Cited by 360Privacy, Security, and Data ProtectionMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsThoreau and American Literature

Availability and quality of mobile health app privacy policies

Open access
Sunyaev, Ali, Dehling, Tobias, Taylor, Patrick L, Mandl, Kenneth D·2015·Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Abstract

Mobile health (mHealth) customers shopping for applications (apps) should be aware of app privacy practices so they can make informed decisions about purchase and use. We sought to assess the availability, scope, and transparency of mHealth app privacy policies on iOS and Android. Over 35,000 mHealth apps are available for iOS and Android. Of the 600 most commonly used apps, only 183 (30.5%) had privacy policies. Average policy length was 1755 (SD 1301) words with a reading grade level of 16 (SD 2.9). Two thirds (66.1%) of privacy policies did not specifically address the app itself. Our findings show that currently mHealth developers often fail to provide app privacy policies. The privacy policies that are available do not make information privacy practices transparent to users, require college-level literacy, and are often not focused on the app itself. Further research is warranted to address why privacy policies are often absent, opaque, or irrelevant, and to find a remedy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002605

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. D'Heureuse N, Huici F, Arumaithurai M, et al. What's app?: a wide-scale measurement study of smart phone markets. ACM SIGMOBILE Mob Comput Commun Rev. 2012;16: 16-27.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sunyaev, A., Dehling, T., Taylor, P. L., & Mandl, K. D.
Affiliations
  • University of Cologne (DE)
  • Boston Children's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Sunyaev, Ali
Venue
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Published
2014-08-21
Volume
22
Issue
e1
Pages
e28-e33
ISSN
  • 1067-5027 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-974X
OpenAlex
W1481354592
Cited by
360
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
84.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Kölner Universitäts PublikationsServer (Universität zu Köln) (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Universität zu Köln
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR000101)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Thoreau and American Literature
Keywords
mobile health apps, privacy policies, data privacy, iOS, Android, App Store, user literacy, health data privacy
MeSH terms
Telemedicine, Privacy, Mobile Applications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review