Cited by 632Quantum Information and CryptographyQuantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureCold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates

High-Fidelity Preparation, Gates, Memory, and Readout of a Trapped-Ion Quantum Bit

Open access
Harty, T. P., Allcock, D. T. C., Ballance, C. J., Guidoni, L., Janacek, H. A., Linke, N. M., Stacey, D. N., Lucas, D. M.·2014·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

We implement all single-qubit operations with fidelities significantly above the minimum threshold required for fault-tolerant quantum computing, using a trapped-ion qubit stored in hyperfine "atomic clock" states of ^{43}Ca^{+}. We measure a combined qubit state preparation and single-shot readout fidelity of 99.93%, a memory coherence time of T_{2}^{*}=50 sec, and an average single-qubit gate fidelity of 99.9999%. These results are achieved in a room-temperature microfabricated surface trap, without the use of magnetic field shielding or dynamic decoupling techniques to overcome technical noise.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.113.220501

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Trapped-ion processors have the least prone error to quantum gates, with single-qubit gate errors of one part at 10^6 and two-qubit gate errors of 0.1%.

    “Currently, the least prone error to quantum gates has been found in trapped-ion processors, with single-qubit gate errors of one part at 10 6 and two-qubit gate errors of 0.1% [29, 30].”

    From Quantum Computing in the Next-Generation Computational Biology Landscape: From Protein Folding to Molecular Dynamics (2024) · cites this paper as [29]

    The randomized-benchmarking results (p. 4) report a trapped-ion single-qubit error of 1.0(3) × 10⁻⁶, and the conclusion (p. 4) says its gate fidelity surpassed measurements in other single physical qubits. The conclusion reports two-qubit gate fidelity only as greater than 99% in separate experiments; it does not establish the claimed 0.1% two-qubit error. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The least error-prone gates to date have been reported in a trapped ion processor, with error rates of one part in 10^6 for single-qubit gates and errors of 0.1% for two-qubit gates.

    “The least error-prone gates to date have been reported in a trapped ion processor, with error rates of one part in 10 6 for single-qubit gates and errors of 0.1% for two-qubit gates [46,49].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [21]T. P. Harty, D.Phil. thesis, University of Oxford (2013). http://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:55264c2d-bb42-4439bf49-731b9f66de74
  2. [24]J. J. Bollinger et al. , IEEE Trans. Instr. Meas. 40 , 126 (1991).
  3. [28]D. J. Szwer, D.Phil. thesis, University of Oxford (2009).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harty, T. P., Allcock, D. T. C., Ballance, C. J., Guidoni, L., Janacek, H. A., Linke, N. M., Stacey, D. N., & Lucas, D. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
2014-11-24
Volume
113
Issue
22
Pages
220501-220501
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
OpenAlex
W1978552568
Cited by
632
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 65 · 2024: 65 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 70 · 2020: 71 · 2019: 58 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 48 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 10
FWCI
41.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates
Keywords
trapped-ion qubits, single-qubit gate fidelity, state preparation and measurement, single-shot measurement, calcium-43, surface traps, fault-tolerant quantum computing, technical noise

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review