Cited by 74Multimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsSpatial Cognition and NavigationReinforcement Learning in Robotics

Neighbor-view Enhanced Model for Vision and Language Navigation

Open access
An, Dong, Qi, Yuankai, Huang, Yan, Wu, Qi, Wang, Liang, Tan, Tieniu·2021·Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Multimedia

Abstract

Vision and Language Navigation (VLN) requires an agent to navigate to a target location by following natural language instructions. Most of existing works represent a navigation candidate by the feature of the corresponding single view where the candidate lies in. However, an instruction may mention landmarks out of the single view as references, which might lead to failures of textual-visual matching of existing methods. In this work, we propose a multi-module Neighbor-View Enhanced Model (NvEM) to adaptively incorporate visual contexts from neighbor views for better textual-visual matching. Specifically, our NvEM utilizes a subject module and a reference module to collect contexts from neighbor views. The subject module fuses neighbor views at a global level, and the reference module fuses neighbor objects at a local level. Subjects and references are adaptively determined via attention mechanisms. Our model also includes an action module to utilize the strong orientation guidance (e.g., "turn left'') in instructions. Each module predicts navigation action separately and their weighted sum is used for predicting the final action. Extensive experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method on the R2R and R4R benchmarks against several state-of-the-art navigators, and NvEM even beats some pre-training ones. Our code is available at https://github.com/MarSaKi/NvEM.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3474085.3475282

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Chat-Scene and Scene-LLM optimize structured embeddings and object-based feature representations, excelling in object-related queries and scene reasoning.

    “Chat-Scene [286] and Scene-LLM [285] optimize structured embeddings and object-based feature representations, excelling in object-related queries and scene reasoning tasks.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
An, D., Qi, Y., Huang, Y., Wu, Q., Wang, L., & Tan, T.
Affiliations
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • The University of Adelaide (AU)
Venue
Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Multimedia
Publisher
ACM
Published
2021-10-17
Pages
5101-5109
OpenAlex
W3206064582
Cited by
74
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 3
FWCI
4.25
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ACM International Conference on Multimedia (ACM MM) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
  • Shandong Provincial Key Research and Development Program (2019JZZY010119)
  • Key Research Program of Frontier Sciences CAS Grant (ZDBS-LY-JSC032)
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China Grant (2018AAA0100400)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61525306, 61633021, 61721004, 61806194, U1803261, and 61976132)
  • Beijing Nova Program (Z201100006820079)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Spatial Cognition and Navigation
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
Keywords
vision-and-language navigation, natural language instructions, multi-view fusion, attention mechanism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review