Cited by 387Social Media and PoliticsElectoral Systems and Political ParticipationMedia Influence and Politics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Consequences of the Internet for Politics

Farrell, Henry·2012·Annual Review of Political Science

Abstract

Political scientists are only now beginning to come to terms with the importance of the Internet to politics. The most promising way to study the Internet is to look at the role that causal mechanisms such as the lowering of transaction costs, homophilous sorting, and preference falsification play in intermediating between specific aspects of the Internet and political outcomes. This will allow scholars to disentangle the relevant causal relationships and contribute to important present debates over whether the Internet exacerbates polarization in the United States, and whether social media helped pave the way toward the Arab Spring uprisings of 2011. Over time, ever fewer political scientists are likely to study the Internet as such, as it becomes more and more a part of everyday political life. However, integrating the Internet's effects with present debates over politics, and taking proper advantage of the extraordinary data that it can provide, requires good causal arguments and attention to their underlying mechanisms.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-polisci-030810-110815

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 98

  1. 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00363.x · DOI
  2. 10.1145/1134271.1134277 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Ahmed A, 2010, Proc. 2010 Conf. Empir. Meth. Nat. Lang. Process.
  4. Al Malky R, 2007, Arab. Media Soc., 1, 1
  5. Ammori M, 2005, Mich. Telecomm. Tech. Law Rev., 12, 1
  6. 10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.611 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Benkler Y, 2006, The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom
  8. Benkler Y, 2010, A Tale of Two Blogospheres: Discursive Practices on the Left and Right.
  9. 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00410.x · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01471.x · DOI
  11. 10.2307/3235370 · DOI
  12. 10.4135/9781446201015.n10 · DOI
  13. Bimber BA, 2003, Campaigning Online: The Internet in US Elections, 10.1093/oso/9780195151558.001.0001 · DOI
  14. 10.1007/BF02686296 · DOI
  15. Chadwick A, 2006, Internet Politics: States, Citizens, and New Communication Technologies
  16. 10.1146/annurev.polisci.6.121901.085538 · DOI
  17. Conover MD, 2011, Proc. 5th Int. AAAI Conf. Weblogs Soc. Media.
  18. 10.1353/jod.2010.0010 · DOI
  19. 10.1146/annurev.polisci.7.121003.091630 · DOI
  20. 10.1353/jod.0.0190 · DOI · Paper page
  21. DiMaggio P, 2004, Social Inequality, 355
  22. 10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.307 · DOI
  23. 10.1080/00085006.2005.11092387 · DOI
  24. 10.1017/CBO9780511806421 · DOI
  25. Etling B, 2009, Mapping the Arabic Blogosphere: Politics, Culture, and Dissent
  26. Faris R. 2008. Revolutions without revolutionaries? Network theory, Facebook, and the Egyptian blogosphere. Arab Media Soc. http://www.arabmediasociety.com/?article=694 · DOI
  27. Faris R, 2008, Fletcher Forum World Aff., 32, 65
  28. 10.1007/s11127-007-9198-1 · DOI
  29. Froomkin AM, 1997, Borders in Cyberspace: Information Policy and the Global Information Infrastructure, 462
  30. 10.3386/w15916 · DOI
  31. 10.1080/10584609.2011.568042 · DOI
  32. 10.1080/09644000412331307534 · DOI
  33. 10.1177/089443930001800306 · DOI
  34. Gladwell M. 2010. Small change: why the revolution will not be Tweeted. New Yorker , Oct. 4, pp. 42–49
  35. 10.2307/1600262 · DOI
  36. 10.1073/pnas.1000814107 · DOI
  37. Gomez R, Manuel, Leskovec J, Krause A. 2010. Inferring networks of diffusion and influence. Proc. 16th ACM SIGKDD Int. Conf. Knowl. Discov. Data Min. New York: Assoc. Comput. Mach.
  38. Hardin R, 1990, The Limits of Rationality, 358
  39. 10.1111/j.1540-6237.2006.00389.x · DOI
  40. 10.1007/s11127-007-9201-x · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1017/S1537592705050115 · DOI
  42. Hindman M, 2010, The Myth of Digital Democracy
  43. 10.1353/jod.2011.0041 · DOI
  44. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199736416.001.0001 · DOI
  45. 10.2307/1229390 · DOI
  46. Johnson SB. 2005. Two ways to emerge, and how to tell the difference between them. In Extreme Democracy , ed. J Lebkowsky, M Ratcliff. http://extremedemocracy.com/chapters/Chapter%20Six-Emergence.pdf
  47. Kalathil S, 2003, Open Networks, Closed Regimes: The Impact of the Internet on Authoritarian Rule
  48. 10.1126/science.1197872 · DOI · Paper page
  49. Kricheli R, Livne Y, Magaloni B. 2010. Taking to the Streets: Theory and Evidence on Protests Under Authoritarianism. SSRN Work. Pap. Series. Rochester, NY: Soc. Sci. Res. Netw. 46 pp.
  50. Kuran T, 1997, Private Truths, Public Lies: The Social Consequences of Preference Falsification
  51. 10.1017/S1537592709992714 · DOI · Paper page
  52. 10.1126/science.1167742 · DOI · Paper page
  53. 10.1145/1557019.1557077 · DOI
  54. Lessig L, 1999, Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace
  55. Levinson C, Coker M. 2011. The secret rally that sparked an uprising. Wall Street J. , Feb. 11. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704132204576135882356532702.html · DOI
  56. 10.1073/pnas.0708471105 · DOI
  57. 10.2307/2950679 · DOI · Paper page
  58. Lotan G, 2011, Int. J. Commun., 5, 1375
  59. Lynch M, 2007, Middle East Rep., 245, 26
  60. Lynch M, 2012, The New Arab Politics
  61. Macedo S, 2005, Democracy at Risk: How Political Choices Undermine Citizen Participation and What We Can Do About It
  62. 10.1017/CBO9780511805431 · DOI · Paper page
  63. McCarty NM, 2006, Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches
  64. 10.1353/jod.2005.0049 · DOI
  65. 10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415 · DOI · Paper page
  66. 10.1177/0010414005282983 · DOI · Paper page
  67. Morozov E, 2011, The Net Delusion: The Dark Side of Internet Freedom
  68. 10.1353/jod.2011.0022 · DOI
  69. 10.1353/jod.0.0102 · DOI
  70. Munson SA, 2011, Proc. 5th Int. AAAI Conf. Weblogs Soc. Media, 233
  71. 10.1145/1753326.1753543 · DOI
  72. 10.1017/CBO9780511617201 · DOI · Paper page
  73. Negroponte N, 1995, Being Digital
  74. 10.1177/0010414010369068 · DOI
  75. 10.1017/CBO9780511846427.003 · DOI
  76. Oweidat N, 2008, The Kefaya Movement: A Case Study of a Grassroots Reform Initiative
  77. 10.1515/9781400830282 · DOI
  78. 10.1017/CBO9781139878425 · DOI
  79. Przeworski A, 1970, The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry
  80. Putnam RD, 2001, Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community
  81. Ritter DP, 2011, Revolutionary Cells: On the Role of Texts, Tweets and Status Updates in Nonviolent Revolutions
  82. 10.1017/S1537592710001210 · DOI
  83. Sennett R, 1977, The Fall of Public Man
  84. Shalizi CR. 2007. Social Media as Windows on the Social Life of the Mind. http://arxiv.org/abs/0710.4911 · arXiv
  85. Shirky C, 2009, Here Comes Everybody: The Power of Organizing Without Organizations
  86. Shirky C, 2011, Foreign Aff., 90, 28
  87. Skocpol T, 2004, Diminished Democracy: From Membership to Management in American Civic Life
  88. Skocpol T, 2011, The Tea Party and the Remaking of American Conservatism
  89. Stodden V. 2010. The scientific method in practice: reproducibility in the computational sciences. MIT Sloan Sch. Work. Pap. No. 4773-10. Cambridge, MA: MIT Sloan · DOI
  90. Sunstein CR, 2002, Republic.com.
  91. 10.2307/4150654 · DOI
  92. 10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.081306.070555 · DOI
  93. Tufekci Z, Wilson C. 2012. Social media and the decision to participate in collective action: observations from Tahrir Square. J. Commun. In press · DOI
  94. 10.1057/palgrave.fp.8200139 · DOI
  95. 10.2202/1540-8884.1231 · DOI
  96. 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01403.x · DOI
  97. 10.1177/0270467610380011 · DOI · Paper page
  98. Zhou DX, 2011, Proc. 5th Int. AAAI Conf. Weblogs Soc. Media, 417

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 387

Metadata

Authors
Farrell, H.
Affiliations
George Washington University (US)
Corresponding author
Farrell, Henry
Venue
Annual Review of Political Science
Published
2012-06-15
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
35-52
ISSN
  • 1094-2939 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-1577
OpenAlex
W2160208583
Cited by
387
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 36 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 4
FWCI
40.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Annual Review of Political Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Media Influence and Politics
Keywords
internet and politics, social media, transaction costs, homophily, preference falsification, political polarization, Arab Spring, causal mechanisms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review