Cited by 101Digital Accessibility for DisabilitiesInnovative Human-Technology InteractionAutism Spectrum Disorder Research

Managing Stress: The Needs of Autistic Adults in Video Calling

Zolyomi, Annuska, Begel, Andrew, Waldern, Jennifer Frances, Tang, John, Barnett, Michael, Cutrell, Edward, McDuff, Daniel, Andrist, Sean +1 more·2019·Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction

Abstract

Video calling (VC) aims to create multi-modal, collaborative environments that are "just like being there." However, we found that autistic individuals, who exhibit atypical social and cognitive processing, may not share this goal. We interviewed autistic adults about their perceptions of VC compared to other computer- mediated communications (CMC) and face-to-face interactions. We developed a neurodiversity-sensitive model of CMC that describes how stressors such as sensory sensitivities, cognitive load, and anxiety, contribute to their preferences for CMC channels. We learned that they apply significant effort to construct coping strategies to support their sensory, cognitive, and social needs. These strategies include moderating their sensory inputs, creating mental models of conversation partners, and attempting to mask their autism by adopting neurotypical behaviors. Without effective strategies, interviewees experience more stress, have less capacity to interpret verbal and non-verbal cues, and feel less empowered to participate. Our findings reveal critical needs for autistic users. We suggest design opportunities to support their ability to comfortably use VC, and in doing so, point the way towards making VC more comfortable for all.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3359236

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Research has shown that autistic people may find video calling (in non-work contexts) stressful due to struggling with eye contact, distracting background noises, feeling self-conscious and concerns about misreading conversations due to missing non-verbal cues.

    “research has shown that autistic people may find video calling (in non-work contexts) stressful due to struggling with eye contact, distracting background noises, feeling self-conscious and concerns about misreading conversations due to missing non-verbal cues [18].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zolyomi, A., Begel, A., Waldern, J. F., Tang, J., Barnett, M., Cutrell, E., McDuff, D., Andrist, S., & Morris, M. R.
Affiliations
Microsoft (United States) (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
Published
2019-11-07
Volume
3
Issue
CSCW
Pages
1-29
ISSN
2573-0142 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2970436446
Cited by
101
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 2
FWCI
19.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
Keywords
video calls, autism spectrum disorder, autistic adults, neurodiversity, computer-mediated communication, stress, sensory sensitivity, cognitive load, anxiety, coping strategies, masking, user needs, inclusive design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review