2024) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-72787-0_6 · Cited by 1
GRACE: Graph-Based Contextual Debiasing for Fair Visual Question Answering
Zhang, Y., Jiang, M. X., & Zhao, Q. (2024) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-72643-9_11 · Cited by 1
Multi-Objective and Multiple Information Source Optimization for Fair & Green Machine Learning
Candelieri, A., Ponti, A., & Archetti, F. (2024) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-81241-5_4 · Cited by 1
FALE: Fairness-Aware ALE Plots for Auditing Bias in Subgroups
Giannopoulos, G., Sacharidis, D., Theologitis, N., Kavouras, L., & Emiris, I. Z. (2024) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-74627-7_37 · Cited by 1
Algorithmic Fairness as an Inconsistent Concept
Hummel, P. (2025) · American Philosophical Quarterly · doi:10.5406/21521123.62.1.04 · Cited by 1
A Framework for Sustainable and Fair Demand-Supply Matchmaking Through Auctioning
Fernández, S., Bodin, U., & Synnes, K. (2025) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su17020572 · Cited by 1
Fair prediction sets through multi-objective hyperparameter optimization
García‐Galindo, A., López-De-Castro, M., & Armañanzas, R. (2025) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/s10994-024-06721-w · Cited by 1
SynthFair: Ensuring Subgroup Fairness in Classification via Synthetic Data Generation
Hattatoğlu, B., Qahtan, A. A., Kaya, H., & Velegrakis, Y. (2025) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-85856-7_26 · Cited by 1
Jaramillo, C. M., Squires, P., & Togelius, J. (2025) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-90062-4_15 · Cited by 1
Structural inequalities and chronic disease health outcomes: Impact of AI on health equity
Linde, S., Walker, R. J., Campbell, J. A., & Egede, L. E. (2025) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-23750-8.00029-1 · Cited by 1
Exploring the Influence of Data Characteristics on Machine Learning Outcomes
Sancricca, C., Castiglione, P., & Cappiello, C. (2025) · Lecture notes in business information processing · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-95397-2_14 · Cited by 1
Ethical AI in Big Data: Challenges in Bias, Fairness, and Transparency
Sanka, V. (2025) · International Journal of Scientific Research in Science and Technology · doi:10.32628/ijsrst25121220 · Cited by 3
Towards Effective Discrimination Testing for Generative AI
Zollo, T. P., Rajaneesh, N., Zemel, R., Gillis, T. B., & Black, E. (2024) · Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3715275.3732067 · Cited by 10
Algorithmic Fairness, Decision Thresholds, and the Separateness of Persons
Holm, S. (2025) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3715275.3732113 · Cited by 1
Bias Mitigation through Proxy Sensitive Attribute Label Generation
Tiwari, D., Pandey, A., & Chaudhari, B. P. (2024) · Joint International Conference on Data Science & Management of Data (CODS-COMAD) · doi:10.1145/3703323.3703329 · Cited by 2
On the Relevance of Logic for Artificial Intelligence, and the Promise of Neurosymbolic Learning
Belle, V. (2025) · Neurosymbolic Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1177/29498732251339951 · Cited by 1
Kaluza, M. C. D. P., Tholeti, T., Chen, Y., Baeza-Yates, R. A., Predrag Radivojac, A., & Jain, S. (2025) · ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) · doi:10.1145/3711896.3736846 · Cited by 1
Justiça Algorítmica: Instrumentalização, Limites Conceituais e Desafios na Engenharia de Software
Valença, L., & Santos, R. D. S. (2025) · Anais do Workshop sobre as Implicações da Computação na Sociedade (WICS) · doi:10.5753/wics.2025.8032 · Cited by 1
Strong Group Fair Classification via Optimal Transport and Mixed-Integer Linear Programming
Tao, Y., Chen, C., Jiang, S., & Wang, Q. (2025) · Journal of Global Optimization · doi:10.1007/s10898-025-01525-1 · Cited by 1
Reducing Human-Induced Label Bias in SMS Spam with Context-Enhanced Clustering (CEC)
Fuhnwi, G. S., Reinhold, A. M., & Izurieta, C. I. (2025) · IEEE International Conference on Cyber Security and Resilience (CSR) · doi:10.1109/csr64739.2025.11130032 · Cited by 1
SafeGen: safeguarding privacy and fairness through a genetic method
Cinquini, M., Manerba, M. M., Mazzoni, F., Pratesi, F., & Guidotti, R. (2025) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/s10994-025-06835-9 · Cited by 1
Fairness in Machine Learning: A Review for Statisticians
He, X., & Li, Y. (2025) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.2025.2579579 · Cited by 2
Software Fairness Testing in Practice
Santos, R. D. S., Leça, M. D. M., Santos, R., & de Magalhães, C. V. C. (2025) · IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance (ICSM) · doi:10.1109/icsme64153.2025.00012 · Cited by 1
PROMIS: A Post-Processing Framework for Mitigating Spatial Bias
Kyriakopoulos, D., Sacharidis, D., Giannopoulos, G., Gunopulos, D., & Dalamagas, T. M. (2025) · ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems (SIGSPATIAL GIS) · doi:10.1145/3748636.3762760 · Cited by 1
Deceptive bias measurement in deep learning: Assessing shortcut reliance in TCGA cancer models
Kheiri, F., Rahnamayan, S., & Makrehchi, M. (2026) · PLOS Digital Health · doi:10.1371/journal.pdig.0001165 · Cited by 1
Correa, G. L., Campello, B. S. C., & Duarte, L. T. (2025) · Computers & Industrial Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.cie.2025.111552 · Cited by 1
Towards a Fuzzy MCDM-Based Framework for Multi-Metric Bias Auditing in Generative AI
Ravikumar, R., Rajan, A. V., Narayan, A., & Maheshwari, P. (2025) · International Conference on Information Technology Trends (ITT) · doi:10.1109/itt69610.2025.11352932 · Cited by 1
Catch Me If You Can: The Dynamic Nature of Bias in Machine Learning Applications
Tarafdar, M., Rets, I., & Hu, Y. (2026) · Information Systems Journal · doi:10.1111/isj.70034 · Cited by 2
Tamvada, N., Akella, V., Dharmale, P., & Khadatare, M. (2026) · IEEE Annual Computing and Communication Workshop and Conference (CCWC) · doi:10.1109/ccwc67433.2026.11393804 · Cited by 1
Modularity-Fair Deep Community Detection
Gkartzios, C., Pitoura, E., & Tsaparas, P. (2025) · Proceedings · doi:10.1109/icdm65498.2025.00036 · Cited by 1
The role of team diversity in AI systems development
Santos, R. D. S., Baldassarre, M. T., & de Magalhães, C. V. C. (2026) · Empirical Software Engineering · doi:10.1007/s10664-025-10755-6 · Cited by 1
Burr, S. A., Zahra, D., & Robinson, I. M. (2026) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci16030488 · Cited by 1
Still unsafe: what’s holding us back on online safety for women
Pérez, Á. P., Farrell, T., de Kock, C., Jurasz, O., Nozza, D., & Fernandez, M. (2026) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-026-01097-0 · Cited by 1
A Neurosymbolic Approach to Counterfactual Fairness
Heilmann, X., Manganini, C., Cerrato, M., Kestel, L., & Belle, V. (2026) · Neurosymbolic Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1177/29498732261443184 · Cited by 1
Software Unfairness Detection in Machine Learning-Based Systems: A Systematic Mapping Study
Alharbi, R., & Abbadeni, N. (2026) · Software · doi:10.3390/software5020018 · Cited by 2
Operational fairness diagnostics for AI-based detection systems: Metrics and methodology
Braga, C. M., Serrano, M. A., & Fernández‐Medina, E. (2026) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2026.116369 · Cited by 1
Fairness Across Fields: Comparing Software Engineering and Human Sciences Perspectives
Valença, L., & Santos, R. D. S. (2026) · ACM Joint European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering (ESEC/FSE) · doi:10.1145/3803437.3806701 · Cited by 1
Fair Enough? On (Avoiding) Bias in Data, Algorithms and Decisions
Dechesne, F. (2020) · IFIP advances in information and communication technology · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-42504-3_2 · Cited by 1
Kaas, M. H. L. (2020) · Advances in human and social aspects of technology book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-4894-3.ch004 · Cited by 3
A Sociotechnical View of Algorithmic Fairness
Dolata, M., Feuerriegel, S., & Schwabe, G. (2021) · Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2110.09253 · Cited by 1
Tackle Cognitive Biases in Videosurveillance
Nicodème, C. (2021) · IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics (ISIE) · doi:10.1109/isie45552.2021.9576423 · Cited by 1
Machine Learning Bias in Computer Vision: Why do I have to care?
Laranjeira, C., Mota, V. F., & dos Santos, J. A. (2021) · SIBGRAPI Conference on Graphics, Patterns and Images (SIBGRAPI) · doi:10.1109/sibgrapi54419.2021.00010 · Cited by 1
Cognification in Learning, Teaching, and Training
Kumar, V., Ally, M., Tsinakos, A. A., & Norman, H. (2022) · Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology · doi:10.21432/cjlt28261 · Cited by 1
Evaluating algorithmic homeless service allocation
Qi, W., & Chelmis, C. (2022) · Journal of Computational Social Science · doi:10.1007/s42001-022-00190-8 · Cited by 2
Are Fair Learning To Rank Models Really Fair? An Analysis Using Inferred Gender
Pietrick, A., Romportl, A., Smith, S., Olulana, O., Cachel, K., & Rundensteiner, E. A. (2022) · IEEE MIT Undergraduate Research Technology Conference (URTC) · doi:10.1109/urtc56832.2022.10002233 · Cited by 1
Gula, N. B., Ferro, C., Mazzitelli, M. G., Etcheverry, L., & Rocamora, M. (2023) · Novos Rumos Sociológicos · doi:10.15210/norus.v10i18.4847 · Cited by 2
GroupMixNorm Layer for Learning Fair Models
Pandey, A., Rai, A., Singh, M., Bhatt, D., & Bhowmik, T. (2023) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-33374-3_41 · Cited by 1
Curtis, F. E., Liu, S., & Robinson, D. P. (2023) · Optimization Letters · doi:10.1007/s11590-023-02024-6 · Cited by 2
Gui, S., Zhang, Q., Huang, C., & Yuan, B. (2023) · International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn54540.2023.10191821 · Cited by 2
Another Point of View on Visual Speech Recognition
Pouthier, B., Pilati, L., Valenti, G., Bouveyron, C., & Precioso, F. (2023) · Interspeech (USB) · doi:10.21437/interspeech.2023-969 · Cited by 1
ALFR++: A Novel Algorithm for Learning Adversarial Fair Representations
Knobbout, M. (2023) · Frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications · doi:10.3233/faia230406 · Cited by 1
Fair Robust Active Learning by Joint Inconsistency
Wu, T.-H., Su, H.-T., Chen, S.-T., & Hsu, W. H. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops · doi:10.1109/iccvw60793.2023.00390 · Cited by 1
Mitigating Representation Bias in Data Transformations: A Constraint-based Optimization Approach
Catania, B., Guerrini, G., & Janpih, Z. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData) · doi:10.1109/bigdata59044.2023.10386181 · Cited by 1
MindSet: A Bias-Detection Interface Using a Visual Human-in-the-Loop Workflow
Kalananthan, S., Kichutkin, A., Shang, Z., Strausz, A., Bautiste, F. J. S., & El‐Assady, M. (2024) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-50485-3_8 · Cited by 1
I Prefer Not to Say: Protecting User Consent in Models with Optional Personal Data
Leemann, T., Pawelczyk, M., Eberle, C. T., & Kasneci, G. (2024) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v38i19.30126 · Cited by 2
15. Making Algorithms Fair : Ethnographic Insights from Machine Learning Interventions
Kinder-Kurlanda, K. E., & Fahimi, M. (2024) · Amsterdam University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9789048556908-015 · Cited by 4
Yuan, B., Gui, S., Zhang, Q., Wang, Z., Wen, J., Mao, B., Liu, J., & Yao, X. (2024) · IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine · doi:10.1109/mci.2024.3364430 · Cited by 3
MBFair: a model-based verification methodology for detecting violations of individual fairness
Ramadan, Q., Konersmann, M., Ahmadian, A. S., Jürjens, J., & Staab, S. (2024) · Software & Systems Modeling · doi:10.1007/s10270-024-01184-y · Cited by 1
Ethical trade-offs in AI for mental health
Holm, S. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1407562 · Cited by 4
Using Large Language Models to Mitigate Human-Induced Bias in SMS Spam: An Empirical Approach
Fuhnwi, G. S., Revelle, M., Whitaker, B. M., & Izurieta, C. I. (2025) · IEEE International Conference on AI in Cybersecurity (ICAIC) · doi:10.1109/icaic63015.2025.10848636 · Cited by 2
Proxy Attribute Discovery in Machine Learning Datasets via Inductive Logic Programming
Gonçalves, R. S. D. M., Gouveia, F., Lynce, I., & Santos, J. F. (2025) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-90653-4_17 · Cited by 2
Biswas, S., Kermarrec, A.-M., Sharma, R. K., Trinca, T., & de Vos, M. (2025) · IEEE Conference on Secure and Trustworthy Machine Learning (SaTML) · doi:10.1109/satml64287.2025.00045 · Cited by 1
Fairness of AI Systems in the Legal Context
Paternolli, V., Preda, M. D., & Giacobazzi, R. (2025) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-92648-8_4 · Cited by 1
Raji, I. D. (2019) · XRDS Crossroads The ACM Magazine for Students · doi:10.1145/3313127 · Cited by 1
Algorithmic Governance der Wikipedia
Müller-Birn, C. (2020) · Ars digitalis · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-27852-6_12 · Cited by 1
Fairness Criteria and Mitigation of AI Bias
Kim, H.-E. (2021) · 한국심리학회지: 일반 · doi:10.22257/kjp.2021.12.40.4.459 · Cited by 1
Bias Quantification for Protected Features in Pattern Classification Problems
Koumeri, L. K., & Nápoles, G. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-93420-0_33 · Cited by 1
An Exploratory Study on Fairness-Aware Design Decision-Making
Tanu, S. S., Zhang, L., Gauri, D. K., & Sha, Z. (2022) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.24251/hicss.2022.675 · Cited by 1
FEPC: Fairness Estimation Using Prototypes and Critics for Tabular Data
Giloni, A., Grolman, E., Elovici, Y., & Shabtai, A. (2022) · Proceedings - International Conference on Pattern Recognition/Proceedings/International Conference on Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/icpr56361.2022.9956582 · Cited by 1
Individual Fairness for Social Media Influencers
Ionescu, S., Pagan, N., & Hannák, A. (2023) · Studies in computational intelligence · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-21127-0_14 · Cited by 1
Joshi, H. C., Yadav, U., Srivastava, B., & Singh, R. M. (2022) · IEEE ... International Conference on Data Mining workshops · doi:10.1109/icdmw58026.2022.00128 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Verma, S., & Rubin, J.
- Affiliations
- Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur (IN)
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the International Workshop on Software Fairness
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2018-05-29
- Pages
- 1-7
- OpenAlex
- W2809878087
- Cited by
- 1,124
- References
- 21
- Citations by year
- 2026: 102 · 2025: 157 · 2024: 188 · 2023: 197 · 2022: 168 · 2021: 170 · 2020: 103 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 140.65
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
- Social Sciences › Law › Discrimination and Equality Law
- Keywords
- algorithmic fairness, algorithmic classification, fairness metrics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
