CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 5,781Job Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorStress and Burnout ResearchWorkplace Health and Well-being

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 156 of the 156 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Conservation of Resources in the Organizational Context: The Reality of Resources and Their Consequences

Hobfoll, Stevan E., Halbesleben, Jonathon, Neveu, Jean-Pierre, Westman, Mina·2018·Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior
DOI 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104640
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Over the past 30 years, conservation of resources (COR) theory has become one of the most widely cited theories in organizational psychology and organizational behavior. COR theory has been adopted across the many areas of the stress spectrum, from burnout to traumatic stress. Further attesting to the theory's centrality, COR theory is largely the basis for the more work-specific leading theory of organizational stress, namely the job demands-resources model. One of the major advantages of COR theory is its ability to make a wide range of specific hypotheses that are much broader than those offered by theories that focus on a single central resource, such as control, or that speak about resources in general. In this article, we will revisit the principles and corollaries of COR theory that inform those more specific hypotheses and will review research in organizational behavior that has relied on the theory.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104640

Cites

156 of 156 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 156 references

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Bauman Z, 2000, Liquid Modernity
  2. Clark MA, 2015, J. Fam. Issues, 1, 1
  3. 10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.218 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Hobfoll SE, 1988, The Ecology of Stress
  5. Krulak CC, 1999, Mar. Corps Gaz., 83
  6. Kurtessis JN, 2017, J. Manag., 43, 1854
  7. Moss SE, 2003, J. Manag., 29, 487
  8. Remlein M, 2015, Pol. Hyperb. Res., 53, 7
  9. Schwartz SH, 1994, Individualism and Collectivism: Theory, Method, and Applications, 85
  10. Smith W, 2010, Athlete satisfaction and the peak event: adapting the athlete satisfaction questionnaire (ASQ) to a New Zealand setting
  11. Triandis HC, 1995, Individualism and Collectivism: New Directions in Social Psychology

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 801–900 of 1,015

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Hobfoll, S. E., Halbesleben, J., Neveu, J.-P., & Westman, M.
Affiliations
  • Rush University Medical Center (US)
  • University of Alabama (US)
  • Université de Pau et des Pays de l'Adour (FR)
  • Tel Aviv University (IL)
ORCID
Venue
Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior
Publisher
Annual Reviews
Published
2018-01-21
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
103-128
ISSN
  • 2327-0608 (ISSN-L)
  • 2327-0616
DOI
10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104640
OpenAlex
W2625774310
Semantic Scholar
ab2a2c436fc0c43d069749154e32cbcccae7ee2a
Cited by
5,781
References
156
Citations by year
2026: 1377 · 2025: 1127 · 2024: 861 · 2023: 775 · 2022: 690 · 2021: 499 · 2020: 295 · 2019: 124 · 2018: 29
FWCI
24.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Workplace Health and Well-being
Keywords
conservation of resources theory, job demands-resources model, organizational stress, burnout, traumatic stress, resource constraints, resource control

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review