The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fairness definitions explained
Abstract
Algorithm fairness has started to attract the attention of researchers in AI, Software Engineering and Law communities, with more than twenty different notions of fairness proposed in the last few years. Yet, there is no clear agreement on which definition to apply in each situation. Moreover, the detailed differences between multiple definitions are difficult to grasp. To address this issue, this paper collects the most prominent definitions of fairness for the algorithmic classification problem, explains the rationale behind these definitions, and demonstrates each of them on a single unifying case-study. Our analysis intuitively explains why the same case can be considered fair according to some definitions and unfair according to others.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Parity on the different metrics across disaggregated population subgroups corresponds to how fairness is often defined [37, 48].”
From Model Cards for Model Reporting (2019) · cites this paper as [48]
In the citing paper
“While similar concepts have been operationalized for machine learning classification tasks (Mehrabi et al. 2021; Verma and Rubin 2018), less has been done in the NLP space, which may contain more ambiguity than classification for tasks like language generation.”
From Bias and Fairness in Large Language Models: A Survey (2024) · cites this paper as Verma and Rubin 2018
In the citing paper
“To combat bias, this paper has highlighted strategies such as robust data augmentation, the application of counterfactual fairness, and the imperative for diverse, representative datasets alongside unbiased data collection methods [49][50][51].”
From Fairness and Bias in Artificial Intelligence: A Brief Survey of Sources, Impacts, and Mitigation Strategies (2023) · cites this paper as [51]
In the citing paper
“As we discussed in §2.3 scholars have proposed a number of competing ways to quantify fairness [46,75,93,148], some of which are mathematically incompatible with each other [26,51,80].”
From Out of Context: Investigating the Bias and Fairness Concerns of “Artificial Intelligence as a Service” (2023) · cites this paper as [148]
In the citing paper
“As a result, a classifier trained without regard to the protected attribute not only fails to remove discrimination, but it can complicate the detection and mitigation of discrimination downstream via in-processing or post-processing techniques [9,10,18,24,25,34,43,51], such as those we describe next.”
From Interventional Fairness: Causal Database Repair for Algorithmic Fairness (2019) · cites this paper as [51]
Citations
Cites
UCI Machine Learning Repository
Asuncion, A. (2007) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 24,190
CAUSALITY: MODELS, REASONING AND INFERENCE
Hitchcock, C., & Pearl, J. (2001) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.2307/3182612 · Cited by 4,827
Dwork, C., Hardt, M., Pitassi, T., Reingold, O., & Zemel, R. (2012) · Proceedings of the 3rd Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference · doi:10.1145/2090236.2090255 · Cited by 3,501
Causality: models, reasoning, and inference
(2000) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.38-1494a · Cited by 2,968
Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learning
Hardt, M., Price, E., & Srebro, N. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1610.02413 · Cited by 2,536
Fair prediction with disparate impact: a study of bias in recidivism prediction instruments
Chouldechova, A. (2017) · Big Data · doi:10.1089/big.2016.0047 · Cited by 2,159
Algorithmic Decision Making and the Cost of Fairness
Corbett-Davies, S., Pierson, E., Feller, A., Goel, S., & Huq, A. (2017) · Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/3097983.3098095 · Cited by 1,149
Kusner, M. J., Loftus, J. R., Russell, C., & Silva, R. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1703.06856 · Cited by 995
Fairness in Criminal Justice Risk Assessments: The State of the Art
Berk, R., Heidari, H., Jabbari, S., Kearns, M., & Roth, A. (2021) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124118782533 · Cited by 988 · cited 7×
“However, it was shown that statistical definitions are insufficient [8, 10, 12, 16].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialInherent trade-offs in the fair determination of risk scores
Kleinberg, J., Mullainathan, S., & Raghavan, M. (2017) · Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik · doi:10.4230/lipics.itcs.2017.43 · Cited by 943 · cited 7×
“Well-calibration [16].”
BackgroundResultInfluential
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- 2016. Machine Bias. https://www.propublica.org/article/machine-bias-risk-assessments-in-criminal-sentencing. (May 2016 ). Online ; accessed February 2018. 2016. Machine Bias. https://www.propublica.org/article/machine-bias-risk-assessments-in-criminal-sentencing. (May 2016). Online; accessed February 2018.
- Matt J. Kusner Joshua R. Loftus Chris Russell and Ricardo Silva. 2017. Counter-factual Fairness. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. Matt J. Kusner Joshua R. Loftus Chris Russell and Ricardo Silva. 2017. Counter-factual Fairness. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–500 of 1,004
Algorithmic Fairness in Mortgage Lending: From Absolute Conditions to Relational Trade-OffsPreprint
Lee, M. S. A., & Floridi, L. (2020) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3559407 · Cited by 13
Unveiling Accuracy-Fairness Trade-Offs
Opoku, R. A., Pei, B., & Xing, W. (2025) · Journal of Learning Analytics · doi:10.18608/jla.2025.8543 · Cited by 12
Purdy, J., & Glass, B. (2022) · Children and Youth Services Review · doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2022.106777 · Cited by 14
Han, S., Lee, S., Wu, F., Kim, S., Wu, C., Wang, X., Xie, X., & Cha, M. (2023) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3543507.3583480 · Cited by 12
FAC-fed: Federated adaptation for fairness and concept drift aware stream classification
Badar, M., Nejdl, W., & Fisichella, M. (2023) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/s10994-023-06360-7 · Cited by 12
Uncovering Bias in Personal Informatics
Yfantidou, S., Sermpezis, P., Vakali, A. I., & Baeza-Yates, R. A. (2023) · Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies · doi:10.1145/3610914 · Cited by 16
Künstliche Intelligenz in öffentlichen Verwaltungen
Heine, M., Dhungel, A.-K., Schrills, T., & Wessel, D. (2023) · Edition eGov-Campus · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-40101-6 · Cited by 12
AI-Driven Decision-Making Applications in Higher Education
Lestari, R., Windarwati, H. D., & Hidayah, R. (2024) · Advances in media, entertainment and the arts (AMEA) book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-0639-0.ch011 · Cited by 12
On prediction-modelers and decision-makers: why fairness requires more than a fair prediction model
Scantamburlo, T., Baumann, J., & Heitz, C. (2024) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-024-01886-3 · Cited by 18
ReFAIR: Toward a Context-Aware Recommender for Fairness Requirements Engineering
Ferrara, C., Casillo, F., Gravino, C., Lucia, A. D., & Palomba, F. (2024) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceedings (ICSE-Companion) · doi:10.1145/3597503.3639185 · Cited by 17
Strategies to improve fairness in artificial intelligence:A systematic literature review
Trigo, A., Stein, N., & Belfo, F. P. (2024) · Education for Information · doi:10.3233/efi-240045 · Cited by 12
Gao, J., Zuo, F., Yang, D., Tang, Y., Ozbay, K., & Seeley, M. (2025) · Journal of Transportation Engineering Part A Systems · doi:10.1061/jtepbs.teeng-8675 · Cited by 11
The ontological politics of synthetic data: Normalities, outliers, and intersectional hallucinations
Lee, F., Hajisharif, S., & Johnson, E. (2025) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/20539517251318289 · Cited by 14
Disparate Impact Diminishes Consumer Trust Even for Advantaged Users
Draws, T., Szlávik, Z., Timmermans, B., Tintarev, N., Varshney, K. R., & Hind, M. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-79460-6_11 · Cited by 16
Hard Choices and Hard Limits in Artificial Intelligence
Goodman, B. (2021) · Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society · doi:10.1145/3461702.3462539 · Cited by 18
Could a Conversational AI Identify Offensive Language?
da Silva, D. A., Louro, H. D. B., Gonçalves, G. S., Marques, J., Dias, L. A. V., da Cunha, A. M., & Tasinaffo, P. M. (2021) · Information · doi:10.3390/info12100418 · Cited by 12
A Fuzzy-Cognitive-Maps Approach to Decision-Making in Medical Ethics
Hein, A., Meier, L. J., Buyx, A., & Diepold, K. J. (2022) · IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE) · doi:10.1109/fuzz-ieee55066.2022.9882615 · Cited by 12
Algorithm Assurance: Auditing Applications of Artificial Intelligence
Boer, A., de Beer, L., & van Praat, F. (2022) · Progress in IS · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-11089-4_7 · Cited by 15
On Demographic Bias in Fingerprint Recognition
Godbole, A., Grosz, S. A., Nandakumar, K., & Jain, A. K. (2022) · IEEE International Joint Conference on Biometrics (IJCB) · doi:10.1109/ijcb54206.2022.10007933 · Cited by 12
FairUP: A Framework for Fairness Analysis of Graph Neural Network-Based User Profiling Models
Abdelrazek, M., Purificato, E., Boratto, L., & Luca, E. W. D. (2023) · International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR) · doi:10.1145/3539618.3591814 · Cited by 13
Individual Fairness with Group Awareness Under Uncertainty
Wang, Z., Dzuong, J., Yuan, X., Chen, Z., Wu, Y., Yao, X., & Zhang, W. (2024) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-70362-1_6 · Cited by 13
Escobedo, G., Moscati, M., Müllner, P., Kopeinik, S., Kowald, D., Lex, E., & Schedl, M. (2024) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-70368-3_21 · Cited by 12
Privacy and Ethical Challenges in Big Data
Gambs, S. (2019) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-18419-3_2 · Cited by 14
Coates, D. L., & Martin, A. J. (2019) · IBM Journal of Research and Development · doi:10.1147/jrd.2019.2915062 · Cited by 13
Capuchin: Causal Database Repair for Algorithmic FairnessPreprint
Salimi, B., Rodriguez, L., Howe, B., & Suciu, D. M. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1902.08283 · Cited by 12
Debiasing Classifiers: Is Reality at Variance With Expectation?Preprint
Agrawal, A., Pfisterer, F., Bischl, B., Chen, J., Sood, S., Shah, S., Buet-Golfouse, F., Mateen, B. A., & Vollmer, S. J. (2020) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3711681 · Cited by 17
The Butterfly Effect in Artificial Intelligence Systems: Implications for AI Bias and Fairness
Ferrara, E. (2023) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4614234 · Cited by 129
Facial Expression Recognition: Impact of Gender on Fairness and Expressions∗
Manresa-Yee, C., Ramis, S., & Rubio, J. M. B. (2022) · doi:10.1145/3549865.3549904 · Cited by 11
Advancing Personalized Federated Learning: Group Privacy, Fairness, and Beyond
Galli, F., Jung, K., Biswas, S., Catuscia Palamidessi, A., & Cucinotta, T. (2023) · SN Computer Science · doi:10.1007/s42979-023-02292-0 · Cited by 14
Da, Y., Bossa, M. N., Berenguer, A. D., & Hichem Sahli, B. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3353056 · Cited by 16
Unveiling and mitigating bias in ride-hailing pricing for equitable policy making
Saxena, N. A., Zhang, W., & Shahabi, C. (2024) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-024-00498-3 · Cited by 11
Ali, M. U., Zafar, A., Ahmed, W., Aslam, M., & Kim, S. H. (2024) · International Journal of Energy Research · doi:10.1155/2024/5586605 · Cited by 11
Bias audit laws: how effective are they at preventing bias in automated employment decision tools?
Hilliard, A., Gulley, A., Koshiyama, A., & Kazim, E. (2024) · International Review of Law Computers & Technology · doi:10.1080/13600869.2024.2403053 · Cited by 14
The hitchhiker's guide to scholarly research integrity
Taswell, S. K., Triggle, C. R., Vayo, J., Dutta, S., & Taswell, C. (2020) · Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/pra2.223 · Cited by 11
BENN: Bias Estimation Using a Deep Neural Network
Giloni, A., Grolman, E., Hagemann, T., Fromm, R., Fischer, S., Elovici, Y., & Shabtai, A. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2022.3172365 · Cited by 13
Learning to Generate Fair Clusters from Demonstrations
Galhotra, S., Saisubramanian, S., & Shlomo Zilberstein, B. (2021) · Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society · doi:10.1145/3461702.3462558 · Cited by 11
Datta, A., & Swamidass, S. J. (2022) · International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence (ICAART) · doi:10.5220/0010877400003116 · Cited by 11
Non-empirical problems in fair machine learning
Scantamburlo, T. (2021) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s10676-021-09608-9 · Cited by 13
Affirmative Algorithms: Relational Equality as Algorithmic Fairness
Zhang, M. (2022) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3531146.3533115 · Cited by 13
Exploiting Fairness to Enhance Sensitive Attributes Reconstruction
Ferry, J., Aïvodji, U., Gambs, S., Huguet, M., & Siala, M. (2023) · IEEE Conference on Secure and Trustworthy Machine Learning (SaTML) · doi:10.1109/satml54575.2023.00012 · Cited by 13
Group Fairness in Prediction-Based Decision Making: From Moral Assessment to Implementation
Baumann, J., & Heitz, C. (2022) · IEEE Swiss Conference on Data Science (SDS) · doi:10.1109/sds54800.2022.00011 · Cited by 13
Privacy-Preserving and Trustless Verifiable Fairness Audit of Machine Learning Models
Tang, G., Tan, W., & Cai, M. (2023) · International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications · doi:10.14569/ijacsa.2023.0140294 · Cited by 12
TestSGD : Interpretable Testing of Neural Networks against Subtle Group Discrimination
Zhang, M., Sun, J., Wang, J., & Sun, B. (2023) · ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology · doi:10.1145/3591869 · Cited by 12
Fairness-aware Maximal Biclique Enumeration on Bipartite Graphs
Yin, Z., Zhang, Q., Zhang, W., Li, R.-H., & Wang, G. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE) · doi:10.1109/icde55515.2023.00131 · Cited by 11
Enhancing Model Robustness and Fairness with Causality: A Regularization Approach
Wang, Z., Shu, K., & Culotta, A. (2021) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.cinlp-1.3 · Cited by 19
Fairness & friends in the data science era
Catania, B., Guerrini, G., & Accinelli, C. (2022) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-022-01472-5 · Cited by 12
Different Views of Interpretability
Iooss, B., Kenett, R. S., & Secchi, P. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-12402-0_1 · Cited by 11
Metrics and methods for a systematic comparison of fairness-aware machine learning algorithmsPreprint
Jones, G. P., Hickey, J. M., Stefano, P. G. D., Dhanjal, C., Stoddart, L. C., & Vasileiou, V. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2010.03986 · Cited by 28
Gemalmaz, M. A., & Yin, M. (2022) · Proceedings of the 2022 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society · doi:10.1145/3514094.3534201 · Cited by 10
Rodolfa, K. T., Lamba, H., & Ghani, R. (2021) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-021-00396-x · Cited by 10
Racial fairness in violence risk instruments: a review of the literature
Ashford, L., Spivak, B., & Shepherd, S. M. (2021) · Psychology Crime and Law · doi:10.1080/1068316x.2021.1972108 · Cited by 12
Generating Interpretable Data-Based Explanations for Fairness Debugging using Gopher
Zhu, J., Pradhan, R., Glavic, B., & Salimi, B. (2022) · ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD) · doi:10.1145/3514221.3520170 · Cited by 10
Politicizing Algorithms by Other Means: Toward Inquiries for Affective Dissensions
Jaton, F., & Vinck, D. (2022) · Perspectives on Science · doi:10.1162/posc_a_00582 · Cited by 10
Jourdan, F., Kaninku, T. T., Asher, N. M., Loubes, J., & Risser, L. (2023) · Algorithms · doi:10.3390/a16030174 · Cited by 14
Algorithmic fairness and resentment
Babic, B., & King, Z. J. (2023) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1007/s11098-023-02006-5 · Cited by 10
FairBoost: Boosting supervised learning for learning on multiple sensitive features
Colakovic, I., & Karakatič, S. (2023) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2023.110999 · Cited by 10
A comprehensive analysis of gender, racial, and prompt-induced biases in large language models
Torres, N., Ulloa, C., Araya, I., Ayala, M., & Jara, S. (2024) · International Journal of Data Science and Analytics · doi:10.1007/s41060-024-00696-6 · Cited by 14
Navigating fairness: practitioners’ understanding, challenges, and strategies in AI/ML development
Pant, A., Hoda, R., Tantithamthavorn, C. K., & Turhan, B. (2025) · Empirical Software Engineering · doi:10.1007/s10664-025-10650-0 · Cited by 20
Bridging finance and AI: a comprehensive survey of large language models in financial system
Khan, A. T., Li, S., & Cao, X. (2025) · Digital Finance · doi:10.1007/s42521-025-00146-3 · Cited by 16
Machine Learning and Law and Economics: A Preliminary Overview
Park, S.-C., & Ko, H. (2020) · Asian Journal of Law and Economics · doi:10.1515/ajle-2020-0030 · Cited by 12
Assuring Fairness of Algorithmic Decision Making
Hauer, M. P., Adler, R., & Zweig, K. A. (2021) · IEEE International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation Workshops (ICSTW) · doi:10.1109/icstw52544.2021.00029 · Cited by 12
Li, J., Moskovitch, Y., & Jagadish, H. V. (2021) · Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment · doi:10.14778/3476311.3476328 · Cited by 10
Towards Automatic Bias Detection in Knowledge Graphs
Keidar, D., Zhong, M., Zhang, C., Shrestha, Y. R., & Paudel, B. (2021) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.findings-emnlp.321 · Cited by 11
Fair Models for Impartial Policies: Controlling Algorithmic Bias in Transport Behavioural Modelling
Vega-Gonzalo, M., & Christidis, P. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su14148416 · Cited by 11
When More Data Lead Us Astray: Active Data Acquisition in the Presence of Label Bias
Li, Y., De‐Arteaga, M., & Saar‐Tsechansky, M. (2022) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Human Computation and Crowdsourcing · doi:10.1609/hcomp.v10i1.21994 · Cited by 12
Robust Personalized Federated Learning under Demographic Fairness Heterogeneity
Carey, A. N., Du, W., & Wu, X. (2022) · IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData) · doi:10.1109/bigdata55660.2022.10020554 · Cited by 10
Bias Assessment Approaches for Addressing User-Centered Fairness in GNN-Based Recommender Systems
Chizari, N., Tajfar, K., & Garcı́a, M. N. M. (2023) · Information · doi:10.3390/info14020131 · Cited by 10
From Machine Ethics to Internet Ethics: Broadening the Horizon
Murukannaiah, P. K., & Singh, M. P. (2020) · IEEE Internet Computing · doi:10.1109/mic.2020.2989935 · Cited by 10
A Methodology for Non-Functional Property Evaluation of Machine Learning Models
Anisetti, M., Ardagna, C. A., Damiani, E., & Panero, P. G. (2020) · International Conference on Management of Emergent Digital EcoSystems (MEDES) · doi:10.1145/3415958.3433101 · Cited by 10
Addressing Under-Reporting to Enhance Fairness and Accuracy in Mobility-based Crime Prediction
Wu, J., Frı́as-Martı́nez, E., & Frías-Martínez, V. (2020) · ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems (SIGSPATIAL GIS) · doi:10.1145/3397536.3422205 · Cited by 10
Improving the User Experience and the Trustworthiness of Financial Services
Cornacchia, G., Narducci, F., & Ragone, A. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-85607-6_19 · Cited by 10
Explaining classification performance and bias via network structure and sampling technique
Espín-Noboa, L., Karimi, F., Ribeiro, B., Lerman, K., & Wagner, C. (2021) · Applied Network Science · doi:10.1007/s41109-021-00394-3 · Cited by 10
Making recruitment more inclusive
Delecraz, S., Eltarr, L., Becuwe, M., Bouxin, H., Boutin, N., & Oullier, O. (2022) · 2022 IEEE/ACM International Workshop on Equitable Data & Technology (FairWare) · doi:10.1145/3524491.3527309 · Cited by 18
Probabilistic Fair ClusteringPreprint
Esmaeili, S. A. H., Brubach, B., Tsepenekas, L., & Dickerson, J. P. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2006.10916 · Cited by 10
An Algorithmic Framework for Fairness ElicitationPreprint
Jung, C., Kearns, M. J., Neel, S., Roth, A., Stapleton, L., & Wu, Z. S. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.4230/lipics.forc.2021.2 · Cited by 10
Removing biased data to improve fairness and accuracyPreprint
Verma, S., Ernst, M. D., & Just, R. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2102.03054 · Cited by 27
Self-citationBias, Fairness, and Accountability with AI and ML AlgorithmsPreprint
Zhou, N., Zhang, Z., Nair, V. N., Singhal, H., Chen, J., & Sudjianto, A. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2105.06558 · Cited by 10
Imputation Strategies Under Clinical Presence: Impact on Algorithmic FairnessPreprint
Jeanselme, V., De‐Arteaga, M., Zhang, Z., Tom, B. D. M., & Barrett, J. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4496874 · Cited by 10
Beyond principlism: Practical strategies for ethical AI use in research practicesPreprint
Lin, Z. (2023) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/w75gs · Cited by 11
FairCompass: Operationalizing Fairness in Machine Learning
Liu, J., Chen, H., Shen, J., & Choo, K. R. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tai.2023.3348429 · Cited by 12
Balancing Act: Evaluating People’s Perceptions of Fair Ranking Metrics
Alkhathlan, M., Cachel, K., Shrestha, H., Harrison, L., & Rundensteiner, E. A. (2024) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3630106.3659018 · Cited by 9
Can Machine Learning Assist in Diagnosis of Primary Immune Thrombocytopenia? A Feasibility Study
Miah, H., Kollias, D., Pedone, G. L., Provan, D., & Chen, F. E. (2024) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics14131352 · Cited by 9
Hypergraph Convolutional Network for User-Oriented Fairness in Recommender Systems
Han, Z., Chen, C., Zheng, X., Zhang, L., & Li, Y. (2024) · International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR) · doi:10.1145/3626772.3657737 · Cited by 11
Trentz, C., Engelbart, J., Semprini, J., Kahl, A. R., Anyimadu, E. A., Buatti, J. M., Casavant, T. L., Charlton, M. E., & Canahuate, G. M. (2024) · Health Care Management Science · doi:10.1007/s10729-024-09691-6 · Cited by 11
How fair are we? From conceptualization to automated assessment of fairness definitions
d’Aloisio, G., Sipio, C. D., Marco, A. D., & Ruscio, D. D. (2025) · Software & Systems Modeling · doi:10.1007/s10270-025-01277-2 · Cited by 12
Unmasking Gender Bias in Recommendation Systems and Enhancing Category-Aware Fairness
Kheya, T. A., Bouadjenek, M. R., & Aryal, S. (2025) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3696410.3714528 · Cited by 10
Detection and Mitigation of Algorithmic Bias via Predictive Parity
DiCiccio, C. J., Hsu, B., Yu, Y., Nandy, P., & Basu, K. (2023) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3593013.3594117 · Cited by 12
Ruggieri, S., Álvarez, J. M., Pugnana, A., State, L., & Turini, F. (2023) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v37i13.26798 · Cited by 11
Fairness via Group Contribution Matching
Li, T., Li, Z., Li, A., Du, M., Liu, A., Guo, Q., Meng, G., & Liu, Y. (2023) · International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.24963/ijcai.2023/49 · Cited by 9
Fair Sampling in Diffusion Models through Switching Mechanism
Choi, Y., Park, J.-G., Kim, H., Lee, J., & Park, S. (2024) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v38i20.30202 · Cited by 14
Towards algorithms and models that we can trust: A theoretical perspective
Oneto, L., Ridella, S., & Anguita, D. (2024) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2024.127798 · Cited by 12
Fairness in Design: A Tool for Guidance in Ethical Artificial Intelligence Design
Shu, Y., Zhang, J., & Yu, H. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-77626-8_34 · Cited by 9
Fairness-Driven Private Collaborative Machine Learning
Pessach, D., Tassa, T., & Shmueli, E. (2024) · ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology · doi:10.1145/3639368 · Cited by 10
Castro, C. (2022) · Public Affairs Quarterly · doi:10.5406/21520542.36.2.04 · Cited by 9
Towards Group Fairness via Semi-Centralized Adversarial Training in Federated Learning
Yang, Y., & Jiang, B. (2022) · IEEE International Conference on Mobile Data Management (MDM) · doi:10.1109/mdm55031.2022.00103 · Cited by 9
Being Right for Whose Right Reasons?
Jakobsen, T. S. T., Cabello, L., & Søgaard, A. (2023) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.59 · Cited by 10
Evaluating Superhuman Models with Consistency Checks
Fluri, L., Paleka, D., & Tramèr, F. (2024) · IEEE Conference on Secure and Trustworthy Machine Learning (SaTML) · doi:10.1109/satml59370.2024.00017 · Cited by 39
Fair Decision Making using Privacy-Protected DataPreprint
Kuppam, S., McKenna, R., Pujol, D., Hay, M., Machanavajjhala, A., & Miklau, G. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1905.12744 · Cited by 9
Fairness On The Ground: Applying Algorithmic Fairness Approaches to Production SystemsPreprint
Bakalar, C., Barreto, R. D. C., Bergman, S., Bogen, M., Chern, B., Corbett‐Davies, S., Hall, M. A., Kloumann, I. M., Lam, M. S., Candela, J. Q., et al. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2103.06172 · Cited by 40
Zhao, T., Dai, E., Shu, K., & Wang, S. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Verma, S., & Rubin, J.
- Affiliations
- Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur (IN)
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the International Workshop on Software Fairness
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2018-05-29
- Pages
- 1-7
- OpenAlex
- W2809878087
- Cited by
- 1,124
- References
- 21
- Citations by year
- 2026: 102 · 2025: 157 · 2024: 188 · 2023: 197 · 2022: 168 · 2021: 170 · 2020: 103 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 140.65
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
- Social Sciences › Law › Discrimination and Equality Law
- Keywords
- algorithmic fairness, algorithmic classification, fairness metrics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
