The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 1 are not checked yet.
Full-stack, real-system quantum computer studies: architectural comparisons and design insights
Open accessAbstract
In recent years, Quantum Computing (QC) has progressed to the point where small working prototypes are available for use. Termed Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) computers, these prototypes are too small for large benchmarks or even for Quantum Error Correction (QEC), but they do have sufficient resources to run small benchmarks, particularly if compiled with optimizations to make use of scarce qubits and limited operation counts and coherence times. QC has not yet, however, settled on a particular preferred device implementation technology, and indeed different NISQ prototypes implement qubits with very different physical approaches and therefore widely-varying device and machine characteristics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“These multi-controlled operations are not natively supported by most available NISQ devices [201], limiting the practical applicability of approaches relying on this concept.”
From Quantum Combinatorial Optimization in the NISQ Era: A Systematic Mapping Study (2024) · cites this paper as [201]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quantum Computing in the NISQ era and beyond
Preskill, J. (2018) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2018-08-06-79 · Cited by 8,830
A fast quantum mechanical algorithm for database search
Grover, L. K. (1996) · Proceedings of the twenty-eighth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing - STOC '96 · doi:10.1145/237814.237866 · Cited by 8,830
Fault-tolerant quantum computation by anyons
Kitaev, A. Y. (2003) · Annals of Physics · doi:10.1016/s0003-4916(02)00018-0 · Cited by 7,238
Biamonte, J., Wittek, P., Pancotti, N., Rebentrost, P., Wiebe, N., & Lloyd, S. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature23474 · Cited by 4,779
A variational eigenvalue solver on a photonic quantum processor
Peruzzo, A., McClean, J., Shadbolt, P., Yung, M.-H., Zhou, X.-Q., Love, P. J., Aspuru-Guzik, A., & O’Brien, J. L. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms5213 · Cited by 4,552 · cited 1×
“Quantum computing (QC) is emerging as a promising paradigm for solving classically intractable computational problems in areas such as machine learning [4, 39], cryptography [60], chemistry [32, 50] and others.”
BackgroundPolynomial-time algorithms for prime factorization and discrete logarithms on a quantum computer
Shor, P. W. (1999) · SIAM Review · doi:10.1137/s0036144598347011 · Cited by 3,904
Quantum Computations with Cold Trapped Ions
Cirac, J. I., & Zoller, P. (1995) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.74.4091 · Cited by 3,733
Hardware-efficient variational quantum eigensolver for small molecules and quantum magnets
Kandala, A., Mezzacapo, A., Temme, K., Takita, M., Brink, M., Chow, J. M., & Gambetta, J. M. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature23879 · Cited by 2,982
Quantum Computation and Quantum Information: 10th Anniversary Edition
Nielsen, M. A., & Chuang, I. L. (2011) · Cited by 2,724
Introduction to Algorithms, third edition
Cormen, T. H., Leiserson, C. E., Rivest, R. L., & Stein, C. (2009) · Cited by 2,309
Coupling superconducting qubits via a cavity bus
Majer, J., Chow, J. M., Gambetta, J., Koch, J., Johnson, B., Schreier, J. A., Frunzio, L., Schuster, D., Houck, A., Wallraff, A. J., et al. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06184 · Cited by 1,393
Bernstein, E., & Vazirani, U. (1993) · Proceedings of the twenty-fifth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing - STOC '93 · doi:10.1145/167088.167097 · Cited by 1,284
14-Qubit Entanglement: Creation and Coherence
Monz, T., Schindler, P., Barreiro, J. T., Chwalla, M., Nigg, D., Coish, W. A., Harlander, M., Hänsel, W., Hennrich, M., & Blatt, R. (2011) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.106.130506 · Cited by 1,110
A single-atom electron spin qubit in silicon
Pla, J. J., Tan, K. Y., Dehollain, J. P., Lim, W. H., Morton, J. J. L., Jamieson, D. N., Dzurak, A. S., & Morello, A. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11449 · Cited by 830
Calafiore, G. C., & Ghaoui, L. E. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781107279667.013 · Cited by 822
Demonstration of a small programmable quantum computer with atomic qubits
Debnath, S., Linke, N. M., Figgatt, C., Landsman, K. A., Wright, K., & Monroe, C. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature18648 · Cited by 777
Self-citationHigh-Fidelity Preparation, Gates, Memory, and Readout of a Trapped-Ion Quantum Bit
Harty, T. P., Allcock, D. T. C., Ballance, C. J., Guidoni, L., Janacek, H. A., Linke, N. M., Stacey, D. N., & Lucas, D. M. (2014) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.113.220501 · Cited by 632
Self-citationKarzig, T., Knapp, C., Lutchyn, R. M., Bonderson, P., Hastings, M. B., Nayak, C., Alicea, J., Karsten Flensberg, B., Plugge, S., Yuval Oreg, A., et al. (2017) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.95.235305 · Cited by 630
Superconducting qubit in a waveguide cavity with a coherence time approaching 0.1 ms
Rigetti, C. T., Gambetta, J., Poletto, S., Plourde, B. L. T., Chow, J. M., Corcoles, A. D., Smolin, J. A., Merkel, S., Rozen, J., Keefe, G., et al. (2012) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.86.100506 · Cited by 592
Quantum Computer Science: An Introduction
Mermin, N. D. (2007) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511813870 · Cited by 592
A Meet-in-the-Middle Algorithm for Fast Synthesis of Depth-Optimal Quantum Circuits
Amy, M., Maslov, D., Mosca, M., & Roetteler, M. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems · doi:10.1109/tcad.2013.2244643 · Cited by 549 · cited 1×
“utput executable code in a syntax supported by that machine. 5 EXPERIMENTAL SETUP Benchmarks: Figure 7 lists the QC programs in our study. Used in prior work on NISQ system evaluation and compilation [2, 38, 46, 63], these benchmarks include the Bernstein-Vazirani algorithm [3], Hidden Shift Algorithm [7], Quantum Fou…”
MethodQuantum algorithms for supervised and unsupervised machine learning
Lloyd, S., Mohseni, M., & Rebentrost, P. (2013) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1307.0411 · Cited by 542
Experimental comparison of two quantum computing architectures
Linke, N. M., Maslov, D., Roetteler, M., Debnath, S., Figgatt, C., Landsman, K. A., Wright, K., & Monroe, C. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1618020114 · Cited by 508
Self-citationProcedure for systematically tuning up cross-talk in the cross-resonance gate
Sheldon, S., Magesan, E., Chow, J. M., & Gambetta, J. (2016) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.93.060302 · Cited by 491
ProjectQ: An open source software framework for quantum computing
Steiger, D. S., Häner, T., & Troyer, M. (2018) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2018-01-31-49 · Cited by 428
Noise-Adaptive Compiler Mappings for Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum Computers
Murali, P., Baker, J. M., Javadi-Abhari, A., Chong, F. T., & Martonosi, M. (2019) · Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems · doi:10.1145/3297858.3304075 · Cited by 411
Self-citationAn Efficient Methodology for Mapping Quantum Circuits to the IBM QX Architectures
Zulehner, A., Paler, A., & Wille, R. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems · doi:10.1109/tcad.2018.2846658 · Cited by 382
Green, A. S., Lumsdaine, P. L., Ross, N. J., Selinger, P., & Valiron, B. (2013) · ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation (PLDI) · doi:10.1145/2491956.2462177 · Cited by 378
Fluctuations of Energy-Relaxation Times in Superconducting Qubits
Klimov, P. V., Kelly, J., Chen, Z., Neeley, M., Megrant, A., Burkett, B., Barends, R., Arya, K., Chiaro, B., Chen, Y., et al. (2018) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.121.090502 · Cited by 328
Blueprint for a microwave trapped ion quantum computer
Lekitsch, B., Weidt, S., Fowler, A. G., Mølmer, K., Devitt, S. J., Wunderlich, C., & Hensinger, W. K. (2017) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.1601540 · Cited by 314
Open Quantum Assembly Language
Cross, A. W., Bishop, L. S., Smolin, J. A., & Gambetta, J. M. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1707.03429 · Cited by 310
Computer Science and Telecommunications Board, Intelligence Community Studies Board, Sciences, D. O. E. A. P., & National Academies of Sciences, E. (2018) · National Academies Press eBooks · doi:10.17226/25196 · Cited by 276
Siraichi, M. Y., Santos, V. F. D., Collange, C., & Pereira, F. M. Q. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 International Symposium on Code Generation and Optimization · doi:10.1145/3168822 · Cited by 254
A surface code quantum computer in silicon
Hill, C. D., Peretz, E., Hile, S. J., House, M. G., Fuechsle, M., Rogge, S. M. J., Simmons, M. Y., & Hollenberg, L. C. L. (2015) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.1500707 · Cited by 247
Bjørner, N., Phan, A.-D., & Fleckenstein, L. (2015) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-46681-0_14 · Cited by 232
LIQUi|>: A Software Design Architecture and Domain-Specific Language for Quantum ComputingPreprint
Wecker, D., & Svore, K. (2014) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1402.4467 · Cited by 218
Parametrically Activated Entangling Gates Using Transmon Qubits
Caldwell, S., Didier, N., Ryan, C. A., Sete, E. A., Hudson, A., Karalekas, P. J., Manenti, R., Silva, M. P. D., Sinclair, R., Acala, E., et al. (2018) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.10.034050 · Cited by 212
Green, A. S., Lumsdaine, P. L., Ross, N. J., Selinger, P., & Valiron, B. (2013) · ACM SIGPLAN Notices · doi:10.1145/2499370.2462177 · Cited by 191
(2014) · doi:10.1145/2597917.2597939 · Cited by 152
Self-citationCompiling quantum circuits to realistic hardware architectures using temporal planners
Venturelli, D., Do, M., Rieffel, E. G., & Frank, J. (2017) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/aaa331 · Cited by 140
Quantum Supremacy Is Both Closer and Farther than It AppearsPreprint
Markov, I. L., Fatima, A., Isakov, S. V., & Boixo, S. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1807.10749 · Cited by 140
Scaffold: Quantum Programming Language
Javadi-Abhari, A., Faruque, A. I., Dousti, M. J., Svec, L., Catu, O., Chakrabati, A., Chiang, C.-F., Vanderwilt, S., Black, J., & Chong, F. T. (2012) · Cited by 119
Efficient mapping of quantum circuits to the IBM QX architectures
Zulehner, A., Paler, A., & Wille, R. (2018) · Design, Automation, and Test in Europe · doi:10.23919/date.2018.8342181 · Cited by 108
An experimental microarchitecture for a superconducting quantum processor
Fu, X., Rol, M. A., Bultink, C. C., van Someren, J., Khammassi, N., Ashraf, I., Vermeulen, R. F. L., de Sterke, J. C., Vlothuizen, W., Schouten, R. N., et al. (2017) · IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Microarchitecture (MICRO) · doi:10.1145/3123939.3123952 · Cited by 104
Qiskit Backend Specifications for OpenQASM and OpenPulse ExperimentsPreprint
McKay, D. C., Alexander, T., Bello, L., Biercuk, M. J., Bishop, L. S., Chen, J., Chow, J. M., Corcoles, A. D., Egger, D. J., Filipp, S., et al. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1809.03452 · Cited by 101
eQASM: An Executable Quantum Instruction Set Architecture
Fu, X., Riesebos, L., Rol, M. A., van Straten, J., van Someren, J., Khammassi, N., Ashraf, I., Vermeulen, R. F. L., Newsum, V., Loh, K., et al. (2019) · IEEE International Symposium on High-Performance Computer Architecture (HPCA) · doi:10.1109/hpca.2019.00040 · Cited by 95
Two-step approach to scheduling quantum circuits
Guerreschi, G. G., & Park, J. (2018) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/aacf0b · Cited by 80
A Case for Variability-Aware Policies for NISQ-Era Quantum ComputersPreprint
Tannu, S., & Qureshi, M. K. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1805.10224 · Cited by 78
A general constraint-centric scheduling framework for spatial architectures
Nowatzki, T., Sartin-Tarm, M., Carli, L. D., Sankaralingam, K., Estan, C., & Robatmili, B. (2013) · ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation (PLDI) · doi:10.1145/2491956.2462163 · Cited by 67
Programming quantum computers using design automation
Soeken, M., Häner, T., & Roetteler, M. (2018) · Design, Automation, and Test in Europe · doi:10.23919/date.2018.8341993 · Cited by 49
Quantum algorithm for a generalized hidden shift problem
Childs, A. M., & van Dam, W. (2007) · CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) · doi:10.5555/1283383.1283515 · Cited by 45
A Microarchitecture for a Superconducting Quantum Processor
Fu, X., Rol, M. A., Bultink, C. C., van Someren, J., Khammassi, N., Ashraf, I., Vermeulen, R. F. L., de Sterke, J. C., Vlothuizen, W., Schouten, R. N., et al. (2018) · IEEE Micro · doi:10.1109/mm.2018.032271060 · Cited by 37
Next Steps in Quantum Computing: Computer Science's RolePreprint
Martonosi, M., & Roetteler, M. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1903.10541 · Cited by 30
Self-citationThe early British computer conferences
Campbell‐Kelly, M. (1989) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 17
An Efficient Quantum Circuits Optimizing Scheme Compared with QISKit (Short Paper)
Zhang, X., Xiang, H., & Xiang, T. (2019) · Lecture notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-12981-1_32 · Cited by 14
An efficient quantum circuits optimizing scheme compared with QISKitPreprint
Zhang, X., Xiang, H., Xiang, T., Fu, L. J., & Sang, J. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1807.01703 · Cited by 13
eQASM: An Executable Quantum Instruction Set ArchitecturePreprint
Fu, X., Riesebos, L., Rol, M. A., et al. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1808.02449 · Cited by 6
The Physical Implementation of Quantum Computation
DiVincenzo, D. P. (2000) · Fortschritte der Physik · doi:10.1002/1521-3978(200009)48:9/11
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- 10.5555/1792734.1792766 · DOI
- IBM. 2018. IBM Announces Advances to IBM Quantum Systems and Ecosystem. https://www-03.ibm.com/press/us/en/pressrelease/53374.wss. Accessed: 2018-08-05.
- 10.5555/977395.977673 · DOI
- 10.5555/1296197 · DOI
- 10.5555/1972505 · DOI
- Robert S. Smith, Michael J. Curtis, and William J. Zeng. 2016. A Practical Quantum Instruction Set Architecture. arXiv:1608.03355 · arXiv
- 10.5555/94938.94976 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Benchmarking an 11-qubit quantum computer
Wright, K., Beck, K. M., Debnath, S., Amini, J., Nam, Y., Grzesiak, N., Chen, J.-S., Pisenti, N. C., Chmielewski, M., Collins, C., et al. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-13534-2 · Cited by 575
t|ket⟩: a retargetable compiler for NISQ devices
Sivarajah, S., Dilkes, S., Cowtan, A., Simmons, W., Edgington, A., & Duncan, R. (2021) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/ab8e92 · Cited by 475
Software Mitigation of Crosstalk on Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum Computers
Murali, P., Mckay, D. C., Martonosi, M., & Javadi-Abhari, A. (2020) · Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems · doi:10.1145/3373376.3378477 · Cited by 253
Self-citationChallenges and Opportunities of Near-Term Quantum Computing Systems
Corcoles, A. D., Kandala, A., Javadi-Abhari, A., McClure, D. T., Cross, A. W., Temme, K., Nation, P. D., Steffen, M., & Gambetta, J. M. (2020) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2019.2954005 · Cited by 203
Self-citationQASMBench: A Low-Level Quantum Benchmark Suite for NISQ Evaluation and Simulation
Li, A., Stein, S., Krishnamoorthy, S., & Ang, J. (2023) · ACM Transactions on Quantum Computing · doi:10.1145/3550488 · Cited by 183
Metadata
- Authors
- Murali, P., Linke, N. M., Martonosi, M., Abhari, A. J., Nguyen, N. H., & Alderete, C. H.
- Affiliations
- Princeton University (US)
- University of Maryland, College Park (US)
- IBM T. J. Watson Research Center
- ORCID
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 46th International Symposium on Computer Architecture
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2019-06-22
- Pages
- 527-540
- ISSN
- 1063-6897 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2950036696
- Cited by
- 128
- References
- 57
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 4
- FWCI
- 8.13
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Proceedings - International Symposium on Computer Architecture/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1730449)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
- Keywords
- quantum computing, NISQ devices, quantum error correction, quantum benchmarking, quantum circuit compilation, coherence time
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
