The DOI matches its Crossref record; 155 of the 188 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 32 are not checked yet; none of the 148 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Personality, Well-Being, and Health*
Open accessAbstract
A lifespan perspective on personality and health uncovers new causal pathways and provides a deeper, more nuanced approach to interventions. It is unproven that happiness is a direct cause of good health or that negative emotion, worry, and depression are significant direct causes of disease. Instead, depression-related characteristics are likely often reflective of an already-deteriorating trajectory. It is also unproven that challenging work in a demanding environment usually brings long-term health risks; on the contrary, individual strivings for accomplishment and persistent dedication to one's career or community often are associated with sizeable health benefits. Overall, a substantial body of recent research reveals that conscientiousness plays a very significant role in health, with implications across the lifespan. Much more caution is warranted before policy makers offer narrow health recommendations based on short-term or correlational findings. Attention should be shifted to individual trajectories and pathways to health and well-being.
Checked 2026-10-05 · 32 references not checked yet
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
94 Not checked yet · 63 Own interpretation · 12 No basis given · 1 Own result
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“we have found (in our own research) that it is empirically and heuristically useful to distinguish and use at least five core health outcomes in addition to longevity”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > Multiple Outcomes
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Friedman et al. 2010
- Not checked yetcites Friedman & Martin 2011
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“depression-related characteristics are likely often reflective of an alreadydeteriorating trajectory”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > Abstract
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Such correlations have little to say about achieving well-being.”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > OUTCOMES
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“studies of patient populations often suffer from personality selection artifacts (biases) because neurotic individuals are more likely to report symptoms (such as chest pain) and to seek medical care than nonneurotics, even when there is little or no discernable organic disease”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > OUTCOMES
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Watson & Pennebaker 1989
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Study of personality-an individual's relatively stable predispositions and patterns of thinking, feeling, and acting-and its relationships to well-being and health continues to be plagued by an overreliance on self-report measures.”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > OUTCOMES
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“many of the questions (or items) used to assess personality are the same questions used to assess health and well-being”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > OUTCOMES
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It is also unproven that challenging work in a demanding environment usually brings long-term health risks”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“a substantial body of recent research reveals that conscientiousness plays a very significant role in health, with implications across the lifespan”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > Abstract
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The commonly used multipurpose Short-Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36), or the closely related RAND 36-Item Health Survey (RAND-36), can be very useful for assessing overall disease burden.”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > OUTCOMES
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Ware 2004
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“a host of characteristics and behaviors associated with the broad personality dimension of conscientiousness is predictive of health and longevity, from childhood through old age”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > INTRODUCTION
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It is unproven that happiness is a direct cause of good health”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“individual strivings for accomplishment and persistent dedication to one's career or community often are associated with sizeable health benefits”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > Abstract
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“people who report having a joyful, cheerful, relaxed, and agreeable personality also report life satisfaction, emotional thriving, and well-being”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > OUTCOMES
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“limited-time measurements of outcomes such as cortisol level, vagal tone, and immune markers do not necessarily provide indicators of future long-term health and longevity”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > Limits of Biomarkers as Outcomes
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Biomarkers naturally fluctuate as the body maintains or reestablishes homeostasis.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Longevity is, for most purposes, the single best measure of health.First, it is highly reliable and valid.”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > Longevity
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“a number of clever positive psychology interventions have been developed that increase happiness and the sense of well-being, even in depressed populations”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > HAPPINESS, SUBJECTIVE WELL-BEING, AND HEALTH
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Lyubomirsky & Layous 2013
- Not checked yetcites Sin & Lyubomirsky 2009
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“the basic five-factor personality dimensions (particularly conscientiousness, neuroticism, and extraversion, but also often agreeableness and openness) do predict multiple diseases”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > Longevity
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Friedman 2007
- Not checked yetcites Goodwin & Friedman 2006
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“General health is well captured by longevity because the people who live the longest usually are not those who have been struggling with diabetes, cancer, heart disease, and other chronic disorders.”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > Quality of Life
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
In the paper
“selfrated health predicts mortality risk”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > OUTCOMES
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Idler & Benyamini 1997
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“much research on personality and health is limited and even distorted by the still-common focus on single-disease conditions, with insufficient attention to overall outcomes, especially overall mortality risk”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > Longevity
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Homocysteine (an amino acid) is a good predictor of heart disease”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > Limits of Biomarkers as Outcomes
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“employing the full SF-36-without sufficient attention to its components-as an outcome measure of health in studies of personality and health again confounds the predictor with the outcome because individuals who report a neurotic, distressed personality also report pain, feeling sick, and a poor sense of well-being”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > OUTCOMES
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“the SF-36 contains multiple dimensions, including behavioral dysfunction, objective reports, subjective rating, and distress and well-being”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > OUTCOMES
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Ware 2004
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Many examples exist of interventions that affect a biomarker of disease risk (sometimes termed a surrogate endpoint) but that do not improve quality of life or mortality risk because the causal links are not as expected.”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > Limits of Biomarkers as Outcomes
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Many medical interventions decrease quality of life for many while improving it for only a few even though short-term biomarkers look better.
- Rests on an assumption: The FDA requires any new class of drug to have studies with hard disease or mortality outcomes.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“it is misleading to speak of personality traits or coping styles that predict cancer risk or heart disease risk (e.g., type A personality) if such factors equally predict (are equally relevant to) other diseases”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > Longevity
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Biomarkers (particularly aggregations of biomarkers as an indication of chronic physiological dysfunction) become very important when they are studied as mediators of relations in fully specified models, such as if the progression of cancer can be shown to have slowed as a function of a psychosocial intervention that boosts the immune system.”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > Limits of Biomarkers as Outcomes
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“lipid levels (especially cholesterol) are very good predictors of cardiovascular-relevant mortality risk”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > Limits of Biomarkers as Outcomes
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“deeper analyses reveal that a simple causal model is incomplete”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > Power of Positive Emotion?
plaindirectn = 900- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Considerable cross-sectional evidence links sense of purpose to various subjective well-being measures, including life satisfaction, self-esteem, ego resilience, and positive perceptions of the world”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > Meaning and Purpose
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Steger 2012a
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“a meaningful life is not necessarily a happy one”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > Meaning and Purpose
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Baumeister et al. 2013
- Not checked yetcites King 2001
- Not checked yetcites Ryff & Singer 2009
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Optimism-characterized by a tendency toward positive expectations for the future and confidence in one's ability to cope with challenges-has been consistently linked to better health”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > Optimism
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Boehm & Kubzansky 2012
- Not checked yetcites Carver & Connor-Smith 2010
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“although there are many ways to increase one's sense of well-being, only some of them will increase health”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > Optimism
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“When full models are spelled out, there is no good evidence for the healing power of positive thought (as a causal relationship).”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > Optimism
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“optimistic individuals set goals and persist longer despite challenges and setbacks”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > Optimism
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Carver et al. 2010
- Not checked yetcites Lench 2011
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“in the Terman Life Cycle Study, neuroticism (measured decades earlier) was protective against mortality risk for bereaved men”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > NEUROTICISM, DEPRESSION, WORRY, AND DISEASE
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Taga et al. 2009
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“there is considerable evidence that persistent, planful striving for meaningful accomplishment is indeed a key pathway to health and longevity”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > Meaning and Purpose
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“over a five-year period, purpose in life was associated with reduced mortality risk”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > Meaning and Purpose
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Boyle et al. 2009
- Not checked yetcites Ryff et al. 2004
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Subsequent research has confirmed this discovery”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > Depression
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Grippo & Johnson 2002
- Not checked yetcites Miller et al. 1996
- Not checked yetcites Rugulies 2002
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Neuroticism is highly correlated with negative feelings”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > NEUROTICISM, DEPRESSION, WORRY, AND DISEASE
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites DeNeve & Cooper 1998
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“neuroticism inconsistently predicts mortality risk, with some studies finding higher risk (Abas et al. 2002, Denollet et al. 1996, Schulz et al. 1996, Wilson et al. 2004) and many other studies finding null (Almada et al. 1991, Huppert & Whittington 1995, Iwasa et al. 2008, Mosing et al. 2012) or protective effects (Korten et al. 1999, Taga et al. 2009, Weiss & Costa 2005)”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > NEUROTICISM, DEPRESSION, WORRY, AND DISEASE
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Abas et al. 2002
- Not checked yetcites Almada et al. 1991
- Not checked yetcites Korten et al. 1999
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The precise causal links are very important because if the associations are not a function of mood induction, then interventions to improve positive mood or subjective well-being may be useless.”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > Depression
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“but if a psychosocial treatment helps the person eat better, get out of bed, attend medical appointments, and connect with other people, it may indeed improve health.”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > Depression
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The depression-mortality relationship is confounded by personality, social environments, unhealthy behaviors, and genetic predispositions.”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > Depression
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Just as the typical (well-being → health) model is incomplete, the simple (depression → disease) model likely is wrong or at least incomplete.”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > Depression
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Depressed patients with heart disease do indeed often have high levels of biomarkers associated with atherosclerosis”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > Depression
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Lichtman et al. 2008
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“It is also the case that these same symptoms can result from infections and other sources of immune system disruptions with increases of proinflammatory cytokines-as happens when an individual contracts the flu and suffers irritability, disordered sleep, anhedonia, and lethargy (Kemeny 2011).”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > Depression
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kemeny 2011
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“An important randomized study found that treating depression in recent heart attack patients did not reduce the risk of death or second heart attack”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > Depression
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Berkman et al. 2003
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A conclusion that depression is a direct cause of disease is unjustified.”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > Depression
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“It is usually through chronic processes, over time, that negative psychoemotional and behavioral reaction patterns play a role in disrupting metabolism, immune function, and physiological rhythms (including sleep), thereby increasing susceptibility to illness and general breakdown (Kemeny 2011, McEwen 2006).”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > Challenge and Health
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kemeny 2011
- Not checked yetcites McEwen 2006 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Certainly, a workplace can be excessively challenging, with unreasonably heavy physical work, chemical exposure, violence, or psychological overload (World Health Organ. 1994).”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > Challenge and Health
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites World Health Organ. 1994
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“But health psychologists have long recognized that challenge is not necessarily harmful (McEwen 2000).”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > Challenge and Health
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites McEwen 2000
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Negative cycles often occur, in which the sick or injured worker loses his or her job, forfeits income for self-care, and faces further deteriorating health”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > Challenge and Health
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Absence from work is a good predictor of subsequent long-term disability and unemployment.
In the paper
“In a longitudinal analysis of elderly participants in the Terman Life Cycle Study, the continually motivated and productive men and women (who were still working for pay, pursuing new educational opportunities, or seeking new achievements) went on to live much longer than their more laid-back comrades”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > Challenge and Health
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Friedman et al. 2010
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Challenge and a heavy workload can be healthy or unhealthy, depending on the person, the context, and the person-situation interaction.”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > Challenge and Health
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“with the US Panel study finding that poor health predicted subsequently being fired or leaving a job voluntarily.”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > Challenge and Health
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“and this productive orientation mattered much more to longevity than did their sense of happiness and well-being (Friedman et al. 2010).”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > Challenge and Health
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Friedman et al. 2010
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“To the extent that depression is a result of the disruption of homeostasis rather than the cause of the disruption, many interventions to treat depression in an attempt to improve later health will be futile.”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > Depression
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: There are no well-controlled studies showing that interventions to improve the chronic mood of neurotics produce direct physiological changes and consequent improvements in cancer progression or death risk.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Increasing physical activity-changing someone from an inactive to an active person-is a likely candidate in this realm (Carek et al. 2011, Pedersen & Saltin 2006, Str öhle 2009).”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > Depression
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Carek et al. 2011
- Not checked yetcites Pedersen & Saltin 2006
- Not checked yetcites Ströhle 2009
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“On the other hand, seeking emotional happiness per se may impede well-being by setting oneself up for disappointment or narcissism (Mauss et al. 2011, Twenge 2006).”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > Challenge and Health
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Mauss et al. 2011
- Not checked yetcites Twenge 2006
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Much research shows an association between early retirement and increased mortality risk, even after adjusting for various selection artifacts (Bamia et al. 2008, Carlsson et al. 2012).”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > Challenge and Health
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Bamia et al. 2008
- Not checked yetcites Carlsson et al. 2012
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“It has long been recognized that challenge is a key precursor of well-being.”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > Challenge and Health
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Many studies of”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > Challenge and Health
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Maddi 2002
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“For example, flow-very high levels of psychological engagement-emerges when challenge and skill meet (Csikszentmihalyi 1997).”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > Challenge and Health
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Csikszentmihalyi 1997
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Individuals who are involved and maintain a sense of personal control sustain a better quality of life (Bambrick & Bonder 2005, Brown et al. 2009, Pruchno et al. 2010, Schaie & Willis 2011).”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > Challenge and Health
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Bambrick & Bonder 2005
- Not checked yetcites Brown et al. 2009
- Not checked yetcites Pruchno et al. 2010
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Personality predicts risk exposure to key life stressors such as marriage and divorce, career success and failure, and crime and safety (Bolger & Zuckerman 1995, Caspi et al. 2005, Magnus et al. 1993, Shanahan et al. 2013, Vollrath 2001).”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > Challenge and Health
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Bolger & Zuckerman 1995
- Not checked yetcites Caspi et al. 2005
- Not checked yetcites Magnus et al. 1993
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Personality influences the events experienced, the elicitation of responses by others, cognitive interpretations of challenges, emotional reactions, coping responses, and resulting actions.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Conscientiousness predicts reduced disease development (Chapman et al. 2007, Goodwin & Friedman 2006)”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > CONSCIENTIOUSNESS, MATURITY, AND LONGEVITY
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Chapman et al. 2007
- Not checked yetcites Goodwin & Friedman 2006
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“and various sorts of social competence and productivity (Bogg & Roberts 2013).”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > CONSCIENTIOUSNESS, MATURITY, AND LONGEVITY
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Bogg & Roberts 2013
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“A metaanalysis (of 20 independent samples of approximately 9,000 participants) clearly links higher levels of conscientiousness to the key outcome of lower mortality risk (Kern & Friedman 2008).”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > CONSCIENTIOUSNESS, MATURITY, AND LONGEVITY
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kern & Friedman 2008
boostedcorrelationaln = 20- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Instead, a remarkable body of new research suggests that certain aspects of personality do indeed play a significant, and likely causal, role in patterns of living that lead to thriving, health, and longevity.”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > Challenge and Health
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Finally, low conscientiousness also predicts Alzheimer's disease and related cognitive problems (for a prospective study, see Wilson et al. 2007).”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > CONSCIENTIOUSNESS, MATURITY, AND LONGEVITY
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Wilson et al. 2007
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“This finding has been repeatedly confirmed in more recent studies as well (Chapman et al. 2010, Fry & Debats 2009, Hill et al. 2011, Iwasa et al. 2008, Taylor et al. 2009, Terracciano et al. 2008).”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > CONSCIENTIOUSNESS, MATURITY, AND LONGEVITY
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Chapman et al. 2010
- Not checked yetcites Fry & Debats 2009
- Not checked yetcites Hill et al. 2011
boostedcorrelationaln = 20- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“For example, in a 17-year follow-up in the Whitehall II cohort study (N = 6,800), low conscientiousness in midlife was an important risk factor for all-cause mortality, an association that was partly but not fully accounted for by health behaviors and certain other disease risks (Hagger-Johnson et al. 2012).”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > CONSCIENTIOUSNESS, MATURITY, AND LONGEVITY
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hagger-Johnson et al. 2012
plaincorrelationaln = 6,800- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Extensive research following up the initial startling finding of two decades ago (Friedman et al. 1993) that childhood conscientiousness is a strong predictor of longevity”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > CONSCIENTIOUSNESS, MATURITY, AND LONGEVITY
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Friedman et al. 1993
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“better coping (Connor-Smith & Flachsbart 2007)”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > CONSCIENTIOUSNESS, MATURITY, AND LONGEVITY
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Connor-Smith & Flachsbart 2007
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“in adolescence, conscientious individuals are less likely to try smoking, alcohol, and illegal drugs”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > CONSCIENTIOUSNESS, MATURITY, AND LONGEVITY
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hampson 2012
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“detrimental effects of anxiety and emotionality are reduced in individuals who are also conscientious (Chapman et al. 2010, Parkes 1984, Terracciano & Costa 2004, Turiano et al. 2013, Vollrath & Torgersen 2002).”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > CONSCIENTIOUSNESS, MATURITY, AND LONGEVITY
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Chapman et al. 2010
- Not checked yetcites Parkes 1984
- Not checked yetcites Terracciano & Costa 2004
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“For example, at a young age, conscientious children face fewer self-control and school problems; in adolescence, conscientious individuals are less likely to try smoking, alcohol, and illegal drugs; and in adulthood, conscientious people are more likely to connect with other conscientious people-personally, socially, and at work-and to place themselves in healthier social and physical environments”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > CONSCIENTIOUSNESS, MATURITY, AND LONGEVITY
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hampson 2012
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“And although being low on conscientiousness and high on neuroticism appears to be a particularly dangerous combination (with individuals who are impulsive, disorganized, anxious, and emotional at very high risk)”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > CONSCIENTIOUSNESS, MATURITY, AND LONGEVITY
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Chapman et al. 2010
- Not checked yetcites Parkes 1984
- Not checked yetcites Terracciano & Costa 2004
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Fifth, conscientiousness may be encouraged by certain genetic patterns-and gene-byenvironment interactions-that are also related to subsequent health.”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > CONSCIENTIOUSNESS, MATURITY, AND LONGEVITY
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“For example, conscientiousness can attenuate the health risk of career failures (Kern et al. 2009).”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > CONSCIENTIOUSNESS, MATURITY, AND LONGEVITY
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kern et al. 2009
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“For example, rank in high school class (N = 10,317 high school graduates), which depends heavily not only on intelligence but also on conscientiousness, was found to be a much better predictor of longevity than was IQ (Hauser & Palloni 2011).”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > CONSCIENTIOUSNESS, MATURITY, AND LONGEVITY
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hauser & Palloni 2011
plaincorrelationaln = 10,317- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Fourth, conscientiousness often interacts with unhealthy stressors and with other unhealthy personality traits, moderating their detrimental effects.”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > CONSCIENTIOUSNESS, MATURITY, AND LONGEVITY
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“for example, one study of middle-aged adults found conscientiousness predicted better recovery from negative emotional challenges ( Javaras et al. 2012).”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > CONSCIENTIOUSNESS, MATURITY, AND LONGEVITY
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Javaras et al. 2012
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Prudent, persistent, planful individuals make a myriad of decisions each day that minimize risk.”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > CONSCIENTIOUSNESS, MATURITY, AND LONGEVITY
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“One study of large numbers of monozygotic twins found minimal predictive ability for individual health (Roberts et al. 2012)”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > Early Life Influences
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Roberts et al. 2012
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“On the other hand, a high degree of self-control and grit, coupled with prudent planning and thinking ahead is especially healthy (Duckworth 2011, Moffitt et al. 2011).”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > CONSCIENTIOUSNESS, MATURITY, AND LONGEVITY
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Duckworth 2011
- Not checked yetcites Moffitt et al. 2011
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“For example, Swedish twin studies suggest that core health-relevant social relations such as stable, happy marriages can be partly predicted by genetic variation (Walum et al. 2008; see also Mosing et al. 2012).”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > Early Life Influences
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Walum et al. 2008
- Not checked yetcites Mosing et al. 2012
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Conscientiousness likely also operates to promote health through reduction of very small risks.”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > CONSCIENTIOUSNESS, MATURITY, AND LONGEVITY
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“A number of studies suggest that high neuroticism combined with low conscientiousness is particularly risky for poor health outcomes (Chapman et al. 2007(Chapman et al. , 2010;;Terracciano & Costa 2004;Vollrath & Torgersen 2002).”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > CONSCIENTIOUSNESS, MATURITY, AND LONGEVITY
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Chapman et al. 2007
- Not checked yetcites Chapman et al. 2010
- Not checked yetcites Terracciano & Costa 2004
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In particular, early life experiences and biological predispositions (including genes, in utero hormones, nutrition, toxins, and postpartum and early infant attachment and environmental challenge) can influence both personality and later health (McEwen 1993(McEwen , 2006;;Puig et al. 2013;Taylor et al. 1997).”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > Early Life Influences
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites McEwen 1993
- Not checked yetcites McEwen 2006 source
- Not checked yetcites Puig et al. 2013
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Whether it is carrying a raincoat, packing an extra set of medications, double locking their doors, minimizing germ exposure (through hand-washing or other sanitary practices), or staying off the golf course when thunderstorms are predicted, conscientious individuals slightly lower their risks of injury and disease each day.”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > CONSCIENTIOUSNESS, MATURITY, AND LONGEVITY
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In summary, a key contribution of modern personality research to understanding health and well-being is the focus on healthy patterns, clusters of predictors, and what we like to call pathways to health and longevity.”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > CONCLUSION: IMPLICATIONS FOR INTERVENTIONS
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“For example, in a study of medication after a myocardial infarction, being conscientious enough to fully cooperate with treatment (even if with a placebo) emerged as a more important predictor of mortality risk than the medication (Horwitz et al. 1990).”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > CONCLUSION: IMPLICATIONS FOR INTERVENTIONS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Horwitz et al. 1990
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Further, new analytic techniques allow integration of extant studies to test lifespan models (Kern et al. 2013, Picinnin & Hofer 2008).”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > CONCLUSION: IMPLICATIONS FOR INTERVENTIONS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kern et al. 2013
- Not checked yetcites Picinnin & Hofer 2008
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“But attention to personality can broaden and sharpen research approaches because it is stable and slow changing, and it is tied to a full range of biopsychosocial influences.”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > CONCLUSION: IMPLICATIONS FOR INTERVENTIONS
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: unclear — It is unclear whether it could be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“When the genetic code and early-life stress are viewed as an initial step in a long-term trajectory-in other words, in terms of personality and development-then the model becomes much more powerful as health risks cumulate.”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > Early Life Influences
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Personality is also highly relevant to who completes the research study.”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > CONCLUSION: IMPLICATIONS FOR INTERVENTIONS
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Multiple causal links to health exist, and models of the hypothesized full long-term pathways should be spelled out in all research in this field, even when the full model is not being investigated in a particular study (for a discussion of causal inference in personality psychology, see Lee 2012).”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > CONCLUSION: IMPLICATIONS FOR INTERVENTIONS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Lee 2012
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“First, individuals with good ties to social networks and who are well integrated into their communities tend to be happier and healthier (Hawkley & Cacioppo 2010, Taylor 2011).”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > CONCLUSION: IMPLICATIONS FOR INTERVENTIONS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hawkley & Cacioppo 2010
- Not checked yetcites Taylor 2011
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“One of the most striking and important surprise conclusions of the eightdecade”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > CONCLUSION: IMPLICATIONS FOR INTERVENTIONS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Friedman & Martin 2011
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Second, people who are physically activedoing things-tend to have better mental and physical health.”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > CONCLUSION: IMPLICATIONS FOR INTERVENTIONS
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Third, self-controlled, conscientious individuals who live and work with purpose and are involved with helping others appear to thrive across the long term (Friedman & Martin 2011).”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > CONCLUSION: IMPLICATIONS FOR INTERVENTIONS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Friedman & Martin 2011
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This third factor may be the most important because it plays a role in the first two as well.”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > CONCLUSION: IMPLICATIONS FOR INTERVENTIONS
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: unclear — It is unclear whether it could be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
- Probably not a substantial claim. 21
- It may state two separate claims as one. 52
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These different outcomes are usually correlated (and sometimes highly correlated) with each other.”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > Multiple Outcomes
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Across four decades of adulthood in the Terman Life Cycle Study, neuroticism was most predictive of subjective well-being but least predictive of longevity (the most objective measure of health)”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > NEUROTICISM, DEPRESSION, WORRY, AND DISEASE
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Friedman et al. 2010
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Individuals who are conscientious-that is, prudent, dependable, well organized, and persistent-stay healthier, thrive, and live longer.”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > CONSCIENTIOUSNESS, MATURITY, AND LONGEVITY
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The size of the conscientiousness effect on health and longevity is equal to or greater than that of many known biomedical risk factors.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The reasons for these associations are complex and sometimes appear paradoxical, as there are multiple simultaneous causal links to health.”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > INTRODUCTION
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“excellent evidence that individual characteristics from earlier in life are reliable predictors and likely causal elements of health later in life”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > INTRODUCTION
boostedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Screening for prostate cancer with the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) biomarker is probably the most notorious case of causing significant harm to patients”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > Limits of Biomarkers as Outcomes
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Welch & Black 2010
- Not checked yetcites Welch et al. 2011
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“an individual's sense of well-being is fairly stable across time”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > HAPPINESS, SUBJECTIVE WELL-BEING, AND HEALTH
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“niacin improves lipid levels, but taking niacin does not decrease mortality risk”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > Limits of Biomarkers as Outcomes
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“B vitamins lower homocysteine levels, but B vitamins do not in turn lower disease risk”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > Limits of Biomarkers as Outcomes
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“An analysis across 142 nations found that positive emotions predict better self-rated health around the world, with positive emotion trumping hunger, shelter, and safety in predictive value”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > Power of Positive Emotion?
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Pressman et al. 2013
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“subjective well-being and related concepts such as positive emotions are associated with better self-reported health, lower morbidity, less pain, and longevity”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > Power of Positive Emotion?
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Chida & Steptoe 2008
- Not checked yetcites Diener & Chan 2011
- Not checked yetcites Howell et al. 2007
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“this is an empirical question that has not yet been resolved”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > Power of Positive Emotion?
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Diener & Chan 2011
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It is correlated with higher levels of agreeableness, extraversion, conscientiousness, and openness to experience, and with lower levels of neuroticism, depression, and psychoticism.”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > Meaning and Purpose
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“in an eight-year study with over 900 individuals, cross-lagged relations between health and life satisfaction found that poor health predicted subsequent life dissatisfaction, but satisfaction did not prospectively predict changes in health”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > Power of Positive Emotion?
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Gana et al. 2013
plaindirectn = 900- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“subjective well-being or happiness is adaptive in some contexts but maladaptive in others”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > Power of Positive Emotion?
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Ford & Mauss 2014
- Not checked yetcites Gruber et al. 2011
- Not checked yetcites Hershfield et al. 2013
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“health is highly complex, and as it turns out, multiple causal processes are simultaneously at work in preserving health or promoting disease, although not in the ways often assumed”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > HAPPINESS, SUBJECTIVE WELL-BEING, AND HEALTH
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“life satisfaction predicts health and longevity, lower suicide risk, college and job retention, and marital success”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > Power of Positive Emotion?
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Diener et al. 2013
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Actions or interventions that improve well-being might indirectly improve a person's physical function but not act directly.”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > Power of Positive Emotion?
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Optimism can function as a self-regulating mechanism, with optimistic people more likely to persevere and engage toward a goal”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > Optimism
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Carver et al. 2010
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the mixed findings concerning neuroticism and health are so striking and jumbled as to call into doubt the viability of further simple studies of these relationships”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > NEUROTICISM, DEPRESSION, WORRY, AND DISEASE
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“strong empirical support is currently lacking for sense of meaning as a vital factor in future health”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > Meaning and Purpose
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“there is little evidence that optimistic thinking will mobilize an immune system and cause tumors to shrink and increase longevity”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > Optimism
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Coyne & Tennen 2010
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Having a sense of purpose facilitates active life engagement, goal setting, and goal pursuit”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > Meaning and Purpose
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“A study of over 11,000 Germans compared expected and actual life satisfaction across an 11-year period (Lang et al. 2013), finding that many individuals grew more pessimistic about their future satisfaction with increasing age, and this pessimism was associated with lower morbidity and mortality risk.”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > NEUROTICISM, DEPRESSION, WORRY, AND DISEASE
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Lang et al. 2013
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“personality trajectories and personality interactions with life events also matter, which strongly suggests that a simple neuroticism-to-poor-health model is incomplete”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > NEUROTICISM, DEPRESSION, WORRY, AND DISEASE
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Chapman et al. 2010
- Not checked yetcites Löckenhoff et al. 2009
- Not checked yetcites Mroczek & Spiro 2007
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although there is no doubt that many diseases are associated with higher levels of anxiety and depression, the causal pathways have never been fully elucidated.”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > Depression
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“A recent meta-analysis of mental health treatments (antidepressants and psychotherapies) for improving secondary event risk and depression among patients with coronary heart disease again showed mental health treatments did not reduce total mortality (absolute risk reduction = -0.00),although there was a minor influence on coronary heart disease events”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > Depression
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Rutledge et al. 2013
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“A Cochrane database review of randomized trials of psychological interventions in adults with coronary heart disease found effects on depression, supporting the success of treating psychological symptoms (Whalley et al. 2011).But there was little evidence that the interventions affected the disease process, with no reduction in the total occurrence of nonfatal infarction or death.”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > Depression
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Whalley et al. 2011
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In all of these cases, depression and/or anxiety are not only significant correlates of illness but are also significant results of illness or of challenges to homeostasis.”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > Depression
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Common symptoms in the days or weeks after a serious concussion include irritability, concentration difficulties, sleep disturbances, and depression.
- Rests on an assumption: These symptoms are also core symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Psychotherapy or advice to cheer up will not stop the progression of cancer or cardiovascular disease (Coyne & Tennen 2010, Thombs et al. 2013)”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > Depression
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Coyne & Tennen 2010
- Not checked yetcites Thombs et al. 2013
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“After menopause, not only the odds of heart disease but also the odds of depression for women are significantly increased (Bromberger et al. 2011).”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > Depression
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Bromberger et al. 2011
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Of course, if an intervention happens to affect the underlying causes of both health and depression for an individual, health will be improved.”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > Depression
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Such disruption is a long-term process that occurs through an interaction of internal and external forces as part of an individual's longterm trajectory, and it cannot be captured in a single measurement or experiment.”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > Challenge and Health
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: unclear — It is unclear whether it could be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“However, when the physiological system is chronically disturbed, resources become depleted and regulatory processes are often affected (Cacioppo & Berntson 2011).”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > Challenge and Health
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Cacioppo & Berntson 2011
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Despite the common perception that very hard workers (workaholics) put their health at risk through nervous tension, work and health are intricately related, often in a positive way.”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > Challenge and Health
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Work can provide a sense of identity and purpose, stable social connections, and income for meeting needs for good food, safe shelter, and competent health care.
In the paper
“Unemployment is a well-established correlate of disability, illness, depression, health care utilization, and mortality risk, often in vicious cycles (Roelfs et al. 2011).”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > Challenge and Health
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Roelfs et al. 2011
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“data from the US Panel Study of Income Dynamics showed that job loss predicted increased risk of a new health condition over the next year, with significantly higher risk if no reemployment occurred (Strully 2009).”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > Challenge and Health
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Strully 2009
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“And in England during the 2008-2010 recession, suicides and injury rates rose (Barr et al. 2012).”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > Challenge and Health
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Barr et al. 2012
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Outside of the formal work environment, psychological engagement and productivity are again important components of health and successful aging.”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > Challenge and Health
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Engaged workers approach their jobs with vigor, interest, and absorption and have enthusiasm both for the task at hand and for the organization as a whole (Lepine et al. 2005, Schaufeli et al. 2006).”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > Challenge and Health
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Lepine et al. 2005
- Not checked yetcites Schaufeli et al. 2006
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“About one-third of all crimes happen to the same (repeat) victims, whereas most people face no criminal victimization at all, even after controlling for neighborhood risks (Tseloni 2000, Tseloni & Pease 2003, Tseloni et al. 2004).”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > Challenge and Health
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Tseloni 2000
- Not checked yetcites Tseloni & Pease 2003
- Not checked yetcites Tseloni et al. 2004
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In global areas with high concentrations of centenarians (Buettner 2012), most long-lived individuals have remained physically and socially active, embracing rather than avoiding challenge.”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > Challenge and Health
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Buettner 2012
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“has revealed that conscientiousness is a very strong and reliable lifelong predictor of healthy pathways and of health and longevity (Friedman et al. 2013, Goodwin & Friedman 2006, Shanahan et al. 2013).”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > CONSCIENTIOUSNESS, MATURITY, AND LONGEVITY
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Friedman et al. 2013
- Not checked yetcites Goodwin & Friedman 2006
- Not checked yetcites Shanahan et al. 2013
boostedcorrelationaln = 20- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As is discussed below, it is not the emotional lability (neuroticism) itself that is crucial, but rather the impulsivity (unconscientiousness).”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > Challenge and Health
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Third and relatedly, conscientious individuals are more likely to have more successful, meaningful careers, better educations, and higher incomes, all of which are known to be relevant to health, well-being, and longer life (Hampson et al. 2007, Ozer & Benet-Martinez 2006, Poropat 2009, Roberts et al. 2003).”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > CONSCIENTIOUSNESS, MATURITY, AND LONGEVITY
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hampson et al. 2007
- Not checked yetcites Ozer & Benet-Martinez 2006
- Not checked yetcites Poropat 2009
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“First, conscientious individuals engage in a variety of important healthier behaviors-for example, they smoke less, eat healthier foods, and wear seat belts (Bogg & Roberts 2004, Lodi-Smith et al. 2010, Sutin et al. 2011).”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > CONSCIENTIOUSNESS, MATURITY, AND LONGEVITY
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Bogg & Roberts 2004
- Not checked yetcites Lodi-Smith et al. 2010
- Not checked yetcites Sutin et al. 2011
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“and in adulthood, conscientious people are more likely to connect with other conscientious people-personally, socially, and at work-and to place themselves in healthier social and physical environments (Hampson 2012).”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > CONSCIENTIOUSNESS, MATURITY, AND LONGEVITY
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hampson 2012
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Serotonin levels in the central nervous system are known to have a genetic basis, change with new circumstances, affect personality (including conscientiousness), and work to regulate core bodily functions (including sleep) necessary for good health (Carver et al. 2011, Caspi et al. 2010, Cicchetti et al. 2012; see also M õttus et al. 2013 regarding inflammation).”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > CONSCIENTIOUSNESS, MATURITY, AND LONGEVITY
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Carver et al. 2011
- Not checked yetcites Caspi et al. 2010
- Not checked yetcites Cicchetti et al. 2012
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Conscientious individuals are more likely to achieve a good education (Poropat 2009), which in turn is helpful in creating more prudent, better-organized, and forward-thinking adults (Vaillant 2012).”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > CONSCIENTIOUSNESS, MATURITY, AND LONGEVITY
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Poropat 2009
- Not checked yetcites Vaillant 2012
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“That is, personality traits, sense of well-being, and many diseases have some genetic or perinatal basis, thus leading to later associations between personality and health that are caused in part by underlying biosocial third variables.”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > Early Life Influences
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The individual effect of each behavior is tiny (and hard to document), but taken together and compounded over decades, a substantial effect may emerge.”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > CONSCIENTIOUSNESS, MATURITY, AND LONGEVITY
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A fuller understanding and more comprehensive causal models of personality, health, and well-being would make these sorts of artifacts less likely.”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > CONCLUSION: IMPLICATIONS FOR INTERVENTIONS
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although the evidence for widely effective interventions is not yet available, more comprehensive models point toward core patterns that may indeed emerge as efficacious policies in promoting a well-organized, healthy, productive, long life.”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > CONCLUSION: IMPLICATIONS FOR INTERVENTIONS
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Fuller models of personality and health help clarify causality and offer likely points for successful intervention.”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > CONCLUSION: IMPLICATIONS FOR INTERVENTIONS
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We have argued that a more complete lifespan perspective (with expanded causal models) reveals that certain common assumptions about health and well-being are untenable and some common interventions are unjustified.”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > CONCLUSION: IMPLICATIONS FOR INTERVENTIONS
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Analogously, a misinterpretation of the correlations of depression with disease can result in the targeting of the wrong behavioral patterns for intervention.”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > CONCLUSION: IMPLICATIONS FOR INTERVENTIONS
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Further, the misunderstanding of the role of worrying may lead to minimization of sober, thoughtful, conscientious life patterns now known to be health protective.”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > CONCLUSION: IMPLICATIONS FOR INTERVENTIONS
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For example, the unconscientious boys in the Terman sample-even though very bright-were more likely to grow up to achieve less education, have unstable marriages, drink and smoke more, and be unsuccessful at work, all of which were relevant to dying at younger ages.”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > CONCLUSION: IMPLICATIONS FOR INTERVENTIONS
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Fortunately, with the increasing number of long-term data sets, more rigorous information is now emerging (Friedman et al. 2013).”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > CONCLUSION: IMPLICATIONS FOR INTERVENTIONS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Friedman et al. 2013
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Some elements of the pursuit of happiness may very well result in increased health, but oversimplification of the strong correlations between subjective well-being and physical health can lead to the”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > CONCLUSION: IMPLICATIONS FOR INTERVENTIONS
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Individuals higher on positive emotions, agreeableness, and conscientiousness are much more likely to stay in ongoing studies, thus creating differential attrition and distorting findings (Czajkowski et al. 2009, Friedman 2011b).”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > CONCLUSION: IMPLICATIONS FOR INTERVENTIONS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Czajkowski et al. 2009
- Not checked yetcites Friedman 2011b
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“And, the degree and quality of such relations can be changed.”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > CONCLUSION: IMPLICATIONS FOR INTERVENTIONS
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Further, such approaches often do not consider long-term lifespan trajectories and the understanding of context.”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > CONCLUSION: IMPLICATIONS FOR INTERVENTIONS
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“and a fuller understanding of the causal pathways and how they can be altered holds the promise of significant value to individuals and to society.”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > CONCLUSION: IMPLICATIONS FOR INTERVENTIONS
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Individual differences earlier in life are reliable predictors and likely causes of well-being and health status later in life”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > CONCLUSION: IMPLICATIONS FOR INTERVENTIONS
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The problem is that many other approaches to treating depression and subjective well-being likely are not very relevant to health.”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > CONCLUSION: IMPLICATIONS FOR INTERVENTIONS
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Although physical activity levels (not formal exercise per se) are somewhat stable over time, they too can be modified, and increased activity usually produces beneficial effects (Bouchard et al. 2012, Mutrie & Faulkner 2004, Pedersen & Saltin 2006).”
§ Personality, Well-Being, and Health * > CONCLUSION: IMPLICATIONS FOR INTERVENTIONS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Bouchard et al. 2012 source
- Not checked yetcites Mutrie & Faulkner 2004
- Not checked yetcites Pedersen & Saltin 2006
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper relies on this without support.
Biomarkers naturally fluctuate as the body maintains or reestablishes homeostasis.
“especially since biomarkers naturally fluctuate as the body maintains or reestablishes homeostasis”
The paper relies on this without support.
Many medical interventions decrease quality of life for many while improving it for only a few even though short-term biomarkers look better.
“In fact, many medical interventions decrease quality of life for many while improving it for only a few, even though short-term biomarkers look better.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The FDA requires any new class of drug to have studies with hard disease or mortality outcomes.
“The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) now requires that any new class of drug must have studies with hard disease or mortality outcomes”
The paper relies on this without support.
Hostility is relevant to injury and to a host of unhealthy behaviors.
“which is known to be relevant to injury (suicide, homicide, accidents) and to a host of unhealthy behaviors”
The paper relies on this without support.
Common symptoms in the days or weeks after a serious concussion include irritability, concentration difficulties, sleep disturbances, and depression.
“For example, common symptoms in the days or weeks following a serious concussion (traumatic brain injury) are irritability, concentration difficulties, sleep disturbances, and depression.”
The paper relies on this without support.
These symptoms are also core symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder.
“These are also core symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder.”
The paper relies on this without support.
There are no well-controlled studies showing that interventions to improve the chronic mood of neurotics produce direct physiological changes and consequent improvements in cancer progression or death risk.
“There are no well-controlled studies showing that interventions to improve the chronic mood of neurotics result in direct physiological changes and consequent improvements in progression of cancer or risk of death.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Work can provide a sense of identity and purpose, stable social connections, and income for meeting needs for good food, safe shelter, and competent health care.
“Work can provide a sense of identity and purpose, stable social connections with others, and of course a source of income for meeting needs for good food, safe shelter, and competent health care.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Absence from work is a good predictor of subsequent long-term disability and unemployment.
“absence from work is a good predictor of subsequent long-term disability and unemployment.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Personality influences the events experienced, the elicitation of responses by others, cognitive interpretations of challenges, emotional reactions, coping responses, and resulting actions.
“Personality influences the events that are experienced (i.e., situation selection), the elicitation (or provocation) of responses by others, cognitive interpretations of challenges, emotional reactions to experiences, coping responses, and resulting actions.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The size of the conscientiousness effect on health and longevity is equal to or greater than that of many known biomedical risk factors.
“The size of this effect is equal to or greater than that of many known biomedical risk factors.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Overall, Treatment Resistant Depression (TRD) is associated with several comorbid features, including prolonged mental and physical dysfunction, increased healthcare spending, worse clinical outcomes, and a higher risk of suicide [4,6,7,8,9].”
From Pharmacotherapies Targeting GABA-Glutamate Neurotransmission for Treatment-Resistant Depression (2023) · cites this paper as [6]
In the citing paper
“Conscientiousness (a tendency toward self-discipline, reliability, and orderliness) and neuroticism (proneness to negative emotionality) in particular consistently predict cardiovascular and all-cause mortality, among other outcomes (8,10-12).”
From Socioeconomic Status Interacts with Conscientiousness and Neuroticism to Predict Circulating Concentrations of Inflammatory Markers (2017) · cites this paper as [10]
Citations
Cites
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Williams, J. B. W., & First, M. B. (2013) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780199975839.013.104 · Cited by 109,845
The structure of psychological well-being revisited.
Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. L. M. (1995) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.69.4.719 · Cited by 10,285
Self-rated health and mortality: a review of twenty-seven community studies.
Idler, E. L., & Benyamini, Y. (1997) · Journal of Health and Social Behavior · doi:10.2307/2955359 · Cited by 8,598
The Measurement of Work Engagement With a Short Questionnaire: A Cross-National Study
Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Salanova, M. (2006) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0013164405282471 · Cited by 7,403
The benefits of frequent positive affect: Does happiness lead to success?
Lyubomirsky, S., King, L., & Diener, E. (2005) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.131.6.803 · Cited by 7,143
Stress, adaptation, and disease. Allostasis and allostatic load
McEWEN, B. S. (1998) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1998.tb09546.x · Cited by 5,092
A gradient of childhood self-control predicts health, wealth, and public safety
Moffitt, T. E., Arseneault, L., Belsky, D., Dickson, N., Hancox, R. J., Harrington, H., Houts, R., Poulton, R., Roberts, B. W., Ross, S., et al. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1010076108 · Cited by 4,885
Loneliness matters: a theoretical and empirical review of consequences and mechanisms
Hawkley, L. C., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2010) · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s12160-010-9210-8 · Cited by 4,782
Ware, J. E. (2000) · Spine · doi:10.1097/00007632-200012150-00008 · Cited by 4,455
(1990) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e530902004-001 · Cited by 3,690
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- Bambrick P, 2005, Work, 24, 77
- Byrne R, 2006, The Secret
- Howell R, 2007, J. Health Psychol., 13, 1092
- Micheel C, 2010, Institute of Medicine (U.S.). Committee on Qualification of Biomarkers and Surrogate Endpoints in Chronic Disease. Evaluation of Biomarkers and Surrogate Endpoints in Chronic Disease.
- Seligman MEP, 2011, Flourish
- Siegel BS, 1986, Love, Medicine and Miracles. Lessons Learned About Self-Healing from a Surgeon's Experience with Exceptional Patients.
- Steger MF, 2012, The Human Quest for Meaning, 165
- Vollrath M, 2001, Scand. J. Personal., 42, 335
- Ware JE, 2004, The Use of Psychological Testing for Treatment Planning and Outcomes Assessment: Volume 3: Instruments for Adults, 693
- Whalley B, 2011, Cochrane Database Syst. Rev., 8, CD002902
- World Health Organ, 1994, Global Strategy on Occupational Health For All: The Way to Health at Work.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The PERMA-Profiler: A brief multidimensional measure of flourishing.
Butler, J., & Kern, M. L. (2016) · International Journal of Wellbeing · doi:10.5502/ijw.v6i3.526 · Cited by 1,485
Self-citationWhat Schools Need to Know About Fostering School Belonging: a Meta-analysis
Allen, K., Kern, M. L., Vella-Brodrick, D., Hattie, J., & Waters, L. (2018) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-016-9389-8 · Cited by 1,141
“Over the last decade, schools have become increasingly aware of the importance of how the personality of students impacts well-being (Friedman and Kern 2014).”
BackgroundSelf-citationNetemeyer, R. G., Warmath, D., Fernandes, D., & Lynch, J. G. (2018) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1093/jcr/ucx109 · Cited by 842
A multidimensional approach to measuring well-being in students: Application of the PERMA framework
Kern, M. L., Waters, L. E., Adler, A., & White, M. A. (2015) · The Journal of Positive Psychology · doi:10.1080/17439760.2014.936962 · Cited by 743
“Positive constructs are often highly correlated with one another, yet are studied independently (Friedman & Kern, 2014).”
BackgroundSelf-citationPsychological Language on Twitter Predicts County-Level Heart Disease Mortality
Eichstaedt, J. C., Schwartz, H. A., Kern, M. L., Park, G., Labarthe, D. R., Merchant, R. M., Jha, S., Agrawal, M., Dziurzynski, L., Sap, M., et al. (2015) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797614557867 · Cited by 507
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Friedman, H. S., & Kern, M. L.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Riverside (US)
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- Venue
- Annual Review of Psychology
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2014-01-03
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 719-742
- ISSN
- 0066-4308 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-2085
- OpenAlex
- W2134111694
- Cited by
- 530
- References
- 188
- Citations by year
- 2026: 25 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 47 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 91 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 39 · 2016: 38 · 2015: 37 · 2014: 14
- FWCI
- 6.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Annual Review of Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health, psychology, and well-being
- Keywords
- personality, well-being, health, lifespan development, conscientiousness, happiness, depression, negative emotions, worry, job demands, career dedication, health trajectories, causal pathways, health interventions
- MeSH terms
- Emotions, Health Status, Humans, Mental Health, Personal Satisfaction, Personality, Workplace
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-05, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-05 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review