The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fairness definitions explained
Abstract
Algorithm fairness has started to attract the attention of researchers in AI, Software Engineering and Law communities, with more than twenty different notions of fairness proposed in the last few years. Yet, there is no clear agreement on which definition to apply in each situation. Moreover, the detailed differences between multiple definitions are difficult to grasp. To address this issue, this paper collects the most prominent definitions of fairness for the algorithmic classification problem, explains the rationale behind these definitions, and demonstrates each of them on a single unifying case-study. Our analysis intuitively explains why the same case can be considered fair according to some definitions and unfair according to others.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Parity on the different metrics across disaggregated population subgroups corresponds to how fairness is often defined [37, 48].”
From Model Cards for Model Reporting (2019) · cites this paper as [48]
In the citing paper
“While similar concepts have been operationalized for machine learning classification tasks (Mehrabi et al. 2021; Verma and Rubin 2018), less has been done in the NLP space, which may contain more ambiguity than classification for tasks like language generation.”
From Bias and Fairness in Large Language Models: A Survey (2024) · cites this paper as Verma and Rubin 2018
In the citing paper
“To combat bias, this paper has highlighted strategies such as robust data augmentation, the application of counterfactual fairness, and the imperative for diverse, representative datasets alongside unbiased data collection methods [49][50][51].”
From Fairness and Bias in Artificial Intelligence: A Brief Survey of Sources, Impacts, and Mitigation Strategies (2023) · cites this paper as [51]
In the citing paper
“As we discussed in §2.3 scholars have proposed a number of competing ways to quantify fairness [46,75,93,148], some of which are mathematically incompatible with each other [26,51,80].”
From Out of Context: Investigating the Bias and Fairness Concerns of “Artificial Intelligence as a Service” (2023) · cites this paper as [148]
In the citing paper
“As a result, a classifier trained without regard to the protected attribute not only fails to remove discrimination, but it can complicate the detection and mitigation of discrimination downstream via in-processing or post-processing techniques [9,10,18,24,25,34,43,51], such as those we describe next.”
From Interventional Fairness: Causal Database Repair for Algorithmic Fairness (2019) · cites this paper as [51]
Citations
Cites
UCI Machine Learning Repository
Asuncion, A. (2007) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 24,190
CAUSALITY: MODELS, REASONING AND INFERENCE
Hitchcock, C., & Pearl, J. (2001) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.2307/3182612 · Cited by 4,827
Dwork, C., Hardt, M., Pitassi, T., Reingold, O., & Zemel, R. (2012) · Proceedings of the 3rd Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference · doi:10.1145/2090236.2090255 · Cited by 3,501
Causality: models, reasoning, and inference
(2000) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.38-1494a · Cited by 2,968
Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learning
Hardt, M., Price, E., & Srebro, N. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1610.02413 · Cited by 2,536
Fair prediction with disparate impact: a study of bias in recidivism prediction instruments
Chouldechova, A. (2017) · Big Data · doi:10.1089/big.2016.0047 · Cited by 2,159
Algorithmic Decision Making and the Cost of Fairness
Corbett-Davies, S., Pierson, E., Feller, A., Goel, S., & Huq, A. (2017) · Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/3097983.3098095 · Cited by 1,149
Kusner, M. J., Loftus, J. R., Russell, C., & Silva, R. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1703.06856 · Cited by 995
Fairness in Criminal Justice Risk Assessments: The State of the Art
Berk, R., Heidari, H., Jabbari, S., Kearns, M., & Roth, A. (2021) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124118782533 · Cited by 988 · cited 7×
“However, it was shown that statistical definitions are insufficient [8, 10, 12, 16].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialInherent trade-offs in the fair determination of risk scores
Kleinberg, J., Mullainathan, S., & Raghavan, M. (2017) · Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik · doi:10.4230/lipics.itcs.2017.43 · Cited by 943 · cited 7×
“Well-calibration [16].”
BackgroundResultInfluential
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- 2016. Machine Bias. https://www.propublica.org/article/machine-bias-risk-assessments-in-criminal-sentencing. (May 2016 ). Online ; accessed February 2018. 2016. Machine Bias. https://www.propublica.org/article/machine-bias-risk-assessments-in-criminal-sentencing. (May 2016). Online; accessed February 2018.
- Matt J. Kusner Joshua R. Loftus Chris Russell and Ricardo Silva. 2017. Counter-factual Fairness. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. Matt J. Kusner Joshua R. Loftus Chris Russell and Ricardo Silva. 2017. Counter-factual Fairness. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 1,004
$$\mathsf {FABBOO}$$ - Online Fairness-Aware Learning Under Class Imbalance
Iosifidis, V., & Ntoutsi, E. (2020) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-61527-7_11 · Cited by 21
FR-Train: A Mutual Information-Based Approach to Fair and Robust TrainingPreprint
Roh, Y., Lee, K., Whang, S. E., & Suh, C. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2002.10234 · Cited by 23
Genovesi, S., Mönig, J. M., Schmitz, A., Poretschkin, M., Akila, M., Kahdan, M., Kleiner, R., Krieger, L., & Zimmermann, A. (2024) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-023-00291-8 · Cited by 19
Salazar, T., Araújo, H. J., Cano, A., & Abreu, P. H. (2026) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-025-11475-5 · Cited by 33
Bernagozzi, M., Srivastava, B., Rossi, F., & Usmani, S. (2021) · IEEE Internet Computing · doi:10.1109/mic.2021.3097604 · Cited by 19
Ahmed, Z., Vidgen, B., & Hale, S. A. (2022) · EPJ Data Science · doi:10.1140/epjds/s13688-022-00319-9 · Cited by 22
Improving fairness generalization through a sample-robust optimization method
Ferry, J., Aïvodji, U., Gambs, S., Huguet, M., & Siala, M. (2022) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/s10994-022-06191-y · Cited by 19
Intersectional Experiences of Unfair Treatment Caused by Automated Computational Systems
van Nuenen, T., Such, J. M., & Coté, M. (2022) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3555546 · Cited by 22
Hafner, L., Peifer, T. P., & Hafner, F. S. (2023) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-022-01619-4 · Cited by 24
Imana, B., Korolova, A., & Heidemann, J. (2023) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3579610 · Cited by 19
Bias on Demand: A Modelling Framework That Generates Synthetic Data With Bias
Baumann, J., Castelnovo, A., Crupi, R., Inverardi, N., & Regoli, D. (2023) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3593013.3594058 · Cited by 21
Kiviat, B. (2023) · Sociological Theory · doi:10.1177/07352751231186797 · Cited by 25
Automatic Fairness Testing of Machine Learning Models
Sharma, A., & Wehrheim, H. (2020) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-64881-7_16 · Cited by 19
Efficient Candidate Screening Under Multiple Tests and Implications for FairnessPreprint
Cohen, L., Lipton, Z. C., & Mansour, Y. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.4230/lipics.forc.2020.1 · Cited by 27
Investigating Bias and Fairness in Facial Expression RecognitionPreprint
Tian, X., White, J. C., Kalkan, S., & Güneş, H. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.17863/cam.56933 · Cited by 19
Fairness in Rankings and Recommenders: Models, Methods and Research Directions
Pitoura, E., Stefanidis, K., & Koutrika, G. (2021) · IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE) · doi:10.1109/icde51399.2021.00265 · Cited by 18
Enforcing Group Fairness in Algorithmic Decision Making: Utility Maximization Under Sufficiency
Baumann, J., Hannák, A., & Heitz, C. (2022) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3531146.3534645 · Cited by 27
MinMax fairness: from Rawlsian Theory of Justice to solution for algorithmic bias
Barsotti, F., & Koçer, R. G. (2022) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-022-01577-x · Cited by 22
Debiaser for Multiple Variables to enhance fairness in classification tasks
d’Aloisio, G., D’Angelo, A., Marco, A. D., & Stilo, G. (2022) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2022.103226 · Cited by 18
Fairness-Aware Maximal Clique in Large Graphs: Concepts and Algorithms
Zhang, Q., Li, R.-H., Pan, M., Dai, Y., Tian, Q., & Wang, G. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2022.3232165 · Cited by 18
Knowledge representation and acquisition for ethical AI: challenges and opportunities
Belle, V. (2023) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s10676-023-09692-z · Cited by 22
BeFair: Addressing Fairness in the Banking Sector
Castelnovo, A., Crupi, R., Gamba, G. D., Greco, G., Naseer, A., Regoli, D., & González, B. S. M. (2020) · IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData) · doi:10.1109/bigdata50022.2020.9377894 · Cited by 21
Survey of EU ethical guidelines for commercial AI: case studies in financial services
Huang, J. Y., Gupta, A., & Youn, M. Y. (2021) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-021-00048-1 · Cited by 11
Local data debiasing for fairness based on generative adversarial training.
Aïvodji, U., Bidet, F., Gambs, S., Ngueveu, R. C., & Tapp, A. (2021) · Algorithms · doi:10.3390/a14030087 · Cited by 16
Towards Fair Unsupervised Learning
Buet-Golfouse, F., & Utyagulov, I. (2022) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3531146.3533197 · Cited by 20
Mannhardt, F. (2022) · Lecture notes in business information processing · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-08848-3_12 · Cited by 18
FFTree: A flexible tree to handle multiple fairness criteria
Castelnovo, A., Cosentini, A., Malandri, L., Mercorio, F., & Mezzanzanica, M. (2022) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2022.103099 · Cited by 17
Purificato, E., Boratto, L., & Luca, E. W. D. (2022) · ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM) · doi:10.1145/3511808.3557584 · Cited by 17
Counterfactual Fairness for Facial Expression Recognition
Cheong, J., Kalkan, S., & Güneş, H. (2023) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-25072-9_16 · Cited by 18
A Novel Approach for Fair Principal Component Analysis Based on Eigendecomposition
Pelegrina, G. D., & Duarte, L. T. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tai.2023.3298291 · Cited by 18
Benchmark suites instead of leaderboards for evaluating AI fairness
Wang, A., Hertzmann, A., & Russakovsky, O. (2024) · Patterns · doi:10.1016/j.patter.2024.101080 · Cited by 19
Algorithmic bias and racial inequality: a critical review
Kasy, M. (2024) · Oxford Review of Economic Policy · doi:10.1093/oxrep/grae031 · Cited by 22
Dealing with Bias and Fairness in Data Science Systems
Saleiro, P., Rodolfa, K. T., & Ghani, R. (2020) · ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) · doi:10.1145/3394486.3406708 · Cited by 20
FEAT: A Fairness-Enhancing and Concept-Adapting Decision Tree Classifier
Zhang, W., & Bifet, A. (2020) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-61527-7_12 · Cited by 17
Cluster-based quotas for fairness improvements in music recommendation systems
Wundervald, B. (2021) · International Journal of Multimedia Information Retrieval · doi:10.1007/s13735-020-00203-0 · Cited by 17
Nápoles, G., & Koumeri, L. K. (2022) · Pattern Recognition Letters · doi:10.1016/j.patrec.2022.01.005 · Cited by 18
Review of Mathematical frameworks for Fairness in Machine LearningPreprint
del Barrio, E., Gordaliza, P., & Loubes, J. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2005.13755 · Cited by 50
Race-Norming and Statistical Discrimination: Beyond the NFLPreprint
Starr, S. B. (2022) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4101693 · Cited by 17
Chen, C., Liao, M., & Sundar, S. S. (2024) · International Symposium on Trustworthy Autonomous Systems (TAS) · doi:10.1145/3686038.3686066 · Cited by 20
Values and inductive risk in machine learning modelling: the case of binary classification models
Karaca, K. (2021) · European Journal for Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1007/s13194-021-00405-1 · Cited by 19
Training on the Test Set: Mapping the System-Problem Space in AI
Hernández‐Orallo, J., Schellaert, W., & Martínez‐Plumed, F. (2022) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v36i11.21487 · Cited by 16
The why and how of trustworthy AI
Schmitz, A., Akila, M., Hecker, D., Poretschkin, M., & Wrobel, S. (2022) · at - Automatisierungstechnik · doi:10.1515/auto-2022-0012 · Cited by 19
Wang, X., Chen, L., & Yin, M. (2023) · International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.24963/ijcai.2023/343 · Cited by 21
Algorithmic fairness in cardiovascular disease risk prediction: overcoming inequalities
Varga, T. V. (2023) · Open Heart · doi:10.1136/openhrt-2023-002395 · Cited by 16
FairBalance: How to Achieve Equalized Odds With Data Pre-Processing
Yu, Z., Chakraborty, J., & Menzies, T. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2024.3431445 · Cited by 16
Chen, C., & Sundar, S. S. (2024) · Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/07370024.2024.2392494 · Cited by 19
Tuning Fairness by Balancing Target Labels
Kehrenberg, T., Chen, Z., & Quadrianto, N. (2020) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2020.00033 · Cited by 20
The social dilemma in artificial intelligence development and why we have to solve it
Strümke, I., Slavkovik, M., & Madai, V. I. (2021) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-021-00120-w · Cited by 24
Kim, S., Bai, Y., Zhu, H., & Eslami, M. (2025) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3711079 · Cited by 20
Policy-as-Prompt: Rethinking Content Moderation in the Age of Large Language Models
Palla, K., Redondo-García, J. L., Hauff, C., Fabbri, F., Damianou, A., Lindström, H., Taber, D., & Lalmas, M. (2025) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3715275.3732054 · Cited by 41
Fairness-aware Maximal Clique Enumeration
Pan, M., Li, R.-H., Zhang, Q., Dai, Y., Tian, Q., & Wang, G. (2022) · IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE) · doi:10.1109/icde53745.2022.00024 · Cited by 15
The AI field needs translational Ethical AI research
Borg, J. S. (2022) · AI Magazine · doi:10.1002/aaai.12062 · Cited by 15
Berghout, E. W., Fijneman, R., Hendriks, L., de Boer, M., & Butijn, B.-J. (2022) · Progress in IS · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-11089-4 · Cited by 17
Hutiri, W. T., Ding, A. Y., Kawsar, F., & Mathur, A. (2023) · ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology · doi:10.1145/3591867 · Cited by 18
Dealing with Popularity Bias in Recommender Systems for Third-party Libraries: How far Are We?
Nguyen, P. T., Rubei, R., Rocco, J. D., Sipio, C. D., Ruscio, D. D., & Penta, M. D. (2023) · International Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR) · doi:10.1109/msr59073.2023.00016 · Cited by 15
Szafran, D., & Bach, R. L. (2024) · Minds and Machines · doi:10.1007/s11023-024-09684-y · Cited by 20
FairXAI - A Taxonomy and Framework for Fairness and Explainability Synergy in Machine Learning
Ramachandranpillai, R., Baeza-Yates, R. A., & Heintz, F. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2025.3528321 · Cited by 18
Fagbola, T., & Thakur, S. (2019) · 2019 International Conference on Intelligent Informatics and Biomedical Sciences (ICIIBMS) · doi:10.1109/iciibms46890.2019.8991505 · Cited by 9
The Crucial Role of Sensitive Attributes in Fair Classification
Haeri, M. A., & Zweig, K. A. (2020) · IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI) · doi:10.1109/ssci47803.2020.9308585 · Cited by 20
Two Kinds of Discrimination in AI-Based Penal Decision-Making
Hübner, D. (2021) · ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter · doi:10.1145/3468507.3468510 · Cited by 19
AequeVox: Automated Fairness Testing of Speech Recognition Systems
Rajan, S. S., Udeshi, S., & Chattopadhyay, S. (2021) · Fundamental Approaches to Software Engineering · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-99429-7_14 · Cited by 20
Castelnovo, A., Malandri, L., Mercorio, F., Mezzanzanica, M., & Cosentini, A. (2021) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-93736-2_46 · Cited by 17
Armas, E., Arancibia, H., & Neira, S. (2022) · Fishes · doi:10.3390/fishes7040204 · Cited by 17
The Effect of Model Compression on Fairness in Facial Expression Recognition
Stoychev, S., & Güneş, H. (2023) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-37745-7_9 · Cited by 24
Fair Robust Assignment Using Redundancy
Malencia, M., Kumar, V., Pappas, G. J., & Prorok, A. (2021) · IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters · doi:10.1109/lra.2021.3067283 · Cited by 15
Algorithmic legitimacy in clinical decision-making
Holm, S. (2023) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s10676-023-09709-7 · Cited by 16
Understanding Fairness Requirements for ML-based Software
Baresi, L., Criscuolo, C., & Ghezzi, C. (2023) · IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE) · doi:10.1109/re57278.2023.00046 · Cited by 16
Şahin, D., Kambeitz‐Ilankovic, L., Wood, S. J., Dwyer, D., Upthegrove, R., Salokangas, R. K. R., Borgwardt, S., Brambilla, P., Meisenzahl, E. M., Ruhrmann, S., et al. (2023) · The British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.2023.141 · Cited by 16
Lünich, M., Keller, B., & Marcinkowski, F. (2023) · Technology Knowledge and Learning · doi:10.1007/s10758-023-09698-y · Cited by 29
Achieve fairness without demographics for dermatological disease diagnosis
Chiu, C.-H., Chen, Y.-J., Wu, Y., Shi, Y., & Ho, T.-Y. (2024) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2024.103188 · Cited by 15
When Causality Meets Fairness: A Survey
Makhlouf, K., Zhioua, S., & Catuscia Palamidessi, A. (2023) · Journal of Logical and Algebraic Methods in Programming · doi:10.1016/j.jlamp.2024.101000 · Cited by 14
Wang, H. E., Weiner, J. P., Saria, S., Lehmann, H. P., & Kharrazi, H. H. K. (2024) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2024.104683 · Cited by 17
A Multi-Objective Framework for Balancing Fairness and Accuracy in Debiasing Machine Learning Models
Nagpal, R., Khan, A., Borkar, M., & Gupta, A. D. (2024) · Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction · doi:10.3390/make6030105 · Cited by 17
Lambiase, S., Catolino, G., Palomba, F., & Ferrucci, F. (2024) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3704806 · Cited by 14
Aboelazm, K. S. (2025) · International Journal of Law and Management · doi:10.1108/ijlma-06-2024-0208 · Cited by 18
Riazy, S., & Simbeck, K. (2019) · Gesellschaft für Informatik (GI) · doi:10.18420/delfi2019_305 · Cited by 17
Fairer Machine Learning Through Multi-objective Evolutionary Learning
Zhang, Q., Liu, J., Zhang, Z., Wen, J., Mao, B., & Yao, X. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-86380-7_10 · Cited by 16
Egalitarianism and Algorithmic Fairness
Holm, S. (2023) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-023-00607-w · Cited by 14
This Thing Called Fairness: Disciplinary Confusion Realizing a Value in TechnologyPreprint
Mulligan, D. K., Kroll, J. A., Kohli, N., & Wong, R. Y. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1909.11869 · Cited by 14
Burstein, D., Hoffman, G. E., Gupta, S., Almeida, S. D., Mathur, D. D., Venkatesh, S., Therrien, K., Fanous, A. H., Bigdeli, T. B., Harvey, P. D., et al. (2023) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2023.01.17.23284670 · Cited by 17
Mitigating Algorithmic Bias Through Probability Calibration: A Case Study on Lead Generation Data
Nikolić, M., Nikolić, D., Stefanović, M., Havzi, S., & Stefanović, D. (2025) · Mathematics · doi:10.3390/math13132183 · Cited by 15
Gittens, A., Yener, B., & Yung, M. M. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3218715 · Cited by 22
Fairness with censorship and group constraints
Zhang, W., & Weiss, J. C. (2023) · Knowledge and Information Systems · doi:10.1007/s10115-023-01842-5 · Cited by 13
iFlipper: Label Flipping for Individual Fairness
Zhang, H., Tae, K. H., Park, J., Chu, X., & Whang, S. E. (2023) · Proceedings of the ACM on Management of Data · doi:10.1145/3588688 · Cited by 13
Lin, Y. C., Mallia, D., Clark-Sevilla, A. O., Catto, A., Leshchenko, A., Yan, Q., Haas, D. M., Wapner, R. J., Pe’er, I., Raja, A., et al. (2024) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/s12884-024-06988-w · Cited by 14
Rountree, L., Lin, Y.-T., Liu, C., Salvatore, M., Admon, A., Nallamothu, B., Singh, K., Basu, A., Bu, F., & Mukherjee, B. (2025) · Online Journal of Public Health Informatics · doi:10.2196/66598 · Cited by 13
Investigation on potential bias factors in histopathology datasets
Kheiri, F., Rahnamayan, S., Makrehchi, M., & Bidgoli, A. A. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-89210-x · Cited by 14
Rehman, A. U., Neyra, J. A., Chen, J., & Ghazi, L. (2025) · Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences · doi:10.1080/10408363.2025.2497843 · Cited by 18
Ethics of Food Recommender Applications
Karpati, D., Najjar, A., & Ambrossio, D. A. (2020) · AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society · doi:10.1145/3375627.3375874 · Cited by 10
Lamba, H., Rodolfa, K. T., & Ghani, R. (2021) · ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter · doi:10.1145/3468507.3468518 · Cited by 14
Mashhadi, A., Winder, S. G., Lia, E. H., & Wood, S. A. (2021) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v15i1.18071 · Cited by 13
Targeted Data Poisoning Attacks Against Continual Learning Neural Networks
Li, H., & Ditzler, G. (2022) · International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn55064.2022.9892774 · Cited by 13
Gender Stereotyping Impact in Facial Expression Recognition
Dominguez-Catena, I., Paternain, D., & Galar, M. (2023) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-23618-1_1 · Cited by 20
Measuring Bias in AI Models: An Statistical Approach Introducing N-Sigma
DeAlcala, D., Serna, I., Morales, A., Fiérrez, J., & Ortega-García, J. (2023) · IEEE Annual International Computer Software and Applications Conference (COMPSAC) · doi:10.1109/compsac57700.2023.00176 · Cited by 13
On Fairness-Aware Learning for Non-discriminative Decision-Making
Zhang, W., Tang, X., & Wang, J. (2019) · IEEE ... International Conference on Data Mining workshops · doi:10.1109/icdmw.2019.00157 · Cited by 13
Facets of Fairness in Search and Recommendation
Verma, S., Gao, R., & Shah, C. S. (2020) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-52485-2_1 · Cited by 13
Self-citationMatchmaking Under Fairness Constraints: A Speed Dating Case Study
Paraschakis, D., & Nilsson, B. J. (2020) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-52485-2_5 · Cited by 13
Flexible and Adaptive Fairness-aware Learning in Non-stationary Data Streams
Zhang, W., Zhang, M., Zhang, J., Liu, Z., Chen, Z., Wang, J., Raff, E., & Messina, E. (2020) · IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI) · doi:10.1109/ictai50040.2020.00069 · Cited by 15
Data Management for Causal Algorithmic FairnessPreprint
Salimi, B., Howe, B., & Suciu, D. M. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1908.07924 · Cited by 20
Data and Model Dependencies of Membership Inference AttackPreprint
Tonni, S. M., Vatsalan, D., Farokhi, F., Kaafar, D., Lu, Z., & Tangari, G. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2002.06856 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Verma, S., & Rubin, J.
- Affiliations
- Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur (IN)
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the International Workshop on Software Fairness
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2018-05-29
- Pages
- 1-7
- OpenAlex
- W2809878087
- Cited by
- 1,124
- References
- 21
- Citations by year
- 2026: 102 · 2025: 157 · 2024: 188 · 2023: 197 · 2022: 168 · 2021: 170 · 2020: 103 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 140.65
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
- Social Sciences › Law › Discrimination and Equality Law
- Keywords
- algorithmic fairness, algorithmic classification, fairness metrics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
