Cited by 98Adversarial Robustness in Machine LearningAdvanced Steganography and Watermarking TechniquesPhysical Unclonable Functions (PUFs) and Hardware Security

On the Robustness of Backdoor-based Watermarking in Deep Neural Networks

Open access
Shafieinejad, Masoumeh, Lukas, Nils, Wang, Jiaqi, Li, Xinda, Kerschbaum, Florian·2021·Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Workshop on Information Hiding and Multimedia Security

Abstract

Watermarking algorithms have been introduced in the past years to protect deep learning models against unauthorized re-distribution. We investigate the robustness and reliability of state-of-the-art deep neural network watermarking schemes. We focus on backdoor-based watermarking and propose two simple yet effective attacks -- a black-box and a white-box -- that remove these watermarks without any labeled data from the ground truth. Our black-box attack steals the model and removes the watermark with only API access to the labels. Our white-box attack proposes an efficient watermark removal when the parameters of the marked model are accessible, and improves the time to steal a model up to twenty times over the time to train a model from scratch. We conclude that these watermarking algorithms are insufficient to defend against redistribution by a motivated attacker.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3437880.3460401

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Yossi Adi, Carsten Baum, Moustapha Cisse, Benny Pinkas, and Joseph Keshet. Turning your weakness into a strength: Watermarking deep neural networks by back- dooring. In 27th USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX Security 18), pages 1615-1631, Baltimore, MD, 2018. USENIX Association.
  2. Xinyun Chen, Wenxiao Wang, Yiming Ding, Bender Chries, Jia Ruoxi, and Dawn Song. Leveraging unla- beled data for watermark removal of deep neural net- works. In ICML workshop on Security and Privacy of Machine Learning, 2019.
  3. K. He, X. Zhang, S. Ren, and J. Sun. Deep residual learn- ing for image recognition. In 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 770-778, June 2016.
  4. Gil Press. Cleaning big data: Most time-consuming, least enjoyable data science task, survey says, Mar 2016.
  5. Florian Tramèr, Fan Zhang, Ari Juels, Michael K. Re- iter, and Thomas Ristenpart. Stealing machine learning models via prediction api. In Proceedings of the 25th USENIX Conference on Security Symposium, SEC'16, pages 601-618, Berkeley, CA, USA, 2016. USENIX Association.
  6. Manzil Zaheer, Satwik Kottur, Siamak Ravanbakhsh, Barnabas Poczos, Russ R Salakhutdinov, and Alexan- der J Smola. Deep sets. In I. Guyon, U. V. Luxburg, S. Bengio, H. Wallach, R. Fergus, S. Vishwanathan, and R. Garnett, editors, Advances in Neural Information Pro- cessing Systems 30, pages 3391-3401.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shafieinejad, M., Lukas, N., Wang, J., Li, X., & Kerschbaum, F.
Affiliations
University of Waterloo (CA)
Venue
Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Workshop on Information Hiding and Multimedia Security
Publisher
ACM
Published
2021-06-17
Pages
177-188
OpenAlex
W2952348804
Cited by
98
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1
FWCI
8.09
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ACM Workshop on Information Hiding and Multimedia Security (IH&MMSec) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Steganography and Watermarking Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Physical Unclonable Functions (PUFs) and Hardware Security
Keywords
deep neural network watermarking, watermark removal attacks, black-box attacks, white-box attacks, model theft

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review