The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Consequences of the Internet for Politics
Abstract
Political scientists are only now beginning to come to terms with the importance of the Internet to politics. The most promising way to study the Internet is to look at the role that causal mechanisms such as the lowering of transaction costs, homophilous sorting, and preference falsification play in intermediating between specific aspects of the Internet and political outcomes. This will allow scholars to disentangle the relevant causal relationships and contribute to important present debates over whether the Internet exacerbates polarization in the United States, and whether social media helped pave the way toward the Arab Spring uprisings of 2011. Over time, ever fewer political scientists are likely to study the Internet as such, as it becomes more and more a part of everyday political life. However, integrating the Internet's effects with present debates over politics, and taking proper advantage of the extraordinary data that it can provide, requires good causal arguments and attention to their underlying mechanisms.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“A recurring theme in the literature on the Internet and politics is how the increasing amount and heterogeneity of political information citizens have access to affects their political views (Farrell 2012).”
From Birds of the Same Feather Tweet Together: Bayesian Ideal Point Estimation Using Twitter Data (2015) · cites this paper as Farrell 2012
Citations
Cites
Coase, R. H. (1960) · The Journal of Law and Economics · doi:10.1086/466560 · Cited by 18,255
Error and attack tolerance of complex networks
Albert, R., Jeong, H., & Barabási, A.-L. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35019019 · Cited by 7,534
Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide
Norris, P. (2001) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139164887 · Cited by 2,921
Political Polarization in the American Public
Fiorina, M. P., & Abrams, S. J. (2008) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.053106.153836 · Cited by 1,798
Homophily and contagion are generically confounded in observational social network studies
Shalizi, C. R., & Thomas, A. C. (2011) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124111404820 · Cited by 994 · cited 1×
“In part, this reflects fundamental methodological problems in distinguishing between homophily and social influence using standard data (Shalizi & Thomas 2011), and in part, genuine ambiguity in research results.”
BackgroundAfter Egypt: The Limits and Promise of Online Challenges to the Authoritarian Arab State
Lynch, M. (2011) · Perspectives on Politics · doi:10.1017/s1537592711000910 · Cited by 388
Research works printed but not linked: 98
- 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00363.x · DOI
- 10.1145/1134271.1134277 · DOI · Paper page
- Ahmed A, 2010, Proc. 2010 Conf. Empir. Meth. Nat. Lang. Process.
- Al Malky R, 2007, Arab. Media Soc., 1, 1
- Ammori M, 2005, Mich. Telecomm. Tech. Law Rev., 12, 1
- 10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.611 · DOI · Paper page
- Benkler Y, 2006, The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom
- Benkler Y, 2010, A Tale of Two Blogospheres: Discursive Practices on the Left and Right.
- 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00410.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01471.x · DOI
- 10.2307/3235370 · DOI
- 10.4135/9781446201015.n10 · DOI
- Bimber BA, 2003, Campaigning Online: The Internet in US Elections, 10.1093/oso/9780195151558.001.0001 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF02686296 · DOI
- Chadwick A, 2006, Internet Politics: States, Citizens, and New Communication Technologies
- 10.1146/annurev.polisci.6.121901.085538 · DOI
- Conover MD, 2011, Proc. 5th Int. AAAI Conf. Weblogs Soc. Media.
- 10.1353/jod.2010.0010 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.polisci.7.121003.091630 · DOI
- 10.1353/jod.0.0190 · DOI · Paper page
- DiMaggio P, 2004, Social Inequality, 355
- 10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.307 · DOI
- 10.1080/00085006.2005.11092387 · DOI
- 10.1017/CBO9780511806421 · DOI
- Etling B, 2009, Mapping the Arabic Blogosphere: Politics, Culture, and Dissent
- Faris R. 2008. Revolutions without revolutionaries? Network theory, Facebook, and the Egyptian blogosphere. Arab Media Soc. http://www.arabmediasociety.com/?article=694 · DOI
- Faris R, 2008, Fletcher Forum World Aff., 32, 65
- 10.1007/s11127-007-9198-1 · DOI
- Froomkin AM, 1997, Borders in Cyberspace: Information Policy and the Global Information Infrastructure, 462
- 10.3386/w15916 · DOI
- 10.1080/10584609.2011.568042 · DOI
- 10.1080/09644000412331307534 · DOI
- 10.1177/089443930001800306 · DOI
- Gladwell M. 2010. Small change: why the revolution will not be Tweeted. New Yorker , Oct. 4, pp. 42–49
- 10.2307/1600262 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1000814107 · DOI
- Gomez R, Manuel, Leskovec J, Krause A. 2010. Inferring networks of diffusion and influence. Proc. 16th ACM SIGKDD Int. Conf. Knowl. Discov. Data Min. New York: Assoc. Comput. Mach.
- Hardin R, 1990, The Limits of Rationality, 358
- 10.1111/j.1540-6237.2006.00389.x · DOI
- 10.1007/s11127-007-9201-x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1017/S1537592705050115 · DOI
- Hindman M, 2010, The Myth of Digital Democracy
- 10.1353/jod.2011.0041 · DOI
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199736416.001.0001 · DOI
- 10.2307/1229390 · DOI
- Johnson SB. 2005. Two ways to emerge, and how to tell the difference between them. In Extreme Democracy , ed. J Lebkowsky, M Ratcliff. http://extremedemocracy.com/chapters/Chapter%20Six-Emergence.pdf
- Kalathil S, 2003, Open Networks, Closed Regimes: The Impact of the Internet on Authoritarian Rule
- 10.1126/science.1197872 · DOI · Paper page
- Kricheli R, Livne Y, Magaloni B. 2010. Taking to the Streets: Theory and Evidence on Protests Under Authoritarianism. SSRN Work. Pap. Series. Rochester, NY: Soc. Sci. Res. Netw. 46 pp.
- Kuran T, 1997, Private Truths, Public Lies: The Social Consequences of Preference Falsification
- 10.1017/S1537592709992714 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.1167742 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/1557019.1557077 · DOI
- Lessig L, 1999, Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace
- Levinson C, Coker M. 2011. The secret rally that sparked an uprising. Wall Street J. , Feb. 11. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704132204576135882356532702.html · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0708471105 · DOI
- 10.2307/2950679 · DOI · Paper page
- Lotan G, 2011, Int. J. Commun., 5, 1375
- Lynch M, 2007, Middle East Rep., 245, 26
- Lynch M, 2012, The New Arab Politics
- Macedo S, 2005, Democracy at Risk: How Political Choices Undermine Citizen Participation and What We Can Do About It
- 10.1017/CBO9780511805431 · DOI · Paper page
- McCarty NM, 2006, Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches
- 10.1353/jod.2005.0049 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/0010414005282983 · DOI · Paper page
- Morozov E, 2011, The Net Delusion: The Dark Side of Internet Freedom
- 10.1353/jod.2011.0022 · DOI
- 10.1353/jod.0.0102 · DOI
- Munson SA, 2011, Proc. 5th Int. AAAI Conf. Weblogs Soc. Media, 233
- 10.1145/1753326.1753543 · DOI
- 10.1017/CBO9780511617201 · DOI · Paper page
- Negroponte N, 1995, Being Digital
- 10.1177/0010414010369068 · DOI
- 10.1017/CBO9780511846427.003 · DOI
- Oweidat N, 2008, The Kefaya Movement: A Case Study of a Grassroots Reform Initiative
- 10.1515/9781400830282 · DOI
- 10.1017/CBO9781139878425 · DOI
- Przeworski A, 1970, The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry
- Putnam RD, 2001, Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community
- Ritter DP, 2011, Revolutionary Cells: On the Role of Texts, Tweets and Status Updates in Nonviolent Revolutions
- 10.1017/S1537592710001210 · DOI
- Sennett R, 1977, The Fall of Public Man
- Shalizi CR. 2007. Social Media as Windows on the Social Life of the Mind. http://arxiv.org/abs/0710.4911 · arXiv
- Shirky C, 2009, Here Comes Everybody: The Power of Organizing Without Organizations
- Shirky C, 2011, Foreign Aff., 90, 28
- Skocpol T, 2004, Diminished Democracy: From Membership to Management in American Civic Life
- Skocpol T, 2011, The Tea Party and the Remaking of American Conservatism
- Stodden V. 2010. The scientific method in practice: reproducibility in the computational sciences. MIT Sloan Sch. Work. Pap. No. 4773-10. Cambridge, MA: MIT Sloan · DOI
- Sunstein CR, 2002, Republic.com.
- 10.2307/4150654 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.081306.070555 · DOI
- Tufekci Z, Wilson C. 2012. Social media and the decision to participate in collective action: observations from Tahrir Square. J. Commun. In press · DOI
- 10.1057/palgrave.fp.8200139 · DOI
- 10.2202/1540-8884.1231 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01403.x · DOI
- 10.1177/0270467610380011 · DOI · Paper page
- Zhou DX, 2011, Proc. 5th Int. AAAI Conf. Weblogs Soc. Media, 417
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Birds of the Same Feather Tweet Together: Bayesian Ideal Point Estimation Using Twitter Data
Barberá, P. (2015) · Political Analysis · doi:10.1093/pan/mpu011 · Cited by 982
“A recurring theme in the literature on the Internet and politics is how the increasing amount and heterogeneity of political information citizens have access to affects their political views (Farrell 2012).”
BackgroundNetwork analysis reveals open forums and echo chambers in social media discussions of climate change
Williams, H. T. P., McMurray, J. R., Kurz, T., & Hugo Lambert, F. (2015) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.03.006 · Cited by 631
“Social media are increasingly a key locus for information exchange, opinion formation, political debate and political activism (Sunstein, 2007; Farrell, 2012).”
BackgroundLorentzen, P. (2014) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12065 · Cited by 602
Political Effects of the Internet and Social Media
Zhuravskaya, E., Petrova, M., & Enikolopov, R. (2020) · Annual Review of Economics · doi:10.1146/annurev-economics-081919-050239 · Cited by 560
How Social Media Facilitates Political Protest: Information, Motivation, and Social Networks
Jost, J. T., Barberá, P., Bonneau, R., Langer, M., Metzger, M., Nagler, J., Sterling, J., & Tucker, J. A. (2018) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12478 · Cited by 492
“…of social media on political participation and to develop and refine empirically testable theories of the microlevel (i.e., social, psychological) processes by which these effects might occur (Aday et al., 2010; Farrell, 2012; Gonz alez-Bail on et al., 2011; McGarty et al., 2013; Meier, 2011).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Farrell, H.
- Affiliations
- George Washington University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Farrell, Henry
- ORCID
- Farrell, Henry
- Venue
- Annual Review of Political Science
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2012-06-15
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 35-52
- ISSN
- 1094-2939 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-1577
- OpenAlex
- W2160208583
- Cited by
- 387
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 36 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 40.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annual Review of Political Science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Media Influence and Politics
- Keywords
- internet and politics, social media, transaction costs, homophily, preference falsification, political polarization, Arab Spring, causal mechanisms
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review