Cited by 54Multimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsReinforcement Learning in RoboticsRobot Manipulation and Learning

Target-Driven Structured Transformer Planner for Vision-Language Navigation

Open access
Zhao, Yusheng, Chen, Jinyu, Gao, Chen, Wang, Wenguan, Yang, Lirong, Ren, Haibing, Xia, Huaxia, Liu, Si·2022·Proceedings of the 30th ACM International Conference on Multimedia

Abstract

Vision-language navigation is the task of directing an embodied agent to navigate in 3D scenes with natural language instructions. For the agent, inferring the long-term navigation target from visual-linguistic clues is crucial for reliable path planning, which, however, has rarely been studied before in literature. In this article, we propose a Target-Driven Structured Transformer Planner (TD-STP) for long-horizon goal-guided and room layout-aware navigation. Specifically, we devise an Imaginary Scene Tokenization mechanism for explicit estimation of the long-term target (even located in unexplored environments). In addition, we design a Structured Transformer Planner which elegantly incorporates the explored room layout into a neural attention architecture for structured and global planning. Experimental results demonstrate that our TD-STP substantially improves previous best methods' success rate by 2% and 5% on the test set of R2R and REVERIE benchmarks, respectively. Our code is available at https://github.com/YushengZhao/TD-STP.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3503161.3548281

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CVDN provides 2,050 human dialogs simulating scenarios where agents request assistance through natural language interactions during navigation.

    “CVDN [124] provides 2,050 human dialogs simulating scenarios where agents request assistance through natural language interactions during navigation.”
  • Applying CLIP ViT-H/14 and EnvEdit reduces the generalization gap between seen and unseen environments to less than 1%.

    “and reducing the longlasting generalization gap between seen and unseen environments [86] to less than 1%.”

    From Scaling Data Generation in Vision-and-Language Navigation (2023) · cites this paper as [86]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhao, Y., Chen, J., Gao, C., Wang, W., Yang, L., Ren, H., Xia, H., & Liu, S.
Affiliations
  • Beihang University (CN)
  • University of Technology Sydney (AU)
  • Meituan (China) (CN)
Venue
Proceedings of the 30th ACM International Conference on Multimedia
Publisher
ACM
Published
2022-10-10
Pages
4194-4203
OpenAlex
W4304097971
Cited by
54
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 16
FWCI
4.53
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ACM International Conference on Multimedia (ACM MM) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (62122010,61876177)
  • Key Research and Development Program of Zhejiang Province (2022C01082)
  • ARC DECRA (DE220101390)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robot Manipulation and Learning
Keywords
vision-and-language navigation, embodied agents, natural language instructions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review