The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Consequences of the Internet for Politics
Abstract
Political scientists are only now beginning to come to terms with the importance of the Internet to politics. The most promising way to study the Internet is to look at the role that causal mechanisms such as the lowering of transaction costs, homophilous sorting, and preference falsification play in intermediating between specific aspects of the Internet and political outcomes. This will allow scholars to disentangle the relevant causal relationships and contribute to important present debates over whether the Internet exacerbates polarization in the United States, and whether social media helped pave the way toward the Arab Spring uprisings of 2011. Over time, ever fewer political scientists are likely to study the Internet as such, as it becomes more and more a part of everyday political life. However, integrating the Internet's effects with present debates over politics, and taking proper advantage of the extraordinary data that it can provide, requires good causal arguments and attention to their underlying mechanisms.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“A recurring theme in the literature on the Internet and politics is how the increasing amount and heterogeneity of political information citizens have access to affects their political views (Farrell 2012).”
From Birds of the Same Feather Tweet Together: Bayesian Ideal Point Estimation Using Twitter Data (2015) · cites this paper as Farrell 2012
Citations
Cites
Coase, R. H. (1960) · The Journal of Law and Economics · doi:10.1086/466560 · Cited by 18,255
Error and attack tolerance of complex networks
Albert, R., Jeong, H., & Barabási, A.-L. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35019019 · Cited by 7,534
Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide
Norris, P. (2001) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139164887 · Cited by 2,921
Political Polarization in the American Public
Fiorina, M. P., & Abrams, S. J. (2008) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.053106.153836 · Cited by 1,798
Homophily and contagion are generically confounded in observational social network studies
Shalizi, C. R., & Thomas, A. C. (2011) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124111404820 · Cited by 994 · cited 1×
“In part, this reflects fundamental methodological problems in distinguishing between homophily and social influence using standard data (Shalizi & Thomas 2011), and in part, genuine ambiguity in research results.”
BackgroundAfter Egypt: The Limits and Promise of Online Challenges to the Authoritarian Arab State
Lynch, M. (2011) · Perspectives on Politics · doi:10.1017/s1537592711000910 · Cited by 388
Research works printed but not linked: 98
- 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00363.x · DOI
- 10.1145/1134271.1134277 · DOI · Paper page
- Ahmed A, 2010, Proc. 2010 Conf. Empir. Meth. Nat. Lang. Process.
- Al Malky R, 2007, Arab. Media Soc., 1, 1
- Ammori M, 2005, Mich. Telecomm. Tech. Law Rev., 12, 1
- 10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.611 · DOI · Paper page
- Benkler Y, 2006, The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom
- Benkler Y, 2010, A Tale of Two Blogospheres: Discursive Practices on the Left and Right.
- 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00410.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01471.x · DOI
- 10.2307/3235370 · DOI
- 10.4135/9781446201015.n10 · DOI
- Bimber BA, 2003, Campaigning Online: The Internet in US Elections, 10.1093/oso/9780195151558.001.0001 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF02686296 · DOI
- Chadwick A, 2006, Internet Politics: States, Citizens, and New Communication Technologies
- 10.1146/annurev.polisci.6.121901.085538 · DOI
- Conover MD, 2011, Proc. 5th Int. AAAI Conf. Weblogs Soc. Media.
- 10.1353/jod.2010.0010 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.polisci.7.121003.091630 · DOI
- 10.1353/jod.0.0190 · DOI · Paper page
- DiMaggio P, 2004, Social Inequality, 355
- 10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.307 · DOI
- 10.1080/00085006.2005.11092387 · DOI
- 10.1017/CBO9780511806421 · DOI
- Etling B, 2009, Mapping the Arabic Blogosphere: Politics, Culture, and Dissent
- Faris R. 2008. Revolutions without revolutionaries? Network theory, Facebook, and the Egyptian blogosphere. Arab Media Soc. http://www.arabmediasociety.com/?article=694 · DOI
- Faris R, 2008, Fletcher Forum World Aff., 32, 65
- 10.1007/s11127-007-9198-1 · DOI
- Froomkin AM, 1997, Borders in Cyberspace: Information Policy and the Global Information Infrastructure, 462
- 10.3386/w15916 · DOI
- 10.1080/10584609.2011.568042 · DOI
- 10.1080/09644000412331307534 · DOI
- 10.1177/089443930001800306 · DOI
- Gladwell M. 2010. Small change: why the revolution will not be Tweeted. New Yorker , Oct. 4, pp. 42–49
- 10.2307/1600262 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1000814107 · DOI
- Gomez R, Manuel, Leskovec J, Krause A. 2010. Inferring networks of diffusion and influence. Proc. 16th ACM SIGKDD Int. Conf. Knowl. Discov. Data Min. New York: Assoc. Comput. Mach.
- Hardin R, 1990, The Limits of Rationality, 358
- 10.1111/j.1540-6237.2006.00389.x · DOI
- 10.1007/s11127-007-9201-x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1017/S1537592705050115 · DOI
- Hindman M, 2010, The Myth of Digital Democracy
- 10.1353/jod.2011.0041 · DOI
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199736416.001.0001 · DOI
- 10.2307/1229390 · DOI
- Johnson SB. 2005. Two ways to emerge, and how to tell the difference between them. In Extreme Democracy , ed. J Lebkowsky, M Ratcliff. http://extremedemocracy.com/chapters/Chapter%20Six-Emergence.pdf
- Kalathil S, 2003, Open Networks, Closed Regimes: The Impact of the Internet on Authoritarian Rule
- 10.1126/science.1197872 · DOI · Paper page
- Kricheli R, Livne Y, Magaloni B. 2010. Taking to the Streets: Theory and Evidence on Protests Under Authoritarianism. SSRN Work. Pap. Series. Rochester, NY: Soc. Sci. Res. Netw. 46 pp.
- Kuran T, 1997, Private Truths, Public Lies: The Social Consequences of Preference Falsification
- 10.1017/S1537592709992714 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.1167742 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/1557019.1557077 · DOI
- Lessig L, 1999, Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace
- Levinson C, Coker M. 2011. The secret rally that sparked an uprising. Wall Street J. , Feb. 11. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704132204576135882356532702.html · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0708471105 · DOI
- 10.2307/2950679 · DOI · Paper page
- Lotan G, 2011, Int. J. Commun., 5, 1375
- Lynch M, 2007, Middle East Rep., 245, 26
- Lynch M, 2012, The New Arab Politics
- Macedo S, 2005, Democracy at Risk: How Political Choices Undermine Citizen Participation and What We Can Do About It
- 10.1017/CBO9780511805431 · DOI · Paper page
- McCarty NM, 2006, Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches
- 10.1353/jod.2005.0049 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/0010414005282983 · DOI · Paper page
- Morozov E, 2011, The Net Delusion: The Dark Side of Internet Freedom
- 10.1353/jod.2011.0022 · DOI
- 10.1353/jod.0.0102 · DOI
- Munson SA, 2011, Proc. 5th Int. AAAI Conf. Weblogs Soc. Media, 233
- 10.1145/1753326.1753543 · DOI
- 10.1017/CBO9780511617201 · DOI · Paper page
- Negroponte N, 1995, Being Digital
- 10.1177/0010414010369068 · DOI
- 10.1017/CBO9780511846427.003 · DOI
- Oweidat N, 2008, The Kefaya Movement: A Case Study of a Grassroots Reform Initiative
- 10.1515/9781400830282 · DOI
- 10.1017/CBO9781139878425 · DOI
- Przeworski A, 1970, The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry
- Putnam RD, 2001, Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community
- Ritter DP, 2011, Revolutionary Cells: On the Role of Texts, Tweets and Status Updates in Nonviolent Revolutions
- 10.1017/S1537592710001210 · DOI
- Sennett R, 1977, The Fall of Public Man
- Shalizi CR. 2007. Social Media as Windows on the Social Life of the Mind. http://arxiv.org/abs/0710.4911 · arXiv
- Shirky C, 2009, Here Comes Everybody: The Power of Organizing Without Organizations
- Shirky C, 2011, Foreign Aff., 90, 28
- Skocpol T, 2004, Diminished Democracy: From Membership to Management in American Civic Life
- Skocpol T, 2011, The Tea Party and the Remaking of American Conservatism
- Stodden V. 2010. The scientific method in practice: reproducibility in the computational sciences. MIT Sloan Sch. Work. Pap. No. 4773-10. Cambridge, MA: MIT Sloan · DOI
- Sunstein CR, 2002, Republic.com.
- 10.2307/4150654 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.081306.070555 · DOI
- Tufekci Z, Wilson C. 2012. Social media and the decision to participate in collective action: observations from Tahrir Square. J. Commun. In press · DOI
- 10.1057/palgrave.fp.8200139 · DOI
- 10.2202/1540-8884.1231 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01403.x · DOI
- 10.1177/0270467610380011 · DOI · Paper page
- Zhou DX, 2011, Proc. 5th Int. AAAI Conf. Weblogs Soc. Media, 417
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Birds of the Same Feather Tweet Together: Bayesian Ideal Point Estimation Using Twitter Data
Barberá, P. (2015) · Political Analysis · doi:10.1093/pan/mpu011 · Cited by 982
“A recurring theme in the literature on the Internet and politics is how the increasing amount and heterogeneity of political information citizens have access to affects their political views (Farrell 2012).”
BackgroundNetwork analysis reveals open forums and echo chambers in social media discussions of climate change
Williams, H. T. P., McMurray, J. R., Kurz, T., & Hugo Lambert, F. (2015) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.03.006 · Cited by 631
“Social media are increasingly a key locus for information exchange, opinion formation, political debate and political activism (Sunstein, 2007; Farrell, 2012).”
BackgroundLorentzen, P. (2014) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12065 · Cited by 602
Political Effects of the Internet and Social Media
Zhuravskaya, E., Petrova, M., & Enikolopov, R. (2020) · Annual Review of Economics · doi:10.1146/annurev-economics-081919-050239 · Cited by 560
How Social Media Facilitates Political Protest: Information, Motivation, and Social Networks
Jost, J. T., Barberá, P., Bonneau, R., Langer, M., Metzger, M., Nagler, J., Sterling, J., & Tucker, J. A. (2018) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12478 · Cited by 492
“…of social media on political participation and to develop and refine empirically testable theories of the microlevel (i.e., social, psychological) processes by which these effects might occur (Aday et al., 2010; Farrell, 2012; Gonz alez-Bail on et al., 2011; McGarty et al., 2013; Meier, 2011).”
BackgroundPolitical Effects of the Internet and Social MediaPreprint
Zhuravskaya, E., Petrova, M., & Enikolopov, R. (2020) · Annual Review of Economics · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3439957 · Cited by 480
“(For an earlier review, see Farrell, 2012).”
Boxell, L., Gentzkow, M., & Shapiro, J. M. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1706588114 · Cited by 467
Corrupting the Cyber-Commons: Social Media as a Tool of Autocratic Stability
Gunitsky, S. (2015) · Perspectives on Politics · doi:10.1017/s1537592714003120 · Cited by 465
Mobilization through online social networks: the political protest of the indignados in Spain
Anduiza, E., Cristancho, C., & Sabucedo, J. (2014) · Information Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2013.808360 · Cited by 375
Varieties of Capitalism: Trajectories of Liberalization and the New Politics of Social Solidarity
Thelen, K. (2012) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-070110-122959 · Cited by 406
“Not this one”: social movements, the attention economy, and microcelebrity networked activism
Tufekci, Z. (2013) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/0002764213479369 · Cited by 323
“…of politics and political change, scholars often focus on topics such as the changes to mechanisms of participation, development of sense of collective identity, creation of community, weakening of “preference falsification,” and framing of political discourse (Farrell, 2012; Garrett, 2006).”
BackgroundGraham, T. R., Jackson, D., & Broersma, M. (2016) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444814546728 · Cited by 266
“For well over a decade, research has been assessing the impact of these changes on politics and what it means for democracy (see, for example, Farrell, 2012).”
How Social Media Is Changing Conflict
Zeitzoff, T. (2017) · Journal of Conflict Resolution · doi:10.1177/0022002717721392 · Cited by 354
Political polarization on twitter: Implications for the use of social media in digital governments
Hong, S., & Kim, S. H. (2016) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2016.04.007 · Cited by 312
Ausserhofer, J., & Maireder, A. (2013) · Information Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2012.756050 · Cited by 252
“For years, scholars have debated the Internet’s impact on politics and what it means for democracy (van de Donk et al. 2004; Benkler 2006; Sunstein 2007; for a current review see Farrell 2012).”
BackgroundPolitics 2.0: The Multifaceted Effect of Broadband Internet on Political ParticipationPreprint
Campante, F., Durante, R., & Sobbrio, F. (2013) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2326705 · Cited by 250
Assessing the bias in samples of large online networks
González-Bailón, S., Wang, N., Rivero, A., Borge-Holthoefer, J., & Moreno, Y. (2014) · Social Networks · doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2014.01.004 · Cited by 238
“…of the bias, which is likely to affect the answers to questions of increasing interest for social scientists – for instance, how online networks co-evolve with offline political events and behaviour, including mass mobilisations that emerge with the support of social media (Farell, 2012).”
BackgroundQuantifying social organization and political polarization in online platforms
Waller, I., & Anderson, A. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-04167-x · Cited by 167
“Of particular concern is whether online populations increasingly sort into homogeneous “echo chambers”, and whether social media platforms tend to shift users towards ideological extremes [7, 8, 9].”
BackgroundShin, J., Jian, L., Driscoll, K., & Bar, F. (2017) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444816634054 · Cited by 203
“Homophily can also manifest indirectly through individuals’ media consumption patterns whereby like-minded people orbit around the same information source or agenda (Farrell, 2012).”
BackgroundCommunication Technology and Protest
Little, A. T. (2016) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1086/683187 · Cited by 192
Social Mobilization and the Networked Public Sphere: Mapping the SOPA-PIPA Debate
Benkler, Y. R., Roberts, H., Faris, R., Solow-Niederman, A., & Etling, B. (2015) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/10584609.2014.986349 · Cited by 212
“Farrell (2012) highlighted three causal mechanisms that shape the relationship of the Internet and politics: declining transaction costs for organizing collective action, homophilous sorting, and preference falsification.”
BackgroundOnline Social Media and Political Awareness in Authoritarian Regimes
Reuter, O. J., & Szakonyi, D. (2012) · British Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0007123413000203 · Cited by 247
“10 Most scholarship finds that the internet increases political awareness (e.g. Boulianne 2009; Farrell 2012; Gil de Zu´n˜iga, Puig-I-Abril and Rojas 2009), but see Sunstein (2002) for a dissenting view.”
Rising Tides or Rising Stars?: Dynamics of Shared Attention on Twitter during Media Events
Lin, Y.-R., Keegan, B., Margolin, D., & Lazer, D. M. J. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0094093 · Cited by 171
“By providing a technological solution to the costs of directing, aggregating, and disseminating discourse, social media might contribute to political deliberations that are more participatory, support larger exchanges of better information, and promote greater mobilization of political action [3].”
BackgroundNarrative and the Making of US National Security: Narrating national security
Krebs, R. R. (2015) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781316218969.001 · Cited by 149
Lying or Believing? Measuring Preference Falsification From a Political Purge in China
Jiang, J., & Yang, D.-L. L. (2016) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0010414015626450 · Cited by 142
Digital Authoritarianism and the Future of Human Rights
Dragu, T., & Lupu, Y. (2021) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s0020818320000624 · Cited by 134
“9 Farrell (2012).”
Responsive and Responsible? The Role of Parties in Twenty-First Century Politics
Bardi, L., Bartolini, S., & Trechsel, A. H. (2014) · West European Politics · doi:10.1080/01402382.2014.887871 · Cited by 234
STEINERT-THRELKELD, Z. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108529327 · Cited by 105
Seven dimensions of contemporary participation disentangled
Kelty, C., Panofsky, A., Currie, M., Crooks, R., Erickson, S., Garcia, P., Wartenbe, M., & Wood, S. (2015) · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.23202 · Cited by 124
“Alternatively, some contemporary social scientists understand online activity (from e-mail to social networking) only as a variable affecting off-line participation in politics or organizations (Earl & Kimport, 2011; Farrell, 2012; Gibson, Römmele, & Ward, 2004; Wellman, Haase, Witte, & Hampton, 2001).”
BackgroundBaek, Y. M., Kim, E., & Bae, Y. (2013) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.010 · Cited by 113
“Internet use has become integrated into the daily lives of many people, whose online activities may be under ‘‘24/7’’ surveillance (Andrejevic, 2007; Farrell, 2012).”
BackgroundSocial media in the 2011 E gyptian uprising
Brym, R. J., Godbout, M., Hoffbauer, A., Menard, G., & Zhang, T. H. (2014) · British Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1111/1468-4446.12080 · Cited by 95
Connecting blog, Twitter and Facebook use with gaps in knowledge and participation
Yoo, S., & de Zúñiga, H. G. (2014) · Communication & Society · doi:10.15581/003.27.4.33-48 · Cited by 99
Impact of social media on opinion polarization in varying times
Lee, F. L. F. (2016) · Communication and the Public · doi:10.1177/2057047315617763 · Cited by 134
“…inadvertent exposure (e.g. Brundidge, 2010); research showing the extent of homophily in social media networks (e.g. Colleoni, Rozza, & Adam, 2014; Levi, 2012) also appears alongside research showing the positive relationship between social media use and network diversity (e.g. Kim, Hsu, & Gil de…”
ResultWhat’s in a Name? Metaphors and Cybersecurity
Branch, J. (2021) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s002081832000051x · Cited by 94
Oser, J. L., Grinson, A., Boulianne, S., & Halperin, E. (2022) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/10584609.2022.2086329 · Cited by 127
“As noted, the expectations discussed in the literature (e.g., Farrell, 2012; Ohme et al., 2018) suggest that if a statistically significant distinction was apparent in the early years of the sample, it would be due to a weaker relationship between PE and OnPP than between PE and OffPP – but that…”
BackgroundThe territorialization of cyberspace
Lambach, D. (2020) · International Studies Review · doi:10.1093/isr/viz022 · Cited by 151
Choi, J., & Lee, J. (2015) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.029 · Cited by 90
Does social media promote democracy? Some empirical evidence
Jha, C., & Kodila-Tedika, O. (2020) · Journal of Policy Modeling · doi:10.1016/j.jpolmod.2019.05.010 · Cited by 86
Pond, P., & Lewis, J. (2017) · Information Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2017.1366539 · Cited by 138
“Farrell (2012) argues that internet technologies lower communication costs, making it easier for political groups to recruit or to organise themselves (campaigns, issue advocacy, protests, voting).”
BackgroundThree dimensions of the public sphere on Facebook
Batorski, D., & Grzywińska, I. (2018) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2017.1281329 · Cited by 85
“Moreover, the divisions between the more politically engaged users may be greater than among those less involved (Farrell, 2012).”
BackgroundDoes Internet penetration encourage sustainable consumption? A cross-national analysis
Wang, Y., & Hao, F. (2018) · Sustainable Production and Consumption · doi:10.1016/j.spc.2018.08.011 · Cited by 89
The Twitter parliamentarian database: Analyzing Twitter politics across 26 countries
van Vliet, L., Törnberg, P., & Uitermark, J. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0237073 · Cited by 108
Alternative framing: The effect of the Internet on political support in authoritarian China
Tang, M., & Huhe, N. (2013) · International Political Science Review · doi:10.1177/0192512113501971 · Cited by 107
“The recent democratic movements in the Middle East and North Africa have re-energised the longstanding debate over the democratic potential of the Internet in an authoritarian environment (Farrell, 2012; Howard and Muzammil, 2011; Lynch, 2011; Tufekci and Wilson, 2012).”
BackgroundClimate Change and YouTube: Deliberation Potential in Post-video Discussions
Shapiro, M. A., & Park, H. W. (2017) · Environmental Communication · doi:10.1080/17524032.2017.1289108 · Cited by 94
“This is evidenced with regard to online deliberations in general (Farrell, 2012; Freelon, 2015) as well as with regard to science- and climate change-related deliberations more specifically (Brossard & Scheufele, 2013; O’Neill & Boykoff, 2011; Stilgoe, Lock, & Wilsdon, 2014).”
BackgroundLaunching Revolution: Social Media and the Egyptian Uprising’s First Movers
Clarke, K., & Kocak, K. (2020) · British Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0007123418000194 · Cited by 72
“We agree with Henry Farrell, who has argued in a review of this literature that ‘one should disaggregate [the Internet] into more discrete phenomena, allowing scholars to ask research questions that they have some hope, however faint, of answering’ (Farrell 2012, 36).”
BackgroundChan, C., & Fu, K. (2017) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/jcc4.12192 · Cited by 89
“On the other hand, Farrell argues that even though research clearly supports the case that the Internet can bring like-minded people together, there is insufficient evidence to substantiate Sunstein’s hypothesis that cyberbalkanization causes opinion polarization (Farrell, 2012).”
BackgroundPearce, K. E., & Jessica Vitak, B. (2015) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444815600279 · Cited by 88
“Cihangir (2013) demonstrates that attitudes toward honor-based behavioral codes do and can change with exposure to differing attitudes toward them; this change can occur through locating and interacting with new and likeminded individuals through social media (Farrell, 2012).”
BackgroundThe Dictator's Digital Toolkit: Explaining Variation in Internet Filtering in Authoritarian Regimes
Hellmeier, S. (2016) · Politics & Policy · doi:10.1111/polp.12189 · Cited by 69
A Model of Protests, Revolution, and InformationPreprint
Barberà, S., & Jackson, M. O. (2020) · Quarterly Journal of Political Science · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2732864 · Cited by 68
From ‘the effect of repression’ toward ‘the response to repression’
Honari, A. (2018) · Current Sociology · doi:10.1177/0011392118787585 · Cited by 97
“Repression and strategies for responding to repression in the online environment In recent years, Internet and online political participation has attracted significant academic attention, particularly with regard to its effect on democratization in repressive contexts (Farrell, 2012).”
BackgroundDerailed emotions: The transformation of claims and targets during the Wenzhou online incident
Bondes, M., & Schucher, G. (2013) · Information Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2013.853819 · Cited by 75
“…agenda or orchestrate sustainable action, that has prompted less optimistic scholars to criticize such online events as mere cacophony and a short-lived venting of emotions in a fragmented online sphere that do not generate ‘real offline events’ (Farrell, 2012; Gladwell, 2010; Leibold, 2012).”
BackgroundMarlow, T., Miller, S., & Roberts, J. T. (2021) · Climate Policy · doi:10.1080/14693062.2020.1870098 · Cited by 64
“Social media platforms like Twitter lower the transaction costs for communication and collective action, ease the dissemination of information to potential collaborators, and provide enough anonymity to allow people to express opinions they might otherwise suppress (Farrell, 2012).”
BackgroundAlgorithmic media use and algorithm literacy: An integrative literature review
Gagrčin, E., Naab, T. K., & Grub, M. F. (2024) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/14614448241291137 · Cited by 82
“Instead, we should consider algorithms as a collection of mechanisms that can be disentangled and studied separately, much like how we have learned to approach “the internet” not as a monolithic entity but as a bundle of mechanisms (Farrell, 2012).”
Medina, R. Z., & Zurutuza, C. (2019) · Communication & Society · doi:10.15581/003.27.36005 · Cited by 62
Baek, Y. (2015) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.021 · Cited by 62
“SNSs are expected to promote political participation, which has declined worldwide in modern societies (Putnam, 2000), because SNSs have technological features cultivating social interactions and networks (Baym, 2010; Farrell, 2012).”
BackgroundInfluentialDemocratizing kompromat: the affordances of social media for state-sponsored harassment
Pearce, K. E. (2015) · Information Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2015.1021705 · Cited by 90
“known (Farrell, 2012; Lynch, 2011), holds potential for challenging authoritarian rule.”
BackgroundInfluentialHänska, M., & Bauchowitz, S. (2019) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/2056305119854686 · Cited by 59
“Interest in the ways digital, social, and mobile media are shaping political communication, and transforming public spheres has grown steadily over the past decade (Dahlgren, 2005; Farrell, 2012; Papacharissi, 2002).”
BackgroundGerosa, T., Gui, M., Hargittai, E., & Nguyen, M. (2021) · doi:10.5167/uzh-204498 · Cited by 57
“On the one hand, it can facilitate informational engagement through the lower cost of communication, because users can devote less time and effort to seeking specific information (Farrell, 2012).”
BackgroundInternet and the Political Public Sphere
Rasmussen, T. (2014) · Sociology Compass · doi:10.1111/soc4.12228 · Cited by 103
Assessing the Bias in Communication Networks Sampled from TwitterPreprint
González-Bailón, S., Wang, N., Rivero, A., Borge-Holthoefer, J., & Moreno, Y. (2012) · arXiv.org · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2185134 · Cited by 55
“how and why social media facilitate collective action and political uprisings (Andersen, 2011; Farell, 2012).”
BackgroundAn online electoral connection? How electoral systems condition representatives’ social media use
Obholzer, L., & Daniel, W. (2016) · doi:10.1177/1465116516630149 · Cited by 54
“comparative institutions framework, we seek to contribute to the debate on the implications of the internet on politics (Farrell, 2012).”
BackgroundVoting Advice Applications: How Useful and for Whom?
Alvarez, R. M., Levin, I., Trechsel, A. H., & Vassil, K. (2014) · Journal of Information Technology & Politics · doi:10.1080/19331681.2013.873361 · Cited by 54
“In recent years, the Internet has become an indispensible tool for citizens of most nations, especially by providing them with new means for political and civic participation (Farrell, 2012; Fox & Ramos, 2012).”
BackgroundRoots, Routes, and Routers: Communications and Media of Contemporary Social Movements
Lim, M. (2018) · Journalism & Communication Monographs · doi:10.1177/1522637918770419 · Cited by 52
“In mobilizing diverse publics, social media can be considered important mostly because it lowers the costs of participation and mobilization (Farrell, 2012; Garrett, 2006).”
BackgroundHonari, A. (2018) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/2056305118803886 · Cited by 60
“In recent years, online activism has attracted significant academic attention, particularly with regards to its impact on political protests and social movements in repressive contexts (Farrell, 2012).”
BackgroundWhat is political expression on social media anyway?: A systematic review
Lane, D. S., Do, K., & Molina-Rogers, N. (2021) · Journal of Information Technology & Politics · doi:10.1080/19331681.2021.1985031 · Cited by 67
“Social media have enhanced the ability of everyday people to express themselves politically (Allen & Light, 2015; Boulianne, 2015; Gil de Zúñiga, Molyneux, & Zheng, 2014;; Farrell, 2012).”
BackgroundAli, M. S. B. (2020) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2020.101382 · Cited by 47
Online Repression and Self-Censorship: Evidence from Southeast Asia
Ong, E. (2019) · Government and Opposition · doi:10.1017/gov.2019.18 · Cited by 57
“The existing literature on the nexus between the state and cyberspace has largely focused on the variety of mechanisms through which the state controls the internet (Deibert 2015; Deibert et al. 2012; Diamond and Plattner 2012; Farrell 2012; Hellmeier 2016).”
BackgroundDolezal, M. (2015) · Policy & Internet · doi:10.1002/poi3.83 · Cited by 59
Rapid rise and decay in petition signing
Yasseri, T., Hale, S. A., & Margetts, H. (2013) · EPJ Data Science · doi:10.1140/epjds/s13688-017-0116-6 · Cited by 46
Protasi, S. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009007023 · Cited by 57
Normalizing or equalizing? Characterizing Facebook campaigning
Lev-on, A., & Haleva-Amir, S. (2018) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444816669160 · Cited by 45
“One of the key research questions of online politics is whether Internet usage favors established/dominant or peripheral/marginal parties and candidates (Farrell, 2012).”
BackgroundThe Routledge handbook of elections, voting behavior and public opinion
Fisher, J., Fieldhouse, E., Franklin, M. N., Gibson, R., Cunill, M. C., & Wlezien, C. (2017) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315712390 · Cited by 43
Who Defects? Unpacking a Defection Cascade from Russia's Dominant Party 2008–12
Hale, H., & Colton, T. (2017) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055416000642 · Cited by 43
Studying the Internet and Violent conflict
Gohdes, A. (2017) · Conflict Management and Peace Science · doi:10.1177/0738894217733878 · Cited by 75
“The move toward the ‘‘social’’ Internet sparked much of the contemporary research on social media and contentious politics, not least owing to events surrounding the Arab Spring (Farrell, 2012).”
BackgroundInfluentialFarrell, H. J., & Newman, A. L. (2021) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s0020818320000302 · Cited by 95
“Farrell 2012.”
Self-citationA Digital Movement of Opinion? Contesting Austerity Through Social Media
Barisione, M., & Ceron, A. (2017) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/978-1-137-59890-5_4 · Cited by 37
Why people participate in online political crowdfunding: A civic voluntarism perspective
Kusumarani, R., & Zo, H. (2019) · Telematics and informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2019.04.011 · Cited by 35
Internet use, political knowledge and youth electoral participation in Australia
McAllister, I. (2016) · Journal of Youth Studies · doi:10.1080/13676261.2016.1154936 · Cited by 35
“The interactivity inherent in the internet has been viewed as a key characteristic that can enhance political knowledge and political engagement generally (for recent reviews, see Bakker and de Vreese 2011; Bimber 2012; Farrell 2012).”
BackgroundThe Interplay Between Digital and Political Divides
Lee, C.-P., Chen, D.-H., & Huang, T.-X. (2014) · Social Science Computer Review · doi:10.1177/0894439313497470 · Cited by 34
“2 It is inappropriate to study ICTs in isolation without considering its relationship to the realities of politics (Farrell, 2012).”
BackgroundInternet and political empowerment: Towards a taxonomy for online political empowerment
Pirannejad, A., & Janssen, M. (2019) · Information Development · doi:10.1177/0266666917730118 · Cited by 33
“…several studies which have investigated the effects of ICT, especially the Internet, on the political dimension of society (e.g. Boehlert, 2009; Chadwick, 2006; Coleman and Blumler, 2009; Farrell, 2012; Rash, 1997; Oates et al., 2006), few studies have explored the effects on political empowerment.”
BackgroundJustwan, F., Baumgaertner, B., Carlisle, J. E., Clark, A. K., & Clark, M. (2018) · Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties · doi:10.1080/17457289.2018.1434784 · Cited by 61
Twitter and Television in a Hybrid Media System: The 2013 Italian election campaign
Marchetti, R., & Ceccobelli, D. (2016) · Journalism Practice · doi:10.1080/17512786.2015.1040051 · Cited by 32
Does Celebrity Issue Advocacy Mobilize Issue Publics?
Atkinson, M. D., & DeWitt, D. (2019) · doi:10.1177/0032321717751294 · Cited by 32
“6 If incidental information sparks interest in an issue, the Internet facilitates engagement by allowing individuals to easily access additional information, find like-minded individuals, join in online debate, and engage in low-cost participatory activities such signing an online petition (Carlisle and Patton, 2013;…”
BackgroundA Survey on Computational Politics
Haq, E.-U., Braud, T., Kwon, Y. D., & Hui, P. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.3034983 · Cited by 40
The effect of new media on consumer media usage: An empirical study in South Korea
Woo, J., Choi, J., Shin, J., & Lee, J. (2014) · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2014.09.001 · Cited by 31
The role of information systems in communication through social media
Tayeb, S. M., Manesh, S. R., Khalili, M., & Sadi-Nezhad, S. (2019) · International Journal of Data and Network Science · doi:10.5267/j.ijdns.2019.2.002 · Cited by 30
Stoycheff, E., Nisbet, E. C., & Epstein, D. (2016) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/0093650216644645 · Cited by 46
“Because the Internet often allows for a wider range of ideas than has previously existed in these legacy media (print and broadcast; for example, Farrell, 2012; Norris, 2003; Tang & Sampson, 2012; Vartanova, 2015), it diffuses an even broader, more diverse range of information that citizens can…”
BackgroundThe Unheavenly Chorus: Political Voices of Organized Interests on Social Media
Hong, S., & Nadler, D. P. (2016) · doi:10.1002/poi3.110 · Cited by 29
Cason, T. N., & Mui, V. (2014) · European Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2014.10.005 · Cited by 25
Fu, K.-W., & Chau, M. (2014) · doi:10.1080/19331681.2014.909344 · Cited by 29
van Kersbergen, K., & Vis, B. (2022) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2022.101707 · Cited by 45
Populism and the American Party System: Opportunities and Constraints
Lee, F. E. (2019) · Perspectives on Politics · doi:10.1017/s1537592719002664 · Cited by 72
“The internet has drastically reduced the costs of political organizing and collective action of all kinds (Farrell 2012).”
BackgroundThe Road to Cynicism: The Political Consequences of Online Satire Exposure in China
Shao, L. H., & Liu, D. (2018) · Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0032321718791373 · Cited by 35
“The Internet is believed to play an important role in many democratization events, from the color revolutions to the Arab Spring (Diamond, 2010; Farrell, 2012; Lynch, 2011).”
BackgroundBhatti, Y., Dahlgaard, J. O., Hansen, J. H., & Hansen, K. M. (2017) · Journal of Elections Public Opinion and Parties · doi:10.1080/17457289.2016.1270288 · Cited by 30
“With increasing internet and cell phone coverage (Pew Research Center 2015), voters increasingly use other platforms and the political campaigns have traveled with them (Farrell 2012, 37).”
BackgroundDoes social media improve women's political empowerment in Africa?
Nkoa, B. E. O., Beyene, B. O., Simb, J. F. N. N., & Eloundou, G. N. (2023) · Telecommunications Policy · doi:10.1016/j.telpol.2023.102624 · Cited by 28
Autocracy login: internet censorship and civil society in the digital age
Chang, C.-C., & Lin, T.-H. (2020) · Democratization · doi:10.1080/13510347.2020.1747051 · Cited by 35
Online clustering, fear and uncertainty in Egypt’s transition
Lynch, M., Freelon, D., & Aday, S. (2017) · Democratization · doi:10.1080/13510347.2017.1289179 · Cited by 46
Price, E. (2013) · Australian Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1080/10361146.2013.846296 · Cited by 27
Internet Access Does Not Improve Political Interest, Efficacy, and Knowledge for Late Adopters
Richey, S., & Zhu, J. (2015) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/10584609.2014.944324 · Cited by 27
“These data, however, have potential problems with omitted variable bias and endogenous causal relationships (see Farrell, 2012, for a related critique).”
BackgroundAzagra, R. Z., & González, J. (2015) · doi:10.12795/ambitos.2015.i28.07 · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Farrell, H.
- Affiliations
- George Washington University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Farrell, Henry
- ORCID
- Farrell, Henry
- Venue
- Annual Review of Political Science
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2012-06-15
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 35-52
- ISSN
- 1094-2939 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-1577
- OpenAlex
- W2160208583
- Cited by
- 387
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 36 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 40.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annual Review of Political Science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Media Influence and Politics
- Keywords
- internet and politics, social media, transaction costs, homophily, preference falsification, political polarization, Arab Spring, causal mechanisms
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review