Cited by 1,055Adversarial Robustness in Machine LearningSecurity and Verification in ComputingDigital Media Forensic Detection

Fine-Pruning: Defending Against Backdooring Attacks on Deep Neural Networks

Open access
Liu, Kang, Dolan-Gavitt, Brendan, Garg, Siddharth·2018·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-030-00470-5_13

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • MobileNet v1 utilizes depth-wise separable convolutions proposed in Xception, which decomposes the standard convolution into depth-wise convolution and pointwise convolution (1×1 convolution).

    “MobileNet v1 [44] utilizes depth-wise separable convolutions proposed in Xception [26], which decomposes the standard convolution into depth-wise convolution and pointwise convolution (1 × 1 convolution), as shown in Fig. 13.”
  • The authors of ShuffleNet v1 reckon that Xception and ResNeXt are less efficient in extremely small networks since 1×1 convolution requires a lot of computing resources; therefore, pointwise group convolution is proposed to reduce the computation complexity of 1×1 convolutions.

    “The authors of ShuffleNet v1 reckon that Xception [26] and ResNeXt [29] are less efficient in extremely small networks since 1 × 1 convolution requires a lot of computing resources.Therefore, pointwise group convolution is proposed to reduce the computation complexity of 1 × 1 convolutions.”
  • Non-zero gradients of the embedding layer in a neural network trained on a natural-language task unveil which tokens emerge in benign clients' training batches during FL training.

    “For example, the non-zero gradients of the embedding layer in a neural network trained on a natural-language task unveil which tokens emerge in the benign clients' training batches during FL training [77].”

    From Vulnerabilities in federated learning (2021) · cites this paper as [77]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, K., Dolan-Gavitt, B., & Garg, S.
Affiliations
New York University (US)
Corresponding author
Liu, Kang
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2018
Pages
273-294
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W2807363941
Cited by
1,055
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 122 · 2025: 212 · 2024: 201 · 2023: 163 · 2022: 119 · 2021: 123 · 2020: 81 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 7
FWCI
24.29
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Security and Verification in Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
Keywords
backdoor attacks, backdoor defense, deep neural network, model pruning, fine-tuning, adversarial triggers, attack success rate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review